Advertisement
If you have a new account but are having problems posting or verifying your account, please email us on hello@boards.ie for help. Thanks :)
Hello all! Please ensure that you are posting a new thread or question in the appropriate forum. The Feedback forum is overwhelmed with questions that are having to be moved elsewhere. If you need help to verify your account contact hello@boards.ie

New zonal ticketing system for the Dublin Commuter Zone from Jun 1, 2025

  • 28-01-2025 10:21PM
    #1
    Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 77 ✭✭


    I know the NTA's 2024 Fare Determination had some information about a new zonal ticketing system for commuter tickets, but a recent document sent to Taxsaver administrators provides information which I hadn't seen before.

    When spelt out in detail, it's apparent how the new structure eliminates a lot of complexity and will save a lot of people a lot of money:

    Screenshot 2025-01-28 at 20.51.43.png

    When tax savings are included this looks even better:

    Screenshot 2025-01-28 at 20.53.34.png

    There are, of course, some anomalies. In a very welcome move, the Dublin City Zone (= Zone 1) tickets will be valid on Bus Eireann to "Ashbourne, Ratoath, Jordanstown, Rathbeggan, Batterstown, Maynooth University and Kilmacanogue / Kilmurry" (sic). However there is no mention of them being valid on GAI "DCOM" services like the 120, 126, etc. This may be just an oversight in the document which does give the impression of being written by someone with only a hazy idea of geography:-)

    It's interesting how the new Dublin system compares with London which has had zonal multi-modal fares for decades. The Dublin City Zone covers a radius of up to 23km, which is slightly further than London zone 5. In London an annual zone 1-5 Travelcard costs £2920 (ca. €3482). Including tax reliefs for a full rate taxpayer, which are not available in the UK, this make London 6.8 times more expensive than Dublin. Of course if you live closer than 23km from London then you can get a cheaper ticket for fewer zones. But there's still a big price difference.



«1

Comments

  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,504 ✭✭✭davetherave


    About time, it's just a shame it is 8 months later than they said it would be. Great value. All three modes being cheaper than my current bus only annual ticket.

    >However there is no mention of them being valid on GAI "DCOM" services like the 120, 126, etc. This may be just an oversight in the document which does give the impression of being written by someone with only a hazy idea of geography:-)

    Not on the City Zone no, but they are mentioned in the Commuter Fare by zones. Do they become drop-off only/pick-up only once they get inside the city zone

    image.png image.png


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 10,635 ✭✭✭✭billyhead


    If someone purchased an annual taxsaver ticket from January 1st for the short hop zone, I presume they will get a refund for the difference in cost of this new ticket from June 1st because the same journey ticket works out cheaper?



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 135 ✭✭ontour2


    Current Annual and Monthly Tickets will be valid until their expiry dates however upon renewal will move to the relevant new product for the travel zone.   



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,052 ✭✭✭TokTik


    Pity that commuters in Skerries, Co Dublin and Balbriggan, Co Dublin aren’t in the Dublin Zone, but Bray, Co Wicklow is.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,456 ✭✭✭bikeman1


    They got the headings wrong on the table. PRSI is 4.1% and USC is 3%.

    Anyway, that is a super price. €507 per year is €9.75 per week. I don’t use PT transport everyday but if I can pay less than a tenner a week out of my wages to travel around the city then sign me up.

    I’ll actually use PT more as it won’t “cost” me anymore to use it. Fantastic stuff. This is exactly what I was looking for and hoping for.

    Literally you would have to do 5 x €2 journeys a week and it would be more beneficial.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 10,635 ✭✭✭✭billyhead


    Cheers however the current ticket for example that I paid for was 1,400 whereas the same one from June 1st is 960 so a difference of 440. Would there not be some sort of refund owed on the difference for 8 months of the year?



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2 eb1495


    Excuse my ignorance in advance, as my knowledge of the rail system in Dublin is very limited, but I’d be incentivised to use it more with the introduction of these new tickets as I already get the taxsaver for the bus anyway. Does the new Dublin City Zone ticket include use of the DART? I can mention of using rail from Dublin to Bray, but nothing of Dublin to Howth in the other direction so unclear as to exactly what is and isn’t included under the term ‘Rail Services’ in this instance.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 423 ✭✭Rock Steady Edy


    I imagine you would have to cancel the existing ticket and buy a new one.

    As the price drop is so substantial,they may put special arrangements in place where you get an automatic refund.

    I remember paying about €2k (gross) in 2019 for an all mode annual ticket. The price drop was inevitable after the €2 90 minute fare came in. Annual ticket sales must have fallen off a lot. Just surprised it's taken this long to implement.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 77 ✭✭D8 boy


    Yes, all rail within the area of the zone is covered, including Howth. @davetherave has helpfully posted a map in this thread.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2 eb1495


    Thanks for the clarification, that’s a very welcome upgrade from them, shame I’ve only just renewed at the start of this month, so hopefully they do arrange some sort of switch over or compensation in this instance



  • Advertisement
  • Moderators, Motoring & Transport Moderators, Technology & Internet Moderators Posts: 23,631 Mod ✭✭✭✭bk


    This is a very welcome reduction in costs.

    However I really wish they dropped the whole taxsaver part of it. First of all it isn't available to everyone, for instance not all companies operate it.

    Also I think it is very unjust that lower paid workers pay more!

    They should just make it €507 for everyone and drop the whole taxsaver element of it.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 135 ✭✭ontour2


    Really interesting question about dropping the taxsaver element. In certain incentives, like pension contributions, there is a benefit to link it to taxable income to avoid it being exploited by the super wealthy. In this case the super wealthy are not really incentivised to buy a 100 public transport tickets if the taxsaver element was removed.

    One reason for keeping the taxsaver aspect is that it can be marketed as a benefit to the public transport users. You are getting €1500 of value for €800. People love a discount so FOMO gets them engaged in using public transport by being suckered in to a 'discount'. People love a discount! And government love being seen to provide that 'benefit'.

    Is there any other hazard to removing the tax element?



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 23,109 ✭✭✭✭ELM327


    I suspect they want to target the professional market who have a choice between car or PT, and not the lower paid who do not have this choice.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,135 ✭✭✭mrslancaster


    It should be compulsory for employers to participate in the scheme. Why should any employee be unable to avail of the tax benefit because their company doesn’t want to join the scheme? It’s unequal tax treatment of workers based on who their employer is.
    It was questioned in the Dail last year but no attempt was made to fix it.



  • Moderators, Motoring & Transport Moderators, Technology & Internet Moderators Posts: 23,631 Mod ✭✭✭✭bk


    Yes and as a result, incredibly unjust.

    Though I think it is much less valid these days. It use to be the case that only the very well paid could afford a car, but these days even lower paid people can often afford one, at least second hand. You also can get situations where one partner in a family is working part time due to child care and just falls under the lower rate due to the part time work, yet the family could still have and afford two cars, so they are still making the decision to drive or use public transport.

    I think the whole concept is badly outdated and unjust.

    A reminder that in Vienna an equivalent all service ticket costs just €365 per year and is available to everyone, non of this tax nonsense. Berlin's version of the same is €29 per month (€348 per year), available to all, no tax nonsense.

    If you were introduce a €365 ticket like Vienna, imagine how great the advertising for that would be, unlimited travel for just €1 per day, available to all. Plaster that across every bus, bus stop, TV and radio ads!

    Nice and simple. I believe this would really attract many out of cars.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 23,109 ✭✭✭✭ELM327


    Agree. All employers with above X employees (say, 10 or 25) should be mandatorily enrolled.

    If it were a private company I'd be arguing about the "just" part, as it's a free market. However as this is a state service, I agree with you, there should be a benefit for all. The only ones that don't benefit from this actually are those in lower paid jobs. Lifetime wasters get free travel anyway, and those of us with well paid jobs get 40% off.



  • Moderators, Motoring & Transport Moderators, Technology & Internet Moderators Posts: 23,631 Mod ✭✭✭✭bk


    Also people who work at companies who just don't bother participating in the scheme.

    I'd argue the fact that lower paid workers pay more is based on the history of the scheme and isn't really valid any more. If they tried to introduce something like that today, I'd say they would get crucified for how unjust it is.

    Remember how the free travel scheme use to be only for offpeak travel, the mostly elderly people kicked up a stink about that being unfair and the FT scheme was then extended to all day use. I think this is a similar case and the government should be crucified for it.

    I'm also well into the higher tax bracket and work from home, so doesn't really impact me, but I still think the scheme is very poorly designed, inaccessible and unfair.

    Imagine they dropped the tax side of it and just made these tickets cheap and accessible to all. Now imagine you could just decide, I'll be using PT a lot next month, I'll buy a monthly ticket for just one month for €29 (like in Berlin) and have it immediately applied to my existing leap card (or phone in future).

    No need to mess around contacting your employer, hoping they participate in the scheme, filling in forms with them, waiting for the card to arrive, etc.

    This sort of thing needs to be made simple and accessible as possible.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 77 ✭✭D8 boy


    As a former Taxsaver administrator even in a company with 1 employee (me!), I found the scheme quite an admin overhead. I can understand why some employers don't want to get involved.

    The tax free concept does give public transport a perceived advantage over private transport. Maybe just being able to claim it back against tax, like MED1 expenses, would work ? But's it's simpler again and more equitable just to lower the prices and remove the tax free element. The issue for government is that pitching the price lower will reduce fare revenue from people who currently use Leap as-you-go.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,003 ✭✭✭Van.Bosch


    the admin needed for the tax saver side must be big for employers and the government - just scrap it and charge €650 to everyone.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,003 ✭✭✭Van.Bosch


    I wouldn’t imagine so, your ticket is still valid.

    If you pay €100 for a seat on AerLingus and the next day they drop the price, you don’t get a refund for that.

    Appreciate it isn’t great but it’s just a few months.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 18,720 ✭✭✭✭LXFlyer


    It’s distance based - not county based.

    That’s how we end up with inconsistencies.



  • Posts: 0 [Deleted User]


    Yeah the circle system is a bit silly. Absolutely no difference operationally between someone getting the train from Balbriggan and from Lusk/Donabate. Will likely just lead to people taking the chance.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 18,720 ✭✭✭✭LXFlyer


    Actually I was disagreeing with the person I quoted.

    Distance based ticketing is the fairest way forward.

    This system is far more equitable.



  • Posts: 0 [Deleted User]


    From an arbitrary point in the middle of the city centre that just so happens to encapsulate the entire Southside and leaves out a large part of the Northside?

    Unsure the equity you mean but I think I've seen it before.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 18,720 ✭✭✭✭LXFlyer


    Arbitrary? The city centre is the city centre. It’s not some made up location.

    I’m not sure how you’re defining “northside” as certainly the northside of Dublin City is included as are journeys out as far as Rush and Ashbourne.

    With any system of fares, there are going to be boundaries, and the current system is very unfair for anyone outside of the Short Hop zone.

    This graduates the fares rather than having the massive cliff edge that’s there at present.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,598 ✭✭✭mikeybhoy


    Why is there tax on state run public transport in the first place is a bit beyond me



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 18,720 ✭✭✭✭LXFlyer


    I find that extraordinary. I’m the one employee ordering a ticket in my company.

    It takes me 2 mins a month to order my ticket.

    It’s anything but a hassle.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,822 ✭✭✭cython


    I don't think there is tax on state run transport as your comment implies? The relief here is on taxation levied on income, i.e. PAYE, PRSI, USC. to incentivise those earners to use public transport.



  • Moderators, Motoring & Transport Moderators, Technology & Internet Moderators Posts: 23,631 Mod ✭✭✭✭bk


    This system is okay, but I wouldn't call it the most equitable system. That would be the Amsterdam system, which basically charges per km travelled.

    It is has a flat fee for when you board the bus, something like €1 and then 20c per km after that.

    So if you travel just 2km, you pay €1.40, while someone travelling 10km pays €3, etc.

    It avoids unfairness like someone getting on a DART at Skerries and travelling to Clontarf Road, paying far more then someone getting on at Rush & Lusk and going all the way to Bray!

    Of course our buses aren't setup to handle an Amsterdam type system (no tag-off), so this is the "best" we can do given the circumstances.

    EDIT: Yes, I see that the Dublin Commuter zone fare is sort of like the Amsterdam fare model, based on distance travelled, sort of.

    I've a strong hunch that the issue is actually comes down to which governments departments budget it comes out of at the moment. I believe the taxsaver discount comes out of the Department of Finances budget, as it is basically forgoing income tax revenue. If they were to drop the taxsaver element and switch to just a subsidised fare, it would instead come out of the Dep of Transports budget. Of course in the end that doesn't really matter it is all coming out of the same pot of tax payers money in the end, but there can be lots of infighting between departments about budgets like this.

    Post edited by bk on


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,598 ✭✭✭mikeybhoy


    I just think tag on tag off is a bit messy for buses. Runs the risk of increasing dwell times as people faff about for their cards getting off the bus. Also people could tag off then the driver closes the centre doors and end up missing their stop or they shouting at the driver to let them off also runs the risk of drivers shutting the doors on passengers creating a h+s issue.

    Then there'll be people who'll tag off as soon as they get on the bus meaning they underpay. Leave the flat fare for buses and have the zonal fares for rail. Works well in London. I think the €2 90 minute fare offers excellent value for money in an expensive city like Dublin.



Advertisement