Advertisement
If you have a new account but are having problems posting or verifying your account, please email us on hello@boards.ie for help. Thanks :)
Hello all! Please ensure that you are posting a new thread or question in the appropriate forum. The Feedback forum is overwhelmed with questions that are having to be moved elsewhere. If you need help to verify your account contact hello@boards.ie

Oscars 2025

24567

Comments

  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 91,033 ✭✭✭✭JP Liz V1


    I'm delighted Sebastian Stan and Monica Barbaro got nominated



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,050 ✭✭✭Shelga


    Kneecap tweeting “fcuk the Oscars” after not getting a nomination was fairly pathetic I thought 🙄



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,562 ✭✭✭George White


    Yes, it's like a film written by Aid*n Comerford (and just as funny).

    Gascon is also I found bland as ****.

    If we wanted to honour a trans/cross-dressing film, give it to I Saw the TV Glow.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,842 ✭✭✭Jack Daw


    Really? You're bamboozled by Emilia Perez being nominated for so many awards?

    You know damn well why it's nominated for so many awards, it's got a transgender person in the lead role and it features gender transition as part of the plot.It doesn't matter if the film is **** or not it's being nominated for that reason so they can stick it to MAGA, conservatives etc and go on a spree of virtue signalling in the build up to the awards.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 5,536 ✭✭✭silliussoddius


    Hollywood walking themselves into legitimate criticism, well I never.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,562 ✭✭✭George White


    Except if they really wanted to nominate a good trans film, they could have picked I Saw the TV Glow. Which is the film all the TRAs wanted nominated. It is actually a brilliant film, disquieting and memorable.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,842 ✭✭✭Jack Daw


    Yes, but neither of the 2 lead actors in I Saw the TV glow are transgender women.As a result it doesn't tick quite so many boxes for virtue signalling for the Hollywood crowd.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 28,765 ✭✭✭✭murpho999


    People say this every year. I personally think Sawshank and Forrest are overrated.

    Either way 2024 was a great year for film and this notion that films were better years ago is just not true.



  • Moderators, Category Moderators, Arts Moderators, Computer Games Moderators, Entertainment Moderators Posts: 30,554 CMod ✭✭✭✭johnny_ultimate


    The irony with Emilia Perez is that it's actually a conservative's dream of a "Mexican" and trans film, given all the retograde stereotypes, tone-deaf writing and bizarre ideas it indulges in. The film has been crucified by many Spanish speaking, Mexican / Latin American and LGBT critics and viewers alike (though has its defenders too within those groups). In a year that gave us extraordinary trans artists' work in the likes of I Saw The TV Glow and Crossing, it is particularly frustrating seeing this film suck all the oxygen out of the room. Even within Netflix's own film slate… I haven't seen Will & Harper, but I know that's been much better received (though probably locked out of most conversations as it's a doc).

    I do give Gascon credit where it's due at least for doing her best with the material and, going by interviews, reigning in some of Audiard's even worse instincts and ideas.

    But beyond the representational nightmare that is the film, it's just so badly made - it should be nowhere near some of the categories it scored nominations in. It's clearly trying to be a campy social satire of sorts but misses every tonal and thematic mark it shoots at. Bad films are rewarded in the Oscars all the time, but this one is truly next-level awful IMO. Almost certainly the most embarassing Oscar barnstormer since Crash (and it isn't that long since Green Book).

    Anyway: watch Nickel Boys. It's fantastic.

    Post edited by johnny_ultimate on


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,562 ✭✭✭George White


    Yes, it's about as convincingly Mexican (it was all shot in France) as Carry On Abroad and the movie of Are You Being Served? were convincingly Spanish, or whatever Morecambe and Wise film where the lads go to Central America.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,370 ✭✭✭thereiver


    I.m glad that Cynthia got the nomination I have not seen wicked yet but looking at gifs on Tumblr Cynthia and ariania look as if they have a great relationship like a couple in love . The set design on wicked is fantastic . I.m glad demi Moore got a nomination. She still looks great .women over 50 tend to be forgotten by Hollywood .



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 91,033 ✭✭✭✭JP Liz V1


    This is Ralph Fiennes first nomination, with so many memorable top notch performances, I hope he wins, like for all his career

    For me Ralph, Demi, Jeremy and Monica for the acting wins



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 896 ✭✭✭JohnFalstaff


    This is Fiennes third nomination. He was nominated for Best Supporting Actor in 1993 for his role in Schindler's List and for Best Actor in 1996 for The English Patient.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 22,034 ✭✭✭✭Ash.J.Williams


    Are kneecappies the new swifties?



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 28,765 ✭✭✭✭murpho999


    Just in relation to awards season. How is that all these apparent separate bodies such as US academy ,British Academy, Screen Actors Guild, Foreign Press Association etc basically agree and come up with pretty much the same nominees every year? Doesn't make sense to me.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 91,033 ✭✭✭✭JP Liz V1




  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,273 ✭✭✭Decuc500


    What doesn't make sense to me is that the same film will win multiple technical awards like cinematography, editing, sound etc It's usually the same film that wins best film/director. I never buy the idea of the best film winner also necessarily having the best technical achievements.

    There must be loads of films with better cinematography and sound design that never get a look in as voters seem to award the same film in all categories.



  • Moderators, Category Moderators, Arts Moderators, Computer Games Moderators, Entertainment Moderators Posts: 30,554 CMod ✭✭✭✭johnny_ultimate


    Substantial crossover in the voting body of these organisations is certainly one of the main reasons. There's always politics - personal, commercial, actually political - behind it too.

    Money is another big one - studios throw significant resources behind particular titles to get the titles in front of members' eyes (screenings, advertising etc…).

    An offshoot of that is lobbying. There was a good example of this when Andrea Riseborough made the cut for a barely seen indie film To Leslie thanks to celebrities lobbying for her. The late David Lynch famously made headlines for his (sadly unsuccessful) one-man, one-cow campaign for Laura Dern for Inland Empire.

    And of course there's always a feedback loop. Academy voters only have a finite amount of time (and many of them aren't the most engaged cinephiles, to put it kindly) so won't watch everything eligible, so will likely gravitate towards the buzziest titles, creating that loop where the films most people have seen will have a greater chance of getting nominated. Given there's basically a six-month 'awards season' cycle flamed by trade publications and the likes, in many ways the fact there is a nominations race at all influences the race.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 5,637 ✭✭✭Man Vs ManUre


    I think Furiosa shuda been in the list for Best Film, with Hemsworth named for best support. That movie was way better than Fury Road.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 896 ✭✭✭JohnFalstaff


    The Oscars carry a sheen of respectability, but in reality they are just a glossier version of the IFTA's and the same caveats apply.

    Most of the people voting won't even have watched all the films nominated. And everyone ultimately votes for their friends, or the film they heard was supposed to be good.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 91,033 ✭✭✭✭JP Liz V1


    I wonder can Academy members vote for themselves or relatives if nominated



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,562 ✭✭✭George White


    I remember an interview from c.1981-1982, with Roddy McDowall talking about his academy membership, where he, a noted cineaste confessed that he was one of the few who actually did watch everything.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 5,565 ✭✭✭eightieschewbaccy


    Shawshank and Gump are fine but in scheme of things not particularly notable. Anora and The Brutalist are two I'm looking forward to seeing, Wicked I really enjoyed. I loved the Nickel Boys as a book too so I'd actually say it's far better than plenty of years TBH.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,480 ✭✭✭sprucemoose


    one of the main actors is non-binary and has changed their name in the last few days to 'Jack Haven'



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 5,536 ✭✭✭silliussoddius


    What makes me feel very cynical is that you hear of films being released later in the year to be in with a better chance of nomination, do the people in the academy have that little of an attention span that they wouldn't be able to remember a good film from earlier in the year?



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,598 ✭✭✭Hamsterchops


    Best Actress / Demi Moore 🤞

    She's been a long time waiting, and personally speaking I think she deserves best actress for her performance in The Substance.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 16,612 ✭✭✭✭MisterAnarchy


    Shawshank is one of the finest movies ever made, its a masterpiece.

    Forrest Gump is a very good film, and has lasted the test of time.

    Pulp Fiction is Tarentinos best, its a masterpiece.

    Hard to believe those films are 30 years old.

    People say this every year. I personally think Sawshank and Forrest are overrated.

    Either way 2024 was a great year for film and this notion that films were better years ago is just not true.

    We also Leon, Four Weddings and a Funeral, The Crow, Interview with the Vampire, Quiz Show and many other films released in 1994. Some great comedies like Dumb and Dumber, The Mask and Ace Ventura.

    Name me a few films in 2024 that would be in their league ??



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,045 ✭✭✭flasher0030




  • Moderators, Category Moderators, Arts Moderators, Computer Games Moderators, Entertainment Moderators Posts: 30,554 CMod ✭✭✭✭johnny_ultimate


    There’s never a bad year for film, just variances in how many of them are in multiplexes. And the Oscars rarely reflect the most interesting things happening in cinema (though I’d say Nickel Boys and Anora were among the best of the last 12 months, and a few other heavily nominated ones were at least interesting or worth watching).

    La Chimera, All We Imagine As Light, Hundreds of Beavers, Chime, I Saw The TV Glow, Perfect Days, Soundtrack to a Coup d’Etat… just a few of the great films last year.

    Even outside the smaller and independent releases, films like Challengers, Furiosa and The Iron Claw spring to mind as classic crowdpleasers. And Anora and Hundreds of Beavers are great cinema comedies - had a great time watching those with a crowd.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 5,565 ✭✭✭eightieschewbaccy


    Yep I also think limiting ourselves to Hollywood in terms of the great stuff from the year is a bit silly. You could equally have made the claim in the 90s that we weren't getting a similar run that happened during the award seasons in the 60s/70s. But it's always more to do with rose tinted glasses IMHO.

    I do think a valid criticism that applies to the Oscars is that it's often the most conservative for nominations and even winners. Other awards tend to have the more interesting selections. I am somewhat surprised that The Substance is up for best picture for that reason. 😂



Advertisement