Advertisement
Help Keep Boards Alive. Support us by going ad free today. See here: https://subscriptions.boards.ie/.
https://www.boards.ie/group/1878-subscribers-forum

Private Group for paid up members of Boards.ie. Join the club.
Hi all, please see this major site announcement: https://www.boards.ie/discussion/2058427594/boards-ie-2026

Irish Property Market chat II - *read mod note post #1 before posting*

1869870872874875943

Comments

  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,132 ✭✭✭RichardAnd


    I would be happy just to see the state NOT wasting resources on things like this.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 839 ✭✭✭poop emoji




  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,147 ✭✭✭I see sheep


    There's a million threads on Current Affairs for people to whinge about refugees.

    "a terrible war imposed by the provisional IRA"

    Our West Brit Taoiseach



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 7,625 ✭✭✭fliball123


    Not whinging about anything just joining the dots that impact on our property market and how we go about implementing our immigration policy is a huge factor when it comes to the effects of supply/demand and cost of Irish property.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,132 ✭✭✭RichardAnd


    Having serious concerns about a major issue is not "whinging".



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,147 ✭✭✭I see sheep


    Yeah great good lads. Even when it was the bears I knew it was the immigants.

    "a terrible war imposed by the provisional IRA"

    Our West Brit Taoiseach



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,132 ✭✭✭RichardAnd


    If you're only capable of adding adolescent remarks, please stay out of the conversation.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 21,325 ✭✭✭✭Donald Trump


    I presume it's a half arsed way of pointing out that there can be a system where a shortage means house prices go up. This can then be exacerbated by vultures who can outbid those who would live in that house. Given the lack of options, they then have to pay high rent to the vulture to live in that same house. This increased profitability then makes the above more attractive again and works as a feedback mechanism

    An extreme analogy, not related to property, was Martin Shrekli in the US. He bought the rights to a particular drug and immediately jacked up the prices. None of the people who needed the drug could have afforded to outbid Shrekli for the drug. No company that would have bought it to manufacture it and sell it for a reasonable price could outbid him either.

    Don't lose your collective shits. I'm only explaining the hypothetical concept that I think it is trying to put forward. Vis-a-vis effectively a system where those with the money can outbid you on something that you need, in the knowledge that they can then force you to pay a sufficient amount to them which makes it profitable for them.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 7,625 ✭✭✭fliball123


    Its crazy to think you cant have a discussion on what is going on in the country today without being labelled a racist/Xenophobe when the evidence is there that our current migration policy is absolutely killing our ability to function correctly as a society. Ireland has gone way to far to the left. I know I will get sh1t for this but wouldnt it be amazing to have someone like Trump - now not all of his policies or some of the crap that he brings, but by god he is not afraid to tackle societal issues that are impacting over there and love him or hate him he has taken a side/stance which he got voted in for. We have not got one politician like this here all too afraid to take a side in case they upset a minority or be seen as being anything other than middle of the road and the good boys of Europe and of course they have to make sure their pensions are topped up when they are booted out for doing phuck all while in government. A lot of people here don't bother voting as there is no valid option for them to vote for who will represent them correctly.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,147 ✭✭✭I see sheep


    "Wouldnt it be amazing to have someone like Trump"

    Brilliant.

    I always used to tell my English friends that Irish people are too smart to fall for con men like Trump or Farage, and judging by election results Irish people are.

    But in the world of Boards.ie it's amazing how many fall so easily for these con men.

    Thank god this place doesn't reflect Irish society in real life.

    "a terrible war imposed by the provisional IRA"

    Our West Brit Taoiseach



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,920 ✭✭✭Rocket_GD


    the evidence is there that our current migration policy is absolutely killing our ability to function correctly as a society.

    Can you please provide the evidence for this statement or is this just your opinion being stated as facts?



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,411 ✭✭✭j62


    Don’t the rules of either thread (one here and one in CA) forbid discussion of impact immigration on housing?

    There ain’t really a subforum to discuss the issue



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,132 ✭✭✭RichardAnd


    That's a legacy rule. It was unenforceable because it's quite simply impossible to discuss housing without regard to immigration.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,132 ✭✭✭RichardAnd


    You're missing the point. Farage is a charlatan, I will agree. Trump's background is also enough to raise serious questions. However, what they represent is a political hand grenade, and this is what fillball is saying.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,147 ✭✭✭I see sheep


    US house prices went up 33% during Trump's first term.

    Is that good?

    "a terrible war imposed by the provisional IRA"

    Our West Brit Taoiseach



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,756 ✭✭✭tigger123


    That was the woke left housing market's fault.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,132 ✭✭✭RichardAnd


    No it isn't.

    I think you're misunderstanding what I'm saying. I don't support Trump, and I don't consider his first term to have been a success. He didn't deliver on very much of what he promised to do. The point is that he was an outsider that gave the established ruling class a shock. That is what Ireland could benefit from if we got our own version of Trump.

    Also, the 33% rises in house prices was due to money printing to fuel lockdowns. The same thing happened all across asset markets.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,147 ✭✭✭I see sheep


    You've asserted that immigration is a 'major issue' in the housing market and you tried to back that up by saying having someone like Trump here would be good here.

    How/Why would it be good?

    You're basically saying in your last point that the government has nothing to do with the housing market.

    So what has immigration got to do with it?

    "a terrible war imposed by the provisional IRA"

    Our West Brit Taoiseach



  • Administrators Posts: 56,219 Admin ✭✭✭✭✭awec


    From an inflationary point of view, my beef with HTB is it causes the price of the specific property bought to be higher than it otherwise would have been, which you appear to agree with. This is not really helping those it is claimed to designed to help. That's the political con that has been lapped up.

    I think the issue here is many just don't understand HTB.

    Take a 500k house for example.

    With HTB:

    House is 500k

    Deposit required = 50k

    HTB rebate = 30k

    Own money required = 20k

    Without HTB:

    House drops by 30k, so now 470k

    Deposit required = 47k

    HTB rebate = 0

    Own money required = 47k

    Without HTB, the amount of money someone needs to save more than doubles, in a period of ever increasing rents. Should HTB go away, the amount of buyers stuck renting will increase, so rents will spiral further, causing further difficulties saving for a deposit.

    HTB was introduced to combat the problem of people being able to afford a mortgage but being unable to gather the deposit required because of rent. It loaded up the deposit for you, and in the amount you pay was higher, but over the lifetime of a mortgage this is a relatively insignificant amount.

    The deposit advance was the carrot for buyers. The increased price was the carrot for developers.

    To suggest this is not helping those it claimed to help is just plainly incorrect. It is obviously helping.

    Should HTB ever be scrapped, I think the amount it was helping will become very obvious to those who just don't realise it yet, when it dawns on those people that getting rid of it may have dropped prices by an insignificant amount, but has come at the cost of delaying their house purchase by years.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 5,854 ✭✭✭BlueSkyDreams


    The anti HTB posts always flag inflation as the over-riding reason why the govt should not extend the scheme to 2nd hand homes, but they don't point out the bridge that the scheme provides for first time buyers; many of whom, without the HTB scheme, would not be able to afford the property at all, even at the reduced, non-inflationary price.

    The deposit is often the blocker for FTBs, not their salary or their ability to pay down the mortgage. Who wants to be trapped in a rent spiral when you know you can afford the mortgage payments, but you just can't save for that deposit AND pay sky high rents at the same time.

    If the HTB scheme has a 5% inflationary effect on house prices but at the same time allows 1000s of young people to purchase their first home, I'd say the scheme is more than worth the price rise.

    A lot of those young people would emigrate if they cant get on the property ladder; I am glad they are able to buy here and to stay here and the HTB scheme offers many people that opportunity to stay in Ireland, long term.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Subscribers, Registered Users 2 Posts: 6,803 ✭✭✭hometruths


    So you'd agree it is undoubtedly inflationary. And yes it undoubtedly helps the specific individual who buys the house by making it more affordable for them.

    But the inflationary effect makes it more unaffordable for everybody else who hasn't yet bought. If the problem in the market is affordability this doesn't seem like an ideal solution.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2, Paid Member Posts: 12,073 ✭✭✭✭J Mysterio


    You've captured it very well.

    My wife and I bought our first house last year with HTB.



  • Administrators Posts: 56,219 Admin ✭✭✭✭✭awec


    HTB really has little impact on affordability. You are trying to suggest that without HTB prices would be lower by an amount that actually makes a difference, this is wishful thinking. Prices may be lower, but not by any significant amount. People suggest that without HTB prices wouldn't have risen like they have over the past 10-12 years, I think this is delusional thinking.

    Removing HTB would absolutely make it more difficult for people to buy houses, not less.

    We have been there before, we know what it looks like. People paying way more on rent than they'd ever have to pay on the mortgage, but being unable to get the mortgage cause they can't save the deposit due to the rent.

    In fact, I would be absolutely certain that if HTB were to cease to exist that this thread would spend a lot of it's time complaining about how it's disgraceful that the government is doing nothing to help people gather the massive deposits they need to buy.



  • Registered Users, Subscribers, Registered Users 2 Posts: 6,803 ✭✭✭hometruths


    People suggest that without HTB prices wouldn't have risen like they have over the past 10-12 years, I think this is delusional thinking.

    This is like Datadude arguing against the posters claiming that HTB is underpinning the entire market. As far as I have seen nobody is suggesting this.

    My only input into this argument has been to whether or not HTB is inflationary or not and it undoubtedly it is. On HTB alone I've never got too bothered about whether the inflationary effect is significant or not.

    Whilst opposed to HTB on ideological grounds, I only started whingeing abut the inflationary impact of govt purchasing support when they introduced the First Home Scheme. That is to my mind significantly inflationary.

    But every time I've mentioned it somebody goes off on a tangent about HTB not having any impact on prices at all, totally ignoring the impact of the First Home Scheme.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,132 ✭✭✭RichardAnd


    I responded to you regarding Trump as you quoted a poster who brought him up. I wanted to correct what I saw as a misunderstanding on your part. It's a separate matter to housing.

    The state have everything to do with the housing market for it is the actions of the state that have contributed to the crisis. Regarding immigration, this is the direct responsibility of the state for it is the state that controls (or doesn't) the borders of the country.

    If you cannot see the affect that immigration at the levels we currently have has on the supply and demand for housing, then there isn't much to discuss.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2, Paid Member Posts: 2,991 ✭✭✭PommieBast


    My recollection is the rule was originally aimed at "discussion" of certain domestic ethnic groups and what they got (que anti-welfare diatribes) rather than refugees and immigrants.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 5,854 ✭✭✭BlueSkyDreams


    if they haven't yet bought, then they are FTBs themselves and will qualify for the same support on the next property they bid on.

    If they are a landlord that wants to buy their 5th or 6th property, they dont get the benefit of a proxy deposit in the guise of Help To Buy; I'm ok with that.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 7,777 ✭✭✭timmyntc


    Landlords prospective or otherwise are simply not buying homes that are available on the market. The increase in rental stock is almost entirely from BTL schemes like apartment blocks that are never offered for private sale.

    There is a false narrative going around that if it weren't for HTB or FHS that a FTB would be outbid by an evil landlord, but the stats don't bear this out at all. Almost no small landlords are buying new builds because finance is too costly (look at BTL mortgage drawdowns last year).

    Any new rentals are coming from large landlords who are buying apartments by the block, or forward funding these blocks from construction stage.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,132 ✭✭✭RichardAnd


    Well whatever it was, it's clearly not hear anymore, and we're now seeing excellent discussions that get to the root of the problems. I think that's a win.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 29 Help_to_


    As a potential first time buyer, the HTB is terrible for the people who actually need help.

    Here is what I think:

    • The vast majority of people who avail of the HTB would have bought anyways. The only people I know who availed of the HTB saw the HTB as a 'free' 20 or 30k. It's extremely frustrating to hear managers in the office on 75 or 80k talking about getting 30k off when buying/building new.
    • "HTB helped me, without it I wouldn't have afforded it!". Yeah that's great for YOU. It allowed YOU with your high salaries to skip the queue of people saving a big deposit with much lower salaries. The houses wouldn't be left unsold had you not got the HTB. If you're in a relationship and you are earning a combined 125k, then you should be able to save 50k in 2 years for a 500k new build, easily. A salary of 62.5k each is a net annual income of 92.5k combined. If you can't sort a deposit of 50k within 2-2.5 years, that's ridiculous.
    • The people suffering are single people and those couples on combined incomes of around 80k. I am on less than that as a single person but I would need a deposit of around 70k currently to be able to buy a bottom of the market matchbox apartment. It's a joke for people who can afford the repayments on a new house claim they wouldn't have ever been able to afford a new build without HTB. By fact that you can get a mortgage, means you can afford without HTB.

    I feel like I am going insane. There's this scenario seemingly where we need house prices to be extremely high, so that developers are encouraged to build more houses, at extremely high prices.

    We're told that developers won't build if prices drop because it's not profitable. Yet the market would adapt. Land prices would drop. Speculation and land hoarding would drop. Eventually, we'd reach a stage where houses would be built and it would be far better!



Advertisement
Advertisement