Advertisement
If you have a new account but are having problems posting or verifying your account, please email us on hello@boards.ie for help. Thanks :)
Hello all! Please ensure that you are posting a new thread or question in the appropriate forum. The Feedback forum is overwhelmed with questions that are having to be moved elsewhere. If you need help to verify your account contact hello@boards.ie

BusConnects Dublin - Bus Network Changes Discussion

1471472474476477519

Comments

  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 6,175 ✭✭✭trellheim


    There is still NO information on any NCR 46a stop (its the only bus for most of the NCR west of Phibsboro not counting the 37 and N2 which only use a single stop ) stating that the service is being changed.

    I've a feeling they are deliberately holding back the 11b schedule and then present it as some magic plan to resolve punters complaints ( of which there are many )



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,527 ✭✭✭p_haugh


    Seems DB didn't update the draft they had before setting the page to live!



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 395 ✭✭TranslatorPS


    I think the fact that going onto the NTA page on the Phase and getting three different visual styles of timetables is probably one of the most damning aspects of how decentralized transport in Dublin still is, despite the NTA's primary purpose being centralizing it to nine hells and back.

    It's a shame that Ireland never really grew into the "online stop-by-stop" phase that's common across a number of continental countries.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 6,175 ✭✭✭trellheim


    TFI are now tweeting there is no 11b https://x.com/TFIupdates/status/1880593529870639393

    Post edited by trellheim on


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 5,049 ✭✭✭thomasj


    😮 It just gets better 🤦‍♂️

    https://x.com/TFIupdates/status/1880600357832728944?t=9wprOy319X9_FxwRT2-_xw&s=19



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 15,458 ✭✭✭✭stephenjmcd


    Completely incorrect information



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,754 ✭✭✭john boye


    That reads awfully like an AI reply



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 5,049 ✭✭✭thomasj


    I think you're on to something . Have a look at TFIs reply to this tweet

    https://x.com/PWolohan/status/1880557886247665981?t=GvwiZoOLzbOOGmBL293xjA&s=19

    Here's TFIs reply

    https://x.com/TFIupdates/status/1880575695715246225?t=iqGa9KHRno4Jh7RwJt5iAg&s=19



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4 Wifimuffins


    Apologies if this is the wrong place to ask, but does anyone know what this is and if it has to do with BusConnects? Found at Stillorgan Grove L25 stop.

    IMG_8608.jpeg


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 205 ✭✭A2000


    Hardly surprising. After 27 months there's no record of the 3 extra departures on the 60 on werkdays. Not even on the db timetable. 2 of them were supposed to be term time departures but run all year round. Maybe because not many in authority know of thier existence.



  • Advertisement
  • Moderators, Motoring & Transport Moderators Posts: 11,866 Mod ✭✭✭✭devnull


    It's a pole that has been installed to attach a new style RTPI display to.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,577 ✭✭✭VG31




  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 760 ✭✭✭loco_scolo


    I'm surprised to see they're running the 4 across O'Connell Bridge southbound. There are already major traffic issues there at peak times, no need to run an additional service across the bridge and into D'Oliver.

    Could they not just use Rosie Hackett / Townsend Street for the southbound direction?

    Diversion-Route4-13.1.25.png


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,754 ✭✭✭john boye


    It has a southbound stop on OCB. Plus the lights on Rosie Hackett Bridge can take an eternity to change.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 760 ✭✭✭loco_scolo


    I think my point is "it could not have a stop on OCB"… since they're already making a major change to the route, it could have been considered.

    I can't speak from experience regarding Rosie Hackett traffic lights, but I'd wager a bet it takes even longer to get through D'Oliver Street and College Green!! Buses turning onto OCB also massively slow down buses coming from OCS to OCB.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,754 ✭✭✭john boye


    Don't forget the 4 on the southside is essentially a sweeper for the 7/A so it kind of has to shadow them.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,185 ✭✭✭KD345


    It's like that on many routes across new BusConnects services. Take the N4, the frequency was cut to every 12 minutes but the timetables online and on street still give it a 10 minute frequency.

    The worst example is on the C5 night service. The running times were changed but nothing was updated for passengers online or on street. If you go to Ringsend Road to catch the timetabled 03:35 or 04:35 departure you will have missed the bus by 5 minutes, as the actual departure times are now 03:30 and 04:30.

    It appears nobody is checking basic things. For example, the S2 terminus stop 4319 at Heuston Station doesn't contain any timetable or route information - and this is a major stop for a new BusConnects orbital. The RTPI here is also messed up for route S2.

    It's a stark difference to Dublin Bus, who update timetable panels online and on street for their services in time and with accuracy, but it seems once a Dublin Bus route gets BusConnected, it falls into the control of TFI with poorly designed layouts and no guarantee of updates.

    BusConnects was supposed to bring an improvement to things like this, in 2023 the NTA signed a €40m 10 year contract with Capita to create a central hub to offer an improved customer service experience, but the examples of social media replies as highlighted on this thread shows how bad things now are. You would imagine having correct timetables at stops and online would be a basic thing easy to get right.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 205 ✭✭A2000


    S4 is also down as serving stop 2674 which is physically impossible as the bus needs to be in the left hand and the right lane to turn into liffey valley at the same time



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 8,932 ✭✭✭dublinman1990


    The 4 essentially runs the exact same route as the 7/a between OCB & Blackrock.

    The 4 also acts as a sweeper when the 120 goes to Simmonscourt Road during the weekday morning peak times.

    Although is the southbound stop on OCB meant to be given over to the F Spine Routes this year?



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,879 ✭✭✭rx8


    That's a pole for an RTPI information sign.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 8 MacDriver


    So let me get this straight, they were willing to increase the 19's frequency from every hour to every 20 minutes with addional peak journeys.

    However, they also don't even bother with the 11 taking over part of probably the MOST frequent bus in Dublin. "Let's sprinkle in an extra one or two 11's in the morning and call it a day."

    And better yet, apparently 11b ceases to exist and if that's the case the NCR will have every 8 - > 30 minute bus. Great job for disconnecting Busconnects.

    Can't also wait to see them change 13, 68 and 69 into one hourly route going up Naas road.

    Also, I heard that the 11 is going to be staying for a while, so they better get their act together with the O orbital.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 15,458 ✭✭✭✭stephenjmcd


    145 has no issue with wait times anymore for the turn onto O'Connell Bridge since the city council implemented the traffic changes. The journey up the quays from Heuston is much better than it was.

    As for college green, your around it most days in 2 minutes. If there's an incident in the city then yeah like every other route it backs up but in general it's alot better now than it used to be



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 760 ✭✭✭loco_scolo


    One of the core aims of Bus Connects is to eliminate turns on the bridge, so they could start working to that now....

    In my experience, buses heading from OCS to College Green are still painfully slow. It has happened a few times that the buses coming from the quays block up the bridge, and the light sequence doesn't let any buses from OCS onto the bridge.

    In any case, I realize the 145 is being removed, so diverting the 4 on that route isn't adding additional services to the bridge.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,621 ✭✭✭mikeybhoy


    Absolutely disgraceful from the NTA. Yet certain posters on here for many years wanted Dublin Bus gone and replaced by the NTA and private operators. Well this is what your getting are you happy now? Dublin Bus were always prompt to update on changes to services and the NTA aren't are you surprised.

    Some GAI routes have had outdated timetables for over two years. Stop 2083 on Fosters Avenue still has timetables for the 17 and 175 even though neither routes have operated for over a year and the stop is now served exclusively by the 4 47 departures that operate via Mount Merrion but no mention of these on the stop.

    The NTA are an incompetent government quango full of pen pusher career civil servants with no experience of working in the public transport industry.



  • Moderators, Motoring & Transport Moderators Posts: 11,866 Mod ✭✭✭✭devnull


    Whilst I think Dublin Bus are better now than they were in terms of updating timetables at stops, I happen to remember many years ago around the time of Network Direct we were all complaining on here about buses not even being programmed with the new scrolls after route changes and out of date information being at bus stops, so whilst Dublin Bus have improved immensely in many ways since then, it wasn't always the case and those who have been around the scene for a while can point to darker days!

    That doesn't mean that the current goings on are great and I agree that the NTA need to seriously up their game and employ people with attention to detail with these kind of things. But then again I do know that the NTA is quite understaffed for a lot of the things that they do and ultimately their purse strings are being held by the government. There was talk a couple of years ago about them asking for extra resources in terms of staff and it wasn't forthcoming, I'm not sure how that got resolved in the end, whether they got them or they just gave up asking?

    Also despite the fact the NTA are far from perfect, they are far better than what came before it, which was a Department for Transport which couldn't operating a proper bus licensing scheme to save it's life and couldn't get operators within the same parent group to work together and was more interested in the interests of certain companies than your average public transport user.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,621 ✭✭✭mikeybhoy


    Well the RVs would've still had the old manual blinds in them which would've been more difficult to update. Not sure the dot matrix displays on the AVs and AXs may have been more difficult to program than the LEDs also.

    Perhaps the ideal situation was having the NTA with the operators running services at arms length from them this was what we had prior to GAI. NTA make the major decisions on things like routes but DB manage the day to day operation of things like timetables, website etc. Any attempt the NTA have made at trying to mange things on a day to day basis has been a bombastic failure.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,621 ✭✭✭mikeybhoy


    The guy from Finnegans of Bray doesn't seem to be best pleased that he's losing the 143 and 144. In fairness he may have a point can't see why smaller operators can't get contracts even though the same NTA have no problem awarding contracts to small operators for Local Link work in rural areas.

    No reason why the L12 and L14 which are basically Bray Town services couldn't be Finnegan's operated that would give DB and GAI more resources to focus on more important routes.



  • Moderators, Motoring & Transport Moderators Posts: 11,866 Mod ✭✭✭✭devnull


    These were not RVs with manual blinds they were AV/AX vehicles with electronic blinds. There's no reason why they should have been difficult to update, it was just bad planning and lack of being prepared. Even some weeks after services launched this was still a problem on some vehicles, an issue which also plagued Irish Rail as well in the past.

    The result of the bus market opening up and DB having competition on tenders has done gone things for Dublin Bus. It has made them up their game and they are a far improved company for it compared to what they were before and are a lot more customer focused. I don't think that would have happened if they had 100% of the services.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 15,679 ✭✭✭✭loyatemu


    The Finnegan's services were very low frequency, nothing on weekends, and the buses were largely ancient rust buckets. I don't think they're any great loss.

    The lack of connection from Bray to the Luas in BC is a fair point that many people have made, but Finnegan's Luas service was barely a service at all.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 8,932 ✭✭✭dublinman1990


    A new site notice application for a bus shelter has been placed on one of the bus stops on Fleurville Road in Blackrock.

    IMG20250119161544.jpg

    If approved it will be used for passengers who get on the L25, L26 and the 7b/d. There is a verge of grass with an overgrown bush on it growing beside bus stop 7421 which doesn't leave enough room for passengers to board the bus routes.

    I would take a guess that students at Newpark school want to have a shelter there to get a bus home when they go home from school. The overgrown bush at that stop is probably leaving them very little room to wait for the bus to bring them home. I would assume that the residents of Castlebyrne Park would want to have a bus shelter installed there as well to ease congestion on the footpath.

    However; the other bus stops do not have a site notice for new bus shelters on them. I have not seen any new steel poles for new RTPI boards installed for these stops either. I find it odd to see the other photo of the new steel pole installed for the RTPI board at that bus stop at Stillorgan Grove. There aren't any new additional routes being provided to serve that stop.

    The new RTPI board however might the help the students who go to the Rehab college across the road to see the live departures times to get their bus home or when they go on class trips associated with their course work. There's also loads of new houses and apartments being built along that road as well which results in more people using these bus stops throughout the working week.



Advertisement