Advertisement
Help Keep Boards Alive. Support us by going ad free today. See here: https://subscriptions.boards.ie/.
https://www.boards.ie/group/1878-subscribers-forum

Private Group for paid up members of Boards.ie. Join the club.
Hi all, please see this major site announcement: https://www.boards.ie/discussion/2058427594/boards-ie-2026

Question About Twin Peaks

  • 18-01-2025 05:47PM
    #1
    Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,043 ✭✭✭


    Twin Peaks has been on my watch list for a few years now but I unfortunately was spoiled yesterday by an inconsiderate podcast host who mentioned who killed Laura Palmer and why. Is the show still worth watching or is everything more or less based on solving that mystery.



Comments

  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 447 ✭✭head82


    The revelation of 'who killed Laura Palmer?' does not detract from the journey it takes to get there.

    Essential viewing,



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 18,052 ✭✭✭✭Galwayguy35




  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,043 ✭✭✭RickBlaine


    I hate this attitude. It is unfair and unreasonable to expect everyone to have seen every significant old movie and TV show. If I was talking to a teenager about The Sixth Sense, I wouldn't just mention the spoiler unless I knew they have seen it. I wasn't even born when Twin Peaks first aired and I've been catching up on other shows over the years.

    Likewise, a podcast that doesn't usually deal with spoilers shouldn't just casually mention who killed Laura Palmer. The name of the killer didn't add anything to the conservation anyway.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2, Paid Member Posts: 6,900 ✭✭✭Buddy Bubs


    Maggie shot Mr burns



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 19,179 ✭✭✭✭banie01


    You mean it wasn't Kristin Shepard? Dammit 😉



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 13,033 ✭✭✭✭Jim_Hodge


    You still can't expect not to hear spoilers for a 35 year old show of any kind.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 770 ✭✭✭BaywatchHQ


    I found a new sealed dvd of the show in a charity shop 3 years ago but haven't got around to watching it.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 657 ✭✭✭rtron


    Season 3 is 25 years after we find out who killed Laura Palmer. And it's excellent 👌



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 60,285 ✭✭✭✭walshb


    It’s an insanely dumb pile a prentious gick.

    But I do love the intro



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 18,052 ✭✭✭✭Galwayguy35


    Sherilyn Fenn was reason enough to watch it.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2, Paid Member Posts: 3,769 ✭✭✭Tork


    Yes, it's still worth watching. Before the third series came out in 2017, I sat down and re-watched the first two series for the first time since they aired. The first series and half of the second one have stood the test of time and are superb. If you don't want to keep going through the Twin Peaks universe, the reveal of Laura's killer is as a good a place as anywhere to stop. David Lynch and Mark Frost stepped away at this point, and there's a run of episodes (10-16) which are pretty ropey. Lynch and Frost came back on board after this, and things improved again. Sadly it wasn't enough to save the series.

    The third series is excellent too, though it's different in tone to the first two. They managed to film it in the nick of time because some of the original cast members have since passed away.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 22,443 ✭✭✭✭endacl


    Gandalf is Luke’s sister.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 573 ✭✭✭Jim Herring


    Who shot JR? Fairly sure it wasn’t the lad from Father Ted.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,608 ✭✭✭thereiver


    Dont listen to tv podcast twin peaks is a great tv series it has a side range of characters who are great actors and. Its very strange not like any other tv show it's like watching a film I intend to watch it again I have seen about 5 episodes years ago it's still worth watching on one else makes tv like this anymore even actors with small parts are great in this program it's in my top twenty tv programs it's like the Beatles of tv programs it starts out good and gets better I think it better to watch now cos no one uses smartphones or looks at screens I just think the story meanders abit it's really a story about a small town and the culture and behavior of the locals to the police and the FBI investigation

    I just read a tweets the point of David Lynch story's is you are not supposed to understand every thing that's not the point of it it's an experiance

    I watched a tv sci Fi show called sunny I don't understand what happened in the last episode

    But I enjoyed it

    Twin peaks is like 2001 the film it's not always clear what is happening but it's a great cinematic experience

    Twin peaks is not just a police procedural

    Dallas the tv show was not just who shot Jr



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 37,707 ✭✭✭✭o1s1n
    Master of the Universe




  • Moderators, Entertainment Moderators, Paid Member Posts: 11,591 Mod ✭✭✭✭squonk


    Miley has an affair with Fidelma. Biddy dies in a car crash at the end.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 15,704 ✭✭✭✭whiterebel


    As with all his films, it's absolutely pretentious crap. You will nt be missing anything.

    You don't need to understand it = I don't know what I was doing.



  • Moderators, Category Moderators, Arts Moderators, Computer Games Moderators, Entertainment Moderators Posts: 31,417 CMod ✭✭✭✭johnny_ultimate


    Always frustrates me when great or interesting art is dismissed as 'pretentious'.

    Twin Peaks is amazing, and knowing the 'twist' will not spoil the show by any means because there's so much other stuff going on. But what's often neglected in the show's reputation as being 'weird' and dark is that it's also often extremely funny and soapy. There's a reason it's Lynch's biggest breakout hit, outside of the 'whodunnit' appeal of its initial run: because it's often laugh out loud hilarious, full of memorable characters in heightened soap operatic dramatics, and is full of some of the most gorgeous and iconic imagery in television. Just keep in mind there is a quality dip in the back half of season two when Lynch became less involved.

    Of course it's defiantly strange and surreal at times, and there's a constantly heightened air to proceedings. But only really in the stunning but pitch black film Fire Walk With Me and the (G.O.A.T.) third season does it become more consistently abstract and challenging, albeit in the latter case still with lots of humour and energy.

    Anyway, it's an extraordinary series (and film and follow up series) that IMO is worth anyone's time, and certainly the original TV show is one of the most accessible entrypoints to the wonderful mind of David Lynch.

    Post edited by johnny_ultimate on


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 7,696 ✭✭✭yagan


    I was a bigger fan of the soundtrack than the series itself. I tried to stay with it when it was first on TV but it just felt plodding, but I did later catch Fire Walk With Me in the cinema and I got to say it really stuck with me as a memorable movie experience.

    I'd sum it up as an American Gothic horror story.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2, Paid Member Posts: 7,316 ✭✭✭Badly Drunk Boy


    it's also often extremely funny and soapy.

    It even has a fictional soap opera playing in the background on several characters' tellies. 😄



  • Advertisement
  • Moderators, Entertainment Moderators, Paid Member Posts: 11,591 Mod ✭✭✭✭squonk


    My sister loved it when it started on RTE. As we had one tv in those days I watched it with her from the beginning. I gave up after a free episodes. It sensed overly pretentious and took a long time to go nowhere from episode to episode. It would seguay into pieces of surreal nonsense as well. It was breakthrough tv for its time mind you Ava opened the door to a lot of similar shows. 4-5 years later another show cane along, American gothic, that I absolutely loved. That wouldn’t have been made had Twin Peaks not opened the door. I know now I just don’t really like David Lynch’s stuff overall so not liking Twin Peaks makes sense in that context.



  • Posts: 0 [Deleted User]


    It's brilliant. Enjoy it.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 12,998 ✭✭✭✭Rothko


    The word pretentious is usually just thrown around to describe anything that dares to do something out of the ordinary.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 6,528 ✭✭✭emo72


    What was that show that came a few years later, it had James Belushi, in some virtual reality shenanigans, it didn't last long, was that American gothic?

    Nope it was Wild Palms. A weird one.



  • Moderators, Entertainment Moderators, Paid Member Posts: 11,591 Mod ✭✭✭✭squonk


    Yes, I remember it looked like it had potential when it started but I recall it going down the toilet fairly quickly.



Advertisement
Advertisement