Advertisement
If you have a new account but are having problems posting or verifying your account, please email us on hello@boards.ie for help. Thanks :)
Hello all! Please ensure that you are posting a new thread or question in the appropriate forum. The Feedback forum is overwhelmed with questions that are having to be moved elsewhere. If you need help to verify your account contact hello@boards.ie

WFH is dead and buried. Right to WFH bill is pointless

13468916

Comments

  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 162 ✭✭dingdangdoo22




  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 208 ✭✭blue_blue


    More arse waffle from a remote working lobby group who are trying to justify their existence.

    The only thing the next programme for Government has committed to in terms of remote work is improving rural broadband. A project which started almost 10 years ago with the national broadband plan. So essentially there's no movement in terms of promoting wfh.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 14,375 ✭✭✭✭Flinty997


    Me, I said the thing about ad hoc requests.

    I'm just saying there's two sides of that coin and unplanned work is often what people claim as being better in the office. When it really isn't.

    Your scenario though isn't about WFH



  • Moderators, Sports Moderators Posts: 26,004 Mod ✭✭✭✭CramCycle


    I hate to say it but that sounds like it is neither a WFH or an in the office problem, that is an employee problem. A swift follow up email within a reasonable timeframe. Emails can be marked by their importance if people do have to prioritise. I've used JIRA for such things, and MS Planner is just my way of working up things and making sure things aren't over looked. On the basis you said Audit, often they have to be in person, internal ones not so much but external and for accredited work spaces, it would be near impossible. The issue is, no one here knows what your job is. There are several where in person is far better, there are several employees where in person is far better but my point is that is not everyone in every situation and people making claims that in person is always better don't live in the real world. There are several situations where WFH is better, and several where it is worse, and some in the middle where it could go either way.

    For your audit queries, a time response for non action after X days, with a follow up to include their manager if that is not actioned, people get quicker. I often put in an expected time to complete in these emails to nip the "I am too busy to get to that" retaliation. If its a requirement, it has to get done, end of discussion.

    I work with teams from all over the place at the minute in my current role and I have to say, in person would be torturous. Tickets with issues, assigned to the right people, and short Teams meetings to walk through the issue are brilliant. Such a meeting in person would be torturous as it would be people sitting round looking at a projector at someone troubleshooting. People realise they can't contribute, they simply say, I am no help here and drop off to another bit of work.

    Had a pint with a friend who used to work for an Aviation company that got bought out, new boss was a hard baller, everyone must be in 9 to 5, in the office. Fly in from China from a job over the weekend, you are at your desk at 9 am Monday morning. Within 3 months, 80% of the Senior staff left, and have now set up competing companies after their gardening leave clauses ran out. Before they were bought out, they were out competing the company that bought them out in every conceivable metric. They loved in person meetings but this draconian BS was enough for that to happen, many others jumped ship to competitors. He now works for an Aviation company in France, but they were happy to leave him remote, he calls in, in person every now and again but 70% of his time is at home.

    Loads of others who are staying at home without issue, companies downsizing offices or hot desking and seeing no downsides. Like I said though, there are those it doesn't suit, and there are employees I had inherited in the past where I was just working out PMPs for them and that had to be done in person for certain metrics to be recorded.



  • Moderators, Sports Moderators Posts: 26,004 Mod ✭✭✭✭CramCycle


    Last question, what do you think a CEO is, maybe some sort of Manager? I think we used to call them Managing Directors here until more US companies moved in.



  • Advertisement
  • Moderators, Business & Finance Moderators Posts: 10,830 Mod ✭✭✭✭Jim2007


    Have a bit of respect for other users, if you can't express yourself without having to resource to abuseive language you have already lost the argument.



  • Moderators, Business & Finance Moderators Posts: 10,830 Mod ✭✭✭✭Jim2007


    Your opinions are not facts, that is unless you can produce references to peer reviewed research to back it up….

    And a CEO is most definitely a manager unless it a private owned company and they are the owners.

    Remote work has been around for long before Covid - I had 3 people in a team of five working remotely back in 1990, they were working of IMB terminals which were installed in their homes with us picking up the cost of the leased lines to their homes. And I can't recall a single team I was involved with over the past 30 years that did not have some remote members including a husband and wife team that were transient moving around Europe.

    Furthermore I have been involved in the merger of three major European banks and our solution was always the same when dealing with branches - make as many staff as possible remote, move the rest into a single branch office and rent out the seconded office until we could sell it later when the market allowed it.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 60 ✭✭Fletwick




  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 208 ✭✭blue_blue


    Forgot to add to the trope list - there's always some guy who'll say "I've worked from home for the last 20 years"

    Another falsehold. WFH was not common pre-covid for office workers unless you're a farmer, etc.

    Jog on @Jim2007



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 559 ✭✭✭SodiumCooled


    I find online meetings much better, I’ve grown to dislike in person meetings in general but the fact is even when I and others are in the office it’s very rarely we don’t just do our meetings online at our desks as there is always people remote or on other sites joining anyway. You can also work away on other stuff rather than lose an hour if there are parts of the meeting not really relevant to you.

    Top management did try a push to get people “into meeting rooms” as part of (failing) RTO mandates but most just ignore it and take calls at their desks.

    I don’t think it would be unreasonable for the client who is defacto employing the person to justify the need for him being in the office full time. Given the details and that he was dealing with sites in other time zones I would have major doubts over his need to be in the office. He was likely sitting there on video calls to South America.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,487 ✭✭✭Rocket_GD


    You have a similar name style to the other very angry poster about people who WFH/Hybrid, interesting.

    There have been many WFH/Hybrid roles since the introduction of broadband, just because you're unaware of these roles doesn't mean they didn't exist.

    Your opinions do not equal facts.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 11,742 ✭✭✭✭LambshankRedemption


    OK, well that is where you are clearly ill informed.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 11,742 ✭✭✭✭LambshankRedemption


    I just noticed that user only has 209 posts to their name.

    Nevermind the introduction of broadband, WFH was common long before that. As Jim said in his post, some companies would pay for a leased line into an employees home so they could dial in. Literally, dial in, over dial-up.



  • Moderators, Sports Moderators Posts: 26,004 Mod ✭✭✭✭CramCycle


    My wife did as said earlier, knew a few people with family commitments who did for big companies, usually part time hours for those I knew. Certainly wasn't common but it definetly existed, typically in very specific types of roles. An ex flatmate worked from home from 2008, as did nearly all his company. They had an office in town near Guinness but one day they realised it was far cheaper to buy everyone a top of the line Mac and pay a contribution towards using their home. This was incredibly common in software development from mid noughties onwards. He ended up getting several promotions and then flown out to San Francisco where he was a team lead for a few years, married an American and now still works from home for a different company on far better pay than me. Recent beers over Zoom he was saying his new job has no permanent office at all, they rent one if needed but hasn't happened yet.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 14,375 ✭✭✭✭Flinty997


    WebEx released 2000

    Skype 2003

    Zoom 2013

    Ms Teams 2017

    About 30,000 WFH in Ireland in 2019

    But I guess if you don't want to be informed you won't be.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 11,742 ✭✭✭✭LambshankRedemption


    Telnet - a terminal emulator used to connect to remote systems, released 1973.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,826 ✭✭✭C3PO


    Working from home has been in existence for 20+ years! Certainly not as common as now but definitely existed for plenty of people!



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 85 ✭✭smalltalker


    indeed it’s as old as the hills. When my mother started back working in the 80s she literally took the companies books home to work on them. It’s a different ball game when you’re dealing with something that potentially every employee in a company can avail of though.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 14,375 ✭✭✭✭Flinty997


    Back in the 1990s I wasn't usual for us to take the work computer (a desktop not a laptop) home for the weekend, or a few days to meet a deadline. Did that in a number of different companies.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 5,965 ✭✭✭caviardreams


    Legislation in employers' favour but 'claims of death of remote work are premature'

    https://www.breakingnews.ie/business/legislation-in-employers-favour-but-claims-of-death-of-remote-work-are-premature-1719142.html



  • Advertisement
  • Moderators, Business & Finance Moderators Posts: 10,830 Mod ✭✭✭✭Jim2007


    At this point you are very long on opinion and very short on facts…. but keep digging… lets just see how long it will take you.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,353 ✭✭✭witchgirl26


    Sorry I meant who said anything about my requests being ad hoc as opposed to anything else. And my point was that during full WFH in Covid, we saw our audit cycle times increase massively whereas with a hybrid, they're a bit longer than previously but an acceptable level that suits everyone. So WFH works for us but not a full WFH - a hybrid solution.

    I love when people explain how I should do my job to me when I've been doing it for over 10 years successfully. I do follow up on requests, my point was around the fact that, unlike external audit which has statutory deadlines, internal does not. And the business needs trump our audit needs sometimes so there will often be wait times. That's ok. I factor those in. I don't go nuclear by cracking down as ultimately that gets the team a bad rep as a police force as opposed to a business partner which we are. So it's a fine line you have to walk. And if it's not a WFH problem then please explain the massive increase in audit cycle times during full WFH in Covid versus before (when no one really did WFH) or after when it's a hybrid model? There has been minimal change in the employees that are being dealt with. That's the only change factor. On site audits for us are a couple of days most to get the meeting parts done with everything else then followed up online after. It's a hybrid solution that works but the face to face time does matter.

    I get that works for you. Any of the in-person meetings I have or arrange, I try to make sure that there is no one remote on them so that it doesn't defeat the purpose. I often will travel to the offices of the people I meet (all within a 25 min drive from mine). And honestly, I would hate if people were working on something else when they're meant to be in a meeting. Personally I find it a bit rude not to give the meeting your attention when you're on it. I get checking an email if it comes in or looking up something relevant to the meeting, but just continuing to work? Nah.



  • Moderators, Sports Moderators Posts: 26,004 Mod ✭✭✭✭CramCycle


    Apologies, in no way trying to tell you how to do your job, just taking it as it came across, always the issue with these discussions when for obvious reasons we do not disclose to much about how, where or what we operate. As I said across numerous posts though, it works for some, doesn't work for others. Clearly doesn't work for your team and that is fine. My internal audits do have deadlines as a lot of my work area is accredited, so they may not be statutory but they have to be done in a timely manner but I get that is not the case everywhere, so apologies.

    My main issue with some posters claiming that WFH doesn't work at all, it might not, your example is one, but those saying resolutely it doesn't work in any scenario are being wilfully misleading or ignorant.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,353 ✭✭✭witchgirl26


    Thanks for that. And sorry for being snippy - I find a lot of people think they know how my job operates because they know external audit which is vastly different.

    We have an overall deadline, some internal ones & a couple of hard ones due to regulations but those are always done well in advance. We work around the business busy times to try to make sure we get the best co-operation. It's usually fine but was startling to see the increase in time when we were all WFH.

    Oh I agree with that part completely - WFH definitely works best for some, some need to be in the office and most could probably do a hybrid. I don't like this all or nothing approach that some places are taking as that doesn't make sense for anyone really. Where I am, we can do 2 days a week WFH, there's a core day everyone is to be in the office (where they can with travel to other businesses etc) but ultimately the schedule is down to you & your team. I think that's a good way & I know senior management are very happy with how it's working.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 14,375 ✭✭✭✭Flinty997


    It's not a WFH problem. It's just compounded by WFH.

    The problem is people are happy to ignore the request until you get in their face. If you have to get in peoples faces (or go nuclear in your terminology) there's a bigger issue. Because you shouldn't need to drive 25 mins to someone's location to get a response. That's a bit mad.

    You'd need to go above their head to create a pain point they can't ignore.

    Familar with Audits internal and external and technical. In my experience dragging their heels on them is common. To ignore them not so much. Any audits I've seen usually have a tight deadline and senior leadership apply a lot of pressure to make sure they are done. We certainly don't have someone driving around the country chasing people.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 559 ✭✭✭SodiumCooled


    Aside from meeting in small group of 1 or 2 people (usually specific ad hoc stuff) its pretty much impossible to get the wider team into a room any more than a few times per year. We have people in sites abroad, some fully remote, hybrid (myself included) and fully on-site. We also try to limit meetings on certain days (generally the days hybrid people are on site trying to get stuff done).

    As for giving attention, its not every meeting you would do it but for example I am involved in regular department level updates to higher management where different parts of the business report their updates, issues on ongoing projects/developments. There is some cross over but in general what most others report is nothing to do with anything I work on but we still need to be on the calls which generally go on for up to 2 hours - it would be an awful waste of my time not to be working away in the background.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,353 ✭✭✭witchgirl26


    If it's not a WFH problem then please explain how the only difference in our metrics was the working from home? Nothing else changed. Including the majority of the people we were dealing with.

    People do not need me to "get in their face" but sometimes a quick 10 minute meeting sorts out something than a back & forth on email does. And I don't drive 25 mins to get a response. I go out to a pre-arranged meeting to discuss through things & get some of the information in person which is easier than sending email requests. Also in the business I'm in, people are more comfortable in general with face to face than emails. I never mentioned people ignoring me at all.

    Also thank you for not knowing my job but telling me what I need to do. 🙄



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 14,375 ✭✭✭✭Flinty997


    With respect you described the process, and like I said audits are not an uncommon process.

    Also is not uncommon for some people needing to be put into a room to get them on task.

    Not everyone needs that.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,680 ✭✭✭channelsurfer2


    Yes agree.work happy and smart. I find that if it can be acommodated and both parties ate happy then we benefit by a positive working environment for all.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,487 ✭✭✭Rocket_GD


    Obviously don't know what sector you work in but any dealings we have with internal audit, 99.9% of the time are done over recorded zoom calls and email in order to maintain that audit trail.

    It would be very unusual for anyone in IA in our business to arrange in person meetings.



Advertisement