Advertisement
If you have a new account but are having problems posting or verifying your account, please email us on hello@boards.ie for help. Thanks :)
Hello all! Please ensure that you are posting a new thread or question in the appropriate forum. The Feedback forum is overwhelmed with questions that are having to be moved elsewhere. If you need help to verify your account contact hello@boards.ie

Clampdown on TV 'Dodgy Boxes'

18889919394105

Comments

  • Moderators, Business & Finance Moderators Posts: 17,972 Mod ✭✭✭✭Henry Ford III


    Do you work for Sky?

    Your whole attitude here is decidedly odd.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 16,336 ✭✭✭✭Fr Tod Umptious


    I've posted about this here before.

    The new rights deal for the EPL that will come into effect in 2025/2026 and run for 4 years has a number of subtle differences that are a response to the perceived* growth of illegal streaming.

    The EPL did away with the small package that Amazon won last time, this meant that it was harder for a newcomer to test the waters and thus more likely that the only ones really capable of bidding for the packages were Sky and TNT.

    Which is exactly what happened.

    So two providers instead of three, one less sub for the public to buy.

    Plus they made the duration of the deal longer, again more costly for the bidder upfront which meant harder for a newcomer to enter.

    They also increased the number of games shown from 200 to 270, and all games on a Sunday can be shown.

    So out of 380 games only 110 will not be broadcast, and with the 3pm rule still in place in the UK one would assume that a majority of not all of those110 will be 3pm games, and they will be the less attractive games.

    It's somewhat likely that all of the games of the big 6 or whatever they are called will be broadcast in the UK.

    The longer duration of the deal has meant more upfront money than ever before for the EPL rights, but it translates to less money per game.

    All of this helps the legitimate rights holders sell their products. They now can show more games than ever before.

    *I say perceived because it's still not clear how much of an effect illegal streaming is having on the legitimate rights holders.

    If the broadcasters were really worried they would have told the EPL that they were not willing to do a record deal and would have started with much lower offers and it would have dragged out much longer, with some packages going unsold initially.



  • Moderators, Business & Finance Moderators Posts: 17,972 Mod ✭✭✭✭Henry Ford III


    I liken IPTV to Athletics.

    There are some very clever doctors and forensic scientists working for World Athletics or equivalent thereof.

    There are also some equally clever and innovative people working in IPTV distribution.

    They remain a short distance ahead, and have been for decades.

    Whilst the demand is there for IPTV nothing will change.

    FACT are a bunch of retired cops doing a bit of handy consultancy to top up their pensions. They aren't a real threat to IPTV.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 6,482 ✭✭✭jj880


    Im still not seeing how the Sunday schedule is "the fightback" against IPTV and it seems you're not willing to expand on that.

    As for the panels you're answering questions with questions after assertions about the end of IPTV. How do we get from "its like the end of card sharing" to the end of IPTV. Flesh it out a bit.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 22,887 ✭✭✭✭dxhound2005


    There is one area in which the scientists seem to be ahead of the clever doctors, womens sprinting. The world records in the 100, 200, 400 and 800 metres all date back to the 1980's.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 101 ✭✭ekkinak


    When you're resetting the router and clearing the cache.

    What would be the exact correct order for all those steps?

    Do you clear the cache while the internet is down.

    I also plug in and out my android box for a fix

    Another thing I do the odd time is force stop the Tivimate app as well as clearing its cache

    But could someone outline what would be the exact order of all these actions, I'm just never sure if I'm doing it right.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 42,559 ✭✭✭✭Boggles


    The EPL did away with the small package that Amazon won last time, this meant that it was harder for a newcomer to test the waters and thus more likely that the only ones really capable of bidding for the packages were Sky and TNT.

    The package count is gone from 7 to 5. EPL invented the package to entice streamers into the market to start a bidding war and drive up the prices.

    The 2 extra packages didn't even meet reserve at auction, eventually Amazon were basically given one of them at a discount and BT took the other.

    Which is exactly what happened.

    So two providers instead of three, one less sub for the public to buy.

    Plus they made the duration of the deal longer, again more costly for the bidder upfront which meant harder for a newcomer to enter.

    That may have been the consequence but it wasn't the intended one.

    The EPL thought they would have 4 heavy hitters bidding on the rights, Amazon stated early on they had no intention on bidding on the rights with the prices quoted and pulled out.

    If the broadcasters were really worried they would have told the EPL that they were not willing to do a record deal and would have started with much lower offers and it would have dragged out much longer, with some packages going unsold initially.

    Sky don't have that luxury, if they lose the Premier League or a substantial portion of it they are as good as finished, or their pricing model is at least.

    The idea that the EPL were tailoring their rights to combat streaming is naïve.

    The EPL don't give a flying fúck about the viewing public, they would have gladly spread their packages across 4 broadcasters or more if they could.

    Ironically their greed back fired and with Sky getting the bulk of the games is better now for the end user. In theory. Of course that depends on how much Sky jack up their prices if they do at all.

    Also worth noting their is no 3pm kick offs in Ireland for those 4 years.

    It was never fully explained why Ireland is part of Britain when it comes to premier league rights anyway. Why we don't get the same overseas rights offers as the likes of Portugal or Lithuania or whoever is a mystery. It's like independence never happened.

    Will any of that have an effect on people sourcing their Football or sport elsewhere?

    I'm not so sure, having X amount of extra football matches sounds great on paper, but at the end of the day the big audiences are drawn to very select fixtures.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 9,678 ✭✭✭Macy0161


    The only people football was stolen from was the match going fan, both with price increases and ridiculous kick off times in relation to travel.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 16,336 ✭✭✭✭Fr Tod Umptious


    Im still not seeing how the Sunday schedule is "the fightback" against IPTV and it seems you're not willing to expand on that.

    I'm not trying to talk for another poster but do you seriously not understand how showing more games helps against illegal IPTV streaming?

    Or are you one of these who doesn't understand broadcast rights and thinks Sky etc could show every game but just don't.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 6,482 ✭✭✭jj880


    Thats not what I said. Calling it "the fightback" against IPTV is what I was querying. As if its in the balance or extra games on a Sunday is a silver bullet thats going to make a big difference. In my opinion its not going to make a big difference.

    In previous posts you're talking about it like its some official response from the EPL to illegal streaming. Debatable. The idea of it being more likely a response from EPL instead of just accommodating viewers is fanciful at best.

    Post edited by jj880 on


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 16,336 ✭✭✭✭Fr Tod Umptious


    In previous posts you're talking about it like its some official response from Sky to illegal streaming. Is it? Or are they just accommodating their customers? What are your sources for that?

    When you say "it" what do you mean, what is "it"?

    If "it" is the new TV deal then you are mistaken if you think it's a response from Sky.

    It's response from the EPL, they decide how many games can be shown and when.

    If you don't understand that then you don't understand broadcast rights.

    And I don't have a source for it other than my own opinion based on what I have read about the deal.

    Post edited by Fr Tod Umptious on


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 6,482 ✭✭✭jj880


    I edited my post. "It" is obviously providing more fixtures on a Sunday.

    Ok you understand broadcasting rights.

    So you do think it's more likely a response to illegal streaming as opposed to the EPL just accommodating viewers? Fair enough. I dont.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 10 hfenton


    I don't use them. I'm not sure they are legal



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 13,556 ✭✭✭✭dulpit


    People use IPTV (I find) for 2 key reasons:

    • Being able to see all games/sporting events regardless of whether local broadcasters are showing them
    • Cost

    I reckon the vast, vast majority of people get IPTV for the cost reason, not the first. So even if Sky showed every match it wouldn't be a big impact unless the cost gets more competitive.



  • Posts: 553 ✭✭✭ [Deleted User]


    Nope, 50 euro a year compared to 130 euro a month is a big difference. Its not going to make the slightest difference.
    You can get Sky now for 40 a month for a year for a new customer and still no one that uses IPTV signs up for it.

    If Sky kept the price at 40 euro a month for all customers going forward then IPTV would be dead in the water. Until they lower the price significantly IPTV will not be affected whatsoever.

    There is also plenty of free sites that you can watch premier league games on although not as good as quality as IPTV.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 16,336 ✭✭✭✭Fr Tod Umptious


    Only a fool is paying 130 a month for sports.

    With discount codes on Now TV you can get Sky sports and BT combined for as low as €20 a month.

    Legal services will never be able to compete with illegal services on price, the cost of the rights and the overhead cost of broadcasting the games make that impossible.

    Illegal services have become very easy to use since you can just text a friend of a friend of a friend and they can drop a firestick in your letter box pre configured and ready to go.

    But if that friend of a friend of a friend gets rumbled, or the services start blacking out during big events then people will obviously lose faith, and if there is an alternative legal service like Now TV, with more games than ever available, with discount codes they will become more attractive.



  • Posts: 553 ✭✭✭ [Deleted User]


    Makes sense, forgot about now TV.

    If I could get that for 20 or 30 quid a month id probably give up IPTv. Must take a look.

    Only thing I use it for is sports and torrent everything else.

    Edit: 27 a month ain't bad really for reliable service for all the sports channels. I'm sure after the 12 months could just use a virtual one time credit card number and new email address. Might give it a go for start of next premier league season when my IPTV is up.

    Have plenty of free links if missing any games.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 16,336 ✭✭✭✭Fr Tod Umptious


    The EPL thought they would have 4 heavy hitters bidding on the rights, Amazon stated early on they had no intention on bidding on the rights with the prices quoted and pulled out.

    The bidding war between Sky and TNT/BT ended a few years ago when BT got on the Sky billing platform.

    The EPL know the lie of the land when it comes to the broadcasters and illegal streaming, they are no fools.

    They engineered this auction to consolidate, as they knew the heat was going out of these auctions.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,647 ✭✭✭Rocket_GD


    I know this discussion has mainly been about live sport and removing the need for a SKY/TNT subscription but IPTV also allows you to basically have access to a Netflix/Prime Video/AppleTv & any standard tv subscription.

    Access to basically any tv show & films you want along with live sport for about €50 a year on average is a no brainer. Even if live sport stopped I'm sure the majority would still keep them for all other features, firesticks aren't going anywhere soon.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 13,556 ✭✭✭✭dulpit


    I disagree about the movies/etc. IPTV is great for live stuff, and yes they have a full catalogue of programs/movies that Netflix/Prime/etc can't compete with - but the quality and ease of use on a Netflix/etc is far and away better and I know a load of people who have IPTV services but also use Netflix or whatever. What I have noticed is more people using streamers for a period of time only though (e.g. sign up to Netflix for 1 month, watch what you want then cancel until the next thing you want is on).



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,574 ✭✭✭Nigzcurran


    I have IPTV a long time but couldn't be without my netflix. The likes of Dolby vision/atmos is superb

    Time is contagious, everybody's getting old.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 18,718 ✭✭✭✭rob316


    Download Stremio, im not saying anymore about how to access TV and movies, you can figure it out yourself. The UI is fantastic, a proper made app.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 8,515 ✭✭✭batistuta9


    some are better than others for vod & ones even sell a better service than included as an extra.

    you can do that yourself though if anyway capable configuring apps, stremio or kodi and you've blu ray rips higher quality than steamers all audio formats.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 13,556 ✭✭✭✭dulpit


    You might fire me a DM with details so I can make a decent comparison perhaps?



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 8,515 ✭✭✭batistuta9


    go on Reddit, guides there. you'll need a debrid service too



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 6,482 ✭✭✭jj880


    Sounds like some IPTV movie + box set sections are definitely better than others. Mine is excellent. Trending, new releases, split up by year, genre etc. continue watching support and of course in the same app as live TV so handy to flick between. I have 4k netflix and prime video which I dont mind paying for but like feck Im paying for disney+, hbo max, paramount+, peacock, hulu, sky for their box sets etc. etc. The attraction is Im covered no matter what for pennies compared to all these subs. With a good IPTV package you never miss out. Watching Lockerbie: A Search For Truth at the moment. Excellent show.

    Edit: I have free apps setup but I prefer the IPTV UI. Since Im primarily paying for the live TV offering why not use the movies box sets section also when its there.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 18,718 ✭✭✭✭rob316


    I find the free sources decent but to get the best out of it 4k,Dolby etc you need a debrid. And as I mentioned previously most of the Debrid services have blocked access now after getting an anti piracy notice.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 18,718 ✭✭✭✭rob316


    Prime is pretty terrible, poor catalogue, buggy UI only for it comes with the delivery subscription, not a hope id pay for it.

    Netflix has the best UI by far, but only for the kids watching it, I'd get rid. Trying to tell them go on to stremio and wait for a torrent to load up doesnt wash!



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 8,515 ✭✭✭batistuta9


    rd still works fine. i don't bother with free, no point, rd is cheap it's really for nothing



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 8,966 ✭✭✭corks finest


    personally I unplug everything

    Take cable from the nvidia shield aswell

    I’ve rarely issues



Advertisement