Advertisement
If you have a new account but are having problems posting or verifying your account, please email us on hello@boards.ie for help. Thanks :)
Hello all! Please ensure that you are posting a new thread or question in the appropriate forum. The Feedback forum is overwhelmed with questions that are having to be moved elsewhere. If you need help to verify your account contact hello@boards.ie

Forming the next Irish Government - policies and personalities

11415171920103

Comments

  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 16,341 ✭✭✭✭markodaly


    @FrancieBrady seems to be terribly upset lately. Has it just dawned on him that SF lost yet another election?



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 74,045 ✭✭✭✭FrancieBrady




  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 11,626 ✭✭✭✭Cluedo Monopoly


    Oh yawn. You completely missed the point of the disucssion. Blanch was floundering. I know all about building regs, passive houses, BERs and construction costs.

    The government know what the current building regs are and they will keep improving. They also know how much construction costs have risen to in order to meet those regs. At the same time FFG have promised 60k a houses a year for 5 years. They have to take every factor into consideration in their election promises and programme for govt. We expect 60k houses per year now. No excuses. Blanch was trying to give them an out by saying we only need 32k houses a year which was utter nonsense. Then he waffled about historic building regs whataboutery. We are talking about new new houses. Not retrofits. Are you on backlog clearance?

    60k houses a year. No excuses.

    What are they doing in the Hyacinth House?



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 16,341 ✭✭✭✭markodaly


     We expect 60k houses per year now. No excuses.

    You come across like a character from Willy Wonka with that language.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 11,626 ✭✭✭✭Cluedo Monopoly


    What are they doing in the Hyacinth House?



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,064 ✭✭✭pureza


    what a load of anti democratic tosh!

    Everybody voting for FF and FG knew the options for government and voted accordingly

    A majority voted basically to keep SF out

    Reflect on that maybe



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,884 ✭✭✭Caquas


    I think the concept of confidential negotiations has eluded you. Here's how your scenario would likely go.

    FF/FG Negotiators: Can we have a briefing on investment in transport?

    Civil Servant: What sort of briefing do you want?

    FF/FG Negotiators: Of course, our specific objectives in these negotiations are highly confidential. We haven't even told out own TDs yet. But strictly for your own information we want to know the effects of moving from 2:1 investment in public transport versus roads to 1:1.

    Civil Servant: Ok, we can prepare something but I will need to ask the higher-ups for permission to give that briefing.

    FF/FG Negotiators: Sure, just don't mention what we have just said.

    [goes to Sec Gen]

    Civil Servant: FF/FG negotiatiors want a briefing on investment in transport. They told me in strictest confidence that they want specific reference to the 2:1 split. Can I give them that?

    Sec Gen: OK but be careful - this is nothing like a normal briefing situation. Give them an advance copy of the briefing we are preparing for our incoming Minister. Just make sure any references to Green Party policies are already deleted. I'll talk to Minister Ryan

    Sec Gen to Minister: FF/FG negotiators want a briefing on investment in transport . Can we give them an advance copy of the brief for your successor?

    Minister: OK but copy me with the briefing note you are giving them.

    Sec. Gen: Sure. (Sends the Minister a massive brief full of stuff the Minister knows and including, on page 215-6, a carefully worded bit about 2:1 - which is the only part the civil servant discusses with the negotiators)

    Of course, your alternative scenario might also have happened but that would end like this:

    Minister in his Irish Times Opinion piece: I believe FF/FG negotiators are watering down commitments to public transport and have lost sight of our climate objectives.

    FF/FG Negotiators: Those backstabbing f***king c**ts. We'll sort those officials out later!

    Awful if our civil servants were as obtuse as you seem to be about confidential negotiations. Even worse if the next Climate Minister thought the senior officials were disloyal and had their own agenda.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 74,045 ✭✭✭✭FrancieBrady


    Again, reflect on why you need to point over there when the issue is FF and FG consorting with somebody who committed profound and breathtaking corruption and is a convicted tax evader.
    Good criminals v bad criminals is not going to cut it.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,064 ✭✭✭pureza


    But I pointed at you for ignoring the will of your fellow countrymen

    Of course you knew that



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 7,088 ✭✭✭Clo-Clo


    You are firing out the same waffle you have for years now, its just funny now

    The people spoke, get over it.

    You seem to struggling with how an election works and we had similar for the last 4 years



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 74,045 ✭✭✭✭FrancieBrady


    The people asked FF & FG to consort with Lowry?

    Where was that?



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 7,088 ✭✭✭Clo-Clo


    You don't seem to understand how an election works



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 74,045 ✭✭✭✭FrancieBrady


    Thread is not about me Pure. You aren’t a barrister conducting a cross examination.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 573 ✭✭✭Jim Herring


    Not to mention more than 116,000 fewer first preference votes for SF this time around.

    Think about that for a minute. Let it sink in.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,064 ✭✭✭pureza


    it is quite legitimate to point at a poster in a government formation thread ignoring the majority will of the people that they didn’t want SF in government

    I suggest you suck it up (finally)



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 74,045 ✭✭✭✭FrancieBrady


    Did a majority vote for FF & FG consorting with Lowry?

    You are terrified of FF or FG being criticised or shown to be hypocrites in pursuit of power. Why is that?



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 13,702 ✭✭✭✭dulpit


    We have representative democracy. We vote for candidates with the assumption they will do what they see fit as politicians. If we disagree with their choices we can vote them out in the next election.

    So in effect we don't ever vote for a specific make up of a government. We vote for people and trust them to sort it out.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,064 ✭✭✭pureza


    Lowry has been asked by 5 or 6 elected independents to head their negotiating team

    That’s because he has experience doing deals with governments

    A government cannot stop him voting for Micheál for Taoiseach as much as they can’t stop Mary Lou voting for him

    That’s a contempt for democracy on display by you repeatedly

    You might want to go into hibernation for a few more years if you’re genuinely disgusted

    Just leave emails to on so you’ll spot a thread alerting you to when democracy aligns a bit more with your thoughts or those of your party



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 74,045 ✭✭✭✭FrancieBrady


    Yeh, no problem with any of that.

    Wouldn’t it be great to see the defenders of the faith telling us if this dalliance will weaken their faith instead of pathetically trying to deflect?



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 17,928 ✭✭✭✭Loafing Oaf


    New opinion poll (remember them?)

    Not much change except independents down bigly



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,884 ✭✭✭Caquas


    Will Ff/FG take this as a signal to drop the Regional Independents?

    They only need one extra vote to elect MM Taoiseach. After that, the Independents will split and a handful will be enough for a stable majority.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,064 ✭✭✭pureza


    But you clearly do,post after post after post have a problem with people eyes wide open voting en masse for Dáil Êireann to have a big majority not wanting SF in government

    Giving out about who they voted for,criticising who amongst them is talking to whom,suggesting some should be left out despite being democratically elected

    All that without pretending even a hint of irony when suggesting your own party is left out

    That poll speaks volumes about the backwards traction in the type of opinion you’re expressing (from a very low base)

    The sane position would be to reflect on why



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,358 ✭✭✭Bishop of hope


    The one factor not mentioned in your link is that the public don't want Lowry involved in govt formation talks.

    https://m.independent.ie/irish-news/politics/poll-public-dont-want-fffg-coalition-talks-with-michael-lowry/a350490708.html



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 74,045 ✭✭✭✭FrancieBrady


    You think the election has given you immunity from criticism.

    Ain't gonna happen.





  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,064 ✭✭✭pureza


    Ranting would be a better word to describe dressing up obsessive compulsive complaining about voters choices



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 74,045 ✭✭✭✭FrancieBrady


    I fully accept what voters have chosen.
    What you show is that you only respect voters that vote how you want. You can't take criticism. Criticism is 'ranting' and 'un- democratic' according to you Pureza. I would say that is an embarrassing.

    I made a comment about something that is causing concern across the electorate, what happened? A pile-on by the usual few (you can count the accounts in and count them out) trying to deflect to a party that have sweet FA to do with this particular dalliance.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,064 ✭✭✭pureza


    you’re showing no respect for voters at all

    It’s your way or no way,poll topper Lowry is just the latest tool you are using to rant

    Of course double standards are ok when it’s you using them



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 74,045 ✭✭✭✭FrancieBrady


    My post wasn't a 'rant', this is just your handy invention.

    The dalliance with Lowry is raising comment across the political spectrum…I reflected that in a reasonable way, enter stage left the usual cast, deflecting and trying to flame and derail.

    If you have no comment on Lowry being rehabilitated and enabled then we are done here. The size of your parties vote in the election doesn't come into it at all. You didn't achieve the right to silence people.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,064 ✭✭✭pureza


    I’m of course not silencing you and you know that

    I’m just answering your nonsense and you don’t like that

    Public forum means opinions are challenged,this isn’t a place to soap box

    The independent group have asked Lowry to negotiate for them,as is their right

    The other negotiating parties have not displayed a willingness (unless you can show otherwise) to invite Lowry into a government

    Ergo all he is doing now is what he is mandated to do

    Ditto the other parties

    None of them have a mandate to negotiate with your party

    That’s your problem not mine

    I couldn’t care less either way as long as a stable centre government is formed

    Waste of time saying this in reply to the above continuous ranting of course as years of similarly veined posts have proved



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 74,045 ✭✭✭✭FrancieBrady


    None of them have a mandate to negotiate with your party

    Utter nonsense tbh.

    There are no specific mandates given on who you negotiate with in an election. You are clutching at straws here and inferring things that you have no right and only an opinion to stand on.

    *Your inability to focus on the points being made and making the thread about your quasi cross examination of me is an attempt to silence.

    Deal with the points made and forget your obsessions.

    Now that is all I am saying on this. As usual, because of the usual crew the thread is getting sidetracked.



Advertisement