Advertisement
If you have a new account but are having problems posting or verifying your account, please email us on hello@boards.ie for help. Thanks :)
Hello all! Please ensure that you are posting a new thread or question in the appropriate forum. The Feedback forum is overwhelmed with questions that are having to be moved elsewhere. If you need help to verify your account contact hello@boards.ie
Help Keep Boards Alive. Support us by going ad free today. See here: https://subscriptions.boards.ie/.
If we do not hit our goal we will be forced to close the site.

Current status: https://keepboardsalive.com/

Annual subs are best for most impact. If you are still undecided on going Ad Free - you can also donate using the Paypal Donate option. All contribution helps. Thank you.

Russia-Ukraine War (continuing)

1189190192194195569

Comments

  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 6,212 ✭✭✭yagan


    Have you got a link for TSCM share of the industry increasing? (btw TSMC stands for something else)

    A quick google shows that their US operations are 50% more expensive to operate even with the federal tax breaks.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 5,120 ✭✭✭RoyalCelt


    It should be noted that yesterdays attack was about the size of a Russian attack we see daily in multiple areas of the front. And like the Russian convoy assaults all vehicles pretty much got destroyed, many infantry were killed or captured. Russia mainly used drones for this similar to how Ukraine defends.

    It's become clear that the advancement of drones have made it extremely difficult for either side to advance without huge losses especially now with fibre optic drones.

    So yesterday the Ukrainian attack was destroyed in Kursk, the Russian attack in Kursk was destroyed, the Russian attack in terny and kupiansk destroyed. Absolutely brutal time to be an assault soldier.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 8,369 ✭✭✭Guffy


    Whats the source for this. Not questioning you, just have been unable to find anything on the Ukrainian attack



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 6,212 ✭✭✭yagan


    I have seen nothing that backs up your claim about the Ukrainian advance being destroyed. Are you going Bricksterish on us?



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,411 ✭✭✭j62


    Ah you talking about the Chinese clone, heh thought it was a typo



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 21,131 ✭✭✭✭cnocbui


    B52 Glass Cockpit.jpg

    B52 cockpit upgrade from analogue to glass.

    It famously has atrociously inefficient and smokey engines, They are about to replace them with far better ones developed by Rolls Royce.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 6,212 ✭✭✭yagan




  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 9,170 ✭✭✭jmreire


    Not forgetting that the military budget figure issued by Putin, and the actual amount of cash that survived the corruption to be spent, are two different figures….



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 880 ✭✭✭junkyarddog




  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 5,120 ✭✭✭RoyalCelt


    Maybe because you don't follow any sources that show Russian drone strikes on the attacking convoys. The Ukrainian channel's I followed shared the drone images of their convoys advancing but left out the rest of the clip where the drone flew in and hit their armour. Or the follow up strikes to finish them off. There was a challenger tank and at least 1 Leo hit amongst other ATV's.

    Like I said the result was basically how it is for the daily Russian attacks. If Ukraine want to advance here they'd need constant attacks but they prefer probing attacks rather then endless brute force meat waves the Russians opt for.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 5,120 ✭✭✭RoyalCelt


    Russian telegrams. I don't follow any of them on twitter otherwise I'd link. Colonel Cassad on telegram has a lot of the footage. He's an absolute **** from Crimea but I started following him recently to see the tears regarding the fall of his buddy Assad. I don't like seeing Ukrainian losses so it's only a matter of time until I'll unfollow him again.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 199 ✭✭Mannesmann


    The new engines are not as powerful as they could have been made, as too much of the airframe/etcwould need changes to cope with extra power.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 7,334 ✭✭✭CelticRambler


    A huge amount of the "Ukrainian convoy destroyed" footage distributed by the Russian accounts yesterday was recycled from Vuhledar two years ago. There's one (read that again: one, 1) Ukrainian vehicle visually confirmed to have been immobilised, and then only after numerous hits. The Russian footage of that was heavily edited to show one hit and the vehicle coming to a stop; in fact it drove about 1km after the first hit and "most" of the crew survived. I haven't seen anything that gives a more precise explanation of what "most" means.

    In any case, there's feck all real evidence that the Russians were able to stop the Ukrainian assault, and they have lost ground … aswell has having their own assault obliterated.



  • Moderators, Society & Culture Moderators Posts: 17,127 Mod ✭✭✭✭Manic Moran


    If it's related to the Ship of Theseus or My Grandfather's Axe, yes.

    The bottom lines are (1) the airframe is old. Regardless what what upgrades are done to it, they have hours on them and they are not designed with the latest in radar cross section or aerodynamic efficiency.

    (2) Unlike the B-52, the Bear isn't really intended to go bouncing around/in enemy airspace. Further, maritime surveillance is a relatively simple task which prioritises some characteristics and others are less interesting. The ones which are prioritized (Ruggedness, endurance, low-level performance, payload), Bear is pretty good at.

    (3) It's not as if the Tu-95/142 of today is the same variant which came off the production line in the 1960s either. The strike fleet is in the midst of the MSM modification, which also has new engines, radar, electronic warfare, etc, coming on the heels of the smaller MS upgrade from six years ago.

    I stand by the analogy. Of all the things you can mock Russia for using these days which was found in the Cold War order of battle, the Bear isn't one of them.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 6,212 ✭✭✭yagan


    Just because the couple of posters who persistently spammed this thread with bullet points directly from Orwell road are quiet at the moment doesn't mean anyone needs to take on the "just asking questions" role.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 5,120 ✭✭✭RoyalCelt


    If I could I'd say something to you now that'd get me banned. Let's just say I don't like the cut of your jib. What fairytale do you live in that a reasonably small Ukrainian attack on one of the hottest points of the frontline went well for the attackers? They suffered losses.

    I provided balance through the fact Russia had multiple similar sized attacks in the last 48 and for them it went equally bad. The reality is it's an absolute nightmare to attack at the moment for both sides. If you don't want Ukraine taking these sort of losses again you better hope they never go on the attack again.

    @CelticRambler I didn't watch any recycled footage from Vuhledar who's terrain a few months ago looked nothing like Kursk now. I'm not stupid. Like I said Ukrainian channel's literally used the Russian drone footage minus the strikes.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 5,120 ✭✭✭RoyalCelt


    I'd be lying if I didn't laugh watching this. Surely North Koreans given it's Kursk.

    I see reports that the Russians made advances in Toretsk and the city is expected to fall soon.

    I've been hoping this city would hold out so I hope it's not true.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 6,212 ✭✭✭yagan


    Where did I say Ukraine didn't suffer losses?

    You still haven't provided a credible source for your earlier assertion that this latest Ukrainian advance was wiped out.

    If you're just going to batt for Putin you might also throw in some "concern" while you're at it.

    I'm putting you on my ignore list.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 5,120 ✭✭✭RoyalCelt


    I'm a credible poster here and don't get called out when I make a pro Ukraine post without a reliable source. I don't follow and have blocked many pro Russian twitter channels. I don't link to telegram if you want me to link to some of the most horrible russian bastards on telegram just to keep you happy I will.

    Btw do you have the telegram app because there's no point linking if you can't even see it.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 21,131 ✭✭✭✭cnocbui


    There are no reliable reports about the Kursk offensive coming from the Ukrainian side, so any chatter reported is coming from Russian sources, aka the FSB.

    "In fact, there is not much information from the Kursk region. And all unofficial information, released by the DeepState intelligence group, is postponed by at least two or three days. I think that (within) up to a week we will see and hear interesting news from there," Narozhny said.

    In turn, Andrii Kramarov, a reserve officer of the Ukrainian Army, tells NV that Ukrainian tactical aviation is already very active there, that is, air strikes are being carried out.

    It seems that the timing chosen by the Ukrainians for the new counteroffensive was not accidental. Andrii Kramarov says that the Russians were in the process of rotating troops in Kursk: "The first information that appeared was that it was precisely in the Kursk region that a Russian column was destroyed near the front line. That is, the Russian column was supposed to ensure and carry out the rotation in the front area. He was given an accentuated blow of very good quality".

    However, the Ukrainian military confirms that we should not expect any significant territorial advance, the goal being to grind the logistics of the Russian army and strengthen the Ukrainian presence in the region.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 5,120 ✭✭✭RoyalCelt


    If they can take the village of Berdyn and the other one beside it that would be gains enough considering the modest size of this attack. Obviously they took losses especially the initial wave but if the follow ups can take them it's a few KM in gains. And we know how much Russia losses to take back a few km.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 5,120 ✭✭✭RoyalCelt


    I'm listening to a twitter space about how easily Ukraine could have still accessed and used their nukes despite no launch codes. Giving those up has turned out to be a mistake.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 590 ✭✭✭vswr


    I'm not claiming Russian numbers…. I'm using American estimates (FAS, Armscontrol, ICAN, et al)

    All give an arsenal size of circa 5,000+ warheads….

    How many are viable is another question, and completely agree most are probably beyond repair.

    However, using the New Start treaty numbers (the agreement where the US allow the Russians and visa versa to count and inspect deployed warheads)… Russia's deployed, viable warheads and delivery systems amount to circa 1500.

    ***This number includes MIRV's, so could be one missile, multiple warheads

    Granted, last inspections were 2017(?) and if I remember correctly from one of the START docs, that they are on a 10 year cycle (deployed, deep maintenance or recycle for new bombs), there's high potential of plenty of healthy viable weapons still in Russia.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 610 ✭✭✭StoutPost


    Met a Polish man yesterday, he was looking for permission to stalk deer on my land. We got chatting about a local historical British/Irish incident. I said his nation suffered too with nazi's & soviets, he was visibly moved when I said WW2 didn't end until 1991. We both share similar opinions on russians and the war in Ukraine. It was a refreshing and welcome exchange. He told me about his grandfather, who served in the Ukrainian military in the early 20th century. My grandfather told me "I will forgive you anything, except if you visit russia". It restored my faith in humanity through all the bullshit.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,411 ✭✭✭j62


    408 Russians recorded dead on drone footage on the 6th alone

    That’s a new record I think

    up to now it’s been between 100-200 per day

    We are getting to a point where friends of Russia can’t dismiss the insane death counts as they are literally being caught on camera



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 13,840 ✭✭✭✭TheValeyard


    Looks like I picked the wrong week to quit sniffing glue



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2, Paid Member Posts: 895 ✭✭✭Avatar in the Post


    The Ukrainians will be getting so much experience THEY will be training NATO on F16s!



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2, Paid Member Posts: 895 ✭✭✭Avatar in the Post


    It would be good if some brave Vatnik explained the concept of “sunk cost fallacy” to Putler. Would perform a great service to their country.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,411 ✭✭✭j62


    I can try


    It’s like two to four Moskvas (crew of 485) sinking every day

    A Moskva worth of orcs caught on camera on the 6th alone going to a better place

    Heh perhaps a Moskva can be a unit of measurement now



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 880 ✭✭✭junkyarddog


    Another little jaunt for a friend of russia!!



Advertisement