Advertisement
Help Keep Boards Alive. Support us by going ad free today. See here: https://subscriptions.boards.ie/.
https://www.boards.ie/group/1878-subscribers-forum

Private Group for paid up members of Boards.ie. Join the club.
Hi all, please see this major site announcement: https://www.boards.ie/discussion/2058427594/boards-ie-2026

Manchester United Thread 25/26 - Teamtalk/Transfers/Gossip Mod Note in OP 26.09.24

13963973994014021313

Comments

  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 56,089 ✭✭✭✭Headshot


    Amorim comes across so well in these interviews



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 13,184 ✭✭✭✭Sand


    They tied themselves quite publicly to Ashworth too. I have zero confidence in them standing by Amorim if this run of form doesn't pick up.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 13,961 ✭✭✭✭Zeek12


    Agree. I would have kept him on.

    Even the choice of substitute that day was a bit odd. He brings on Garnacho to replace Ugarte?



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,514 ✭✭✭BenK


    Yeah just can't get on board with Southgate under any circumstances. There's absolutely nothing to recommend him imo.

    To be fair to Amorim, even in his post match interview, he didn't look too down. It feels to me like he knows what he wants to do and how to do it. I admire his determination to stick to what he thinks is for the best long term. He's principled at least.

    It might blow up in his face but at the very least it seems he's not going to bend to these players, they'll have to bend to him.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 13,184 ✭✭✭✭Sand


    No, likely the reverse. Presuming the club has to borrow to build it (cant see the Glazers contributing anything to it) it would be another debt that needs to be serviced and paid before transfers.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 56,089 ✭✭✭✭Headshot


    No I think investment in a stadium gives a positive to the FFP



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 5,924 ✭✭✭Whatsisname


    This is how I feel on it too. I don’t think Ratcliffe has much patience and will make a decision whether it’s right or wrong. He’s sacked a fair few already at Nice since buying them in 2019.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 48,941 ✭✭✭✭Mitch Connor


    With ineos now being the part owners there is likely far better financing options available. Also, I believe some clubs have got loans that didn't require repayment til the stadium was opened, so there's maybe a possibility there.

    From a PSR point of view stadium costs can be mostly written off.

    Cash flow would still be an issue - need to up revenues imo. Need to get some new sponsors on board.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2, Paid Member Posts: 14,751 ✭✭✭✭JRant


    No, because the PSR calculation is over a 3 year period so we need to bank the money for Europe or the losses get us as we've somehow managed to accrue a collosal amount of loses over the past few years.

    "Well, yeah, you know, that's just, like, your opinion, man"



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 13,184 ✭✭✭✭Sand


    Not a positive, but financial costs linked to building infrastructure dont count as a negative under FFP rules. So they can be discounted for FFP, but the club still needs to find the money to actually service/repay the debt regardless of FFP. All other things being equal that is less money available for transfers.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2, Paid Member Posts: 14,751 ✭✭✭✭JRant


    Whenever we have Ugarte playing we are a better team and harder to play through. Unfortunately he was suspended today.

    Amad is a solid RWB option but the problem is we lack creative players in the 2 positions behind the striker. Mount is perfect for it but is made of sugar glass. Bruno doesn't have the discipline. Garnacho looks lost and probably needs a loan spell. Rashford wants out.

    We don't actually need that many players to make it work but we need a LWB and CM option.

    "Well, yeah, you know, that's just, like, your opinion, man"



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 10,686 ✭✭✭✭FourFourRED


    I don’t think Ashworth actually suggested him tbf. It was the likes of Howe & Frank.

    It would be Brailsford who I fear in terms of suggesting him.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 48,941 ✭✭✭✭Mitch Connor


    If the result is less money then why do it? If you're waiting 20 years to start seeing the benefit?

    1. I'd assume much higher match day revenue
    2. Stadium naming rights, would add to that as well.

    So we don't know the terms, or the results as if yet.

    Could be the sponsorship, plus increased stadium revenues minus repayments is greater than the current match day revenues.

    Plus you'd have psr as a more limiting factor in spending - so stadium financing gets reduced in psr write offs but the revenues generated being higher would give the greater benefit.

    If we return to making Europe we'd be limited to 70% (is it going to 60%?) of revenues.

    So is 70% of the higher revenues better than the current situation even with repayments?



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2, Paid Member Posts: 14,751 ✭✭✭✭JRant


    Looking back at some of the images of Zirkzee after he came off and you could tell he was hurting. Got to feel for the lad, thrown into a disfunctional team and then gets cheered coming off after 32 minutes.

    "Well, yeah, you know, that's just, like, your opinion, man"



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 48,941 ✭✭✭✭Mitch Connor


    The reports say it was ashworth. If yiu believe Southgate was pushed at all then ashworth was the source, and even then he was only really discussed in the summer.

    Frank was the guy ashworth preferred, apparently.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 10,686 ✭✭✭✭FourFourRED


    Depends on who the reports are from. The Atheltic didn’t mention GS from my memory. I’m not sure if anyone reliable actually said that Ashworth wanted him to replace EtH.

    I don’t believe he was pushed. I think if they go crazy and fire Amorim, Brailsford and Jim could do it.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 48,941 ✭✭✭✭Mitch Connor


    Not when he got sacked no.

    I don't think Southgate was a credible name at any point, but ashworth was apparently the guy who mentioned him (but didn't push him)

    Berrada abd wilcox decided on amorim and pushed him.

    Unless ineos sack them, I don't see Jim or Brailsford deciding on the manager.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 8,283 ✭✭✭kingshankly


    shocking from the Utd fans tbh and Utd fans would generally show more class than most in fairness



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2, Paid Member Posts: 20,327 ✭✭✭✭y0ssar1an22


    no. any funds spent on a new stadium would not be factored into FFP.

    the returns would come down the line selling naming rights and having an extra ~20000 buying tickets.

    maybe they could pre-sell naming rights is the only way i can think of them increasing revenue in the short term.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2, Paid Member Posts: 14,751 ✭✭✭✭JRant


    I thought it might have been Newcastle fans when I first heard it.

    "Well, yeah, you know, that's just, like, your opinion, man"



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2, Paid Member Posts: 8,375 ✭✭✭El Gato De Negocios


    Same as tbh but when it comes to us, the most negative narrative is the one that will be pushed.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,813 ✭✭✭DataDude


    A lot to be impressed about from that Amorim interview. More charisma in 2 sentences than 2 years under the last fella.

    Think he might actually finally be the right man, but (sadly) probably at the wrong time. ETH really did a hatchet job on this club. Sad to see.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,669 ✭✭✭kyote00


    Sir Jim was a vocal Brexit supporter so he must be dumb as rocks.

    2025 predictions:

    -Will be stuffed by Liverpool by record score.

    -Amorim will quit

    -Southgate will take over to keep us in premier league



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 5,269 ✭✭✭paulbok




  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 38,815 ✭✭✭✭BorneTobyWilde


    Portuguese league is a lot like Scottish League, literally impossible to fail as a manager if you're at one of the top 3 clubs.

    Same as Gerrard at Rangers, or Rodgers at Celtic, Amorim is like this , and just like Gerrard and Rodgers, he's learning that the PL is a very different ball game. He went from an impossible to fail scenario, to an impossible to win scenario in PL, if your team is not functioning at 100% in all areas of the pitch.

    Roy Hodgson could move to Benfica in ten years and win a league title, it's impossible not to.

    Right now Amorim is looking like Gerrard, out of his depth .



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 13,961 ✭✭✭✭Zeek12


    Without that Lwb and Cm it just doesn’t make sense to persist with this formation. Most likely he’d have to wait until at least next Summer for those signings. That’s assuming such players would want to join this mess.

    No point relying on Mount to stay fit either, so he’s still short at no. 10….and Amad at Rwb doesn’t happen.

    Go to 4-2-3-1 seems the most plausible short term plan. He can’t keep this losing streak up much longer



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 13,184 ✭✭✭✭Sand


    Sure, in the long run a new stadium with greater capacity and presumably more revenue from shops etc will pay off. No disagreement there. But that's the long run. You can't get increased revenues until its built. There will be 2-3 year gap to fund before revenues improve. Building could actually hurt match day revenue in the short term.

    Look at Arsenal and the Emirates. Just building the stadium (after planning and all that) took well over two years and while the revenues have paid out in the long run, in the years after building it the debt involved came first before transfers. Wenger himself said it [2006 to 2014] was the worst period of his professional life as manager.

    “We had restricted finances, we had to pay back a huge amount of money and we had to sell our best players.

    “We had to stay in the top, to stay in the Champions League and at least to make 54,000 people [attend]. There are many debates when you start building a stadium, how big can it be? It’s quite simple.

    “At the time it was £4,000 a seat. You multiply that by 60,000 it’s £240million. Plus we had to buy the soil, all the businesses we had to buy out. It went to over £420m.

    “We had to pay a huge amount of money back every year. That’s why we had to stay in the Champions League.”

    United is financially bigger than Arsenal, but the stadium cost they had was a fifth of what's being quoted to United now. The next few years, a new stadium is going to be a constraint on the club trying to spend big money on players at the same time. Sure INEOS might have a trick or two up their sleeves, but it's still servicing a loan of 2 billion before you spend on player wages and transfers.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 10,686 ✭✭✭✭FourFourRED


    The new stadium will be another way to ride the fans. I have zero interest in it. I get the long term financial benefits etc…

    I’m more interested in financial benefits like getting Casemiro & Rashford off the wage bill.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 7,782 ✭✭✭Iseedeadpixels


    Sporting have been a shambles since he left, they sacked his replacement already.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 38,815 ✭✭✭✭BorneTobyWilde


    He was a stop gap, and he still has them top of the league. Which proves the point, impossible not to be top



Advertisement