Cold Case Review of Sophie Tuscan du Plantier murder to proceed. **Threadbans lifted - see OP**

Physical evidence is not necessary for suspicion.

I haven't accused Bailey at any point.

Maybe learn to differentitate the two.

I gave solid reasons for why Bailey is a very good suspect in this crime. Thats why I entered the thread, knowing that he fits a certain profile consistent with the crime, I gave reasons for why he makes a good suspect.

People are always going to suspect him, and he'll remain the chief suspect by far, with very good reason.

If you have a problem with that then maybe offer up a better suspect, contribute a better theory, or a better something, enlighten the public. I dont think you can. I think you have nothing new of any value to add, or anything in any way convincing to offer.

what dna?

If you are not aware there was unknown male DNA found on Sophie's person, which is confirmed as not being from Bailey, or any members of her family.

Of course I can accept a lack of evidence against Bailey.

Maybe you can remember that I have at no point accused him of a crime.

I came here to point out an indisputable consistency between the crime and Baileys psychology.

Its not a speculation. Its a verifiable truth.

Your position is illogical because you can't accept that.

Or you confuse it with an accusation.

Look carefully now. And dont add to this or take away from it.

Bailey was a malignant narcissist, a thankfully rare condition, and the crime which happened in his community is in line with his disorder.

Thats all.

Thats it. You cannot debate it. You cannot deny it. You cannot trick or game your way around it.

You will live with this fact (and it is a fact) now.

I thought you may be suggesting a type of dna.

i.e. semen.

In the case of a sexual homicide by criminals with certain psychological disorders they can still fulfil the sexual motive without orgasm.

(i believe baileys condition is one such disorder).

May he rest in peace, and a tragedy that he never got to see justice for Sophie in his lifetime.

No. Its not gossip. Court professionals established as much. And it formed part of his conviction in the French courts.

"Ian Bailey was a man with “narcissistic and megalomaniac traits” and a “sexual inclination” who most likely killed Sophie Tuscan Du Plantier"

• Renowned criminal psychologist Dr Florent Gatherias ahead of Bailey’s 2019 French trial. Which was a guilty verdict btw.

or "pub talk and gossip" according to internet user Rooks.

Ok. Well my point still stands, A male who leaves DNA on a murder victim is almost always the perpetrator of the crime.

seriously what?

All these antics just because I came into a thread and offered an insight into the match between Baileys psychology and the nature of the crime.

If you were as logical as you let on you could see it too and simply accept it.

Rather than dismissing the conclusions of a published doctor as 'pub talk'.

if you go back through the thread you can read about the fact that the manner of Sophie’s death was fairly typical (>50% of female homicides are overkill) and almost 90% from a close acquaintance or family member.
Your statement about Baileys personality is reasonable but statistically less relevant than you make it out to be, especially in the context that there was other DNA found on her person, which you continually ignore and paint as a straw man, in a cold case murder investigation thread. no less.

Stop trying to diminish and dismiss.
It warrants detailed investigation and ruling in or out. It is exceedingly obvious that unknown DNA on a dead body, clothes or skin, or hair or anywhere on a victims person, would be Bombshell evidence in almost any cold case.
Until such time that it is explained, or more conclusive evidence is found, the person who left the unknown DNA evidence is the chief suspect.

How would you know what they think?

"Ian Bailey was a man with “narcissistic and megalomaniac traits” and a “sexual inclination” who most likely killed Sophie Tuscan Du Plantier"

• Renowned criminal psychologist Dr Florent Gatherias ahead of Bailey’s 2019 French trial. Which was a guilty verdict btw.

Great. And I never disputed the importance of the dna. Nor did I ignore it, I previously posted about it - twice. Its on the previous page if you'd care to check. I literally communicated with you directly twice on the issue.

Also where is my strawman. Thats right. You didnt quote it. As I said you wouldnt. Because it doesnt exist.

Theres a possibility you have my avatar mixed up with another user.