Advertisement
Help Keep Boards Alive. Support us by going ad free today. See here: https://subscriptions.boards.ie/.
https://www.boards.ie/group/1878-subscribers-forum

Private Group for paid up members of Boards.ie. Join the club.
Hi all, please see this major site announcement: https://www.boards.ie/discussion/2058427594/boards-ie-2026

Ireland's Refugee Policy cont. Please read OP before posting

1122123125127128142

Comments

  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,658 ✭✭✭Mr. teddywinkles


    As i said the condition should be you support yourself. No other condition should apply if thats the case. Any shady crap and forcable removed

    Post edited by Mr. teddywinkles on


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 25,180 ✭✭✭✭One eyed Jack


    I’m not conflating the two at all, neither was the Judge. The comparison in circumstances however, is there - the people in asylum accommodation have not bypassed anything, they are there precisely because they have taken the legal route of applying for, and being granted asylum - they are prevailing on the humanity of the people of Ireland.

    This guy, who had expressed a desire to emigrate to Canada, was hoping to avoid a conviction, which would prevent him from going to Canada, with the irony of course being that he sought to prevent other people from making a better life for themselves in another country in the same way as he was hoping to do.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2, Paid Member Posts: 29,747 ✭✭✭✭_Kaiser_


    For me this is very very simple - and apologies to those who have heard me beat this drum several times before!

    • Come here legally, with necessary skills to offer, a job lined up, and the ability to support yourself from the day you arrive - welcome!!

    • Come here in the back of the container, having mysteriously "lost" your documents from when you boarded the plane to when you arrived (or where those documents are fraudulent to begin with - back to wherever you arrived from, or anywhere else that'll have you!

    • Come here with violent or serious criminal history, or commit such crimes while availing of our hospitality and generosity - back to wherever you arrived from, or anywhere else that'll have you!

    • Come here from a known safe country, or via a safe country, or several of them claiming "asylum" - back to wherever you arrived from, or anywhere else that'll have you!

    • Come here looking for economic opportunities or a "better life" but circumventing the established visa process and controls in the process - back to wherever you arrived from, or anywhere else that'll have you!

    • Come here with a verifiable claim of real threat to your life or safety from a country known to persecute people fitting your circumstances - welcome! However, that welcome comes with the condition that you respect our laws, culture and people, and understanding that our generosity is not infinite, is at our discretion and may change over time, and you will be expected to return home when we deem it safe for you to do so, or that you apply to remain through our existing visa system and are able to support yourself if successful.

    • If you don't like any of these conditions and requirements you are free not to come at all, or leave at your earliest convenience but Ireland nor the Irish have any ongoing moral or other obligations to support you indefinitely, and our support is subject to our sustainable ability to provide it and may change over time.

    See, simple and would address all of the current issues. All we need now is a party willing to implement it!



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 573 ✭✭✭Jim Herring


    ^ Common sense.



  • Site Banned Posts: 12,921 ✭✭✭✭suvigirl


    And yet all this post does is ignore the actual law in our country.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 647 ✭✭✭Ozvaldo


    Irelands refugee policy has imported lots of trouble makers we cant do anything about people born here who act in a wild manner.You seem not to like Irish people ?



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,079 ✭✭✭InAtFullBack


    Please show us where this is contrary to the law, if it is we can simply change the law.



  • Moderators, Recreation & Hobbies Moderators Posts: 23,078 Mod ✭✭✭✭Brian?


    it’s gas how the proposed solutions are never actually viable.

    Post edited by Brian? on

    they/them/theirs


    The more you can increase fear of drugs and crime, welfare mothers, immigrants and aliens, the more you control all of the people.

    Noam Chomsky



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2, Paid Member Posts: 17,375 ✭✭✭✭Goldengirl


    They are not solutions certainly not viable , but wishful thinking .



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 25,180 ✭✭✭✭One eyed Jack


    See, simple and would address all of the current issues.

    It's simple to write, obviously. However it's not remotely simple to implement in reality, which is why Ireland is in the position it's in where even this -

    • Come here with a verifiable claim of real threat to your life or safety from a country known to persecute people fitting your circumstances - welcome! However, that welcome comes with the condition that you respect our laws, culture and people, and understanding that our generosity is not infinite, is at our discretion and may change over time, and you will be expected to return home when we deem it safe for you to do so, or that you apply to remain through our existing visa system and are able to support yourself if successful.

    It's all 'we' this, and 'our' that, yet the people who were trying to get themselves into positions where they could implement even one of your… 'policies?', have been roundly rejected by the Irish electorate. That's only the first step, and they couldn't even do that much. What, I would love to know, gives you the confidence to imagine they would so easily be able to introduce legislation which would have the effect of writing what you want into Irish law when they can't even get themselves elected to a position where there's a snowballs chance in hell even if they were elected, that they would be able to do so?



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 647 ✭✭✭Ozvaldo


    Ah suvigirl I have to disagree with you there

    Mod note: Poster warned

    Post edited by Irish Aris on


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 8,333 ✭✭✭prunudo


    All I see from the pro immigration posters is can't do this, can't do that, that's impossible, blah blah blah. The fact is, inaction and lack of leadership has lead to decades old asylum laws being taken advantage of.

    We are an island nation, on the periphery of NW Europe, there is no excuse for us to have the level of fake asylum seekers we do. We are being taken for fools, and our good nature is being taken advantage of.

    We can't contuine on the current path of ever increasing immigration growth, and something needs to change drastically before we pass the point of irreversible damage to society.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 647 ✭✭✭Ozvaldo


    Its fcuked



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,766 ✭✭✭Lotus Flower


    You’re not seriously suggesting there are no crimes committed by anyone except ‘our own’ are you?



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,766 ✭✭✭Lotus Flower


    Continuing on the same path with the huge increase in numbers (and lack of services) is not a viable solution either



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,766 ✭✭✭Lotus Flower


    This has been covered time and time again on this thread so I’ll summarise

    The election does not mean that Irish people are happy with how immigration is handled. By the same logic that means Irish people are happy with health and housing too

    The government deliberately appeared to take a strong stance on immigration in the run up to the election. Many of us predicted that here and we knew that strong stances post election would be forgotten about. And that this would be used as proof that Irish people think the government are doing a great job

    The recent shift to the right across Europe will happen here too eventually. We are usually behind in such matters and the countries that have shifted to the right are further down this path than we are



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 25,180 ✭✭✭✭One eyed Jack


    This has been covered time and time again on this thread so I’ll summarise

    I’ll be honest LF, I haven’t been arsed to keep up with the discussion so I appreciate the summary.

    However, I’m acutely aware without any election ever needing to be held, that the Irish people aren’t happy with the current Government’s handling of immigration or asylum and all the rest of it. However, Kaiser proposes a whole new approach and claims that it is simple, all is needed is a party to do it.

    I like Kaiser but he’s talking populist nonsense on this occasion, and that’s why the one-trick ponies who ran on the immigration ticket (they padded out their objectives with a few local issues) - they got nowhere! So, the first hurdle to be overcome by a party to implement Kaiser’s suggestions is to get themselves elected. The parties that were elected are the same as the main parties that formed the previous Government, and I don’t have the same confidence in your predictions as you do. While populism is certainly on the rise in Europe, immigration still remains well down the list on the priorities of the Irish electorate:

    The main issues in the campaign were the cost of living, housing affordability and availabilityimmigration and asylum management, and economic stability amid external trade uncertainties, reflecting voter concerns despite the country's strong overall financial health.

    https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/2024_Irish_general_election



  • Moderators, Recreation & Hobbies Moderators Posts: 23,078 Mod ✭✭✭✭Brian?


    It certainly isn’t. We need to focus on improving services so we can process asylum seekers faster, land the genuine better and deport those who fail quicker. This requires time, money and effort.

    they/them/theirs


    The more you can increase fear of drugs and crime, welfare mothers, immigrants and aliens, the more you control all of the people.

    Noam Chomsky



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 92,394 ✭✭✭✭JP Liz V1


    How do we know they are not viable if our government in charge never try implementing, other countries are taking tougher stances on it but why are we not



  • Moderators, Recreation & Hobbies Moderators Posts: 23,078 Mod ✭✭✭✭Brian?


    I know the ideas that break the law aren’t viable. It’s that simple.

    “Speed processing times up to 2 weeks”, isn’t viable either. It can’t be done.

    they/them/theirs


    The more you can increase fear of drugs and crime, welfare mothers, immigrants and aliens, the more you control all of the people.

    Noam Chomsky



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,766 ✭✭✭Lotus Flower


    It’s not so much confidence, it’s just more down to logic. Populism is on the rise in countries that are further down this path than we are. If we continue with the same increase in numbers I can’t see how we wouldn’t end up the same. What makes us different? The answer is nothing.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 92,394 ✭✭✭✭JP Liz V1


    Ken O'Flynn has harshly criticised the government following recent figures that reveal 99% of rejected asylum applicants remain in Ireland

    Well Ken got elected but can he and Independent Ireland do something



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 25,180 ✭✭✭✭One eyed Jack


    The answer is that we don’t have the same history of immigration as other countries in Europe for one thing. The other difference is that all the main political parties, even populist SF, are all singing from the same hymn sheet, and minority parties and independents are unlikely ever to gain sufficient influence to implement the kind of changes in policy which Kaiser is suggesting, which is why while the idea sounds simple and wonderful in theory, that’s really all it will ever be.



  • Site Banned Posts: 12,921 ✭✭✭✭suvigirl


    The International Protection act is from 2015.

    The Refugee act is from 1996, amended sections up to 2015.

    So legislation is not from some far off historical age, it's very recent.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 270 ✭✭Movementarian


    Obviously not. Simply pointing out its easy to blame immigrants which the poster I was replying to was saying they were making the country unsafe. I was pointing out they aren't soley or even majorly responsible for that. So why is that not pointed out or dealt with first? If safety is a real concern?



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 270 ✭✭Movementarian


    I don't like Irish people who use refugees as a thin excuse. Your point was about refugees making the country unsafe. My point was if you actually cared about safety you would propose tougher laws against Irish youths who make the city far more unsafe on a daily basis then refugees do. But you clearly have no interest



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 668 ✭✭✭highpitcheric


    150,000 entered the UK illegally via the channel since 2018.

    That was the stat on sky news last night.

    With the political situation in the north, thanks to our orange friends, all 150k can enter the republic as they so choose, if things change.

    Which they previously did, with the predictable results of a tent city in DCC.

    (Id like to know why Irish registered ferry co's arent forced by Irish and eu law to implement id checks to prevent the boarding of such welfare shoppers from uk, they are complicit)

    Bailey had a borderline personality" based on "narcissism, psycho-rigidity, violence, impulsiveness, egocentricity with an intolerance to frustration and a great need for recognition".

    • Psychiatrist Jean Michel Masson and psychologist Katy Lorenzo-Regreny


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,813 ✭✭✭downthemiddle


    Go ahead and hitch your wagon to Ken. See where that leads you.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 14,841 ✭✭✭✭Geuze


    That is a good question about ID on the ferries.

    I think things are gone so far that we must have checks on ID on travellers within the CTA.

    AS are clearly taking advantage of the lack of checks on internal UK transit between GB and NI, and the open border between NI and RoI.

    I suggest full biometric checks on all entries and exits, full stop.

    CTA, EU, everybody = passport, iris scanner, the lot.

    I accept that this means checkpoints on the M1, which I am unhappy about.

    Can anybody suggest any alternative to checkpoints on the border, that would prevent AS from travelling GB-NI-RoI?

    If they are genuinely fleeing persecution, they would make their claim in the UK, so by coming here they reveal that their claim isn't genuine.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 14,841 ✭✭✭✭Geuze


    AS in port of arrival: "I wish to claim asylum".

    Officer: "Okay, where are you from?"

    AS answers Albania, Georgia, USA, South Africa, Nigeria, or any of the long list of safe countries.

    Officer: "okay, thanks".

    Officer notes on forms that claim is denied.

    AS is taken to a detention centre within the grounds of the same port of arrival.

    Photos and fingerprints taken, full biometric checks taken.

    Given food and bed.

    The following day, or within a week, taken on board an aircraft, flown back to Albania, Georgia, USA, South Africa, Nigeria.

    (whether or not those countries co-operate)

    If they don't co-operate, AS is left on apron of foreign airport.



This discussion has been closed.
Advertisement