Advertisement
Help Keep Boards Alive. Support us by going ad free today. See here: https://subscriptions.boards.ie/.
https://www.boards.ie/group/1878-subscribers-forum

Private Group for paid up members of Boards.ie. Join the club.
Hi all, please see this major site announcement: https://www.boards.ie/discussion/2058427594/boards-ie-2026

Irish Property Market chat II - *read mod note post #1 before posting*

1856857859861862943

Comments

  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,132 ✭✭✭RichardAnd


    I think a lot of people in nursing care rent out their houses to pay for the care. That's what my grandmother did, God rest her.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 5,853 ✭✭✭BlueSkyDreams


    The population we have already needs increased services. We need people to deliver those services.

    Infrastructure is developed over time. We arent going to stand still economically and face down a recession by choice, but we do need to work on finding a balance with immigration.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 5,853 ✭✭✭BlueSkyDreams


    There is nothing stopping a relatve caring for someone elderley, as they did pre 2012.

    Why is that not happening anymore and what is the impact?



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 5,853 ✭✭✭BlueSkyDreams


    You can manage immigration to enable the delivery of services and infrastructure.

    What is your suggestion? Block all immigrants coming into the country?



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 7,777 ✭✭✭timmyntc


    The people delivering those services are not coming into the country, they are already here.

    Majority of our infrastructure will be built using citizen workers, there is no exclusionary policies or anything it's just how it happens and the nature of those industries. Newly immigrating people are unfortunately adding to the demand side of the equation, both for housing and all other infrastructure.

    Anyways thread has veered OT for long enough, that's the last I'll say on the "full" argument



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 5,853 ✭✭✭BlueSkyDreams


    If they are here they are not employed, because we have plenty of job vacancies in almost every sector.

    The same question keep being asked: What is the right amount of immigration for Ireland?

    People seem to be arguing for or against immigration, but the real requirement is somewhere inbetween.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2, Paid Member Posts: 2,991 ✭✭✭PommieBast


    I feel much of the arguments for immigration curbs are a bit close to magic-bullet territory. Supply/demand is so out of whack I doubt that even Ireland ending all immigration tomorrow would put that much of a dent into the problem.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 5,462 ✭✭✭PokeHerKing


    If I thought immigration was being managed I'd have no issue.

    But it's not, they're not even lying. Their stated position is, we can't stop the world arriving on our shoes either legally of illegally and shur why would we want to, aren't they all a great bunch of lads.

    Post edited by PokeHerKing on


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,619 ✭✭✭Timing belt


    if there was zero immigration for year it would be the equivalent of the annual delivery of housing that we currently have. That would be a little bit more than a dent….

    That never going to happen because immigration is needed to run the country but certain immigration could be prioritised over others.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 5,853 ✭✭✭BlueSkyDreams


    It would not.

    But ending all immigration tomorrow would also destroy the countries services & infrastructure and lead to an exodus of MNCs leaving our shores, because they cant hire the correct talent in Ireland any longer.

    Back to the 80s we go...



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,132 ✭✭✭RichardAnd


    We don't actually know what would happen if immigration ceased tomorrow. As it's not going to happen, we can speculate away.

    Someone earlier in the thread was accused of catastrophising their predictions of a return of tenements if immigration and the infinite growth paradigm continues. Well, I can equally say that the claim of a return of the 1980s is the catastophising of the idea of drastically reducing immigration.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 5,853 ✭✭✭BlueSkyDreams


    I think most fair minded people would agree that immigration is necessary, but that it should be managed in line with the state's requirements.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,132 ✭✭✭RichardAnd


    They would agree that SOME immigration is desirable, but it is not necessarily required. As I've said before, the state should be pursuing policy to encourage the native Irish to have more children. I'm aware that that is a minefield, but then so is the matter of immigration….



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 5,853 ✭✭✭BlueSkyDreams


    I would say it is required if we want to keep the MNCs here and all the CT and high income tax that comes with them.

    There is not a chance in hell the large MNCs would be based here if they could not hire staff from abroad.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2, Paid Member Posts: 21,347 ✭✭✭✭Stark


    Why has the state disincentivised the extreme low cost solution in favour of the massively expensive solution plus the associated housing implications ?

    Because the "extreme low cost solution" has rightfully been speaking out about being exploited for years for their low cost labour? Caring is a very tough gig and carers have a right to a life as well.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,516 ✭✭✭Blut2


    Not all immigrants have equal levels of employment in Ireland. There are massive discrepancies between national orgins:

    employment123.jpg

    That said, nobody is trying to argue for or against immigration as a whole here or anywhere else, thats a typical straw man made by you and other people trying to claim we can't control immigration at all.

    There are worlds of differences within the headline of "immigration" - returning Irish citizens, EU citizens, legal non-EU immigrants arriving with a work visa, and illegal immigration / asylum seekers. The first two categories can't be limited, and most of the third category people wouldn't want to limit - nurses, doctors, highly paid tech workers etc. The last one is the issue.

    Copying Denmark and reducing the numbers of asylum seekers arriving by 20,000+ a year would save the state over €1bn a year in housing costs alone (nevermind other benefits), be the equivalent of building 10,000 odd extra housing units a year, and would impact very very few skilled jobs. Its literally all positive, in particular in regard to the Irish housing market.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,132 ✭✭✭RichardAnd


    Illegals are an issue, but the reality is that ALL (EDIT, overall) immigration needs to be reduced. Obviously, there are legal issues here, but I think we need to not fool ourselves into thinking that only so called asylum seekers comprise the majority of the problem.

    That said, knocking down the numbers of illegal immigrants who are permitted to remain here would be a very, very good start.

    Post edited by RichardAnd on


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 5,853 ✭✭✭BlueSkyDreams


    The post below yours demonstrates that some people ARE aruging to reduce all types of immigration, including returning irish, I assume.

    The fourth category related to asylum immigration is the one that costs the state the most money, but the state still have to prepare for some level of asylum seekers arriving.

    Even if the govt implemented a Denmark asylum policy (which wont happen, we all know that) they would still need to prepare for some level of asylum immigration, including application processing accommodation, housing for succesful applicants etc.

    What number of applicants do you think we should prepare for and how would we provide the infrastructure?



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 5,853 ✭✭✭BlueSkyDreams


    So you would like to restrict the numbers of returning irish, the numbers of EU citizens and the number of skilled visas we issue to non-EU citizens?

    What would be your threshold for restrictions?



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,132 ✭✭✭RichardAnd


    Before I reply, please let me ask you not to use strawman arguments or a "begging the question" fallacy with me or anyone else on these boards. It's disrespectful, and extremely deleterious to any discussion.

    Legal immigration could be reduced without in anyway restricting Irish citizens or EU citizens, which would be legally impossible and in the case of Irish citizens, reprehensible.

    From the CSO:

    • The population in Ireland rose by 98,700 people which was the largest 12-month increase since 2008.
    • There were 149,200 immigrants which was a 17-year high. This was the third successive 12-month period where over 100,000 people immigrated to Ireland. 
    • Of those immigrants, 30,000 were returning Irish citizens, 27,000 were other EU citizens, and 5,400 were UK citizens. The remaining 86,800 immigrants were citizens of other countries.
    • Over 69,000 people departed the State in the 12 months to April 2024, compared with 64,000 in the same period of 2023. This is the highest emigration figure since 2015. 
    • There was a natural increase of 19,400 people in the State comprised of 54,200 births and 34,800 deaths.

    That 86,800 figure should be where immigration restrictions should be targeted.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 5,853 ✭✭✭BlueSkyDreams


    You said ALL immigration needs to be reduced.

    Now you are saying EU immigration does not need to be reduced.

    Which is it?



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,132 ✭✭✭RichardAnd


    I should have said "overall" immigration. However, I don't think that my meaning was unclear in that I meant that legal immigration should be reduced alone with illegal immigration.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,516 ✭✭✭Blut2


    You're putting words in that posters mouth, he never once mentioned returning Irish. Do try and debate whats actually said instead of what you're "assuming".

    Why can't the state implement a Denmark style asylum policy exactly? Whats stopping us?

    As far as I can see its just people like you who throw their hands up in the air and say the problem is unsolvable, that limiting any immigration will destroy the economy, so we should do nothing. Which just isn't based on the real world outcomes that other countries have demonstrated.

    Denmark's number of yearly asylum seekers accepted dropped from 21,316 to 1,151 after they reformed their policy. Its stayed around that level for most of the last decade, with 2,479 accepted in 2023.

    They have a population of 6million, so about 20% more than us. And they're also on mainland Europe, and part of Schengen, so considerably easier for asylum seekers to reach.

    So approximately the same, or less, for about 1000-2000 asylum seekers is a realistic level of arrivals for us to accept and house. Considering we're an island nation, on the outskirts of Europe, with a small population of 5 million people, and a severe housing crisis. Approaching 30,000 a year, which we're taking at present, is not.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 7,777 ✭✭✭timmyntc


    EU immigration cannot be restricted as it's not really a member state competency.

    Non-EU migration can be, as it is controlled almost entirely by the Irish state. The UK is an exception due to the CTA.

    Enough with the snark, it was very clear what was went. The only person trying to conflate non-EU migration or asylum seekers with EU migration is you.

    https://www.irishtimes.com/business/2024/12/18/irish-house-prices-rising-by-close-to-10-a-year/

    Now in actual property related news - the average price in Dublin is now 600k. Nationwide avg is 430k.

    It is very clear FF and FGs housing plans are not working. In govt together for past 4 years, supporting each other for a further 4 years before that. And the rental & property markets have only got worse in that time.

    In another 4 years prices will be up around 550k nationwide and above 750k in Dublin.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 5,853 ✭✭✭BlueSkyDreams


    What are you talking about?

    The poster said ALL (in capitals because the poster put ALL in capitals) migration and not just asylum migration needs to be reduced.

    I did not say that, they did.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 5,853 ✭✭✭BlueSkyDreams


    The poster said ALL (capitals theirs, not mine) migration needs to be reduced, not just asylum migration.

    They specifically said that; I am not putting words in anyone's mouth.

    If you discern that All migration does not include Irish/EU migration, well then you have a different comprehension of the word 'all" than I do.

    Thanks for putting a number of acceptable asylum, so we are talking 1,000 to 2,000 per annum I think?

    But what happens if 5,000 arrive and they succesfully claim asylum?

    Post edited by BlueSkyDreams on


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 5,853 ✭✭✭BlueSkyDreams


    If they had gotten into govt, do you think SF would deliver more new homes than FFG, over this next 5 yr term?



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 7,777 ✭✭✭timmyntc




  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 5,853 ✭✭✭BlueSkyDreams


    Well that's fair enough.

    Personally, I dont see how driving investment funds out of housing construction, whilst at the time relying on those same private investment funds to deliver the majority of your new housing stock, was a viable plan.

    Not to mention the SF state land homes that still do not have any commitment from the banks to lend mortgages on.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 350 ✭✭SpoonyMcSpoon


    why do you think it is not working? Price rices are exactly what a lot of FF and FG voters want as it makes them richer. The FF and FG housing policy talks of “affordability” and never about “reducing prices while increasing supply”; which is translated as increasing supply of houses and the ability of people to buy houses at whatever prices they are. This sounds like trying to have one’s cake and also eat it of course.



Advertisement
Advertisement