Advertisement
If you have a new account but are having problems posting or verifying your account, please email us on hello@boards.ie for help. Thanks :)
Hello all! Please ensure that you are posting a new thread or question in the appropriate forum. The Feedback forum is overwhelmed with questions that are having to be moved elsewhere. If you need help to verify your account contact hello@boards.ie

Irish Property Market chat II - *read mod note post #1 before posting*

1856857859861862909

Comments

  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 36,432 ✭✭✭✭o1s1n
    Master of the Universe


    Are you aware of the cognitive distortion known as 'catastrophising'?

    Is suggest looking it up and applying it to your last paragraph.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,121 ✭✭✭RichardAnd


    But you never did live in an exclusively Irish Ireland. There have always been foreigners here in come capacity. Indeed, my own grandfather was Italian.

    Asylum seeks comprised only a small fraction of the total immigrants here. The majority of the 100k or so that arrived here last year (and the year before) did so legally. This is, seemingly, part of the cost of perpetuating infinite growth. Given the enormous problems that this is already causing, I am not content to enjoy the short term economic benefits without thinking about the trouble that it will create for future generations.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 460 ✭✭Rooks


    I don't think your French friends are completely wrong though. Migrants within the EU have a different status to non EU migrants. It's just a fact.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 36,432 ✭✭✭✭o1s1n
    Master of the Universe


    Oh come on, you know you're being incredibly disingenuous with that comparison.

    Of course there were foreign people here when I was growing up, but it was nowhere near comparable to now. We live in a very different Ireland from a multi cultural point of view.

    Its incredibly easy to blame all of our countries ills on 'the other'. People have been doing it for a very long time. What we actually need to do is get the bloody thumb out and start building exponentially to suit our current needs.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 36,432 ✭✭✭✭o1s1n
    Master of the Universe


    Oh they're 100% correct.

    I was pointing out how people's perspectives of our crisis change based on their own situation and how one person's 'immigrant taking up space' is another person's entitlement for being part of the EU.

    I can also fully admit my opinion may be different if I didn't own a house, or if I was an asylum seeker or if I was from another planet.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 282 ✭✭babyducklings1


    That system sounds really efficient. We really need something similar here. Our infrastructure is starting to heave. People are feeling it too.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,920 ✭✭✭PokeHerKing


    But it's not catastrophising when we accept planes can't be over loaded or boats because they might sink?

    We understand load bearing when it comes to engineering and it's not catastrophising to say things would fall down without it.

    But In terms of the infrastructure of the country, no limits, no need for critical thinking? It's catastrophising to say if we keep loading it woth people it will break?

    All because you like more brown faces than white in your office, so you can feel more cosmopolitan?



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,121 ✭✭✭RichardAnd


    I think we'll just agree to disagree here, respectfully. I've had constructive exchanges with you in the past, and I don't want to create animosity.

    Just for the record, I don't blame "the other". This was caused by state. If they will not protect the borders and wish to facilitate enormous immigration, then obviously people are going to take advantage of it. Mass immigration is a symptom of the rot of the neo-liberal world-view, which is the root cause IMHO.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,882 ✭✭✭Villa05


    I'm normally migration positive, but look at the case study I'm giving you

    Pre 2012 many sick/elderly were cared for voluntarily by relative that was fully aware of there needs for a paltry sum of 200 p/W

    Now many are herded into care homes that can cost anything up to 2,500 p/W. There sourcing foreign labour and paying salaries incompatible with life in Ireland. There wages need to be topped up to afford rent, family income supplement etc all at great cost to the taxpayer.

    The taxpayer has to pay much higher rent because of the housing deficit, higher taxes because the care of elderly that used to cost 200p/w, now with subsidies and cost of living payments is close to 3k. Far more homes are required due to more foreign staff, and a strong liklihood that the patients home now lies empty and unused, whereas the old system was most likely housing neutral

    One nursing home provider alone had 355 work permits granted this year.

    Why has the state disincentivised the extreme low cost solution in favour of the massively expensive solution plus the associated housing implications ?



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,121 ✭✭✭RichardAnd


    I think a lot of people in nursing care rent out their houses to pay for the care. That's what my grandmother did, God rest her.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 5,168 ✭✭✭BlueSkyDreams


    The population we have already needs increased services. We need people to deliver those services.

    Infrastructure is developed over time. We arent going to stand still economically and face down a recession by choice, but we do need to work on finding a balance with immigration.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 5,168 ✭✭✭BlueSkyDreams


    There is nothing stopping a relatve caring for someone elderley, as they did pre 2012.

    Why is that not happening anymore and what is the impact?



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 5,168 ✭✭✭BlueSkyDreams


    You can manage immigration to enable the delivery of services and infrastructure.

    What is your suggestion? Block all immigrants coming into the country?



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 7,620 ✭✭✭timmyntc


    The people delivering those services are not coming into the country, they are already here.

    Majority of our infrastructure will be built using citizen workers, there is no exclusionary policies or anything it's just how it happens and the nature of those industries. Newly immigrating people are unfortunately adding to the demand side of the equation, both for housing and all other infrastructure.

    Anyways thread has veered OT for long enough, that's the last I'll say on the "full" argument



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 5,168 ✭✭✭BlueSkyDreams


    If they are here they are not employed, because we have plenty of job vacancies in almost every sector.

    The same question keep being asked: What is the right amount of immigration for Ireland?

    People seem to be arguing for or against immigration, but the real requirement is somewhere inbetween.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,916 ✭✭✭PommieBast


    I feel much of the arguments for immigration curbs are a bit close to magic-bullet territory. Supply/demand is so out of whack I doubt that even Ireland ending all immigration tomorrow would put that much of a dent into the problem.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,920 ✭✭✭PokeHerKing


    If I thought immigration was being managed I'd have no issue.

    But it's not, they're not even lying. Their stated position is, we can't stop the world arriving on our shoes either legally of illegally and shur why would we want to, aren't they all a great bunch of lads.

    Post edited by PokeHerKing on


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,619 ✭✭✭Timing belt


    if there was zero immigration for year it would be the equivalent of the annual delivery of housing that we currently have. That would be a little bit more than a dent….

    That never going to happen because immigration is needed to run the country but certain immigration could be prioritised over others.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 5,168 ✭✭✭BlueSkyDreams


    It would not.

    But ending all immigration tomorrow would also destroy the countries services & infrastructure and lead to an exodus of MNCs leaving our shores, because they cant hire the correct talent in Ireland any longer.

    Back to the 80s we go...



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,121 ✭✭✭RichardAnd


    We don't actually know what would happen if immigration ceased tomorrow. As it's not going to happen, we can speculate away.

    Someone earlier in the thread was accused of catastrophising their predictions of a return of tenements if immigration and the infinite growth paradigm continues. Well, I can equally say that the claim of a return of the 1980s is the catastophising of the idea of drastically reducing immigration.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 5,168 ✭✭✭BlueSkyDreams


    I think most fair minded people would agree that immigration is necessary, but that it should be managed in line with the state's requirements.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,121 ✭✭✭RichardAnd


    They would agree that SOME immigration is desirable, but it is not necessarily required. As I've said before, the state should be pursuing policy to encourage the native Irish to have more children. I'm aware that that is a minefield, but then so is the matter of immigration….



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 5,168 ✭✭✭BlueSkyDreams


    I would say it is required if we want to keep the MNCs here and all the CT and high income tax that comes with them.

    There is not a chance in hell the large MNCs would be based here if they could not hire staff from abroad.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 21,180 ✭✭✭✭Stark


    Why has the state disincentivised the extreme low cost solution in favour of the massively expensive solution plus the associated housing implications ?

    Because the "extreme low cost solution" has rightfully been speaking out about being exploited for years for their low cost labour? Caring is a very tough gig and carers have a right to a life as well.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,300 ✭✭✭Blut2


    Not all immigrants have equal levels of employment in Ireland. There are massive discrepancies between national orgins:

    employment123.jpg

    That said, nobody is trying to argue for or against immigration as a whole here or anywhere else, thats a typical straw man made by you and other people trying to claim we can't control immigration at all.

    There are worlds of differences within the headline of "immigration" - returning Irish citizens, EU citizens, legal non-EU immigrants arriving with a work visa, and illegal immigration / asylum seekers. The first two categories can't be limited, and most of the third category people wouldn't want to limit - nurses, doctors, highly paid tech workers etc. The last one is the issue.

    Copying Denmark and reducing the numbers of asylum seekers arriving by 20,000+ a year would save the state over €1bn a year in housing costs alone (nevermind other benefits), be the equivalent of building 10,000 odd extra housing units a year, and would impact very very few skilled jobs. Its literally all positive, in particular in regard to the Irish housing market.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,121 ✭✭✭RichardAnd


    Illegals are an issue, but the reality is that ALL (EDIT, overall) immigration needs to be reduced. Obviously, there are legal issues here, but I think we need to not fool ourselves into thinking that only so called asylum seekers comprise the majority of the problem.

    That said, knocking down the numbers of illegal immigrants who are permitted to remain here would be a very, very good start.

    Post edited by RichardAnd on


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 5,168 ✭✭✭BlueSkyDreams


    The post below yours demonstrates that some people ARE aruging to reduce all types of immigration, including returning irish, I assume.

    The fourth category related to asylum immigration is the one that costs the state the most money, but the state still have to prepare for some level of asylum seekers arriving.

    Even if the govt implemented a Denmark asylum policy (which wont happen, we all know that) they would still need to prepare for some level of asylum immigration, including application processing accommodation, housing for succesful applicants etc.

    What number of applicants do you think we should prepare for and how would we provide the infrastructure?



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 5,168 ✭✭✭BlueSkyDreams


    So you would like to restrict the numbers of returning irish, the numbers of EU citizens and the number of skilled visas we issue to non-EU citizens?

    What would be your threshold for restrictions?



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,121 ✭✭✭RichardAnd


    Before I reply, please let me ask you not to use strawman arguments or a "begging the question" fallacy with me or anyone else on these boards. It's disrespectful, and extremely deleterious to any discussion.

    Legal immigration could be reduced without in anyway restricting Irish citizens or EU citizens, which would be legally impossible and in the case of Irish citizens, reprehensible.

    From the CSO:

    • The population in Ireland rose by 98,700 people which was the largest 12-month increase since 2008.
    • There were 149,200 immigrants which was a 17-year high. This was the third successive 12-month period where over 100,000 people immigrated to Ireland. 
    • Of those immigrants, 30,000 were returning Irish citizens, 27,000 were other EU citizens, and 5,400 were UK citizens. The remaining 86,800 immigrants were citizens of other countries.
    • Over 69,000 people departed the State in the 12 months to April 2024, compared with 64,000 in the same period of 2023. This is the highest emigration figure since 2015. 
    • There was a natural increase of 19,400 people in the State comprised of 54,200 births and 34,800 deaths.

    That 86,800 figure should be where immigration restrictions should be targeted.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 5,168 ✭✭✭BlueSkyDreams


    You said ALL immigration needs to be reduced.

    Now you are saying EU immigration does not need to be reduced.

    Which is it?



Advertisement