Russia-Ukraine War (continuing)

For those who don't dismiss battlefield accounts as unproven fake news unless they've got the nod from their Man in Moscow, here's another chilling observation of how the North Koreans are even worse than the Russians at "Special Military Operations" in the real world:

Full text for those who don't want to inflate Twitter traffic figures:

"From what I saw yesterday, it seemed to me that the Koreans were not providing first aid to their wounded. I saw a scene: an FPV flew into a group of 3 Koreans, two fell and did not get up, but showed signs of life. The third looked at them, stood, waited for the others to come up and went with them further across the field.

At the same time, individual Koreans were gathering their own in the field and dragging them on stretchers along the ground back along the same route they had come up. I saw one crowd of those still alive walking parallel to the stream of those who were dragging the bodies. A kind of conveyor belt of death.

Sometimes I watched a shell explode 20 meters from their groups, to which they did not react in any way and continued to walk at the same pace. In the photo, the moment when one of the groups got tired of walking across the field under fire and sat down to rest. The impression is that they still don't understand what to fear in war."

But would you ?

And close to 100% of their more sophisticated missiles are wasted making holes in hospitals, schools and other civilian infrastructure.

Any chance you could set out the security concerns of the one side that has been rejected for 30 years?

I mean, you're surely not implying that the nuclear-armed, Second Greatest Army In The World, the one with almost limitless resources, and a foot in three continents was seriously worried about its security?

Nope.

Note the language cited - "perceived"... "interests"

Zero proof of any genuine threat to Russia.

Your sources actually contradict your claims.

Russia has proven it to be a pack of lies by withdrawing its forces from nato borders to send to Ukraine.

Concerns about escalation from NATO expansion were all dealt with in the NATO Russia Founding Act.

Russia has nothing to fear from nato expansion militarily unless it all along planned to reduce its neighbours to vassal states and see nato as a block to that.

it will be of interest to see how the Alawite sect - especially in their homeland on that western coastal strip of Syria will fare out along with the sea ports and air strips there that the Ru had ‘ Bashir’s full permission to use - 99.9% to bomb the s—t out of Aleppo, Homs ,Iblis and anything else that ‘moved or did not move ‘. There was a continuous and unrelenting bombardment , from the skies,by Russian bombers , spray planes on all groups opposed to Bashir.

If the aAlawites ‘are left alone ‘ by the incoming administration - HTS led presumably,-and Ru are allowed to retain its ‘facilities’ there then is it because of Turkey’s influence over the victors?

If the Ru are allowed to ‘stay”in Syria then the ‘services ‘ that it will provide from there will 100% pivot towards it’ African ‘interests’. I understand that Russian’s involvement in a significant no of African countries involves working ‘very closely’ with governments - mainly to keep them in control of their countries. I wonder if The HTS will be in support of this. I would see a problem if some of these regimes are Bashirlike and, for example , keeping the Sunni opposition ‘in check’

Countries joining nato are simply none of Russia's business. The Russians think they can expand by invasion but when countries join nato to escape Russian expansion the Russians behave as if they have a bucket stuck up their ass. Fuk'em. Maybe if Russia gives up the countries they invaded we can reach a happy medium. Russia's objections are pure arrogance. Russia, give up Buryat, Tuva etc, get out of Georgia, Transnistria, Chechnya and we can have a grown up's discussion. F'ing infantile murderers I hope you get burned to the ground.

The other 50% is used turning once-functioning towns into rubble during their 'liberation'.

If, yes. Should the US inevitable concerns be listened to or simply ignored ?

No. If they stay out of Europe, Ukraine etc. they can do what they like. But who would they be defending against? NATO is not trying to invade China.