Advertisement
If you have a new account but are having problems posting or verifying your account, please email us on hello@boards.ie for help. Thanks :)
Hello all! Please ensure that you are posting a new thread or question in the appropriate forum. The Feedback forum is overwhelmed with questions that are having to be moved elsewhere. If you need help to verify your account contact hello@boards.ie

Munster Team Talk Thread - Beirne After Reading

19319329349369371064

Comments

  • Moderators, Sports Moderators Posts: 12,913 Mod ✭✭✭✭Cookiemunster


    Scannell has history with successful kicks from distance, so I was surprised that we didn't go for it. Not Crowleys call though.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 26,022 ✭✭✭✭phog


    History maybe but nothing recent and he's had a long lay off since he played anyway regularly for us.

    For me, it was never an option



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,496 ✭✭✭sprucemoose


    id be very interested in what was discussed when they were making the call at the end. Scannell was there so i would hope he was saying he wasnt confident because otherwise it was a fairly poor call - an extra try was going to be largely immaterial and working a drop goal is 50/50 at best anyway so the kick at goal would have been the best option imo



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 26,022 ✭✭✭✭phog


    But the kick at goal was 50/50 at best too. When was the last time you saw him do kicks at goal in a pre match warm up, I've seen Murray practice them more recently than Rory



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,605 ✭✭✭hawley


    He kicked out the ball on the full inside our 22 with seconds left in the first half. Gave an awful forward pass to JOD, under no pressure, when we looked certain to score. Knocked on the ball from the kick off, that led to the scrum that they got the winning penalty from.

    Communication was the greatest fatality



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 885 ✭✭✭blackvalley


    Couldn’t agree more. People on here criticising Zebro for “ bigging up “ Castres while at the same time “ bugging up the Castres player who blocked Crowleys kick to touch. Hard to believe in that any player playing rugby at international level in ANY position is incapable of kicking the ball off the pitch.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 548 ✭✭✭Madeoface


    No way. Totally sh1t kick. Like Burns with Ireland, went for too much distance. The only call here is off the pitch and go again.

    Hopefully a learning experience as I like Crowley and Ireland need a consistent performer at 10. I thought he was going to be it.

    Munster fans have been pissing on the Byrne's (fairly for the most part) but that performance by Crowley was truly awful. Conservative Ross would have buried that...10 metres behind Crowley s target.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,496 ✭✭✭sprucemoose


    crowley did kick the ball off the pitch, it was just that some fantastic skill kept it in



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,496 ✭✭✭sprucemoose


    10m behind where crowley kicked it to would have barely made any ground and would have been pointless, they might as well have just tapped or went for a scrum. i dont think kicking for touch was the right call but i dont put the fault on crowley. its also not the same as BB v Wales, that was purely bad execution whereas this down to a piece of brilliant individual skill to keep the ball in



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,567 ✭✭✭niallm77


    10m metre shorter but in the crowd gives Munster a lineout. Win it and maul and provoke a penalty from Castres 20m closer to goal.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,666 ✭✭✭Pepp1989


    Oh ya I know. I'm referring more to the Ben Healy munster had. Not the current version



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 11,744 ✭✭✭✭aloooof


    And if it was that straightforward, we'd have been doing that all game…

    Crowley caught the kick really well, and but for a fraction of an angle and some good athleticism from the Castres player, it would've been a perfect kick.

    Them's the breaks, and Crowley will have to take it on the chin. But the "that's where he's at" stuff is over the top.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,756 ✭✭✭50HX




  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,567 ✭✭✭niallm77


    Well the kick was short. Castres shouldn't have been even remotely close to keeping the ball in play. Sorry but that's on Crowley. Munster needed the ball 5m over the sideline. Doesn't matter how well he caught it, it was a bad error.

    Lineout 30m out, maul, gain a few metres, go a few phases and win a kickable penalty (or run a play to create drop goal opportunity). That's what should have been done. Castres were there for the taking. They are a limited team who had 3 YC.

    When Munster are away in a knock out and losing out on serious revenue from a home gate, they can't go pleading the poor mouth about the IRFU/Leinster.

    "That's where he is at" is fairly accurate. Crowley is a good player but in poor enough form overall so far this season.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 11,744 ✭✭✭✭aloooof


    5m gain would also have been a bad kick. Iirc, the kick was taken from around halfway. Crowley was always going to back himself to get as much out of it as he could.

    Yes, he didn’t make touch, yes, that’s on him and yes, he’ll have to take it on the chin.

    But some of the stuff on here has been very reactionary, imo.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,567 ✭✭✭niallm77


    The ball was collected by the castres player 10m from his own tryline. A lineout on the 22 would have been more than acceptable.

    If That kick was by Billy Burns he would be crucified.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 11,744 ✭✭✭✭aloooof


    If That kick was by Billy Burns he would be crucified.

    Correct and it’s not dissimilar to what’s been happening Crowley here.



  • Hosted Moderators Posts: 8,861 ✭✭✭fitz


    As usual, the truth is somewhere in the middle, I feel. It wasn't a great kick - it was great positionally, if it had been a few feet higher when crossing into touch. But it's a bad mistake to hand a winger an opportunity to keep it in. While the winger did well in terms of awareness, I don't think it was a particularly challenging one for him to take. Job one is to secure possession, and Crowley failed that one.

    I still think he's a very good player, but he's seemed off since the start of the season tbh. Dunno if he's in his own head or what, but it feels like he's forcing things a lot, and compounding mistakes. I'm sure the coaching situation isn't helping...no doubt it adds extra pressure on him.

    He had a bad game, it happens. He's had a few now, and I get the concern, but people are way too quick to throw in the boot and push him onto the trash heap. He's still young, and has shown plenty of bloodymindedness in the past…he'll tough it out and get back on form I reckon.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 7,628 ✭✭✭Former Former Former


    I mean, it was a bad miss, there’s no other way to describe it. It happens to all out halves at some point.

    I’d be far more concerned about his overall performance and the loss of Casey

    The big problem now is needing big performances in January to get a home knockout game.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,622 ✭✭✭BoardsMember


    Crowley is a talented lad who hasn't yet learnt how to run a game, or run all different types of games.

    Zebo is a clown, always has been, a joke of a pundit, likely to say anything as long as it lacks insight.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 26,022 ✭✭✭✭phog


    The problem for Crowley now is that he's surely rested next week for Ulster.

    And looking forward to Ulster, Munster could be going up there without any of the lads that were injured last night



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,639 ✭✭✭theVersatile


    Thought Zebo actually talked a lot of sense on TV. Some people here equating "not joining the pile on" to lacking insight



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 26,022 ✭✭✭✭phog


    He pundits like he played, with a smile on his face. He put the defeat in perspective and acknowledged the short comings.

    He's a breath of fresh air when you compare him to the VM panel for the AIs.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 11,744 ✭✭✭✭aloooof


    I like him, tbh. Far better than, say, Ferris who was on co-comms.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,391 ✭✭✭letowski


    Aa popular as it is to have a in depth conversation about Crowley, the ongoing problem at prop were far more detrimental to our performance last night than Jack.
    Going down to the south of France with two 36 year old props playing for an hour, I mean I think most of us would have expected Killer and Archer to have retired last summer. Same issues last year versus Bayonne.
    The scrum pens has a massive bearing on the game. When Castres were pinned 5m out and a man down, they got two consecutive scrum penalties to get them 3 points. Their winning penalty came from a scrum. And I’m not blaming Archer or Kilcoyne, it’s just that we still need them to play because this club hasn’t produced props.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 26,022 ✭✭✭✭phog


    💯

    But we both know why Jack is the centre of attention here



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 11,744 ✭✭✭✭aloooof


    100% agree with this. At the start of the 2nd half, Castres were down a man and we had a lineout at their 5m. We knocked on, they win a scrum penalty and exit to half way. Another (I think scrum?) penalty there puts them deep into our territory and from there we concede a pen and go down 13-7.

    That's the type of thing that was the winning and losing of the game. Losing Bleuler so early was a huge loss.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,316 ✭✭✭realhorrorshow


    Outhalves have been taking the brunt of poor team performances in media and online discourse for as long as I can remember. It's not right but it's consistent and not unique to Crowley.

    Ross Byrne got absolutely raked over the coals after that La Rochelle final loss despite the fact that he twice tried to set up the winning drop goal and JGP both times threw big passes to the blindside as he was getting into position.

    It doesn't even seem to matter if there is a clear reason for a loss, e.g. scrum, breakdown, etc. The conversation always circles around the 10.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,337 ✭✭✭Schorpio


    Completely agree - but there is no getting away from the fact that Jack did genuinely have a poor game yesterday.

    He shouldn't be crucified for it, but it shouldn't be glossed over either.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 6,212 ✭✭✭Yeah_Right


    Firstly, Crowley had an awful game. Pretty much the whole team had an awful game. That last play wasn't on Crowley. Great play by the Castre player.

    Post edited by Yeah_Right on


Advertisement