Advertisement
If you have a new account but are having problems posting or verifying your account, please email us on hello@boards.ie for help. Thanks :)
Hello all! Please ensure that you are posting a new thread or question in the appropriate forum. The Feedback forum is overwhelmed with questions that are having to be moved elsewhere. If you need help to verify your account contact hello@boards.ie
Help Keep Boards Alive. Support us by going ad free today. See here: https://subscriptions.boards.ie/.
If we do not hit our goal we will be forced to close the site.

Current status: https://keepboardsalive.com/

Annual subs are best for most impact. If you are still undecided on going Ad Free - you can also donate using the Paypal Donate option. All contribution helps. Thank you.

The End of Assad? Syrian Rebels enter the outskirts of Aleppo for the first time since 2016

13133353637

Comments

  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2, Paid Member Posts: 12,421 ✭✭✭✭AbusesToilets


    That's just being straight up bigoted there. You suppose a hypothetical where Jews would be oppressed in a secular state, as opposed to the Arabs being massacred in the wonderful Jewish state of Israel today. Israel has oppressed and killed Palestinians since its inception. Building on their murderous violence against the Palestinians and Lebanese, they've expanded to killing Syrians this week. They have joyfully killed men, women and children, while useful tools like yourself apologise and sanctify their violence. It's disgusting.

    You speak on the current state of the Arab world while choosing to ignore the reasons that it roils with turmoil and conflict. You hold them to standards that you don't hold Israel or the west to. Your concern is shown to be a performative charade, a means to obfuscate the evils of the Israeli state.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 16,662 ✭✭✭✭markodaly


    Ah, this old chestnut. It's all America's fault.

    Ignoring of course that the region in question, the people there have been knocking lumps out of each other for thousands of years.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2, Paid Member Posts: 12,421 ✭✭✭✭AbusesToilets


    Every region of the earth has had its people knocking lumps out of each other from the rise of civilisation. It's a trite effort to hand wave away the very real and documented actions of the various world powers in interfering with the region. Not that I would expect anything less from you, given what your clear disdain towards Arabs.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 16,662 ✭✭✭✭markodaly


    It's not a hypothetical at all. Jews have almost totally left the Arab world because of wider extremism, persecution and anti-semitism. This happened.

    The idea that we would today, have a secular democratic state in Palestine with Arabs and Jews living side by side is pure fantasy. Utter Fantasy.

    Why do I call it a fantasy? Because there is no democratic or secular state like it in the world. The best we have is Turkey and we see how they treat their Kurdish cousins, never mind how they treated the Armenians 100 years ago and the actual Genocide they perpetrated.

    So, please come back to the real world.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 16,662 ✭✭✭✭markodaly


    The history of the world is one of violence. I won't disagree with that.

    Yet it is you who wants to push a fantasy alternative history that the Jews in 1940's had a chance of a shared secular democratic nation with the Arabs in the Southern Levant, and that it would have been all sunshine and lollipops ever after.

    But you admit that history is littered with conflict and violence, but somehow these areas would be different? Please tell us how?

    Nation states are thus. People of a shared culture, religion, ethnicity and society norms want to rule themselves. Otherwise, why on hell did Ireland ever want to leave the Union 100 years ago? Are you telling us now that we should have stayed?

    Come on! Come back to reality.

    At the end of the day, the Arabs of the region never accepted this new reality, and have been beating the empty docket ever since. If they accepted this reality decades ago, we would have had an actual Palestinian state, with a chance.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 15,217 ✭✭✭✭Danzy


    I don't know what to say. Arabs are not the naive children subjected to flow and ebb of western tides as you imagine. They have been an imperial power for most of the last 1500 years and are imperial in culture and outlook in a way no European is.

    The middle east has imperialism at its heart in a way that very few places in the world are, it was an ancient and defining belief there 3000 years ago, that's never changed.

    Don't try to impose western ideas like Socialism or Democracy, alien concepts.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2, Paid Member Posts: 12,421 ✭✭✭✭AbusesToilets


    Your replies are contrived hypotheticals, bigotry masquerading as historical analysis. Jews did face discrimination in Middle East countries after 1948. The Israeli government also was very keen for mass immigration to increase the Jewish population and actively sought to stir unrest in those countries to spur Jews there to leave. We'll never know what might have been possible for the region, as the West ensured that their colony would be created, and forever poison the well between Jews and Arabs. Which was entirely the point, where the creation of Israel ensures endless instability for the Middle East. This acts to prevent the creation of any strong, representative societies, leaving them easy to manipulate. Arguably the most consequential area on the planet, for the value of its oil resources, bent to the whims of the wealthy developed countries. The petrodollar is built on the back of the Israeli state.

    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/One_Million_Plan

    Nation states are thus. People of a shared culture, religion, ethnicity and society norms want to rule themselves. Otherwise, why on hell did Ireland ever want to leave the Union 100 years ago? Are you telling us now that we should have stayed?

    Come on! Come back to reality.

    At the end of the day, the Arabs of the region never accepted this new reality, and have been beating the empty docket ever since. If they accepted this reality decades ago, we would have had an actual Palestinian state, with a chance.

    The doublespeak is astounding, even for your low standards of reasoning.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2, Paid Member Posts: 12,421 ✭✭✭✭AbusesToilets


    The region was under the heel of the Ottomans for centuries. See the failed Arab revolt and goals of Arab nationalism. Europe endured repressive feudalism, until democracies finally came about. It was an alien concept until it wasn't. Your words epitomise the "Othering" that occurs when speaking of those who've endured western colonialism. You speak as though they are a different species, not capable of aspiring to higher forms of culture and society. You point to the struggles and difficulties faced in those countries as evidence that they can't do it, all while ignoring the targeting interference and violence that has been inflicted upon them by developed countries. All done with the goal to undermine their ability to build free and representative governments. They weren't allowed to succeed because it would have threatened Western interests. A cursory read of the history of colonialism makes that abundantly clear.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 15,217 ✭✭✭✭Danzy


    "Not capable of aspiring to higher forms of culture"

    Lord God but what you think of as higher culture is our culture, not their one, not westerner bourgeoisie socialist thought, or democracy.

    They are coming from a very old tradition, the whole thread is about the sweeping away of the old Arab Socialist party in Syria, a legacy of European education of Arab elites.



  • Moderators, Society & Culture Moderators Posts: 17,118 Mod ✭✭✭✭Manic Moran


    No, the two big ones are both gone. The tunnels and everything else near them are in better shape. The smaller of the two wasn't quite as thoroughly destroyed, you can still see a few bits attached to the cliff, but to all intents and purposes, it's gone.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 9,166 ✭✭✭jmreire


    Heres a pic taken in my time there…..what its like now, I have no idea.

    2011-09-21 17.13.28 (2016_01_16 09_03_57 UTC).jpg


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 15,217 ✭✭✭✭Danzy


    There was a statue there once of Buddha, now there is no eye, no ear, no nose, no tongue, no body.

    No form at all left.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 9,166 ✭✭✭jmreire


    Yes, just the shape left, the remains, unlike the big brother, where all is left is the hollowed-out shape where Buddha once proudly stood. But had the Taliban had their way, there would have been two hollowed spaces, like I said, Mullah Omar stopped further destruction of them.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 680 ✭✭✭Bitcoin


    visegard often posts in favour of genocide in Gaza.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 10,185 ✭✭✭✭volchitsa


    Wikipedia says both were destroyed (that was my recollection of it too) but that the smaller one is being restored from pieces left over and resin:

    The decision made was leave the bigger one destroyed as a testimony to the destruction of both.

    "If a woman cannot stand in a public space and say, without fear of consequences, that men cannot be women, then women have no rights at all." Helen Joyce



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 10,185 ✭✭✭✭volchitsa


    And now the new Taliban power is indeed running them as a tourist attraction, or they were in 2021:

    "If a woman cannot stand in a public space and say, without fear of consequences, that men cannot be women, then women have no rights at all." Helen Joyce



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,939 ✭✭✭donaghs


    The idea that Arab people trying to aspire to some form of government and society, not intrinsically based on Islam, is just a colonial or European legacy, is a tad racist, or at least condescending.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 16,662 ✭✭✭✭markodaly


    If the best you can do is a theory of 'What if' then its a fantasy argument.

    The West didn't interfere in every area of the Middle East, for example. Turkey is such a country, like Suadi.

    Yet they are neither secular and democratic and certainly would not welcome a sizeable Jewish population to share power with.

    Your counterfactual history is just that, counterfactual. And its a very easy trope to just blame it all on the West. When will the people and leaders of the region take accountability?

    An example. The West tried its best to get Arafat a deal, but he flat out refused it. This at a time when he had over $1 Billion in swiss banks. The leadership of the Arab were and still are corrupt. Is that the West fault too? I heard it rained yesterday in Gaza, I guess you can blame the West for that too.

    Anyway, the idea that a Muslim/Arab majority country would share power with a Jewish minority and everyone would just 'get on', is a fantasy. But since you have nothing else, that is now the hole you have dug for yourself.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 10,185 ✭✭✭✭volchitsa


    Jews did face discrimination in Middle East countries after 1948.

    And nothing before that? Seriously?

    While Jewish communities in Islamic countries fared better overall than those in Christian lands in Europe, Jews were no strangers to persecution and humiliation among the Arabs. As Princeton University historian Bernard Lewis has written: “The Golden Age of equal rights was a myth, and belief in it was a result, more than a cause, of Jewish sympathy for Islam.”

    Muhammad, the founder of Islam, traveled to Medina in 622 A.D. to attract followers to his new faith. When the Jews of Medina refused to recognize Muhammad as their Prophet, two of the major Jewish tribes were expelled. In 627, Muhammad’s followers killed between 600 and 900 of the men, and divided the surviving Jewish women and children amongst themselves.18

    The Muslim attitude toward Jews is reflected in various verses throughout the Koran, the holy book of the Islamic faith. “They [the Children of Israel] were consigned to humiliation and wretchedness. They brought the wrath of God upon themselves, and this because they used to deny God’s signs and kill His Prophets unjustly and because they disobeyed and were transgressors” (Sura 2:61). According to the Koran, the Jews try to introduce corruption (5:64), have always been disobedient (5:78), and are enemies of Allah, the Prophet and the angels (2:97-98).

    Jews were generally viewed with contempt by their Muslim neighbors; peaceful coexistence between the two groups involved the subordination and degradation of the Jews. In the ninth century, Baghdad’s Caliph al-Mutawakkil designated a yellow badge for Jews, setting a precedent that would be followed centuries later in Nazi Germany.19

    At various times, Jews in Muslim lands lived in relative peace and thrived culturally and economically. The position of the Jews was never secure, however, and changes in the political or social climate would often lead to persecution, violence and death.

    When Jews were perceived as having achieved too comfortable a position in Islamic society, anti-Semitism would surface, often with devastating results. On December 30, 1066, Joseph HaNagid, the Jewish vizier of Granada, Spain, was crucified by an Arab mob that proceeded to raze the Jewish quarter of the city and slaughter its 5,000 inhabitants. The riot was incited by Muslim preachers who had angrily objected to what they saw as inordinate Jewish political power.

    Similarly, in 1465, Arab mobs in Fez slaughtered thousands of Jews, leaving only 11 alive, after a Jewish deputy vizier treated a Muslim woman in “an offensive manner.” The killings touched off a wave of similar massacres throughout Morocco.20

    Other mass murders of Jews in Arab lands occurred in Morocco in the 8th century, where whole communities were wiped out by the Muslim ruler Idris I; North Africa in the 12th century, where the Almohads either forcibly converted or decimated several communities; Libya in 1785, where Ali Burzi Pasha murdered hundreds of Jews; Algiers, where Jews were massacred in 1805, 1815 and 1830; and Marrakesh, Morocco, where more than 300 Jews were murdered between 1864 and 1880.21

    Decrees ordering the destruction of synagogues were enacted in Egypt and Syria (1014, 1293-4, 1301-2), Iraq (854­-859, 1344) and Yemen (1676). Despite the Koran’s prohibition, Jews were forced to convert to Islam or face death in Yemen (1165 and 1678), Morocco (1275, 1465 and 1790-92) and Baghdad (1333 and 1344).22

    The situation of Jews in Arab lands reached a low point in the 19th century. Jews in most of North Africa (including AlgeriaTunisiaEgyptLibya and Morocco) were forced to live in ghettos. In Morocco, which contained the largest Jewish community in the Islamic Diaspora, Jews were made to walk barefoot or wear shoes of straw when outside the ghetto. Even Muslim children participated in the degradation of Jews, by throwing stones at them or harassing them in other ways. The frequency of anti-Jewish violence increased, and many Jews were executed on charges of apostasy. Ritual murder accusations against the Jews became commonplace in the Ottoman Empire.23

    https://www.jewishvirtuallibrary.org/myths-and-facts-treatment-of-jews-in-the-arab-world-chapter-11#google_vignette

    "If a woman cannot stand in a public space and say, without fear of consequences, that men cannot be women, then women have no rights at all." Helen Joyce



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 9,166 ✭✭✭jmreire


    Yes, now the statue restoration underway. But also in that article, it speaks about life under the Taliban, and how they are destroying the country, which is true, and you still get people calling the US presence and invasion, that was defeated by the Taliban..complete and utter rubbish!! Best 20 years that Afghans had. Also as can be seen in the article, the Nr of Taleban carrying AK-47's….keeping the peace….???



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 10,185 ✭✭✭✭volchitsa


    It seems to be that the west must both get in there and fix up the countries - whichever countries - but will also be entirely in the wrong for doing so.

    It also seems to be a very white western approach as well. The word "self hating" comes to mind except of course they don't hate themselves, because they feel they're on the "right" side by taking this hostile approach. They only hate some made-up notion based on extrapolating the very worst of CIA Cold War excesses to the entire western world.

    "If a woman cannot stand in a public space and say, without fear of consequences, that men cannot be women, then women have no rights at all." Helen Joyce



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 15,217 ✭✭✭✭Danzy


    You are projecting your values on to them, at a time when they are increasingly going in a specific direction, an Islamic world view.

    It's what is happening now that matters.

    The Islamic world has been returning to a purer Islam since the 1920s



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 15,217 ✭✭✭✭Danzy


    It's a loathing of everything that they are not, purely because it differentiates themselves as better, especially better than the working class, who the modern left despise, utterly despise.

    People talking about how the west must help women in Afghanistan, do this in Iraq, that in Syria.

    That involves going to war in those places.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 10,185 ✭✭✭✭volchitsa


    I'd actually understand that - saying "We'd like to do that but aren't prepared to go to war" I mean. What annoys me is that they don't want to go to war, but still blame the west for all the bad things that happen in the countries where they don't want the west to do anything about it. It's as though the people in those places have no agency, and we are responsible for everything that happens, whether or not we're actually present there. It seems quite racist to me.

    Mind you, there's the same mindset on display in the thread about the murdered CEO: Irish people who've never experienced the US healthcare system, much less suffered one whit from it, calling the murdered CEO a parasite and scum and saying the world is better off without him.

    "If a woman cannot stand in a public space and say, without fear of consequences, that men cannot be women, then women have no rights at all." Helen Joyce



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 9,166 ✭✭✭jmreire


    Heres another opinion on what a future Syria will be like, worth a look as it paints HTS in a different light, much different than is portrayed here on Boards

    https://youtu.be/4Xt_OdzOioE



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,939 ✭✭✭donaghs


    No, I’m not projecting anything onto anyone. Arab people are entitled to have views/ideas which are not rooted in Islam, if they want to. Such ideas don’t have to be rooted in colonial or European ideas.

    This is regardless of what trends come and go.

    I’m aware of the rise in religiosity globally since the 1970s. Most places except Europe. Even in the US , but that seems recently to be heading in the direction of Europe in recent years as less and less people there identify with religions.

    it’s been mentioned before, but there were Arab nationalists in Ottoman Syria before WW1.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,411 ✭✭✭j62


    Last two episodes of this pod had interviews with people on ground during civil war and now



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2, Paid Member Posts: 12,421 ✭✭✭✭AbusesToilets


    This is exact line of reasoning that's used against poor communities across the world. Why don't black people simply do better, take responsibility for their society? Conveniently ignoring the decades of efforts to undermine their ability to do so, the violence inflicted against them.

    The "deal" offered to Arafat would have left the Palestinians with no sovereignty over their boarders, their airspace or seas. It was a better version of the prison that they were already living in. Peace under the threat of Israels guns. It was never a proposal that would be accepted by the Palestinian people, for good reason.

    Anyway, the idea that a Muslim/Arab majority country would share power with a Jewish minority and everyone would just 'get on', is a fantasy. But since you have nothing else, that is now the hole you have dug for yourself.

    As ever, you project your own bigotry. It's clear that Arabs will never be respected or afforded equal rights in a Jewish state. They'll be murdered and jailed and disposed, ultimately driven from their land. No doubt you would be cheerleading for the Rhodesians and South Africans in decades past.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 13,833 ✭✭✭✭TheValeyard


    This is interesting. I have doubts if they are supporting a failed regime or Russian paid mercs holding out.

    Looks like I picked the wrong week to quit sniffing glue



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 19,147 ✭✭✭✭Dohnjoe


    Another grim piece, this one from the BBC, reporting on the systematic torture that ook place in the "human slaughterhouse" (Sednaya prison). I know it's heavy stuff but worth posting because a lot of this was repeatedly denied at the time (including on this discussion site)

    https://www.bbc.com/news/articles/cy4784vn4jdo

    image.png

    "All of the people we spoke to described being beaten with different implements - metal staffs, cables, electric sticks.

    "They would enter the room and start to beat us all over our bodies. I would stay still, watching and waiting for my turn," Adnan, who was arrested in 2019 on accusations of kidnapping and killing a regime soldier, recalls.

    "Every night, we would thank God that we were still alive. Every morning, we would pray to God, please take our souls so we can die in peace."

    Adnan and two of the other newly released inmates said they were sometimes forced to sit with their knees towards their foreheads and a vehicle tyre placed over their bodies with a stick wedged inside so they couldn't move, before beatings were administered.

    Forms of punishment were varied.

    Qasem says he was held upside down by two prison officers in a barrel of water until he thought he was going to "choke and die".

    "I saw death with my own eyes," he says. "They would do this if you woke up in the night, or we spoke in a loud voice, or if we had a problem with any of the other prisoners."

    Two of the prisoners released this week and the former inmate at Saydnaya described witnessing sexual assaults by guards, who they said would anally rape inmates with sticks.

    One man said inmates would offer oral sex to the guards in their desperation for more food.

    Three described guards jumping on their bodies as part of the abuse."

    "Qasem said they could hear what sounded like a helicopter taking off from the hospital grounds before the men's shouts in the corridors. But in the windowless cell they couldn't be sure.

    Then the doors opened, and the freed inmates began running as fast as they could.

    "We ran out of the prison. We ran from fear too," Rakan says, his thoughts on his young children and wife.

    At one point in the chaos, he says, "I was hit by a car. But I didn't mind. I got up and carried on running."

    He says he will never go back to Saydnaya again.

    Adnan, too, says he couldn't look back at the prison, as he ran crying towards Damascus.

    "I just kept going. I can't describe it. I just headed for Damascus. People were taking us from the road in their cars.""



Advertisement