Advertisement
If you have a new account but are having problems posting or verifying your account, please email us on hello@boards.ie for help. Thanks :)
Hello all! Please ensure that you are posting a new thread or question in the appropriate forum. The Feedback forum is overwhelmed with questions that are having to be moved elsewhere. If you need help to verify your account contact hello@boards.ie

Star Trek: Section 31

24567

Comments

  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 8,001 ✭✭✭Inviere




  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 17,792 ✭✭✭✭AMKC
    Ms


    Eh because that Rubbish Discovery is not Star Trek so whatever happened in it has nothing ho do with the Trek Universe. Simples.

    Post edited by AMKC on

    Live long and Prosper

    Peace and long life.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 11,766 ✭✭✭✭LambshankRedemption


    Thats how I have it in my mind. The only original Trek character in Disco, was Spock, but not our Spock. It was a Spock who spent time in a psychiatric hospital, had a weird looking beard and had a sister. So not our Spock.

    None of the events of Disco affect TNG, DS9 etc.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 17,478 ✭✭✭✭Blazer


    not terrible…its utter shite and a stain on Star Trek…that section 31 looks to be going the same way.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 11,766 ✭✭✭✭LambshankRedemption


    I find it funny you quoted a post of mine from 6 weeks ago.

    I was being diplomatic because I felt sure if I declared it as terrible, someone would flame me because they liked it.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 117 ✭✭Joe286


    Michelle Yeo is generally worth a look. I will do so because of her



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 11,766 ✭✭✭✭LambshankRedemption


    I love her as an actress, but I hate her character in all Disco episodes except the pilot. I cannot sit through alternate-universe Georgeu, practically twirling her moustache every 5 minutes.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 117 ✭✭Joe286




  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 17,792 ✭✭✭✭AMKC
    Ms


    New trailer out,

    Its certainly looks better in that than the Teaser Trailer. Still not very Trek like though.

    Live long and Prosper

    Peace and long life.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 29,837 ✭✭✭✭breezy1985


    Looks the exact same level of sht.

    Also (and I know you can find reasons) why do they have a half black half white person when we know their species are dead. Fukin amateur level memberberries.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,669 ✭✭✭Rawr


    I guess we only assume that everyone on Cheron was killed in their Civil War, and some might have been off planet at the time. However, that does kind of ruin the dramatic punch of "Let that be your Last Battlefield"

    (Can already imagine the fluff-pieces for this declaring: "Section 32 Trailer finally solves 50 year old mystery!!")

    It's a better put together trailer than last time for sure, and does seem to at least imply that Space-Hitler will have a solid team to work with her. But…I sense from the scenes here that we'd get the same empty caloies we got with Discovery and the low-points of Picard. Flashy Trek-adjacent special effects with superficial character beats that might sound good, but have little else going on.

    I could be wrong, but I don't find myself any less dubious about this show or my potential to enjoy it. If people start reporting that it's good, I might watch…but I'm still of the mind of giving this a miss.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 29,837 ✭✭✭✭breezy1985


    And you wouldn't be too far off.

    I just Googled "Charon Star Trek" and all the usual clickbait sci-fi sites are talking about it.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,669 ✭✭✭Rawr




  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 8,001 ✭✭✭Inviere


    Yeah same, I'm not even gonna bother with it unless it appears to be some bizarre diamond in the rough (it's not, the trailer shows it's as soulless and shallow as Discovery et al.)



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,669 ✭✭✭Rawr


    The thing about trailers is that the art of making good trailers seemed to be lost eons ago. Personally I think it all went to hell when we lost the legendary voice of Don LaFontaine (The "In a world…" guy. He could make anything sound awesome)

    The past couple of decades have been rough when it comes to trailers. Some of the movies I really enjoyed happened to have pretty bad trailers and that seems to be pretty universal regardless of the end product.

    A trailer will either:

    • Be a bit tone deaf and try to (badly) generate excitment with flashy visuals.
    • Contain scenes that don't even exist in the final work
    • Or, worst of all, simply tell you the entire movie, destroying the point of even watching it.

    The fact that trailers are usually so very bad at their job means that sometimes a bad trailer might be attached to a good project. So there's a slither of a possibility that a bad Section 31 trailer is somehow attached to a good show.

    However since the people who made this show have form for doing a bad job with Trek, I'm inclined to believe that the trailer is showing us the quality we should expect from a Discovery spin-off.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 8,001 ✭✭✭Inviere


    Exactly, this is coming from the same slurry pit that Discovery came from. In fact, it appears to encompass the very worst parts of the Discovery style. Expect zero character development, zero depth to the writing and story, and zero substance. It's already about a character I strongly dislike, working for an organisation that the writers made an absolute balls of, so it's off to a very poor start in my books.

    I used to watch Discovery just hoping beyond hope that it'd improve, and it never really did. I'm gonna save myself the time on this one.

    I've come to accept that "my" Star Trek is TNG, DS9, VOY, and ENT....and that those days are never, ever coming back. Its a shame, but that's how it feels these days. Is it that the audience isn't there for more cerebral Star Trek anymore? Or is it that the studios choose not to make it any more? Who knows.

    Yes SNW is good, but when the bar is set so low, is it truly great? Of course Lower Decks is brilliant too (it's a love letter to Trek, but it'll always be a parody to me and I have a hard time accepting any of those characters truly belong in the uniform as portrayed by TNG Picard etc.) Picard was only saved by industrial strength nostalgia in its final season. Prodigy is another good showing, but the hyperbole around it is a bit eye rolling (the recent one stating that S2 may be the best serialised season in the franchises history....i mean cmon.)

    So yeah, any hope I may have held has dwindled now do to what I can only call apathy at best. Section 31, if that's the show to change my mind, I'll eject my own warp core.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 6,429 ✭✭✭TheIrishGrover


    In fairness, last episode of Season 1 of SNW was simply amazing. And I think it's good solid, fun Trek. But that's another thread…. Oh and LD was awesome. (And I've never watched Prodigy)

    Other than that, I heartily agree with you above.

    I really really REALLY gave Disco the benefit of the doubt. God knows I tried to see the best in it. I STILL really liked their interpretation of Klingons and enjoyed whatshisname in Klingon form. Thought he spoke it as a language rather than unconnected word after word (If you know what I mean). Enjoyed Jason Isaacs up until the reveal. Enjoyed and will be thankful for the introduction of Pike, Spock, Number One ("Una". lol).

    But this does NOT look good. S31 were great when used very sparingly. Even by their end in DS9 they were bordering on the edge of too campy. Then…. Well…. I mean I can hear the leather creak. As has been said, Emperoress Georgio (Or whatever) killed billions. Ate sentient aliens etc etc and is so eeeeeeeeeevilllllll that she should have TWO goatees.

    I mean, the production values on that latest trailer look amazing. It is movie-level effects etc and lots of wham bam but… eeeeeevvvvviiiilllllll. That was her whole one-dimensional trait. The entire Disco SHOW consisted of one dimensional "characters". Some started out well. Rounded, interesting characters (Jason Isaacs, the doctor/engineer relationship). Before every interesting trait was removed and they went from characters to "characters". Zero depth (Alternate Universe moustache twirler, camp couple who creepily "adopt" adult trans character simply because they are trans). Actually, I take it back. I actually really liked Adira. Thought they were the most human on the show.

    At least this is a parody but with S31 be any different?:



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 21,183 ✭✭✭✭Stark


    Tbf, Discovery is set before the events of TOS so there's some excuse for having Cheron aliens there.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 29,837 ✭✭✭✭breezy1985


    The clip is from S31 which is set post TOS movies.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,669 ✭✭✭Rawr


    Any solid indication of when S31 is set? I think I read rumors of Rachel Garret being a featured character, placing the show in the “Lost Era” between the TOS Moves and TNG.

    I think setting this in the Lost Era is one of the few things the might grab my attention, but even then it’s probably not by enough to get me watching unless I hear later that it was actually a good show.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 21,183 ✭✭✭✭Stark


    Ah missed it being set in the "lost era". Had just assumed they were picking up where S2 of Discovery left off.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 29,837 ✭✭✭✭breezy1985


    Garrett is definitely in it as a young officer. Looks like she is assigned reluctantly to Yeoh's wannabe Suicide Squad and will be the "straight guy" to wacky sassy Space Hitler.

    I doubt it will be the lost era story any of us ever wanted. I bet if we get a monster maroon it will be a fleeting glimpse of Garrett at the end with some overdone emotional music to make it clear we should be moved.

    Wouldn't be surprised if the uniforms got some stupid origin story moment.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 8,001 ✭✭✭Inviere


    In a world where a near thousand year out of date ship fits right in and helps saves the day, I'm not even sure that it matters what era it's set in. Pre TOS, TOS, Lost Era, and beyond...I wouldn't trust these writers to write a shopping list tbh.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,669 ✭✭✭Rawr


    Pretty much this too. Although not impossible that they could do a good job, if these are Discovery vintage writers, they’ll likely make a Dog’s Dinner of any Trek era.

    There’s also the paradox of the Lost Era being interesting precisely because it hasn’t featured centrally in any Trek production. The Lost Era gets referenced a lot and covers everything from the early careers of most TNG era characters, the Tomod Incident, most of the Occupation of Bajor, the Federation- Cardassisa War and Seven’s assimilation on The Raven.

    We get glimpses and flashbacks of this time in Trek, but that’s it. I’m of 2 minds when it comes to the Lost Era. I am very curious about what a Trek show here would be like, but at the same time doing so would forever remove the mystery. Sort of ruining the appeal of it.

    I feel that going to the Lost Era should be saved for an exceptionally good story that could make good use of the setting. Alas, I fear that Section 31 is not this.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 8,001 ✭✭✭Inviere


    Absolutely, no doubting there's a myriad of solid stories possible in that era. The Cardassian Occupation of Bajor alone holds all sorts of possibilities. I just have no faith in it to be explored with any type of depth or soul, so I'd prefer it left alone really.

    Even SNW, it's a good show, leagues ahead of Discovery, interesting characters, character development, and in many ways it's the flagship Nu-Trek show....but it still, for me, just still too "save the galaxy" focused. I'd love to see it steer toward classic exploration, mysterious, and frontier stuff.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 29,837 ✭✭✭✭breezy1985


    The lost era would need someone way way more in tune with Star Trek than the Disco, SNW or JJ writers for it to be what fans have hoped for. Would need to be very capable of navigating the lore of Star Trek without getting into accidental parody levels like SNW or JJ.

    Would need to be the love child of the Lower Decks team and Andor team.

    The Disco team are big Trek fans but very much In the fanfic, books and STO world rather than the main TV/movie stuff and I'm 100% certain S31 is in the lost era because they spent years on the likes of Trekbbs listening to fans like us (core canon) talking about how much we want a lost era show so are now gonna do a ham fisted attempt to try (and fail) to please the core fanbase.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 13,446 ✭✭✭✭TheValeyard


    Could we get to see an Ambassador class ship in all its glory?

    Also would the ENT B or C be in usage around then?

    All eyes on Kursk. Slava Ukraini.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,669 ✭✭✭Rawr


    Memory Alpha suggests that the Ambassador started in 2325, 20 years before Garrett dies as Captain of the Enterprise C in the 2340’s

    https://memory-alpha.fandom.com/wiki/Ambassador_class

    So if the show features a younger Garrett, there’s a possibly that it’s during the time of Ambassador usage. The role of Enterprise B & C are usually the fodder or Lost Era Trek novels. In canon we only know about the very start of the Enterprise B and the very end of the Enterprise C. Enterprise C might have been brand new when destroyed, or maybe even one of the original Ambassador Class from the 2320’s and had served for years until her loss. Similarly, we don’t know if Enterprise B was still around until the 2340’s and then replaced by the Ent C.

    We just don’t know. Prior to Picard S3, I would have feared them even touching an existing class without fouling it up with redesigns, but I think if they did introduce an Ambassador it might appear in her original design. I get the impression that Discovery writers are of a kind who would skim through the greatest hits of Trek rather than propery watch a show, and since Yesterday’s Enterprise is one of those click-baity “Top 10” entries of most Best-of Trek lists, they’ll likely have watched this episode and are aware of its popularity with fans. It would not surprise me at all if there will be an attempt to mine it for Easter Eggs, since they were already willing to use Garrett.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 21,183 ✭✭✭✭Stark


    Looks like January 24th is the date for this anyway



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,669 ✭✭✭Rawr


    I wonder how it will do.

    Since I don’t have “official” access to this I’d have to use alternative methods to watch it (glances at eye-patch hanging on the monitor), and can’t find myself even considering going to the effort. Sure, it’s only just one 2-part pilot that got hobbled by budget limitations TV Movie, but it’s still more effort than I’m likely to give to watch such a dubious Kurtzman pet-project.

    But still, if any Boardsie does watch it, I’d appreciate if they share their perspective.



Advertisement