Advertisement
Help Keep Boards Alive. Support us by going ad free today. See here: https://subscriptions.boards.ie/.
https://www.boards.ie/group/1878-subscribers-forum

Private Group for paid up members of Boards.ie. Join the club.
Hi all, please see this major site announcement: https://www.boards.ie/discussion/2058427594/boards-ie-2026

Dublin Coach Experience Discussion Thread

1676870727376

Comments

  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 163 ✭✭Jameslee23


    it’s not like it’ll be going to waste Citylink will operate it the only difference to it is they won’t stop at Kildare village or the red cow



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,772 ✭✭✭mikeybhoy


    I wonder is it possibility that the 816 will be converted to PSO a bit like the 310 in Limerick



  • Moderators, Motoring & Transport Moderators, Technology & Internet Moderators Posts: 23,744 Mod ✭✭✭✭bk


    If it does happen, then DC should be excluded from any such PSO.

    We shouldn't reward companies for dropping routes like this.

    If needed perhaps a temporary PSO contract for just 6 to 12 months, giving time to other companies to bid on a longer term PSO contract and get fleet, etc. into place.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2, Paid Member Posts: 1,300 ✭✭✭z80CPU
    Darth 8-bit


    "We shouldn't reward companies for dropping routes"

    But this is Ireland



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 957 ✭✭✭LiamaDelta




  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2, Paid Member Posts: 1,300 ✭✭✭z80CPU
    Darth 8-bit


    I Apologize for not wearing my Michael o Leary hat for you Liama :p



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,772 ✭✭✭mikeybhoy


    I wouldn't necessarily exclude DC from bidding from any such contract if say they decided to get their act together and started operating buses in roadworthy conditions, improve the standards of driver training and customer service etc. Probably very unlikely as long as the current management are there mind you.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 13,962 ✭✭✭✭Red Silurian


    It should be a condition of any licence held by any public bus operator that certain standards are kept on every route, PSO or not.

    Bus Eireann should be drafted in to provide any route rejected by the private companies, and to provide competition on the other routes if needs be



  • Moderators, Motoring & Transport Moderators, Technology & Internet Moderators Posts: 23,744 Mod ✭✭✭✭bk


    Because the government pay for the route and cover any loses.

    So it goes from a route that DC lose money on to a route that they now make a guaranteed profit on but at the expense of the tax payer. It is basically free money for DC.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 957 ✭✭✭LiamaDelta


    It is a condition of the licence, but it's not enforced by the NTA. I had a very long email tennis game with them where I asked them what their standards were and how they assessed them….they wouldn't (couldn't) say how.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 13,962 ✭✭✭✭Red Silurian


    If it's not enforced it's not really a condition is it?



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 13,962 ✭✭✭✭Red Silurian


    My understanding of a PSO route is that a company is paid a set fee to run the route (including collect a fare decided by TFI.) The fee will cover the drivers wages, the fuel as well as the cost of and maintenance of the bus/train/tram whatever it may be and a profit for the company who wins the PSO

    So effectively the taxpayer incurs all the costs for the route to be run and pays the private company a profit on top of it. And this was sold as a good idea Vs having Bus Eireann run the show



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 957 ✭✭✭LiamaDelta


    https://www.boards.ie/discussion/comment/122895804/#Comment_122895804

    Because the government pay for the route and cover any loses.

    So it goes from a route that DC lose money on to a route that they now make a guaranteed profit on but at the expense of the tax payer. It is basically free money for DC.

    But that's exactly the definition of a PSO service. If there isn't a subsidy the service doesn't run. Do you want to remove them all?



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 957 ✭✭✭LiamaDelta


    Yes that's it roughly. There's usually a profit share element to it if the route becomes very popular, but with the low fares charged it rarely would be profitable, just less of a cost. The core premise is that the route is considered necessary as a public service. It doesn't just happen on all routes, there is an amount of due dilligence regarding the need etc.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 957 ✭✭✭LiamaDelta


    I suppose its there in case of really bad performance/service, they can implement it if they want/need to. My query was in relation to the 726. You actually find that you will always get a better performance on PSO routes because they don't get paid if they don't run the service!



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 13,962 ✭✭✭✭Red Silurian


    It can't be easy to determine what is necessary and what is not to be fair. The major issue I have is using private companies instead of a company the state already owns



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 957 ✭✭✭LiamaDelta


    Yes there are a number of factors, e.g. demographics, population etc. Some are designated so as to provide access to HSE services maybe once or twice a week. The new local link services seem to be doing well at adapting service requirement to needs. They reguarly launch a route and then tweak it in terms of frequency or stopping points.

    Regarding state(semi) companies, they are subject to EU competition rules so as to provide some competition in the market. So Dublin Bus or Go Ahead or Bus Eireann can all bid for the work on an even playing pitch.



  • Moderators, Motoring & Transport Moderators, Paid Member Posts: 11,974 Mod ✭✭✭✭devnull


    Because it might be that the route is just about financially viable but the company feels that it would make more money by it being rolled over into a PSO route. It would also encourage operators to start a route that they know is not going to be commercially viable in the hope it will get rolled over into a PSO route that nobody else will be able to tender for to avoid an open tender process. That's why you need to make sure that any route that does get rolled over is subject to an open tender .

    But it has to be said, a private company running a city bus service, like for example City Direct in Galway, live and die by the income of the farebox. If they are not running any services they also will not take in any money, just like a PSO service.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 957 ✭✭✭LiamaDelta


    I don't think there has ever been a route that just gets 'rolled over' into a PSO route. That's not a thing, they have to go to tender.

    I'm not at all familiar with Galway. I would expect that City Direct operate under licence, but they could likely find themselves having to tender for the routes that they already operate. In a similar way to how GoAhead was able to get into the Dublin market. They left all current routes with Dublin Bus at the time, and new routes were open to tender.

    Anyway apologies we're straying way away off how unbelievabley shyte Dublin Coach are. I think their service has only improved at the moment because there is some extra capacity in the market over the winter when there is less tourist busses in use. Normal service will resume around Easter!



  • Moderators, Motoring & Transport Moderators, Paid Member Posts: 11,974 Mod ✭✭✭✭devnull


    Dublin Coach literally are currently running a PSO route in Limerick after saying they could no longer operate a route covering the same areas commercially. The argument that was made was that as they felt the route was no longer commercially viable, it was best to essentially roll it over to a PSO service with some changes rather than putting it out to tender which takes a lot longer and means a loss of service for a considerable period whilst the tender exercise takes place.

    The City Direct Galway routes are not PSO routes, they are commercial routes. The Dublin Bus and Go-Ahead routes are PSO.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 957 ✭✭✭LiamaDelta


    yeah fair enough, another NTA failing. Understandable that it has to be done in an emergency, but there should have been a tender process commenced at the same time with the intention of having an operator in place in 12 months



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2, Paid Member Posts: 29,746 ✭✭✭✭_Kaiser_


    Another day, another breakdown. This time a 221-reg blocking the left lane just after the on ramp from kildare village on the M7 Dublin bound just now. Big tailback on approach.

    How these clowns are allowed to still be operating is a joke!



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 163 ✭✭Jameslee23


    I wouldn’t be surprised if the only one they operate by the end of next year is the 726



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 194 ✭✭DUBLINBUSGUY




  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 163 ✭✭Jameslee23


    cause nearly all the coaches they have have gone to the scrapyard



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 163 ✭✭Jameslee23


    171 van hool has broken tail light at the red cow yesterday evening they only got them weeks ago and they’re starting to fall apart already



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,723 ✭✭✭p_haugh


    The NTA have determined that the Portarlington→Monestavern section of the 816 will require a PSO replacement service, which is some good news at least!

    No indication on timelines for the launch date or who shall be running it yet, however.



  • Moderators, Motoring & Transport Moderators, Paid Member Posts: 11,974 Mod ✭✭✭✭devnull


    I suspect it will end up being rolled over and the income and certainty of the revenue will help Dublin Coach.

    It honestly doesn't sit well with me.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 957 ✭✭✭LiamaDelta


    @devnull I take it all back 🤣

    Hopefully it'll be Martleys or someone similar, they're running a lot of good services locally.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 163 ✭✭Jameslee23


    there’s been a 2012 double-decker broke down in the redcow since yesterday morning



Advertisement