Advertisement
If you have a new account but are having problems posting or verifying your account, please email us on hello@boards.ie for help. Thanks :)
Hello all! Please ensure that you are posting a new thread or question in the appropriate forum. The Feedback forum is overwhelmed with questions that are having to be moved elsewhere. If you need help to verify your account contact hello@boards.ie

Luas Finglas

12930323435

Comments

  • Moderators, Motoring & Transport Moderators Posts: 14,109 Mod ✭✭✭✭monument


    There might be blue murder in terms of the need for underpasses or elevated tracks on some sections, but a highly segregated route could have gone via Finglas. There are a host of issues with using a route via Finglas.

    There would still be tunnelling needed at the airport (or fairly convoluted elevated tracks around the airspace requirements at the airport), and south of Broadstone would need a tunnel or to be split into two lines in the centre.

    Without even going the full hog, there are questions about the balance of how segregated Luas was built and than could continue with Luas Finglas. The routing of the end of Finglas via St Margaret's Rd seems questionable — there seem to be too many road crossing and foot crossing points along there.



  • Moderators, Motoring & Transport Moderators Posts: 14,109 Mod ✭✭✭✭monument


    I'm sure people will try to make out the parkland is some kind of biodiversity goldmine or something (it's not), but I fully agree here. This is relatively a really simple project, and it highlights how broken our system is that it has not been progressed faster and that the planning will likely take much longer.



  • Moderators, Science, Health & Environment Moderators Posts: 14,648 Mod ✭✭✭✭marno21


    TII have commenced a market consultation regarding the delivery of Luas Finglas

    https://www.etenders.gov.ie/epps/pmc/viewPmc.do?resourceId=4780964



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 30,851 ✭✭✭✭blanch152


    Luas Finglas could get a boost by TII wanting to show that they can move more quickly than Irish Rail.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,396 ✭✭✭gjim


    6 months doesn't seem that crazy to me when you think of what 4km means in an urban environment, there's a lot to consider no? And you can't keep throwing bodies at a task like this before they start tripping over each other.

    We'd all love it to happen quicker but I think what may look like a "relatively simple" rail project is not simple in any absolute sense.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 72 ✭✭Brightlights66


    It is clear to everyone that this extension to/from Finglas will be a success.

    Some short time after it opens there will be a clamour for it to be upgraded to a metro, given that it has a standalone corridor into the city between the Royal Canal and the city.

    The problem then will be that Ireland will just have spent a lot of money tunnelling the metrolink just 300-400 metres, mostly, away from any purported upgrade of the line to/from Finglas.

    If Ireland were to build its proposed Metrolink through Drumcondra, this would not be the case, as it would be sensibly far enough away from the current Green Line, and, in indisputable fact, in an area with a considerably higher population.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,426 ✭✭✭KrisW1001


    please, for the love of God, put away this hobby-horse.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 72 ✭✭Brightlights66


    I really should ask, somewhere, but I'm not sure if this is the place.

    In the latest government plan, there's a proposed tram service to run between Balgriffin and the City in the years to 2042, via Drumcondra.

    It would be nice, in the 15-20 years hence , to see if there are options for the Midland line to have an appropriate connection with the proposed LUAS to/from Balgrifffin.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 14,097 ✭✭✭✭Zebra3


    It has a stand-alone corridor between Broombridge and Broadstone.

    There will be no clamour to upgrade it to metro.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 72 ✭✭Brightlights66


    We'll see.

    There is pretty much a stand-alone corridor between Dundrum and the Grand Canal, and bleating for a replacement with a metro started at about day seven.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 14,097 ✭✭✭✭Zebra3




  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 5,247 ✭✭✭Daith


    Broombridge has Irish Rail and Bus connections. No need for anything else. Plenty of Luas Finglas people will transfer to other services there.

    I wish the NTA would promote this more and try and ensure the three services coordinate if possible though



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 18,557 ✭✭✭✭Idbatterim


    This line should be more segregated, given there is a high chance, this will become our airport service… When is the public consultation or has it already taken place?



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 15,604 ✭✭✭✭loyatemu


    there have been 2 consultations already. It doesn't go to the airport, and in all the many Dublin transport strategies there have been over the years, there have been zero proposals to have it go to the airport.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 18,557 ✭✭✭✭Idbatterim


    Yeah I am aware it isnt designed as an airport service. But there is a good chance metrolink wont be built, I read several articles in the irish times recently, speculating the same thing… Wont be surprised if it isnt built, that they bring the Dart and Luas to it, via finglas…



  • Moderators, Science, Health & Environment Moderators Posts: 20,361 Mod ✭✭✭✭Sam Russell


    You have saying the metro will not be built almost as long as proposals have been on the table to build a metro to the airport.

    You have been correct so far.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 18,557 ✭✭✭✭Idbatterim


    I'd say the chances of metrolink being built are 50/50 or thereabouts, the endless planning farce, actually hinders these projects going ahead, by the time they have planning, often the financial circumstances have changed and the first thing they should continue pumping money into with our colossal infrastructure deficit, is the first thing that is cut…

    Say the cost is ten billion, its actually nothing in the scheme of things… But to the public , its sold differently by the media etc.. Who only want to sell their papers and sell misinformed agenda driven nonsense…



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 14,097 ✭✭✭✭Zebra3


    If it’s not built, Dublin is finished.

    If Dublin is finished, the state is too.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 12,023 ✭✭✭✭tom1ie


    tell that to the charlemont residents who don’t give a fiddlers about the rest of us.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 18,557 ✭✭✭✭Idbatterim


    the problem is far more the system, these nimbys exist everywhere… What are these idiots up in arms about? overlooking is it?



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 12,023 ✭✭✭✭tom1ie


    The system must allow NIMBYISM to be declared fair.
    For the system to work properly it has to deal with these NIMBYS quickly.
    When metrolink gets RO in jan, a JR will be applied for probably on the last week of the window.
    So let’s say RO is granted on Friday jan 31st, a JR will be applied for W/C mon 24/3/25
    The JR, if granted, should only take a further 8 weeks if we were serious about getting infrastructure built, which would bring us to W/C mon 19/5/25.
    At that stage construction should be given the go ahead.

    But we can only wish for this setup as we have no idea how long a JR will take under the new planning courts- if in fact they are setup and ready?



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 18,557 ✭✭✭✭Idbatterim


    It is a damn shame in my opinion, that the greens didnt win a few more seats… this is probably wishful thinking, BUT, if **** hits the fan again, the could have said, the infrastructure spending, isnt being decimated, make it a total red line or they pull the plug… because capital expenditure is the first place spending will be hit and its the last place it should be hit, in this country… Mickey Mouse and the boy scout, were asked just before the election, where they would cut spending and raise taxes, if **** hits the fan… Of course they didnt give a straight answer, which you already know they didnt… But as I know and as I read in a few news articles in the irish times, backing up my assumption, capital expenditure , will be the first for the dramatic cuts



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,242 ✭✭✭spillit67


    I’m a big believer in the Greens on transport but I will say they are big part of the problem on planning.



  • Moderators, Motoring & Transport Moderators Posts: 14,109 Mod ✭✭✭✭monument


    Metro via Finglas with Luas on-street via Drumcondra Road and Ballymun (with a branch to Coolock) was the preferred Metro route in Platform for Change, so, it's hardly an idea that's without merit.

    I'm not saying it's should be entertained at this stage as MetroLink should go ahead. And if MetroLink is going ahead, Luas Finglas should meet it in Ballymun and maybe go onto Coolock etc. In recent years, the GDA plans have failed to look at orbital rail, which we can see is key elsewhere.

    Screenshot 2024-12-16 142111.png

    https://www.nationaltransport.ie/wp-content/uploads/2011/12/platform_for_change_2001.pdf



  • Moderators, Sports Moderators Posts: 29,555 Mod ✭✭✭✭Podge_irl


    Why would there be any cuts in the first place?

    The Luas is not going to ever go to the airport.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 10,008 ✭✭✭✭cgcsb




  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,426 ✭✭✭KrisW1001


    Yeah, this is one that I always find funny. We have quite a lot of “green” legislation on the books here that objectors can use to delay projects, but almost none of it has come from the Green Party.

    The Greens have been in government only twice: in the 30th Dáil (2007-2011) and the 33rd (2020-2024). But, surprisingly, we enacted very little environmental legislation during either period. Some people just want a scapegoat, and the Green Party fits their ideological bill for it, but the truth is that every party in the state that can come within an ass’s roar of government is on the same page when it comes to environmental legislation - especially as quite a lot of it is dictated by EU treaty obligations.

    The biggest “threat” to large infrastructure projects is the right to consultation about environmental issues granted by the Aarhus Convention. This is the most successful lever that NIMBY groups can use to stall or cancel a project, and it is the main grounds under which Judicial Reviews are sought. It has nothing to do with the Greens, though, as we ratified the Aarhus Convention in 2012, under a FG/Labour government.



  • Moderators, Science, Health & Environment Moderators Posts: 5,324 Mod ✭✭✭✭spacetweek


    we ratified the Aarhus Convention in 2012, under a FG/Labour government.

    And what a grievous mistake that was. This convention makes a lot of sense in Denmark where everybody is very sensible and the greater good is put first, but does not work at all in an individualistic country like Ireland as all this has done is empower the wealthy frivolous litigators and cranks. Talking about how slowly our infrastructure projects proceed, people will mention the endless public consultations being the cause but they are entirely about avoiding JR‘s and nothing else.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 12,023 ✭✭✭✭tom1ie


    Yeah but they end up going to JRs anyway.
    Hopefully the new planning court and planning bill brought in by FG will sort that.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,426 ✭✭✭KrisW1001


    It's an international treaty. Nothing to do with Denmark except that that is where it was negotiated and signed.

    (See also Geneva, Oslo, Berne, Kyoto… even Dublin gets one: about immigration)

    The mistake was in not educating our planners about its impacts; that widespread institutional ignorance of government obligations under this treaty is why it became such a useful attack vector for NIMBYs.

    NIMBYs are basically a price we pay for civic freedom. And it has to be said that one man's NIMBYs are another's "defenders of the rights of the ordinary citizen"... all depending on where the particular Back Yard is.



Advertisement