Advertisement
If you have a new account but are having problems posting or verifying your account, please email us on hello@boards.ie for help. Thanks :)
Hello all! Please ensure that you are posting a new thread or question in the appropriate forum. The Feedback forum is overwhelmed with questions that are having to be moved elsewhere. If you need help to verify your account contact hello@boards.ie

Sky Stream has arrived in Ireland

11516171921

Comments

  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 31,698 ✭✭✭✭AndrewJRenko


    THanks, mine came back working 'normally' later last night. As I'm coming up to renewal shortly, it helped me greatly in my decision to switch to Virgin's streaming box.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 711 ✭✭✭maik3n


    As a general rule, how does the sky stream system fare when under pressure, so to speak?

    I'm thinking of your average busy household where you might have kids gaming online, other family members watching youtube, streaming netflix or just general web browsing etc. Does Sky Stream just die and become a buffering mess, lol?



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 873 ✭✭✭Cork981


    I left Sky Steam in August and they wouldn't budge on offering a discount, got two texts the last few weeks offering Stream and Netflix for €20 for 12 months. Good offer but I already locked into Eir TV for 12 months. Worked fine for me but wasn't worth the €50 out of contract.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 31,698 ✭✭✭✭AndrewJRenko


    It didn't have any such issues for me for most of the year, but for the last two months, we had intermittent issues of channels or programmes not loading. It didn't seem to relate to concurrent usage by other family members.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,860 ✭✭✭BionicRasher


    No issues with buffering for us.

    I'm currently flicking through channels whilst 2 kids are gaming one on Xbox one on PlayStation. Wife in the kitchen watching RTE player and daughter upstairs on her phone.

    No issues at all - we have 500mb broadband but normally speeds are about 400-420

    Stream box is on WiFi in the TV room approx 10m from our closest Google Nest WiFi mesh point



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 914 ✭✭✭WildCardDoW


    Off topic and sorry, but is streets ahead an actual thing? I (feel like) it's known from Community as a phrase Pierce tries to make popular haha.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 31,698 ✭✭✭✭AndrewJRenko


    Yiz might be interested in my initial thoughts on the Virgin streaming box.

    TLDR; It's better than Sky Stream.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 11,793 ✭✭✭✭Red Silurian


    The next big thing, which will blow the competition out of the water is recordable box with internal hard drive version of sky stream, probably named sky stream +

    I will hold on to my sky q until this comes along but once it does I think it will become very popular



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 959 ✭✭✭decor58


    I think you will be waiting a very long time, the broadcastes, including Sky, want us to use their players. The ad revenue is the decider, most skip over ads on recordings and that doesn't make money.



  • Moderators, Technology & Internet Moderators Posts: 12,310 Mod ✭✭✭✭icdg


    I don’t think it’s going to happen either. They want us watching the adverts, and never were keen on the fact that people were fast forwarding through them.

    Now they can force-feed us non skippable adverts. They are not going to undermine that.

    Sky have even brought in an extra charge to avoid adverts on catch up, should you really want to.

    The BBC is the huge casualty in is, as (except on Sky) there is no catch up. We are back to the pre VHS era. On Sky there’s a limited BBC catch up that doesn’t have everything and nobody is terribly happy with.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 6,038 ✭✭✭JDxtra




  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 11,793 ✭✭✭✭Red Silurian


    I remember we said similar about sky back in the early 00's, one of the main issues we had then was you couldn't "tape" from a sky box without awkward connections happening. The word on the street was that Virgin (then Chorus or NTL depending on where in the country you lived) would beat sky because they could be recorded much easier. Then sky+ appeared

    I have no reason to believe the same won't happen with the streaming platforms. It's a question of who blinks first



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,849 ✭✭✭Delta2113


    Probably not enough people but people will begin dropping these streaming boxes if they can't do or won't do what you could achieve with an old VHS recorder.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 729 ✭✭✭babelfish1990


    There is no technical reason to re-introduce hard disks into Streaming boxes. Eir had the perfect solution working on their Apple TV box with cloud recording - probably the best of the streaming platforms. Up until recently you could record BBC, on Eir completely unrestricted, fast-forward etc. This proved that it is technically possible to emulate all the capabilities of hard-disk recording. Recently, the BBC stopped them from allowing the recordings. (RTE had never allowed recording on streaming). This is purely a copyright issue which the TV channels are using to stop streaming providers from allowing recording, in most cases to force users to their own players (Although BBC i-Player is not available outside UK). Unfortunately, I can't see it changing.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 11,793 ✭✭✭✭Red Silurian


    There is no technical reason to re-introduce hard disks into Streaming boxes

    What about the below technical reason?

    Recently, the BBC stopped them from allowing the recordings. (RTE had never allowed recording on streaming)

    My sky q box or Freesat HD box can, always will be able to, and always could, record from BBC and RTE.

    Furthermore I am hearing of dodgy services allowing cloud recordings on all channels without restriction. Eir, Sky and Virgin are all competitors with each other but they also all compete with the dodgy crowds, they can't afford to offer a sub-standard service

    From the POV of sky they could potentially go down the cloud streaming route but they will need to get RTE and BBC on board or not give them the option to pull out as Eir have done as they are 90% of what many households watch and if they don't allow it for some BS rights reason Mr Dodgy-Box will step in and fill that void



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,515 ✭✭✭Nigzcurran


    My dodgy supplier now offers 5 day catch up on all the main channels. Id happily pay sky or similar if they offered the same

    Time is contagious, everyone is getting old.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 11,793 ✭✭✭✭Red Silurian


    Can you elaborate on what you mean by main channels? Or would that cause legal issues.

    I'm not trying to be smart with my question, I've never owned a dodgy service so just want a feel for it



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,330 ✭✭✭Schorpio


    To be fair, that's not strictly a technical reason. That's a rights-holders/permissions issue.

    There isn't any technical reason that it can't be done, but it won't be done - either cloud-based or HDD-based.

    Back in the Sky+ days, catch-up streaming services weren't a thing, and while Sky probably weren't thrilled about the prospect of people fast-forwarding through adverts on Sky channels, the Sky+ subscription cost more, so the revenue stream was still there. Plus, I don't every recall seeing reports at the time about ad revenues being down on the back of people recording TV.

    Nowadays that model has transformed into paying money to skip ads on Sky Stream. This model is common across the streaming industry (YT Premium, Spotify etc.) No chance it's going away. It's a win-win for Sky - either you pay, or the advertisers do.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 11,793 ✭✭✭✭Red Silurian


    The issue of the BBC/RTE not allowing cloud recording is a technical issue because Eir, in this instance, created the technology to allow broadcasters to pull out of the service. If that ability wasn't technically implemented it would not be available to broadcasters

    The EE TV Box Pro available in the UK is an internet and Freeview enabled box that allows recording from either the IPTV channels or the Freeview ones. So there is no technical reason for recording not to be a thing on sky's stream or glass services with a hardware change

    The model may indeed be a win-win for sky but it is anything but for the consumer, most households will stubbornly hold on to their Q or +HD boxes until the very last day that they can - and after that there's no guarantee that sky stream will be chosen as the replacement considering they have lost their USP



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 31,698 ✭✭✭✭AndrewJRenko


    Eir didn't create the technology to allow broadcasters to pull out for the laughs. They created that technology because some broadcasters insist on having that technology. They wouldn't be able to carry the channel at all without it.

    RTE isn't really an issue, with the RTE Player widely available.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,665 ✭✭✭KildareP


    It's highly unlikely to happen. Margins in traditional pay TV subscriptions are on an inevitable downward trend because of declining viewership.

    A hard drive is an added expense, is added complexity in your equipment and generally the most likely thing to fail in the field.

    When the alternative is to stream everything, either live or timeshifted, and have cheap-as-chips equipment with no moving parts, that's added margin.

    Then factor in you can do unskippable ads, that are relevant at the point of watching, can gather far more metrics around viewership than you could before to target said ads, let people watch "recordings" on any device (not just the TV) and revoke playback rights at a moment's notice because you can make extra money selling them to a higher bidder, why would any operator want to revert back to the PVR style of before?

    The only reason PVR's were let take off was because in their heyday capturing the off-air broadcast to disk was the only reaslistic means to allow timeshifting to happen at all. No longer the case.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,515 ✭✭✭Nigzcurran


    All the terrestrial ones like rte, BBC, Itv and then the likes of sky sports. I signed up to sky stream when it launched last year and sent it back because of the issues with recording/catch up. I then got sky q installed and that was just as bad so had to send that back. I would love to get a proper official supplier that offered a decent record/catch up option as the 3 of us at home rarely watch live TV.

    Time is contagious, everyone is getting old.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 711 ✭✭✭maik3n


    Besides the cost issue for Sky, I think as mentioned already that people's viewing habits have just changed so considerably at this stage, that the demand for a SKY+ stream box is rather limited.

    I think people are also generally familiar/happy enough with catch up services nowadays and it's even rarer that people want to have/keep an offline back up/recording of something. We already kind of have a SKY+ stream box with Sky Q anyways.

    I believe the days of the PVR might be numbered perhaps, except for the true tech-heads, lol.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 31,698 ✭✭✭✭AndrewJRenko


    Try Virgin streaming box, much more stable than Sky Stream - playback available on everything except BBC.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,050 ✭✭✭IrishHomer


    I have Eir tv on an apple tv box. I also installed a VPN and I have all the UK players working flawless.

    The BBC iPlayer is excellent I can catch up on everything from the BBC.

    I use the All 4 player lots



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 11,793 ✭✭✭✭Red Silurian


    Not sure on the BBC situation in this country but RTE, as national broadcaster have to make their channels available to every pay-tv supplier in this country so can't make any demands about recording facilities.



  • Moderators, Technology & Internet Moderators Posts: 12,310 Mod ✭✭✭✭icdg


    Lest I need to remind, there’s no discussion or advocacy of either piracy or circumventing regional restrictions.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 11,793 ✭✭✭✭Red Silurian


    I don't know of a single person who is willing to move from Sky Q or Sky+HD to any of the streamers for the pure and simple fact that there is no PVR. A small amount also don't want an internet based service because they're worried if the internet goes, so does the telly and then all the entertainment is gone



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,849 ✭✭✭Delta2113


    RTE are making demands - for example with Virgin 360 using replay function RTE won't let you skip the adverts. You can't record RTE with a streaming box.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 31,698 ✭✭✭✭AndrewJRenko


    They absolutely can, and do.

    I moved from Virgin Horizon pvr to Sky Stream, and it was fine. I've moved back to Virgin, with their streaming box with recording to the cloud, and it's fine. The BBC thing is a slight PITA, but that's it.



Advertisement