Advertisement
If you have a new account but are having problems posting or verifying your account, please email us on hello@boards.ie for help. Thanks :)
Hello all! Please ensure that you are posting a new thread or question in the appropriate forum. The Feedback forum is overwhelmed with questions that are having to be moved elsewhere. If you need help to verify your account contact hello@boards.ie

Kerry Co Op Shares

1161719212237

Comments

  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 171 ✭✭kerry_man15


    If they want to keep people's money and put it towards a new venture then those people should have a vote on it. How is it fair to any C shareholder to have no say in their money being put into a venture they most likely don't want. It makes little sense to have them involved.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,297 ✭✭✭awaywithyou


    so no debt? new JV if it gets go ahead with will have 3 loans totalling 100million to pay back… Mad



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 986 ✭✭✭cap.in.hand.


    It looks like Kerry coop will still exist and they'll run KDI as a additional company.

    Post edited by cap.in.hand. on


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 7,097 ✭✭✭jaymla627


    A convertible bond loan was taken out,

    Latest on this is they are going to forfeit the pledged plc shares and not repay the loan in cash terms



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 227 ✭✭ftm2023


    KerryCow, you’re trolling, plain and simple.

    Claiming this deal will be voted down, then suggesting buying the dairy business outright with a spin-out ratio of 4.3, is beyond absurd. Every single B shareholder would vote against it, and the vast majority of A’s would too. It wouldn’t just fail—it would be obliterated by 99%, and you know it. You’re just here to wind people up.

    I know one guy voting no to this. A friend of mine was drawing silage for him a while back, and the man couldn’t even pay the few quid he owed. My friend called three times for the money before giving up. Some lads should focus on taking the 5.4c/L top-up and sorting out their bills rather than trying to block this deal.

    As for the 1c/L levy, let’s do the math: say a farmer has 40 years of milking ahead of him. He pays the levy for 5 years but earns an extra 3c/L for the next 35 years. That’s a return of 20 times the initial investment. Any young farmer with sense would jump at that—it’s called investing in your future.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 227 ✭✭ftm2023


    Bellview, I’ve explained this so many times I could recite it in my sleep: the cash is being used by the co-op to pay the stamp duty for transferring the shares into shareholders’ own names.

    The remaining shares are being cancelled to pay for the stake in the JV.

    Yet here you are, ignoring these basic facts and then having the nerve to claim nobody has explained it to you. I’ve spelled it out repeatedly.

    And as if that wasn’t enough, you’re now trying to argue we’d be better off paying income tax? That’s not just wrong—it’s absurd.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 227 ✭✭ftm2023


    If this is defeated the C shareholders could eventually face getting €1 for their shares


    In response to Kerryman15



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 5,570 ✭✭✭finbarrk


    Not following this. But what way should a beef farmer with a couple of hundred shares vote?



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 7,097 ✭✭✭jaymla627




  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 171 ✭✭kerry_man15


    So much for ensuring all shareholders receive full value for their shareholding. Why are they complicating it so much by keeping all the B's and C's, most of whom have little to no interest in it. Like Denis Brosnan said, if this is what milk producers want then they should be the only ones investing in it. It'll end up just as messy as the current situation with most of the shareholders not actually involved in milk production and not able to monetise their shareholding easily. The coop is basically taking B's and C's money to put towards a new venture to reduce the amount the A's have to invest. The new venture should be for A's only. If they want to raise other capital towards it then they could go the traditional route rather than forcing B's and C's into it.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,390 ✭✭✭kerry cow


    Ftm you are all positive about this deal ,

    Living in the real world , things don’t always go according to a plan that was structured on paper to succeed ,

    Paper never refuses ink .

    The plc has been eyeing up a sale 5 years ago ,

    They know what the buyer need to see ,

    The profits in KDI are not in line with similar operations in other area ,

    Google it yourselves ,

    Only glanbia with their massive milk pool can match kerry ,

    Something not adding up there .

    You can spin it what ever way you want , but if the new KDI can’t pay a price higher than it competitors , and if the pool shrinks , then it’s a sinking ship .
    in a business plan you always have to forecast for things not been as good as predicted , stress test it ,

    If KDI profits are imo closer to 30m after tax and interest , then this ship is taking water immediately ,

    You believe it will float ,

    I believe it will flop .
    Look around at the other processors profits , Kerry is nothing special , and in Kerry’s profit , they have under paid the milk suppliers , so take that off there bottom line ,

    net profit is what is left to fund this project and forget these EBITA equations ,

    Guys need to step back from this one and reflect ,

    Do you really want to be in charge of a sinking ship ,

    We need a new buyer , shore up with them if necessary , get on their boards , have control that way, with an entity that has a proven record .

    If milk buyers emerge out of the long grass and hoover up the suppliers that don’t want this deal , then the KDI ship will sink faster ,

    Natural retirement , nitrates pressures , inflation eroding the herds ,causing more Dairy to go , and milk leakage to other suppliers ,


    just look at the facts lads,
    I am not making this up .
    The outlook is bleak the amount of aging kerry farmers is huge with very little young generation coming in .
    all is not rosy in the garden IMO



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 986 ✭✭✭cap.in.hand.


    In fairness there isn't enough A shareholders in the coop to fund it fully themselves



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,390 ✭✭✭kerry cow


    we need to go to another milk buyer .
    the plc need to come back to the farmers ,

    Settle our arbitration ,

    Give us a new contract and then sell us with the steel to another buyer ,

    And get milk suppliers to vote on their own destiny ,

    They know who we are .
    we don’t need kerry co op

    And the B and C share holders don’t want them either ,

    If milk suppliers were given this option , I think they would take it



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 20,231 ✭✭✭✭Bass Reeves


    Yes the co-op wanted rid of B&C well mostly C shareholders but they did not want to give them all there money.

    I do not think I said it was a great deal but it's probably as good a deal as most will get. How can the co-op stump up for it themselves,it would mean about 50% of A shareholders putting up all the money and still taking on the same level of borrowing.

    As I posted many and you included want the perfect deal for you individually. Its the same with many here they want the perfect solution for them personally.

    Slava Ukrainii



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,214 ✭✭✭ginger22


    The more I think about this deal the more it stinks of Kerry group greed.

    The reality is that Kerry group want out of milk processing but they also see a large pot of wealth controlled by Kerry CoOp and they see an opportunity to get their hands on some of it. They claim that a few remaining dairy food brands that are going with it are worth 350 million but I would imagine if they could have offloaded them for that value they would have done so long before now. They realize that there is no other victim for the milk processing other than the CoOp who are desperate to keep themselves relevant.

    If this goes ahead it is a win win for Kerry group, They get out of milk processing and having to deal with "complaining farmers" and still get access to dairy ingredients and get a pot of money also.

    Vote this down and take our chances.

    We have a valuable asset in our milk pool and other better opportunities will come along.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 171 ✭✭kerry_man15


    Well if it's a good business the A's could put up some money towards it and get finance for the rest. I'm sure many financial institutions could arrange funding if the business model stacks up. From the talk on here many are saying it's a great price, great business with healthy profits etc. So why not cut the B's and C's loose and give them the full value of their shares and let the producers buy the milk processing and control their own destiny.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 227 ✭✭ftm2023


    If the A’s were to buy it on their own they’d only end getting a share ratio of less than 3 PLC shares per co-op share, they’d be wasting everyone’s time putting that to vote. That’s the height of nonsense. 85% for the B’s & C’s & shares in a new company is the only show in town, there’s literally no alternative to what’s on the table



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 227 ✭✭ftm2023


    KerryCow, when you say “the numbers don’t add up,” are you suggesting they’ve cooked the books? Because if that’s what you’re implying, it’s even more ridiculous than the time you went on about “round up” after arbitration didn’t go your way. I was getting phone calls from the big wigs back then, and I had to explain that you weren’t a credible threat. 😂😂

    They made it very clear at a meeting last night: if this is rejected, it’s straight back to arbitration. That means four more years of waiting, and there’s every chance we could end up with nothing.

    Leaving the shares aside, rejecting the 5.4c/L top-up just to risk going back to arbitration and waiting another four years is absolutely ridiculous.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 227 ✭✭ftm2023


    What do you want to happen Ginger22? What’s your idea of a better alternative?



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 7,097 ✭✭✭jaymla627


    Biggest mistake kerry plc made was they needed to of got a deal like today's over the line in 20/21, other processors where up their tits in milk and didn't need access to more, they where to greedy then and now find themselves in a situation where the milk pool is the only valuable tangiable asset, the stainless steel and milk plants are liabilities in the main given the investment needed



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,214 ✭✭✭ginger22


    Work away as we are and see who is more desperate, Kerry Group or farmers. I didn't go broke for want of their "top up".

    They will need to come back with a new contract in 2026, see how that goes for them.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 171 ✭✭kerry_man15


    Explain the numbers. Why would they get less than 3 PLC shares per coop share if they were going to buy it on their own?



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 227 ✭✭ftm2023


    A lot of you here are making emotional decisions instead of rational business ones.

    Some of you have mentioned that you’re milk suppliers who’ve already disposed of most of your co-op shares. For those in that position, let’s break this down: €251 million of other people’s money is being used to buy this JV, and you’re getting 80% of what you think is the maximum you could ever get out of arbitration.

    Now, let me put it another way. Imagine, God forbid, you’re in a car crash today and you break your leg. Your solicitor tells you the maximum you might get in court is €100,000, but you’re being offered an €80,000 settlement upfront. And they also tell you that going to court could take four years, and you might lose the case entirely. You’d have to be out of your mind to turn down the €80,000.

    As for those claiming the brands are worth nothing and we should “take our chances”—let’s look at the facts. Kerry sold its consumer foods division and brands for €819 million, and that business had profits similar to KDI. Now we’re getting a business with comparable profits, and yet some are trying to tell you this is a bad deal? It’s nonsense.

    People are being completely blinded by emotion here. This isn’t about feelings; it’s about the cold, hard facts.

    And to those saying, “There’ll be another bite of the cherry…” 🤦‍♂️🤦‍♂️🤦‍♂️ This is the other bite of the cherry. Back in April 2021, the deal was as good as done. The co-op got hammered with backlash because they couldn’t hold a shareholder vote due to Covid, and it came out they were planning to buy without approval. All hell broke loose, and in the end, they offered less than the agreed valuation just to save face.

    Honestly, some of you deserve the consequences of a no vote because you’re letting emotion and misinformation dictate your decision. The rest of us, unfortunately, will be dragged down with you.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 227 ✭✭ftm2023


    The A shareholders collectively own €540 million worth of shares.

    To fund the €251 million down payment for the JV, the A’s would need to give up half their shares, which would result in a ratio of 3 PLC shares per co-op share.

    That kind of proposal would be dead on arrival—it wouldn’t even get 100 votes. Let’s be honest, nobody in favor of it would bother showing up to vote because they’d know there’s no chance it would ever pass. They’d be better off heading to the pub for the day and accepting that reality over a pint.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,390 ✭✭✭kerry cow


    I did nt say kerry cooked any books. ,

    I said they knew 5 years ago that they would exit now .
    and as shrewd business minded that they are , they focused on turning over maximum profit for the last 3 years ,

    But in reality you can’t sustain a business without reinvesting and that compared to the other profit the other competitors are achieving as industrial norms , we can not float the boat with a net profit of 30 m


    to could look at it 2 ways

    Either the shareholders buy this outright as they already indirectly own it ,

    Or the shareholders should be released out altogether .

    If it can not be sustained by the milk suppliers on their own , then it shouldn’t be a runner .

    I am glad you have admitted you connection to the top .
    and your right , I am not a threat to anyone . My days of milk my few cows are limited , but I do wish the next generation success if Dairy is what they want , it’s a difficult living financially in the west but rewarding in quality of life ,

    I don’t think discussing options should be such a issue to anyone , everyone should be heard ,



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,297 ✭✭✭awaywithyou


    Not too bothered about arbitration now tbh... we are surviving grand without it.. anyway they'll give us 5.4c and then take it back off us over next 5 years... so we aren't gaining..



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,214 ✭✭✭ginger22


    What is so special about Kerry milk processing that makes it so valuable that it justifies spending 500 million to acquire it.

    Shurely it makes more sense to amalgamate kerry milk pool with other processors. Isn't this the way Kerry group have grown to what it is today. Benefits of scale and all that.

    In our parish I don't think there is any supplier now supplying less than 500,000 litres and some up to 2,000,00 million litres.

    No problem filling a milk tanker in a few pickup's.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,390 ✭✭✭kerry cow


    I think FTM , nothing is a foregone conclusion ,

    This race has a long way to run and even if the shareholders get convinced to invest and the deal goes ahead , I can factually tell you that it won’t be plain sailing financially for the new KDI unless it can united all suppliers and that is not happening at present .



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 21 cowman10


    remember that 5.4c is only on quota milk plus 20% not on all the milk we supplied



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 815 ✭✭✭degetme


    Whats the story with 2021 milk to date? Are these years going to be forgotten about



Advertisement