Advertisement
If you have a new account but are having problems posting or verifying your account, please email us on hello@boards.ie for help. Thanks :)
Hello all! Please ensure that you are posting a new thread or question in the appropriate forum. The Feedback forum is overwhelmed with questions that are having to be moved elsewhere. If you need help to verify your account contact hello@boards.ie

Deposit return scheme (recycling) - Part 2

19394969899132

Comments

  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 19,207 ✭✭✭✭kippy


    But sure - it'll be too late in the future - it's too late now, many would say.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,301 ✭✭✭patnor1011


    It does not mean that.

    Only a fraction of collected plastic is recycled. Most end up in incinerators. Plus, to this day we do not have a clue what happens with plastic return is collecting.

    One can even argue that return actually worsened situation simply because plastic and cans were collected by refuse collecting companies which still go around and collect waste we just added another middleman with their own fleet of lorries spewing out carbon driving all bottles to Limerick and then driving it somewhere else. All of which was done by classic refuse collection companies until this glorified waste collector came to existence.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 6,375 ✭✭✭jj880


    It means less new plastic

    somehow people on the thread linked prices increases, which were higher in previous years, to the introduction of DRS. With no evidence

    A Directive allows you to state definitively "less new plastic" with no evidence but others are not allowed to deduce that the cost of RVMs + running this DRS is reflected in higher prices of popular soft drinks (not soda water)? 🤣

    The CPI does not settle this debate as we cant see what soft drinks / multi packs etc are selected / left out.

    So not for the first time I must have missed the thread rules where you decide when evidence is provided.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 22,641 ✭✭✭✭dxhound2005


    The classic refuse collection is long gone. The Council lorry which came around once a week to pick up the contents a single steel bin. To be transported to the local dump/tip/landfill, the home of odours, fires and seagulls. Replaced by coloured plastic bins collected on various pickup schedules. Two of my neighbours have changed contractor lately, so we have at least three separate lorries on the street at different times.

    My next door neighbour never uses bins. He brings his stuff to the local Recycle Centre. I could do this too and save money, but I must have a drop of the don't care attitude in me which make people throw away 15/25 cents. The other big change is that these lorries go on to the country roads. Unless it was different in other places, farmers never got bin collections where I grew up.

    I think you know more about the plastic and aluminium than you are letting on. If you know that it is being driven somewhere beyond Limerick, then you must know where that is?



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 19,207 ✭✭✭✭kippy


    I don't think you understand.

    The DRS adds more car (assuming you cannot walk to the nearest DRS) (could be argued that you might be on a car journey anyway) and lorry journeys (these lorries wouldn't have been on the road anyway) to the environment than the situation just 12 months ago.

    Do you agree that theres more carbon now used in the entire waste/collection service than there was 12 months ago as a result of this scheme?

    No matter how many bin providers there are the DRS adds another other to that group and makes the existing ones less efficient one could argue.

    As for your neighbour - good on them. We've significantly reduced the amount of "General Waste" we put in the bin over the years also. I'd say many have.

    Not sure the relevance of farmers not getting bin collections where you grew up.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 22,641 ✭✭✭✭dxhound2005


    If you don't understand, then find out. You proclaimed your ignorance before. But there is no chance you are going to leave it to those who do know. You will still keep coming up "one could argue" "not sure" and "perhaps" interventions.

    "You are asking me, an individual who has zero expertise in this specifica area, zero access to actual figures and research to come up with a solution for a PET free future. Aren't there tonnes of professionals/organisations etc supposed to be working on this very problem - or perhaps those resources have now been shifted elsewhere as DRS is our magic non saviour and the impact of DRS hasn't been felt at all in the profits of those who should be looking at this?



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 19,207 ✭✭✭✭kippy


    I don't think YOU understand in this particular instance.

    Simple question here:

    Do you agree that theres more carbon now used in the entire waste/collection service than there was 12 months ago as a result of this scheme?



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 22,641 ✭✭✭✭dxhound2005


    If it's something you made up in your head, then I don't agree. If you present the figures, I will make a judgement on that.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 6,375 ✭✭✭jj880


    Wasting your time.

    I asked dxhound if Re-Turn is an acceptable DRS in its current state a few months ago. Refused to answer.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 19,207 ✭✭✭✭kippy


    What figures do you need presented?

    Let X be the number of collection trucks involved in the collection of waste/recycling 12 months ago.

    X will remain static into this year as the DRS does not result in a lowering of X over time.

    Let Y be the number of collection trucks involved in the collection of DRS related items.

    Amount of trucks involved in waste/recycling at end of 2024 = X+Y

    X+Y > X - therefore more carbon being produced versus last year in the collection of waste/recycling……………..

    I at least, have the capability to acknowledge where I have been wrong, or where the DRS may have its positive points, but you don't seem to have the capability to acknowledge ANY of the issues with the scheme.

    I am not sure why…………



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 22,641 ✭✭✭✭dxhound2005


    I can't remember that. I probably thought I would be wasting my time and yours. When you don't even know the difference between this scheme and a scam.

    "I wonder how plastic return numbers would have changed if plastic bottle banks were added beside local amenity glass and can banks before this scam was introduced."



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 19,207 ✭✭✭✭kippy


    Well what is your opinion on the current implementation of DRS…….just so the good people of boards know.

    Maybe a Pros and Cons style answer would be good.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 22,641 ✭✭✭✭dxhound2005


    Maybe later. I'm still trying to work out your X and Y conundrum.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 6,375 ✭✭✭jj880


    Oh you remember it alright. Your reply in the end was "what was the question again?"

    I see you've now refused to answer kippy's question. Im shocked*

    *Not really.

    You're always going to have people querying you if you keep trying to post in support of this DRS and refuse to acknowledge any of the obvious gombeenery.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 11,625 ✭✭✭✭LambshankRedemption


    I added Dee Ex Doggy to my ignore list months ago. I advise you do the same. I'm not entirely convinced he's not a shill for DRS with his whataboutery and refusal to answer basic questions.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,301 ✭✭✭patnor1011


    The only people who knows where collected plastic is driven from Limerick are return people and they refuse to disclose that. What is clear so far or what they let us to know is that all collected plastic is coming to Limerick private company which compact and bale it. I do not for a second think that they do it for free.

    What happens after that is pure guessing game so incineration is valid example of how it may be disposed unless you or return can provide some new information as to what happens with it next.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 19,207 ✭✭✭✭kippy


    Don't be asking Re-Turn for any facts or figures that may not suit their goals………..



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 22,641 ✭✭✭✭dxhound2005


    There is a video on the homepage of the Re-Turn site, which tells a bit about what happens in Limerick and beyond.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 22,641 ✭✭✭✭dxhound2005


    Beware. This is a wolf in sheep's clothing. Pushing the "Re-Scam" conspiracy theory.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 6,375 ✭✭✭jj880


    "(recycling)" should be taken out of the thread title until Re-Turn provide the details of exactly where the recycling happens. Theres a good section (43:00 to 48:00) in the new Netflix documentary called "Buy Now: The Shopping Conspiracy" that explains how producers use labels and store dropoff of plastics (basically Re-Turn) to make customers think theyre doing their bit and plastics are actually getting recycled. Its all green theatre. Pure nonsense.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 6,375 ✭✭✭jj880


    CEO Foley couldn't even say "recycling targets" in that video. He had to say "targets around recycling" 🤣. Its farcical really. If pellets are created in mainland Europe with our plastic bottles lets have the stats! Shouldn't be hard to get. It wont happen because Re-Turn are happy to let most customers interchange "recycle" and "return" as it gives us all a fuzzy feeling inside. If the actual recycle stats for our plastics through this scheme were any good we'd be hearing about it non stop.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 16,919 ✭✭✭✭elperello


    There is another factor missing from your calculations, maybe we could call it Z for the sake of argument.

    Pre DRS the trucks that collected from houses and businesses only delivered their contents to the bin company yards around the country.

    There would have been other trucks collecting from the yards and bringing the recyclables to Limerick.

    In fairness, some of these trucks are still on the road collecting whatever PET and cans are still handled by the bin companies.

    But journeys by these trucks will have been greatly reduced after DRS.

    Taking that reduction from your total represented by Y gives us Z which is the real transport emissions impact of DRS.

    So to sum up while we don't have an exact figure for the carbon produced by DRS transport I think Z should be in the mix.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,301 ✭✭✭patnor1011


    Only if you think that all refuse collection companies used to drive plastic waste to Limerick.

    Which they did not. They usually baled it themselves and disposed where it was the most convenient for them. That Limerick destination for plastic waste is fairly new thing as they do have some contract with return.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 16,919 ✭✭✭✭elperello


    No, the bin companies would not take the recyclables to Limerick or any other destinations but they had to be moved.

    Their trucks only collect from houses and businesses.

    The bin companies yard was and is not the destination, only a holding place.

    Mostly independent truck companies move the loads.

    It still involves truck movements which is the salient point in trying to assess the carbon emissions from the transport.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 19,207 ✭✭✭✭kippy


    There's also the unknown variable involved IF people are making more car journeys to shops to deposit their items in the first instance (I for example would have rarely visited the shop and less so using a car - now I have to every few weeks) - lets not forget.

    So the question remains - even assuming what you have outlined - are carbon emmissions higher or lower due to the transport emmissions associated with this scheme?



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,043 ✭✭✭bog master


    Went to the bottle bank this morning-lorry was there emptying the "bins" or whatever. As I waited was chatting to your man on the lorry, about DRS. He reckons they will soon do away with the aluminium cans bin as its not worth their time to empty it as there is so little in it!



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 35,392 ✭✭✭✭odyssey06


    I'm surprised they aren't gone already, weren't there reports of them being raided for cans to put into DRS.

    "To follow knowledge like a sinking star..." (Tennyson's Ulysses)



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 146 ✭✭ElJaguar




  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 20,703 ✭✭✭✭Tony EH


    Nothing about this scam has been a "good look" so far.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 16,919 ✭✭✭✭elperello


    I think most people will fit a visit to the RVM in with a shopping trip.

    Those like yourself who get home delivery will mostly do the RVM in conjunction with some other errands.

    Overall I'd guess that there is an increase in transport emissions due to DRS but I don't have any figures to prove one way or the other.



Advertisement