Advertisement
Help Keep Boards Alive. Support us by going ad free today. See here: https://subscriptions.boards.ie/.
https://www.boards.ie/group/1878-subscribers-forum

Private Group for paid up members of Boards.ie. Join the club.
Hi all, please see this major site announcement: https://www.boards.ie/discussion/2058427594/boards-ie-2026

Russia-Ukraine War (continuing)

Options
1969799101102936

Comments

  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 672 ✭✭✭Not made with hands


    Has Ukraine launched these new missiles into Russia in the last couple of days?



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 938 ✭✭✭engineerws




  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 938 ✭✭✭engineerws




  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,411 ✭✭✭j62


    That’s a load 💩

    We had the the interview with US ambassador here


    who clearly gave examples of how Russia did not want to negotiate and just strung everyone alone before February 2022

    The above is a must listen to anyone pushing the “Ukrainians don’t want peace” variety of Russian propaganda manure



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 938 ✭✭✭engineerws


    This came out recently.

    Nuclear War: A Scenario by Annie Jacobsen

    It has good reviews but yeah, it's utterly bizarre the recklessness of current governments and people.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 19,390 ✭✭✭✭Dohnjoe


    "We'll never know"

    We do know. Zelensky openly offered to drop neutrality during Putin's early talks (widely suspected to be fake). Russia had no interest. Thus demonstrating that it was never a deal-breaker to them and they were going to invade regardless.

    Which we all know.

    Putin is forcing Ukrainian children to learn Russian, that has nothing to do with security concerns. He's stealing Ukrainian grain, that has nothing to do with security concerns.

    The individuals who pretend that somehow peace was on the table as Putin was invading the country are as misguided as those individuals suggested the same when Hitler was invading Poland.

    The fake talks were designed to project that somehow peace was on the table (it wasn't) and it was a mechanism so that Putin could accuse Ukraine or anything of "not wanting peace" if they pulled out of them.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 7,663 ✭✭✭brickster69


    Well the Ukrainian ambassador who was part of the negotiations says differently. Once again we will never know so a bit pointless because it is more he says she says.

    The old world is dying, and the new world struggles to be born: now is the time of monsters. — Antonio Gramsci



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 8,569 ✭✭✭Jinglejangle69


    How do people still swallow Russian propaganda and spew their nonsense after all this time?


    it’s truly bizarre.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 19,390 ✭✭✭✭Dohnjoe


    Note that a lot of these recent posts are part of a systematic attempt to shift blame away from Putin onto either Ukraine or countries that support Ukraine.

    Or obvious posts about Russian gains laden with "concern".



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 938 ✭✭✭engineerws


    None peer reviewed. You are not a professor and claim to know better than the leading scholars in the world.

    I've no idea why you refuse to acknowledge the likelihood of a coup. All the evidence points to a coup but you think a few opinion pieces proves otherwise.

    I have published in academic journals. Have you? Perhaps you could present your body of work that proves you are a better school than John Mearsheimer whose work naming the coup has been recognized by jstor.

    I think in years to come people will look back at forums like this in disbelief.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,411 ✭✭✭j62


    Not the first time Russians attempt to rewrite history

    The problem for these scutter spreaders is that there’s so much evidence that undermines them, like the interview higher up

    So they just scurry along to next point of their talking sheet

    I especially enjoy their attempts as trying to paint Russia as a great place to live, hilarious



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 19,390 ✭✭✭✭Dohnjoe


    Your twitter source there is well known "vatnik" Katchanovski

    https://vatniksoup.com/en/soups/196/

    Chalyi is a former ambassador who believes "no treaties with Russia will end war"

    Full interview here, not some carefully curated clip.

    https://newsukraine.rbc.ua/interview/truce-will-not-stop-war-with-russia-ukraine-1728543529.html



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2, Paid Member Posts: 15,680 ✭✭✭✭Igotadose


    Nice quote from the Wikipedia article about this book:

    'Jacobsen has said "You would want to have a commander-in-chief who is of sound mind, who is fully in control of his mental capacity, who is not volatile, who is not subject to anger. These are significant character qualities that should be thought about when people vote for president, for the simple reason that the president has sole authority to launch nuclear weapons."'

    We're f*cked.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 19,390 ✭✭✭✭Dohnjoe


    Your 2014 article isn't "peer reviewed". It's someone's opinion. It happens to be a very controversial opinion. You can read the opinions of many of his peers and you'll find many are critical of his.

    Just because one seemingly smart person believes something doesn't mean it is true. I read a piece in a science journal by a group of scientists that 9/11 was an inside job.

    This is why we look at the consensus of experts - not isolated experts who are known for their controversial or whacky views.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 7,663 ✭✭✭brickster69


    Like i say you will hundreds of different opinions so it is just speculation. Like this one, who knows what happened.

    The old world is dying, and the new world struggles to be born: now is the time of monsters. — Antonio Gramsci



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,411 ✭✭✭j62


    I actually read the book and linked it couple pages back

    The scenario is two nuclear strikes on US, DC with ICBM and submarine launched missile at Californian power plant

    By North Korea whom now attached themself at hip with Russia

    Zelensky should irradiate half of Russia with similar tactics if it ever looks like Ukraine is backed into a corner and about to lose, if gonna get genocided may as well drag Russia down with them in mutually assured destruction



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 19,390 ✭✭✭✭Dohnjoe




  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 9,245 ✭✭✭Markcheese


    You're right , the recklessness of the Putin regime is astounding,

    Invading a neighbouring state , f'ing up ,and threatening everyone who they think is hindering their war efforts - nuclear sabre rattling , changing their nuclear doctrine on the fly , even firing a medium range ,nuclear missile - without the multiple warheads at eastern Ukraine,

    And the west is guilty of letting them -what would Reagan have done ? Or George bush senior , ?

    The west has been recklessly ignoring the escalations , their silence and lack of action has allowed the escalation..

    Slava ukraini 🇺🇦



  • Moderators, Sports Moderators, Paid Member Posts: 34,080 Mod ✭✭✭✭Podge_irl


    I've no idea why you refuse to acknowledge the likelihood of a coup. All the evidence points to a coup but you think a few opinion pieces proves otherwise.

    Jesus Christ, you do know that the word "coup" has an actual definition right? Literally everything that happened in Ukraine happened according to the constitution and was lawfully completed. The Russian loving coward fled after having his cronies murdered a bunch of civilians and the Parliament took steps to elect a new president.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 938 ✭✭✭engineerws


    It seems you think Mearsheimer is wacky and jstor wacky because they don't align with your pro Ukraine worldview.

    Here's the transcript of Nulands 2014 call which even the BBC reported.

    You seem completely unwilling to discuss any of the nuance in Ukraine. In leaving certificate history, the causes for war are discussed. I expect this forum would present a version of world war one would be that the German side was evil and engaged in the war because they are evil.

    I recommend picking up a history book.

    Mod Edit: Warning issued for uncivil posting

    Post edited by Necro on


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,411 ✭✭✭j62


    Untitled Image

    the cockroaches sure are busy crawling out of the dung pile today, wonder what’s up?

    Mod Edit: Poster warned for uncivil posting

    Post edited by Necro on


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 14,790 ✭✭✭✭TheValeyard


    There are rumours, only rumours now, so not posting the links to only have to delete them later, but they state that the storm shadow strike on that Putin complex with the North Koreans may have been far more damaging than is currently getting shared around.

    Not to mention that while the Russians, while in the ascendancy and gaining grounds as suffering catastrophic losses in doing so. You'd have to wonder if ground gained today will be easily lost few months from now.

    Russian economics is also looking fairly dicey at the moment

    Looks like I picked the wrong week to quit sniffing glue



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2, Paid Member Posts: 15,680 ✭✭✭✭Igotadose


    A long time ago https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Fate_of_the_Earth was a series of essays in the New Yorker. I remember it being very timely, as Reagan who was not adverse to going on about nuclear weapons was in office. A worthwhile read as I recall, creating a big splash.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2, Paid Member Posts: 15,680 ✭✭✭✭Igotadose


    Umm, no, Mearsheimer's discredited. Lots of times he's trotted out here and links to the rebuttals to his positions are published.

    Not sure what you're on about wrt to Jstor, they publish. In this case, an editorial in the Financial Times. Just like this one, rebutting him yet again:

    https://www.ft.com/content/2d65c763-c36f-4507-8a7d-13517032aa22



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 7,663 ✭✭✭brickster69


    The source is the interview not the person who posted the interview. Did you actually watch it ?

    Obviously a deal was close but for some reason it was binned. Putin said the exact same thing also. What that something was we don't know so it pointless to speculate what happened.

    No need to bring out fact checkers when people are capable of listening to what she actually said from her own mouth and try to discredit it.

    This is the very person who said **** the EU while arranging who would be put in positions of government and was handing out cookies in Maidan square to the protesters.

    The old world is dying, and the new world struggles to be born: now is the time of monsters. — Antonio Gramsci



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 19,390 ✭✭✭✭Dohnjoe


    Very interesting, keep going..

    (Just going to dust this off)

    image.png


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 5,772 ✭✭✭fly_agaric


    Whoda thunk Boris was so persuasive or the UK such an influential country that they prevented peace from dawning in Spring 2022, despite how much Putin, biggest "Dove" in Europe, really wanted it? 🙄

    Always thought he was bit of a ridiculous figure in a way (even beyond the act he put on) and his time as PM was a rollercoaster ride.

    I do kind of wonder what @brickster69 thinks of Boris Johnson's legacy now? 🤔

    He was a supporter on here I could have sworn, once upon a time. The past really is another country. Yesterday's top tier Russian propaganda (boosting of Brexit, the British anti EU fever, and Boris) is only good for today's chip paper wrapper or for cleaning up dog shít.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 38,697 ✭✭✭✭odyssey06


    Earlier you posted a false claim about Istanbul that Ukraine would not lose territory.

    That was utterly discredited with reference to multiple articles that clearly established your claim to be false - they hadnt even gotten to discussing territory . You provided exactly nothing to support that claim. Nor withdrawn the specific false claim.

    Now when that Russian propaganda is challenged you deflect with:

    "What that something was we don't know so it pointless to speculate what happened."

    When you thought you could get away with posting fake Russian claims you were happy to make specific claims.

    Demonstrably a deliberate attempt to deceive posters on this thread and spread pro Russian fake news to discredit Ukraine.

    "To follow knowledge like a sinking star..." (Tennyson's Ulysses)



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 19,390 ✭✭✭✭Dohnjoe


    Indeed, a common technique is to post some questionable info then play a game of "well we don't know" or "we can't trust anything"

    Which is literally Kremlin doctrine - the firehose of falsehood, spray so many dubious claims around that people don't know what to trust. I can understand perhaps Russians engaging in this, but Irish individuals it's a bit embarrassing really.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 19,390 ✭✭✭✭Dohnjoe


    More classified info has been released regarding Putin's long list of assassinations and attempts, including the near fatal poisoning of former Ukrainian politician Yushchenko back in 2004, a reminder for how long this has been going on

    image.png

    https://www.bloomberg.com/news/newsletters/2024-11-22/putin-s-assassination-targets-revealed-in-declassified-memo



Advertisement
Advertisement