Conor McGregor Megathread *Mod Warning in OP Updated 20th April*

I think it's pretty clear now she was talking about McGregor and there was another assault reported to Gardai around this time.

https://www.google.com/amp/s/www.dublinlive.ie/news/dublin-news/irish-sports-star-claims-dublin-17214248.amp

Get a grip? Of what

Everything I said was logical

Things arent reported for various reasons, that's genius

They didn't report the break in as this was before the courts

That's why they reported it today

They would report anything to do with the case that was new today

You claimed to know something, others said it was another case

It fair to ask you how you know

It seems you have gotten mixed up

Will Conor be getting a knock on the door of the gardai now ? New evidence etc came to light in this case during the trial ?

Dee Devlin must be some dose as well!

The court are defining it as sexual assault. The accusation and details provided by the accuser were of rape. So we all know what he is now.

Because nothing new came out

I mean something new could possibly come out, but it's unlikely

So it's very unlikely

It's one thing to have your head in the sand and pretend nobody knows what you are putting up with, and a whole other thing to have it printed in national media. Must be more difficult to turn a blind eye and pretend you don't know when it's the latter.

I'm referring to the evidence given that the practice of booking a hotel room to hook up with random women was a regular and normal thing

The **** people put up with off lads on the scratch and nothing going for them

Hes got 100m

Its easy to turn a blind eye and some people don't care

As to whether he can be called a rapist in the press, the answer is probably yes. In order to defend yourself from defamation you have to prove that a statement is “in substantial effects, true”. A decision of a civil court would be quite compelling in that defence. But I can understand the Irish press being cautious.

Can the general public call him a rapist? Well, yeah. I do hope I get the chance to shout it at him at some point.

Yes we all know it's a civil case but if you think the dpp ain't looking at this.... I wouldn't be surprised if he is charged in the next few weeks. His scumbag mate will definitely be lying under oath to cover for him

He's not going to be charged. The civil case changes nothing regarding a criminal case.

I haven't read all 8 pages but this is exactly it. Remember when he was interviewed after giving up his apprenticeship, saying he wanted to beat aldo, and around 5 years later he went and did it. He won his first fight and said he had to go down and sign off the dole. It was a proper inspirational journey from nowhere to the top, and he ended up as an arrogant can't.

Yes, but he hasn’t changed his story, and the DPP can’t prove he’s lying, so no change there.

Does this train of thought apply both ways? If a lad had 8 pints and has sex with a woman who had two can he then sue her for rape? I just ask because I only ever hear this in the context of the woman unable to consent.