Advertisement
If you have a new account but are having problems posting or verifying your account, please email us on hello@boards.ie for help. Thanks :)
Hello all! Please ensure that you are posting a new thread or question in the appropriate forum. The Feedback forum is overwhelmed with questions that are having to be moved elsewhere. If you need help to verify your account contact hello@boards.ie

Kerry Co Op Shares

18911131437

Comments

  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 228 ✭✭ftm2023


    I’m losing my patience here pal 😂😂 honestly you can ring me if you’d like, I think it may be easier.

    Let me be more clear.

    Let’s say you own 2,000 co-op shares worth €1m (for round figures) and have 1 child

    If you want to transfer them to your child now, this is what will happen:

    Let’s say you bought all your co-op shares for a total of €100,000

    If you give your shares to your child while you’re still alive you will be taxed on what the shares increased in value by when you owned them. So you bought them at €50/each and now they’re worth €500 each so in the eyes of revenue you made a gain of €450/share and will be due to pay CGT of 33%. I know this is probably surprising to many of you but ring IFAC and ask them instead of trying to tell me I’m wrong. I know I’m right. You yourself would face a CGT bill of €300,000. You made a gain of €900,000 and 33% of that is owed to the tax man.

    People used be able to sign their co-op shares over for the par value of €1 but that’s well and truly stamped out now.


    When your child would inherit the €1m worth of shares they’d have €400,000 worth of an inheritance tax allowance so would have to pay inheritance tax of 33% on €600,000 which is €200,000

    You can “WILL” your shares in such a way that when you die your child can sell the shares and pay no tax whatsoever as long as they buy land from the proceeds.

    Try doing it your way though pal and see how that works out for you. When the revenue send you a bill for hundreds of grand tell them “yada yada yada”

    Post edited by ftm2023 on


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,216 ✭✭✭ginger22


    When was that change made. Wasn't there a case a few years back where the revenue were defeated on their tax assecment on the CoOp shares, yer man Henry Walsh was the test case.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 988 ✭✭✭cap.in.hand.


    I remember asking my ifac accountant few yrs ago about revenue valuing the coop share value for inheritance purposes and he was saying €250 per coop share( Kerry plc share value was around €120 per share that time) whether that was upped since I don't know

    Post edited by cap.in.hand. on


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 171 ✭✭kerry_man15


    How does it work if they are transferred to the child after the death of the shareholder? What would be the difference?



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 20,252 ✭✭✭✭Bass Reeves


    If something is inherited after death there is never CGT paid on it only inheritance tax per tge inheritance rules. It's immaterial whether its houses, land art or shares. Agri shares may fall under farming inheritance rules but owner needs to pay CGT before transfer

    Slava Ukrainii



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,298 ✭✭✭awaywithyou


    that was over the patronage shares… the ones given out with every 500gallons milk supplied



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 5,626 ✭✭✭straight


    The communication around this is some joke. There will be three NO votes from my family anyway. Arbitration is one thing but expecting us to pay 1c a litre for 5 years for no return. That's 6k a year to me and I scrimping and saving every day for a few bob.

    The Co-Op own 17% of the PLC and could throw their weight around a bit more if they wanted to. They could actually bring the PLC to their knees through the stock market. But instead they are allowing themselves and moreover suppliers to be walked all over.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 988 ✭✭✭cap.in.hand.




  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 5,626 ✭✭✭straight


    OK. That's still loads. Look up what Elliott Investment Management can do as activist investors.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 988 ✭✭✭cap.in.hand.


    For what's it's worth to me now ...not life changing anyway.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,314 ✭✭✭Castlekeeper


    "Losing your patience"?

    "Pal"?

    "😂😂"

    Why such aggressive language? Or are you being condescending and belittling, why? Either aren't a good look, imho, but each to their own.

    I understand things in relation to tax in relation to sales and transfers to be as you've written, why is why I'm struggling to reconcile them with your earlier claim regarding the tax free transfer of converted plc shares through inheritance and how a plc share then differs from differs from a coop share.

    The only people who you explain are going to benefit here are a small cohort who are going to die soon and whose children all want buy land?

    If is in fact this is a large number of people, the price if land booms again and the benefit may be lost anyway.

    I'm more ignorant than stupid here tbh so if I can test your kind patience one more time to just explain how this will work I'd be very grateful.

    That's what you came here to post about in the first place?



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,333 ✭✭✭cute geoge


    You must have got out of wrong side of bed today or are you naturally a crank to suggest Kerry co op should try and bring down the PLC ,Between them they have created millonaires in your family and vast wealth for dairy farmers in the region and you are willing the co op bring the PLC to its knees ,Get real and come up with something better



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 5,626 ✭✭✭straight


    Wrong on all counts there George. Kerry never did me any favours. They are bullying the Co-Op and as sh1t flows downhill the Co-Op will gleefully walk all over the suppliers.

    Dairygold or the producer group for me I'd say come 2026.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,314 ✭✭✭Castlekeeper


    One would wonder if the Co-Op went back to their PWC advice in how to extricate themselves from this mess in a tax free manner or if the main aim is to give the PLC a load of other peoples money, and play fantasy creamery board member, but now with a real business?



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 228 ✭✭ftm2023


    I think I’ve explained it in black and white, crystal clear. If you would like to speak to me on the phone where it would be easier to explain I am perfectly happy to talk to you. If I wanted to insult you I don’t think I’d repeatedly offer to make time to talk to you.

    You genuinely don’t sent able to grasp it and that’s okay.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,298 ✭✭✭awaywithyou


    and not only will you and I be paying 1c/l for 5 years to buy the 70% stake… we will also be required to pay 1c/l yearly towards the 25million that will be required to reinvest in the facilities to keep them going



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 5,626 ✭✭✭straight


    Between them they have created millonaires in your family and vast wealth for dairy farmers in the region 

    I'm sick of hearing this sh1t. The Kerry boys took the coin. They sold out to the stock market and now they want us to buy the co-op back. Dairygold never sold out like the kerry boys.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,314 ✭✭✭Castlekeeper


    Less of the you stuff, and yes I'm okay with my grasp of life in general!

    If you would humour me one more time here I think everyone would benefit. Im hardly going ringing a blind stranger who goes around insulting people without even acknowledging it!

    Maybe my question isn't clear enough as much as I try and reduce it.

    I'll try using your method of a case study.

    A parent, 60, has 300 shares and would like to give three of their children, in their 20's and 30's, the proceedings of 100 shares each I order to help them along in life. None of these children are interested in or have use for agricultural land.

    How will this deal work for them and improve their lot?



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 5,626 ✭✭✭straight


    And a few crumbs toward the leading milk price contract. It's no wonder they are running out of suppliers. Imagine what the milk price will be next year for us. Bottom of division 3 again I guess and then minus 1 cent after that.

    And here I am trying to find a second hand trailer because I don't want to spend 6k on a new one.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 988 ✭✭✭cap.in.hand.


    Kerry coop could end up being the best paying milk coop in the country but probably not in the short term...they are deserving of giving it a go anyway.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 228 ✭✭ftm2023


    I’m only trying to save you from yourself. You want to vote against a great deal and it’s only out of the goodness of my heart that I’m here educating you.

    By voting for the JV the farmer 60, gets a share cert for 1,590 kerry group shares + 300 “new” co-op shares

    Scenario number 1:
    Vote for the JV & he can “will” the kids 530 shares each and they’ll be well below their inheritance tax limit and upon their fathers death they can sell the shares and not pay a penny tax - so literally absolutely zero tax whatsoever to be paid out of the shares and they’ll end up with €46,110 in their back pockets each after tax

    Scenario number 2:

    The kids inherit the 300 co-op shares and they sell them on the grey market for €400 each

    Each child gets 100 co-op share

    Each child gets €40,000 for their co-op shares

    Scenario number 3:

    Alternatively they can sell them through the cash for shares scheme and pay income tax on them, the average person in kerry earns €43,000/year (top income tax limit is only €44,000) so at todays price each co-op share would make €513 and half that goes in income tax, prsi, USC so they’d get €256/share after tax which is €25,600 per child

    The numbers speak for themselves, this JV puts extra money into your kids back pockets. It doesn’t matter if you’re dead or alive, they still come out better. For the sake of this I just took the assumption the father is dead and willed them but ultimately the way I’m speaking out on behalf of is best for the kids in the example you gave me



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,314 ✭✭✭Castlekeeper


    Thanks for taking the time to reply. This is exactly what I assumed happened all along.

    Giiven normal life expectancies, the children will have to wait between 15 and 30 years for any benefits here, ie averaging in their 50's, by which time its the grandchildren that they will benefit. (A point I made bit ago).

    Live horse and you'll get grass, not much use if one is trying to get a mortgage and put together a deposit for a house.

    Even in this scenario 1 and 2, is it still dependent on purchasing agricultural land if one is a farmer, I assume one would have to be?

    Scenario 3 for a low income person would be best, especially if they sold at a higher share price.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 20,252 ✭✭✭✭Bass Reeves


    The children will not necessarily need to wait. As they are considered business assets retirement relief is available for a farmer in this scenario or in a liquidation situation. This is available from 55 to 65 you may dispose of 750k from 65 to 75 you may dispose of 500k worth of assets. It one of the reason why business assets should be held jointly by husband's and wives and wives should be in a business partnership(not necessarily reg with dept of agricultural)

    Post edited by Bass Reeves on

    Slava Ukrainii



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 21 cowman10


    Hi lads list the pro and cons of this thing for those of us that don’t have a million to make from shares and depend on the price of milk. There is more of us then ye think. And most have one share so we can and will vote for what suits us. Milk price!!!!



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 5,626 ✭✭✭straight


    They could...... But I'm not a gambler and if I was I would bet that all we will get off them is plenty winks, nudges, promises and cute hoorism in general. Coupled with stories of old lads making loads of money in previous generations.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 228 ✭✭ftm2023


    Oh no Castlekeeper, come on 🫣🫣🤣🤣

    You nearly have it - no forget land entirely. In my calculations above, the money I mention is literally into the kids hand to do absolutely whatever they want with it

    You don’t have to be dead but for the sake of simplicity I said if the parent was dead. If you want to pass the shares on now when you’re alive just take any of the answers I gave you and multiply them by 0.67

    The JV will leave the kids with the most money - that is literally a fact

    I hear what you’re saying about the income tax, however it is fair to assume they’re earning the average in our county which is €43,000 and tbh with you the share price now is in the absolute gutter. Realistically nobody should be selling their shares now, they should be waiting to get at least €100 for them.

    Selling the shares today for €86 and only paying the lower rate of income tax may seem great at the time but (hopefully) when in 5 years the share price has doubled or maybe more it won’t seem so great of an idea

    The thing with the income tax “cash for shares” scheme is if you were gonna give those co-op shares to your kids today right, this is what would happen: (bear in mind you’re not dead)

    Father gives 100 co-op shares to each of his 3 kids

    Father got them shares through the patronage share scheme for €1

    The shares are now worth €500

    The father must value them at €500 when passing them over to his kids, in the eyes of the revenue commissioner he has made a gain of €499 which is taxed at 33% CGT which leaves him with a tax bill of €49,900 - this is 100% fact

    Then the 3 kids get 100 shares each and if we follow your logic and they put the shares into the “cash for shares” scheme then they’ve to pay 50% tax on the shares so they end up paying €75,000 in tax (€25,000 in tax each) and you paid €49,900

    So if we follow your logic and go with the income tax scheme and if you were to take part in it today with your 3 kids between yourself and the kids ye would end up paying €124,900 in tax out of €150,000 worth of shares

    Pretty hard to make out that the “cash for shares” income tax scheme is a better option versus what we’ll be voting on in Killarney on December 16th



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 988 ✭✭✭cap.in.hand.


    Well the nods & winks/cute hoorism was definitely going on at Kerry coop during the 80s/90s until plc took control especially in relation to quota.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,390 ✭✭✭kerry cow


    just wondering if anyone has signed up to producer group or might possibly consider it ,


    I haven’t yet but I 100% will ,

    I will track down the kerry contact this evening



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,314 ✭✭✭Castlekeeper


    That's very good information. I'm sure there are other options as advised by PWC a few years back besides liquidation, I was just using thatto contrast with this deal, and also as I see the Co-Op board to be out of their depth I all of their dealings.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,314 ✭✭✭Castlekeeper


    Thanks for the reply yet again.

    In the case of this deal, you mention 0.67, does this refer to 33% CGT? If so, do you mean the parent who transfers is liable to CGT or the recipient child on sale if shares, forget about retirement relief as highlighted by Bass Reeves as that applies to many scenarios, if eligible.

    We'll forget about land ok, just you did include it as a factor earlier. Also Away Wth You did mention an exemption, however relevant.

    BTW I never suggested selling at high tax rates or low share prices, in fact i keep pointing out the opposite, but you've based many sums on such scenarios.



Advertisement