Advertisement
Help Keep Boards Alive. Support us by going ad free today. See here: https://subscriptions.boards.ie/.
https://www.boards.ie/group/1878-subscribers-forum

Private Group for paid up members of Boards.ie. Join the club.
Hi all, please see this major site announcement: https://www.boards.ie/discussion/2058427594/boards-ie-2026

Irish Property Market chat II - *read mod note post #1 before posting*

1846847849851852943

Comments

  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,132 ✭✭✭RichardAnd


    As I've said many a time; no one can be this incompetent.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 22 paulyboy


    I agree with that , its disjusting the greed going on in the Building Industry.Our children are the ones going to pay.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 5,035 ✭✭✭Villa05


    Failure? I've long stopped believing that rocketing prices is anything other than an intentional outcome

    Is there any poster here that disagrees with this statement?

    As it was in the Celtic tiger, so it is again. Everything that can be possibly done is thrown in to pump prices.

    Absolutely nothing done in an effort to cool price inflation



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 461 ✭✭Rooks


    I don't think the current government is doing enough to solve the issue, and it's possible that they don't mind increasing prices as suggested above as they are taking the short sighted view of managing their core voter base which is still predominantly property owners. But that's politics for you.

    But I don't think that this is a bubble like we saw in 2005-08. To believe this is a complete misunderstanding of what drove prices in both scenarios.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 9,351 ✭✭✭Ray Palmer


    I completely disagree because nobody who makes the claim can actually point out how or why they are doing it? The can make claims without proof so somehow they are geniuses at hiding when in reality it is a very complex issue

    Claims like all TDs are landlords making laws to favour themselves yet laws brought in have punished landlords. So how and what have they done to favour landlords?

    I replace 2 floorboards and it cost 50 euro for the wood. It used to be about 10euro. Materials are way more expensive than 5 years ago



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 7,777 ✭✭✭timmyntc


    Demand led measures are inflating prices in the market. Govt subsidies to buyers only push prices up.

    They know this, they have admitted this. The whole purpose of HTB and FHS was to increase new build prices so they would remain 'viable' for developers. The goal of those schemes is literally to increase house prices.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,132 ✭✭✭RichardAnd


    I think it's as much a case that they simply don't care about the outcomes of their actions because they will never be affected by them.

    We can assume one of two things; the state is run by incompetents who have created this mayhem because they do not know what they are doing, and don't care about the results. Or, alternatively, the state is run by malicious individuals who are doing this deliberately because it benefits them.

    Personally, I think it's both. However, regardless, what they either done or allowed to happen under their watch is unforgivable. There are people in power (in government and in the civil service) who simply should not be allowed anywhere near positions of influence.

    Until the day arrives when politicians and civil servants are faced with severe consequences for their misbehaviour, Ireland will stumble from one disaster to the next.



  • Registered Users, Subscribers, Registered Users 2 Posts: 6,803 ✭✭✭hometruths


    In fairness I don't think it is incompetence or maliciousness - bad decisions are taken to benefit them politically in the short term.

    And then these are compounded because there is a reluctance to say we got that wrong - again for political reasons - and the course of action continues.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,132 ✭✭✭RichardAnd


    "bad decisions are taken to benefit them politically in the short term."

    But that is malicious behaviour. If I do something that I know will harm someone else but benefit me, then I have ethically done something wrong. Continuing to do this because admitting that I was wrong would bring negative consequences onto me is even worse.



  • Registered Users, Subscribers, Registered Users 2 Posts: 6,803 ✭✭✭hometruths


    Politicians are going to politic.

    What scares about extreme left or right parties, is that I do think they'd take decisions intended to deliberately harm a certain demographic.

    But whatever faults the current lot have, I think its a bit unfair to accuse them of deliberately and maliciously setting out to harm people.

    The decisions are taken to benefit their voter base, and thus their chances of election. Of course prioritising one section of society will disadvantage another, but I really don't think the motivation is to disadvantage anybody. That's just an inevitable consequence.

    What bugs me is the spin - i.e Darragh O'Brien et al patting themselves on the back for helping those struggling to buy a home.

    What they're really doing is supporting house price for those who already have a home. Everything else that happens, whether it is to somebody's advantage or disadvantage, is of lesser importance.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,132 ✭✭✭RichardAnd


    I wouldn't worry about the political right. If Ireland does produce a perceived "right-wing" political entity, it will likely come in the form of a Donald Trump figure or, God help us, an utterly unctuous individual like Farage. That is to say, a centrist who will make small concessions to populism whilst delivering nothing but a continuation of globalist policy. Mind you, Paddy Trump could at least be amusing…

    I don't think most politicians and bureaucrats are actively malicious, though there are a few that do strike me as being genuinely sinister (not naming names.) My point is more that they are indifferent and insulated from the consequences of their actions.

    Honestly, I see no political way out of this. The crisis will continue until something external from Ireland changes the circumstances that created it. I will vote in the upcoming election, but I consider it a fairly pointless action when all is said and done.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,516 ✭✭✭Blut2


    They've brought in numerous measures that they were told would pump up housing/rent prices, and that did - FHS, HTB and HAP among them. And they increased the mortgage:income ratio limit to do the same, at the very moment interest rates were rising in Europe so our home prices might possibly have stabilised or dropped.

    And they're now talking of expanding HTB to second-hand homes, at complete odds with the stated justification for it (to encourage building of new builds) - very clearly purely to pump up prices.

    And at the same time they've very deliberately chosen not to bring in easy/popular measures that would instantly reduce prices - big hikes on stamp duty for foreign purchasers of Irish properties etc.

    For the first few years of the housing crisis I would have put it down to incompetence. But at this stage, almost a decade into the crisis, I fully agree with the other posters here that all evidence based signs point to it being clearly malicious. We're not going to see any solution in the next 5 years if theres a continuation of the FG/FF government after this election.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 9,351 ✭✭✭Ray Palmer


    The thing is that is completely different to what I responded to. You are saying they don't care where as others are saying they are conspiring to make sure prices go up for their own benefit. You aren't agreeing.

    You don't seem to understand what the civil service do and their role. They have no say on government policies and just implement what they are told by the government. You might as well be angry at a form you have to fill out.

    Politicians take their que from the public and the public don't think of the ramifications. Irish public really don't like the government to dictate things but if they see punishment policies against a smaller group like landlords it is really loved by the public. The fact it made smaller landlords leave the market a reduce rentals people still think this was good because it meant people could buy these properties. You will see this mentioned in other threads which completely ignores the reduction in property occupancy rate meaning less room for people overall.

    What people here are doing is looking at the outcome and saying how the government did everything with intent to hurt the public. When in reality the government ignored expert advice and followed what the public wanted. I believe it was about 2010 that ERSI said the government should fund developers to build housing. The public were very angry and claim (another conspiracy) that this was to help out their developer friends. The government decided to ignore the experts and follow the public wishes. Politicians did as asked but then you get (conspiracy theory 2) they did this so house prices would rise to suit themselves. That is literally a no win situation.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2, Paid Member Posts: 2,991 ✭✭✭PommieBast


    Pretty much. Many of this base are the ones who got into negative equity by overpaying in the 2000s so there's no denying they have been looked after. Trouble is getting people out of negative equity (prices up) and affordable accommodation (prices down) are mutually exclusive goals.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,557 ✭✭✭Emblematic


    In terms of solving the accommodation crisis the key determination to make is whether it is a housing bubble or a housing shortage.

    If it is a housing bubble then solving it involves trying to curb irrational investment through taxation, interest rates or other means.

    If it is a housing shortage then you want to encourage investment as much as possible.

    Obviously this is simplifying things greatly but you can see that solutions to fix one problem are kind of at odds with solutions to fix the other.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 5,853 ✭✭✭BlueSkyDreams


    What solution could there be, if we did not return an FFG govt?



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 5,853 ✭✭✭BlueSkyDreams


    Agreed. I am not an FFG voter, but I dont believe they are doing all they can to inflate prices.

    I believe they are trying to encourage investment and jobs and this has worked incredibly over the past number of years; perhaps almost too well.

    Housing simply hasn't kept up with demand from people wanting to live here.

    We have the highest build rate per capita vs 19 euroconstruct european countries in 2024!

    We are the top of the league for housing output in europe, yet still some say we just purposely aren't building.

    God love those people if we were only building at the same rate as the UK, or even at the european average!

    2025 will see another increase in output and the highest number of new homes delivered in ireland since 2008.

    We also have to consider the alternative, which is really only a SF led govt.

    I don't see any circumstance in which the anti-private investment led approach from SF does not lead to a large reduction in new homes being built over the next 5 yr govt term.

    The approach we have with FFG sure ain't perfect, but its absolutley the best option WE have and is leading the scorecard across europe.



  • Registered Users, Subscribers, Registered Users 2 Posts: 6,803 ✭✭✭hometruths


    This is it in a nutshell.

    You'd think it would be pretty easy to answer the question of whether it is a shortage or not.

    Just count the number of existing houses and calculate how many are required to house the existing population.

    And that count unambiguously tells us that we don't have a shortage.

    That's also backed up by the fact we have a vacancy rate of almost twice what you expect in a functioning market never mind a market with a housing shortage.

    But for whatever reason people do not wish to even consider this as a possibility.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 7,777 ✭✭✭timmyntc


    In either case, speculative investment by buying and selling homes and treating them like equities should be discouraged, as this does not add supply to market. This is what fuels a bubble.

    New supply should be allowed and encouraged, 0 rated for VAT, measures taken to reduce input costs like land, etc. Instead of throwing money at the demand side of the market which causes a bubble in either scenario



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 7,777 ✭✭✭timmyntc




  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 5,853 ✭✭✭BlueSkyDreams


    We have a 3.9% vacancy rate across the country; a record low.

    Dublin has a 1.2% rate, the lowest in the country. There are very high rates in Mayo, Donegal, Leitrim and other rural areas, but I dont think thats where the housing demand is generally.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 5,853 ✭✭✭BlueSkyDreams


    I am not, but whatever.

    Good luck with your SF vote.



  • Registered Users, Subscribers, Registered Users 2 Posts: 6,803 ✭✭✭hometruths


    That's the spin that I was referring to above. 3.9% only includes long term vacants.

    You get 3.9% if you disregard any properties that might be vacant short term because of between tenants, for sale, renovation, probate etc - i.e all the normal sort of vacancies you'd expect from day to day turnover.

    The CSO found almost 8% vacancy when they counted all of them. That's the national average. Some of the highest demand areas of Dublin have rates in excess of 12 and 15%

    No point in arguing over it - it has been done to death.

    But it still remains a mystery why people are so willing to say nothing to see here with such a high and unexpected short term vacancy rate.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,557 ✭✭✭Emblematic


    Yes, I am of the view that it is overwhelmingly a problem of chronic housing shortage and not currently a speculative bubble such as in the years leading up to 2006/2007.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 5,035 ✭✭✭Villa05


    Front page of the business post

    WE CAN'T BUILD Top developer lashes government on housing

    We haven't a site where there isn't a water or electricity problem

    Builders contemplating laying off workers due to planning, water or electricity connection issues

    Yet we are the best in Europe apparently



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2, Paid Member Posts: 21,925 ✭✭✭✭Bass Reeves


    We are in an election every potential vested interest ate laying out there stall.

    Slava Ukrainii



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 395 ✭✭Lofidelity


    Its a shortage, not a bubble. The economy is strong and there are lots of jobs being created. There is not enough people here to do these jobs so they come from overseas. Add these workers to the thousands of returning Irish, students, refugees, asylum seekers and you easily have 100,000 extra people in the country every year. Unless there is a major slow down in the economy or a drastic change in government policy, accommodation shortages and price rises will continue.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,516 ✭✭✭Blut2


    There are plenty of policies that are easy to implement, near instant, and that have been proven to work in other countries, that are being completely ignored here.

    Increase the taxes hugely on vacant land zoned for housing to prevent land hoarding

    Increase property taxes on vacant properties significantly

    Increase the stamp duty massively on foreign buyers of Irish property

    We could copy Denmark's policy changes on asylum seekers and reduce arrivals by 90% overnight (as happened there), reducing the number of arrivals to Ireland who need to be housed by over 2000 humans a month - thats the equivalent of building approx 10,000 additional new houses a year. Independent Ireland are at least calling for that and may possibly be a junior part of an FF/FG government instead of the Greens if they get enough seats.

    etc

    Thats also not even touching on the longer term stuff like dramatically increasing the production of social and affordable housing, to remove the 60,000 households on HAP from the private sector market, which our opposition parties are at least in favour of.

    There are lots of policies levers that FG and FF are just refusing to pull, because their goal very clearly at this stage is further increases in house prices.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 8,093 ✭✭✭growleaves


    'Increase the stamp duty massively on foreign buyers of Irish property.'

    Great idea. Many foreign buyers are just looking for assets to park money in that will keep up with (true) monetary inflation. With bonds the way they are under this monetary system, the housing market becomes a dumping ground for free floating cash.

    No way are we obliged to play along with that. That is an insane distortion of housing which no one could foresee.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 5,035 ✭✭✭Villa05


    None of these issues are new

    A government flush with cash and spending 8 billion per year on housing mainly on the demand side should be at the top of there game in ensuring there responsibilities in supply generation are adequately met.

    This particular developer offered to do the water connection works themselves but the system is inflexible to allow this

    Electricity and water connections cause significant delays in building. Delays are a huge cost for a project. Is it poisible that these delays are swallowing up all the subsidies to buyers in higher housing costs

    Planning has been one of the greatest scourges on the nation for most posters lifetimes and the recent ammendments to the planning act is 800 pages long. This surely adds significant cost to housing and significantly more in the soft costs of housing provision

    20241117_105030.jpg


Advertisement
Advertisement