Advertisement
Help Keep Boards Alive. Support us by going ad free today. See here: https://subscriptions.boards.ie/.
https://www.boards.ie/group/1878-subscribers-forum

Private Group for paid up members of Boards.ie. Join the club.
Hi all, please see this major site announcement: https://www.boards.ie/discussion/2058427594/boards-ie-2026

Ireland Team Talk XII: Farrell's First Fifteen

1125012511253125512561849

Comments

  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 12,996 ✭✭✭✭aloooof


    I agree tbh.

    The larger point now is, whether or not he has been a conservative selector in the past, he certainly needs to be willing to give others a chance going forward just given the age profile of the squad / starting 15 now.

    We have a high distribution of players 30+.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 601 ✭✭✭thamus doku


    South Africa, all blacks and France rotate a lot and I don’t need any stats to back that up, I have eyes.

    The game is super physical with many serious injuries and the mental side of it is tough on the players.
    It’s makes sense to rotate.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,259 ✭✭✭mun1


    id like to think the AF selection tomorrow night should be enough to take care of Argentina.

    Hopefully everyone goes well especially Prendergast. You could not have picked a more aggressive team to play against for your first test at OH. But i trust AF to make the call and he has said he’s ready.

    I’m really interested to see how Clarkson goes as I haven’t seen him play this season. We need the dept at THP.

    Post edited by mun1 on


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,392 ✭✭✭FtD v2


    Clarkson is probably the most improved player in Leinster over the past 15 months or so. Fans were genuinely concerned when he was in 23’s at the start of last season and he had a few very ropey days, mostly in the scrum.

    That said - like any young prop he needs exposure and game time. He’s been ever present for Leinster this season and has racked up close to 50 performances so far. I’d still obviously have some concerns for his scrummaging at this level, but he’s dynamic with a bit of burst about him, and very good hands for a prop. I’ve been impressed with his work rate in defence and his attacking rucking has been a noticeable improvement of late.

    I still don’t see him leapfrogging the queue of guys who are ahead of him but injured too soon, but next year he’ll be Leinster’s #2 THP (and given Furlong will likely tour with the Lions, will he #1 for a good chunk) so he’s going to get plenty of opportunities to show what he can do.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,865 ✭✭✭sprucemoose


    i dont think starting ross bryne would have been the easier option in that example to be honest though, he had been with the squad for probably a day or two at most when crowley had been there for a few weeks. as an other poster has said, the osbourne call is hard to be sure about too since keenan wasnt available, much as it was a bit of surprise JO was the one to come in



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 9,071 ✭✭✭Former Former Former


    It absolutely can be debated.

    We have a 21 year old out half on the bench tomorrow hoping to make his debut and overtake the other young out half, that Farrell promoted to the national team long before his province did, and the third OH is a centre that no one except Farrell really sees as an OH who’s either going to have a mare (last week) or win the game for us (the previous match).

    Funny that Farrell is so conservative but positively cavalier when it comes to OH.

    During the summer, he threw Osborne in for his debut at FB in South Africa. He could have picked Frawley, Larmour (both of whom played 15 during the 6N) or JOB, and bizarrely enough the people criticising him for being conservative wanted Mike Haley to be called up. Let that sink in for a second.

    Osborne now benches tomorrow and a Lions test centre will be in the stands, just as was the case last week btw.

    And he picked Jordan Larmour at 15 for a 6N title game. On what planet is that a conservative call?

    In the 6N opener this year, he benched James Ryan and threw in Joe McCarthy. Conservative? Playing a young, extremely raw lock with a penchant for conceding penalties, in the first game, in Paris? Ahead of someone as rock solid if slightly unexciting as Ryan? Tell me that’s conservative, please. Genuinely tell me your take on that.

    Again, the same people calling Farrell conservative also slate him for not recalling a 30 year old and reliable but extremely medium lock. And Farrell is the conservative one?

    That’s just since the RWC. None of the above is particularly out of character from his first four years either. He absolutely is not a conservative selector. The players who’ve established themselves under him are not the players a conservative coach would pick. Can anyone see Joe Schmidt or Declan Kidney picking James Lowe?

    People are utterly fixated on Healy and POM to the point that that they can’t see the wood for the trees.

    So yes, it can be debated plenty.

    Post edited by Former Former Former on


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 7,088 ✭✭✭Clo-Clo


    Farrell is not conservative

    Running an EI tour with how many players capped and brought into the Ireland structure is been conservative?
    Plus what you listed above…

    The conservative option at 10 was Ross Byrne, he was the easy pick and the conservative option.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 12,996 ✭✭✭✭aloooof


    The EI tour aren’t capped games.

    That was a part of the criticism of the first tour, they were against weaker teams than the players would’ve been playing for their Province.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 5,317 ✭✭✭Brief_Lives


    Has this been posted?

    Irish Rugby's biggest issues in 2024 that need to be resolved

    BY Philip Bendon · Tuesday Nov 12, 2024

    Last Friday night at the Aviva Stadium was the latest in a string of disappointing big time moments for Irish Rugby. Letting slip their impressive 19-game home winning streak as a far from vintage All Blacks side claimed a 23-13 victory. But Ireland’s loss wasn’t just a matter of being outplayed by the New Zealanders; it revealed some deeper issues within Irish Rugby. The lack of atmosphere in the Aviva Stadium, the reliance on veteran players, and an increasingly Leinster-heavy selection process are all concerns that threaten the future of the national team.

    Rocking Landsdowne to soulless Aviva

    Now seemingly a generation removed from the rocking days of Lansdowne Road when Willie Anderson stared down the All Blacks with the nation behind him. Friday’s clash reaffirmed the Aviva as one of the most disappointing international venues in International Rugby. Facing the side that dumped them out of the Rugby World Cup quarterfinals, the Irish side had to urge those in the stands to get behind them in what a bitterly disappointing atmosphere. Such was the lack of interest in the on field product, that fans streamed out of their seats with ten minutes to play ahead of both half-time and full-time with the battle for priority at the bar outweighing the one of the pitch.

    For this the IRFU need to take responsibility with much of this issue coming down to accessibility and the cost of attending games. Dedicated fans from across Ireland—particularly Munster, Connacht, and Ulster—are finding it increasingly difficult to attend matches, with ticket prices often out of reach and a Friday evening kick-off only compounded this issue. What’s more, the local fan base that can afford to attend doesn’t always bring the same intensity to the game, making the atmosphere feel more like a social event where bank loans and mortgages are discussed in place of play-by-play commentary by passionate fans rugby. One such example came in the 36th minute right next to the press box where this writer was sitting as 17 young adults fixed to their phones walk out of their seats in the direction of the bar. At this point, my mind was cast back to the hilariously depressing scene in ‘The Inbetweeners Movie” where the four lads ended up in an empty night club. This thought was made ever more apt as the Irish players continually gestured to the crowd to get involved as if mimicking Will McKenzie’s side-to-side gallop across the dance floor to four unfortunate ladies. The result of incidents like this offer a snapshot of a stadium experience that feels sterile and lacks the passion of Ireland’s core supporters.

    To rebuild the Aviva’s identity as a fortress, the IRFU should make a concerted effort to make matches more affordable and accessible to fans from all parts of Ireland. Even if this means reducing ticket prices and improving transport options for those outside of Dublin. Irish Rugby’s “Team of Us” slogan is meant to embody the idea of a nation united behind one team, but if the Aviva remains inaccessible to most fans, the motto starts to ring hollow.

    Andy Farrell’s loyalty to Ireland’s veteran players has been a defining aspect of his coaching approach, and it’s brought consistency to the team. But as the squad’s aging core continues to be leaned on heavily, it’s becoming clear that Ireland is missing a chance to develop younger players who could inject energy and new skills into the lineup. The loss against the All Blacks highlighted how Ireland’s reliance on seasoned veterans may be hindering the team’s evolution.

    Players like Cian Healy, Conor Murray, Iain Henderson, and Peter O’Mahony have been outstanding servants to Irish Rugby. Yet in a game where Ireland looked sluggish, their limitations were clear. Instead of stacking his squad with players capable of chasing a game, Farrell opted for tried and tested game managers. Adding to the disappointment of this decision was the eerily similar feeling to Ireland’s quarterfinal exit at last year’s World Cup. The latest in Ireland’s quarterfinal failings showed the dangers of relying too heavily on the same core players. That match, coupled with Friday’s loss, shows that Farrell’s “go-to” players do not have the same impact they once did.

    To rectify this issue it would appear the only answer is for the IRFU to support Farrell in making squad selections that prioritise development as much as immediate wins. Players like Munster’s Calvin Nash and Shane Daly, who excel under the high ball, have proven their ability at the provincial level, yet they aren’t getting the opportunities they deserve in the national setup. John Hodnett, a hard-hitting back-rower also from Munster, could play a similar role to Josh van der Flier but he too has been overlooked.

    In Connacht, Cathal Forde and Ben Murphy bring energy and potential, and they could add depth to the Irish squad whilst their provincial captain Cian Prendergast, plays a style of rugby similar to Peter O’Mahony’s, making him a natural fit for the number six jersey in both the short and long term.

    From Leinster Ryan Baird, with his athleticism and versatility, should already be a regular squad member, while Ulster’s Cormac Izuchukwu has the physical presence and dynamism to make an impact either off the bench or as a starter. In order to avoid the well trodden path to another disappointing Rugby World Cup, now is the time to back promising young players and shift away from an over-reliance on those who are at this point progress stoppers.

    The solution is clear: the IRFU should empower Farrell to build a squad for the future, even if it means taking some short-term risks. Relying solely on veterans to secure week-to-week victories will hinder the development of Ireland’s next generation, and it may cost Ireland when it matters most in the years to come.

    Team of one but not all

    While Leinster’s success at the club level is undeniable, there’s a growing perception that Ireland’s national team has become too Leinster-centric. An over-reliance on Leinster players has raised concerns among those from outside the hallowed walls of Dublin four. In the other regions that make up the national team, fans in Munster, Connacht, and Ulster, feel that the national team selection is becoming unbalanced. This issue is threatening to create a disconnect between the national team and fans from outside of Leinster.

    The reality is that Leinster does produce exceptional players. However, when 50/50 selection calls consistently go in favour of Leinster players, it’s understandable that other provinces feel overlooked. For example, the pairing of Nash and Daly from are among the best in the Northern Hemisphere under the high ball making them tailormade for the latest iteration of World Rugby’s laws. In the front row, Jeremy Loughman has been exceptional despite the turmoil engulfing Munster and in no uncertain terms deserves to be selected of a 37-year-old Cian Healy.

    Ulster’s Michael Lowry is a dynamic and pacy fullback that could add a new dimension to Ireland’s backline, especially if the team adopts a blitz defensive system as it appears they will. Lowry’s ability to cover the backfield could mimic South Africa’s Cheslin Kolbe and Kurt-Lee Arendse, who excel in transitioning defence into attack. Jude Postlethwaite, another Ulster talent, has shown he could be a natural challenger for Garry Ringrose’s spot at outside centre, adding crucial depth in a position where Ireland needs it.

    In the forwards, players like Cian Prendergast and Cormac Izuchukwu offer the dynamism and physicality that Ireland often lacks off the bench. .

    Irish Rugby is strongest when the team draws from the best talent across all four provinces, not just Leinster. By making selection decisions that better reflect the entire country’s rugby strength, the IRFU can foster a true “Team of Us” identity that resonates with fans everywhere. Otherwise, the risk is that fans from outside of Leinster may start to feel alienated from a team that’s supposed to represent all of Ireland.

    Fixable issues

    The challenges facing Irish Rugby are not insurmountable. Rebuilding the Aviva’s atmosphere, addressing the over-reliance on veteran players, and creating a fair, nationwide selection process are all achievable goals that would strengthen the national team’s future are all things that are perfectly achievable.

    The IRFU must find ways to make the Aviva more accessible, bringing back the passionate fans that gave the stadium its fortress-like reputation. Farrell should be given the freedom to prioritise player development and build a team with long-term potential, rather than always favouring veterans for immediate gains. And finally, Irish Rugby must make selection decisions that reflect the best of all four provinces, ensuring the squad truly represents the country as a whole.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 7,088 ✭✭✭Clo-Clo


    Sitting in the stand for the province in the majority.

    I’m not going down the same rabbit hole as usual, the EI tour is a way for Ireland to give a huge group of players access to the Irish coach’s etc and get them playing competitive rugby in the Ireland way.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 12,996 ✭✭✭✭aloooof


    Sitting in the stand for the province in the majority.

    Said this countless times, but this simply not true when it comes to Munster in the first EI tour. You're simply wrong here.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 420 ✭✭roverjoyce


    Prove about South Africa

    They know this year doesnt matter, its a time for developing players

    image.png image.png


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,225 ✭✭✭TomsOnTheRoof


    Mod Edit

    Warning issued.

    Post edited by ShamoBuc on


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 7,573 ✭✭✭OldRio


    His alligance to one province clouds some of his conclusions.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,392 ✭✭✭FtD v2


    It's 49 players they've used this year actually, and the comparable number for Ireland is 37 (obviously excluding EI). As I mentioned previously, of the extra 12 players they used compared to us, half of those featured against Portugal and Portugal only. Another (Edwil van der Merwe) featured against Wales and Wales only. If Ireland had played a test against a minnow like Portugal, I'd wager our number would be higher by another 3/4 players (and we still have scope to play a few other players who are in the current squad who haven't played this year, including Dave Heffernan, Gus McCarthy, Cormac Izuchukwu, Cian Prendergast, Nick Timoney, Jacob Stockdale). The only player in their squad who hasn't played this year is Jean Kleyn.

    I really don't think it's that informative a disparity when you consider their far greater playing resources.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,253 ✭✭✭Hey_Ho_Lets_Go_3


    Mod Edit

    Warning issued.

    Post edited by ShamoBuc on


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2, Paid Member Posts: 27,562 ✭✭✭✭phog


    I certainly wouldn't call Farrell (a guy I hugely admire) conservative, maybe cautious or probably just over reliant on some players.

    People will point to the likes of Clarkson getting a cap tonight but in fairness he's getting it because it's forced through injury. Look back at our QF defeat to The All Blacks, we left a fit young outhalf on the bench while a 37yo (?) was clearly out on his feet for the last 10 minutes.

    Last week when all around us was failing we left players on the bench until the 70th minute, what hope has anyone in turning it around in 10 minutes.

    He talks of not being able to magic something out of the hat but he sticks with a group of ~35 for the training camps, why not bring a few more in (1) see how they react in camp (2) have them in camp to learn the system and a few players ready for when injuries hit one or two areas. I know he depends on the provinces in developing the players but he could still have more in camp to learn his systems for when the need arises.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,253 ✭✭✭Hey_Ho_Lets_Go_3


    The EI tour players work under the irish system so players are exposed to it then.



  • Closed Accounts Posts: 2,095 ✭✭✭CMcsporty


    As bad as it was last Friday for performance and atmosphere. Last night was Library Lansdowne at its worst.

    Performance-Atmosphere are Intrinsically linked.

    The idea that Mike Lowry over Keenan/Lowe/Hansen would improve the Performance…..

    or that Jude Postlethwaite is within a sniff of providing competition to Ringrose……..

    and that Jeremy Loughman has been exceptional!!!!

    We are crying out for Loose Heads. The idea that Farrell is ignoring an exceptional option in Loughman is pathetic "journalism".



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 7,088 ✭✭✭Clo-Clo


    We see plenty of people posting that the Aviva was quiet because the "real fans" didn't attend

    The pubs outside the stadium was hoping, songs going, a good few kiwi around, good banter

    The game sucked the life out of the stadium.

    These so called "real fans" are who exactly? the provinces play a huge number of games and have really cheap tickets, are the "real fans" at these games? or they just want to attend high profile international games?

    I gte all my tickets via club rugby, so does everyone I know. Are these "real fans" helping out or supporting club rugby? if so why can't they source tickets via club rugby like everyone else does?

    If it is a problem about the price, well the IRFU funds all rugby in Ireland. The money generated at these games feed all the little clubs and the provinces in Ireland so people can go watch rugby at those levels.

    A lot of the time, not saying it is always, these so called "real fans" have zero interest in Irish rugby till a NZ comes calling and then suddenly they want a ticket, a cheap ticket, hence we see the moaning and complaining about ticket prices.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 7,088 ✭✭✭Clo-Clo


    They have all the irish coachs/staff etc on the tour, incredible experience for the players and a real chance to show to the coachs what they can do on training pitch day in day out….



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2, Paid Member Posts: 27,562 ✭✭✭✭phog


    Without Farrell being there and more importantly without the main key players being there, I'm sure you would agree systems change depending on what you key players are capable of delivering.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 7,088 ✭✭✭Clo-Clo


    If Mike Lowry was as good as Arendse or Kolbe he would be playing.

    Baird hasn't played all season really, Im a huge fan and can see why he wasn't picked

    Postlewaite was on the EI tour and is in the mix long term but we have some of the best centres in the World available to us.

    ireland is best when it is picking the best players they have available, hopefully that is across all the 4 provinces but at the moment that is not possible.

    "bringing back the passionate fans" see above.

    It's a click bait article which is no surprise, full of the usual topics which Irish "passionate fans" like to complain about so it will be spread across the internet very quickly. I would kindly refer to it as a pile of bo**cks article :-)

    One loss and this is the tripe flowing out, so much for the playing the young lads and don't worry about losing a game



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 12,996 ✭✭✭✭aloooof


    Mod: Discuss the topic by all means, but stop trying to goad / bait other provinces fans.

    That goes for everyone.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,392 ✭✭✭FtD v2


    edit: Deleted.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2, Paid Member Posts: 27,562 ✭✭✭✭phog


    One loss and this is the tripe flowing out, so much for the playing the young lads and don't worry about losing a game

    I'm sure you'd agree that losing to the All Black when playing the younger players would be way more acceptable than losing when your senior players are playing sh1te rugby. Last week was unacceptable. And maybe, just maybe, if these players knew there might be consequences for their poor play then we might not have to give them a second chance tonight to redeem themselves.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,392 ✭✭✭FtD v2


    On the topic of selection as well - the All Blacks, while playing 13 games so far this year (including this coming weekend) have used 41 players - 4 more than Ireland (who, inclusive of this weekend's fixture, will have played 4 less games than them).

    Once again, hardly indicative of a team picking significantly more widely than Ireland.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2, Paid Member Posts: 27,562 ✭✭✭✭phog


    They have all the irish coachs/staff etc on the tour

    Didn't Farrell miss out on EI tour?



  • Closed Accounts Posts: 2,095 ✭✭✭CMcsporty


    v Fiji

    I'm expecting Nash, Stockdale (groan), Osborne, Prendergast, Prendergast, Baird, Izzy, Herring and maybe Clarkson to start.

    That would be 9 changes from this week

    and 43 players (Stockdale and Izzy)?



  • Advertisement
  • Posts: 12,836 ✭✭✭✭ [Deleted User]


    image.png

    Third oldest squad at the WC

    Average Age

    Average Caps

    #Players <=10 Caps

    Italy

    24.7

    17.9

    13

    Wales

    25.5

    21.6

    16

    England

    26.5

    28.5

    16

    France

    26.7

    21.7

    13

    Scotland

    27.5

    26.1

    14

    Ireland

    28.2

    37.9

    8

    Followed by oldest squad at the 6N and we've not changed much since.

    We have objectively been selecting conservative squads for a while now..

    I like Farrell, I am not slating Farrell, being conservative isn't necessarily a bad thing, but to suggest we aren't is just gaslighting tbh



Advertisement
Advertisement