Advertisement
Help Keep Boards Alive. Support us by going ad free today. See here: https://subscriptions.boards.ie/.
https://www.boards.ie/group/1878-subscribers-forum

Private Group for paid up members of Boards.ie. Join the club.
Hi all, please see this major site announcement: https://www.boards.ie/discussion/2058427594/boards-ie-2026

Ireland Team Talk XII: Farrell's First Fifteen

1123112321234123612371850

Comments

  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,394 ✭✭✭FtD v2


    Frisch made a French squad when they called up 42 players (for 3 matches). He didn’t make the squad against their weakest opponent yesterday.

    You say a French squad with “better quality centres than us” but there is absolutely nothing to support that statement. Danty and Fickou are elite international centres who are on a par with our centres; Gailleton and Costes are two guys who look like they could be elite but who’ve done nothing at international level as of yet, I don’t think Yoram Moefana or Antoine Frisch are as good as our centres (Aki, Ringrose, Henshaw, Osborne & McCloskey).

    Farrell isn’t a conservative selector just because he didn’t pick the 28 year old player you wanted him to pick. He’s given a huge amount of caps to players and has backed young players with limited CVs countless occasions, including Jack Crowley, Joe McCarthy, Mack Hansen and a few others. He just obviously doesn’t rate Frisch that highly, and he wouldn’t be the only one.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 85 ✭✭chicks4free


    They are all mercenaries- hunting the next contract. Sometimes that contract is with your current club, sometimes it is with someone else. Remember also that the clubs will drop you like a hot snot as soon as the next “new thing” comes along.



  • Moderators, Sports Moderators, Paid Member Posts: 33,887 Mod ✭✭✭✭Podge_irl


    Also there seems a massive underlying implication that France are somehow better than us when we are vastly more successful.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,238 ✭✭✭Rugbyf565


    go back to cork

    Mod: Two week threadban. Do not post in this thread again until Monday 25th.



  • Site Banned Posts: 2,430 ✭✭✭Seadin




  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,918 ✭✭✭snotboogie


    Osbourne didn't make a single match day 23.

    Not sure how anyone can say Farrell hasn't been conservative. I think everyone would agree that we have great back row depth. We have had 35 back row slots in the match day 23 across 8 games since the RWC, 3 games outside competitions, and we have only used 6 players. 1 of those 6 places (using 2 slots) was moving someone who started 5 of the other games at second row.

    VDF and Doris have started every game in the 2022, 2023 and 2024 6 nations, every game in the World Cup bar Romania, every game against the All Blacks on the 2022 tour, every game against South Africa on the 2024 tour and have played 6 of the 7 November internationals in 2021, 2022 and 2024, the exception being Fiji. We have had the same two back rows start 29 of the last 31 competitive games we've played. No team in the world comes close to this sort of consistency/conservatism in selection, let alone in a position we claim to have huge strength in.



  • Moderators, Arts Moderators Posts: 36,493 Mod ✭✭✭✭pickarooney


    Frisch is a 12, a position we've no shortage in. Munster played him at 13 but at every other club (and France C team) he's played 12.

    And 10 for the Barbarians for some reason



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,394 ✭✭✭FtD v2


    Singling out JVDF and Doris starting every game is bizarre. JVDF was World Player of the Year in 2022 (and our best player on Friday night), and Doris has been one of our very best players of the past few years and a probable World Player of the Year candidate this year.

    You’ve listed out a load of games our coaches would see as “must win” games. Any coach picks their best players if available for those games.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,918 ✭✭✭snotboogie


    You don't think VDF had a dip in form in 22/23?

    What other International team comes close to that level of consistency in selection? Other teams don't feel the need to start their best players for every single tour game and for 90% of November internationals, particularly if it's in a position that they have significant straight in.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 9,075 ✭✭✭Former Former Former


    Farrell may well be a conservative coach, he may even be a bad coach, but the non selection of Frisch is proof of neither of these things. The guy just isn’t good enough for Ireland.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 20,370 ✭✭✭✭Clegg


    I don't really associate Farrell with conservative selections. He has shown that he'll parachute you into the side if he thinks you're good enough. Done it with three players alone in the last 18 months. Crowley and McCarthy are regular starters and Osborne is very close to cracking the 23 regularly.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,394 ✭✭✭FtD v2


    I don’t have the stats in front of me, but when was the last time Antoine Dupont, Ardie Savea, Maro Itoje, Eben Etzebeth, Pieter Steph du Toit, etc didn’t start must win games for their respective countries?

    Because they’re guys at a similar level of significance to their teams as JVDF and Doris are to us. They are both way ahead of any competition in their positions and are both more often than not amongst our best players. There is nothing controversial about their continued selection, it’s just noteworthy and fortunate they’ve been healthy for such a prolonged period.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,918 ✭✭✭snotboogie


    Touloun have mostly played him at 13 in the last few weeks.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,918 ✭✭✭snotboogie


    Im talking about a combination which is very different to an individual. Playing the same 2 players 29 out of 31 times means you don't get to see how good other players could be. Connors, McCann and Hodnett are total unknown entities at the top level because they never get a chance. VDF will always be selected under Farrell through any dip in form and if Farrell once in a blue moon decides to rest him, he'll move one of the other perennially selected players like O'Mahony or Doris to 7 to cover. It's an extraordinarily conservative selection policy in a position we supposedly have huge strength in. You can see how Nienebar is wiling to experiment at 7, with only Connors really at his disposal, in big games but Farrell won't even pick another 7 in a training squad.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,543 ✭✭✭clsmooth


    What’s the argument here? That we lost to NZ because didn’t pick a 28 year old journeyman French centre who can’t make the French team?



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,918 ✭✭✭snotboogie


    No its pointing out there hypocrisy in Farrell complaining about player populations in South Africa, England and France vs Ireland having not selecting players who then go on to get included in French and South African squads.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2, Paid Member Posts: 27,563 ✭✭✭✭phog


    Absolutely not, we lost to a poor ABs because the lads failed to show up. It was a error filled game and we couldn't eradicate them from our game, some of the bench were worse the the guys the replaced



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,543 ✭✭✭clsmooth


    So you want the Irish coach to pick eligible journeymen to tie them down? Not sure that benefits either Irish rugby or the individuals although I guess it would make certain provinces stronger which is a separate argument.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,543 ✭✭✭clsmooth


    Agree 100%. It’s was a particularly poor performance from the starting 15 with very poor cameos from Frawley and Henderson in particular and no impact from others.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 9,075 ✭✭✭Former Former Former


    Farrell complaining about player populations in South Africa, England and France vs Ireland

    What did Farrell say? I missed this



  • Advertisement
  • Moderators, Sports Moderators, Paid Member Posts: 33,887 Mod ✭✭✭✭Podge_irl


    He said largely what you did. That we'd never have the depth they do.

    We also don't do the kind of tours France just did to Argentina - albeit we will the coming summer with the Lions.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 20,370 ✭✭✭✭Clegg


    The Emerging Ireland tours haven't been popular amongst some fans, but they've been fantastic in identifying what players can contribute to the Ireland senior squad immediately.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,991 ✭✭✭RichieRich_89


    If you very selectively look at his last three appearances you see two starts at 13 and one at 12. For all of his appearances this season it's three starts at 12 and two at 13.



  • Posts: 2,692 ✭✭✭ [Deleted User]


    its not really how good or bad he is.

    Its just you can't have 'bang average' players that south africa swoop on the second they are eligible and also have a big problem with 'depth'.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,394 ✭✭✭FtD v2


    Do you accept that South Africa play a very different style of rugby than us, and therefore might have a significantly higher rating on a player with Kleyn’s skill set than we would?

    I’m sure there are some guys not being picked by South Africa, France, NZ and England etc that Andy Farrell would love to get his hands on too, but who aren’t in the plans of their national selectors.



  • Posts: 2,692 ✭✭✭ [Deleted User]


    Such a significantly higher rating than us in that he is a world cup 23 guy for them, and he is a not even in a training camp for 4 years guys for us?

    That also seems like an unlikely proposition in a universe where our problem is a 'lack of depth'.

    I think if Farrell coached France he's probably select some different players and overall way less players.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,991 ✭✭✭RichieRich_89


    Frawley's ahead of the ball carrier there. Ireland lucky not to be done for obstruction.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,394 ✭✭✭FtD v2


    He was a World Cup 23 guy for them on a 7-1 bench when they’re missing a few other locks through injury. He wasn’t even picked in their squad for this November and got a call up when Ruan Nortje got injured. He’s a good player but stop making out he’s some massive game changer at international level.

    I’ve already said here today on this thread I would have had him in wider Ireland squads at the time, but I completely understand if Farrell thinks he’s not a fit at all for the way we want to play.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 9,075 ✭✭✭Former Former Former


    I don’t think anyone said Kleyn is bang average.

    He’d be a useful guy to have in the wider squad but no more, just like he is for SA, because he plays a position in which we have good depth, just like SA do.

    This blithe assertion that our lack of depth is universally the same across all positions is one of the weirder sticks that people have invented to beat Farrell with.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,567 ✭✭✭niallm77


    The argument should be around Tom Ahern not getting opportunities atm. Not Kleyn



Advertisement
Advertisement