Advertisement
If you have a new account but are having problems posting or verifying your account, please email us on hello@boards.ie for help. Thanks :)
Hello all! Please ensure that you are posting a new thread or question in the appropriate forum. The Feedback forum is overwhelmed with questions that are having to be moved elsewhere. If you need help to verify your account contact hello@boards.ie

Israel are going to start WWIII

1194195197199200280

Comments

  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,886 ✭✭✭dmcdona


    What this hinges on is the organised hunting of Israeli supporters that Dutch police and authorities have condemned and believe was an organised action.

    So currently, Dutch Authorities have a "belief" that the action was organised?

    If that's the case, then let due process progress. If that "belief" is crystallised into proof and evidence, then let justice take its course. Until then, there is only a "belief" - and "beliefs", though strongly held, can be wrong.

    For example, I strongly believe that Israel is committing genocide in Gaza. People are entitled to hold a different belief of course. And both sides can be debated.

    But it will be the ICJ that make a final ruling on the case of Genocide before it on the basis of evidence it receives. On making that ruling, one half of the folks holding a belief on Israeli genocide, will be wrong.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 7,147 ✭✭✭SafeSurfer


    Is that the president of Israel making a “personal” claim?


    Do you believe Dutch authorities without question but suspect Israeli figures may not be truthful?

    That Israelis are consummate liars is an ant semetic trope. Why do you believe Dutch authorities but doubt Israeli ones. Next you will be claiming Netenyahu and President Herzog lied about babies being beheaded.

    Multo autem ad rem magis pertinet quallis tibi vide aris quam allis



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,769 ✭✭✭Homelander


    So on one hand, we cannot believe the authorities, who for obvious reasons would have the most relevant evidence and information on what happened to form an opinion.

    Fair enough.

    But we can come onto Boards.ie and make claims that a) dutch authorities are involved in a cover up b) Israeli fans got what they deserved c) Israeli fans started it d) the global media cannot be trusted and is shilling for Israel in this bizarrely specific case e) some supporters behaving badly justifies mass beatings of all Israeli supporters

    I am not saying you have said, or believe those things, but calling a spade a spade the entire thread the last couple of dozen pages is full of those precise sentiments.

    I haven't used the words antisemitic in his case because I don't think being anti-Israeli, anti-Israeli state or anti-IDF or whatever else is antisemitic.

    But this thread is profoundly anti-Israeli, which is generally fine as people are entitled to hold that opinion, and many compelling arguments can surely be made, but my personal problem is that it has crossed the line of rationality into absurd irrationality.

    So much so that we're now hearing that the global media are in bed with Israel and deliberately peddling lies, decrepit Iran has a world class military that would destroy Israel, the IDF is a crumbling third rate army, Iron Dome doesn't work and is a sham, and all the rest.

    "Israel is a rogue terrorist state" = valid opinion.

    "Dutch authorities are lying at the behest of others and the world media are involved in it" = completely conspiracy theory based on nothing but a desperate need to always make Israel the bad guy in every single unique situation.

    Again I am not saying you specifically are saying these things, but that is the sentiment expressed by many on this thread.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 16,313 ✭✭✭✭markodaly


    "Some bloke.."

    • The Mayor of Amsterdam
    • The Dutch King
    • The Prime Minister of Holland
    • The Police

    These are not just some 'bloke'. It is amazing that you do not and will not accept the reports or the evidence presented at the moment. Yet, you will accept someone's other version if posted on X without fail or cause.. Odd that!

    Tell us, do you think there were Gas Chambers at Auschwitz, and if so why/why not?



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,060 ✭✭✭Spudmonkey


    Few folks here would deny the holocaust happened I'd reckon, except for maybe the current one in gaza.

    Post edited by Spudmonkey on


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 16,313 ✭✭✭✭markodaly


    Do you care to answer the questions in the post you quoted, or do you wish to ignore the available evidence and continue to spread lies?



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,769 ✭✭✭Homelander


    Me thinking that Dutch authorities are far more reliable on what happened on their own ground than the literal president of the country, involved in and leading a horrific offensive war in the Middle East, making claims about operations in said war is…..somehow wrong?



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 7,147 ✭✭✭SafeSurfer


    I’m still waiting for your video of the man in Athens the Macabbi fans nearly killed throwing a bottle.

    Multo autem ad rem magis pertinet quallis tibi vide aris quam allis



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 7,147 ✭✭✭SafeSurfer


    Why do you not think the Israeli authorities are not as reliable about what happened on their territory as the Dutch are about what happened on theirs?
    Is this not antiemetic?

    Multo autem ad rem magis pertinet quallis tibi vide aris quam allis



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,769 ✭✭✭Homelander


    We are also still waiting for your reasoned opinion as to why Dutch authorities, including police, are lying or spreading disinformation, and whose behest they are acting on in doing so.

    Luckily I didn't ask about anyone in Athens so you don't need to raise that issue with me or post links about Israeli fans behaving badly because that's already well established, just a literal straight answer on the stance of Dutch authorities and police would be fine.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 16,313 ✭✭✭✭markodaly


    Calling events of the last few days makes a mockery of historical attacks on Jewish people and pisses on their memory.

    Are you willing to listen to actual Dutch Jews take on this, or are you just speaking for them, even if you have zero lived experience of being a Jew.

    Here is what the CJO in Holland says about what happened. Do you agree or disagree with them? If so why?

    https://www.cjo.nl/nieuws/cjo-amsterdam-moet-zich-schamen-voor-pogrom-op-avond-van-kristallnachtherdenking/

    image.png


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,769 ✭✭✭Homelander


    Do you think I'm at Mossad HQ on my keyboard or something?

    I am not sure why else you would question why I would think that anything from the authority of any state, in a state of war, should be treated with caution.

    Just in case I have to spell it out - I don't lap up anything Israel says because unless you have been dropped from a great height onto your head, you understand Israel is going to frame everything in a way that a) benefits them b) minimises damage to them.

    No different from any other country in the world at war, justified or unjustified, in the history of the world.

    Now, on the other hand, what possible motive do Dutch authorities and police have to alter and distort facts to suit an agenda about a non-fatal incident in their capital? What is that motive, and who is driving it?



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 16,313 ✭✭✭✭markodaly


    What makes you more qualified to speak of the Jewish experience?



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 7,147 ✭✭✭SafeSurfer


    Politicians will say whatever is expedient to say. Do you think politicians denying Israel is committing war crimes is evidence based or based on political expediency?

    Do you believe the US government believe Israel does not have nuclear weapons based on evidence or is it politically expedient to deny Israel has nuclear weapons because it would preclude the US from supplying weapons to Israel.

    Multo autem ad rem magis pertinet quallis tibi vide aris quam allis



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,886 ✭✭✭dmcdona




  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 7,147 ✭✭✭SafeSurfer


    Multo autem ad rem magis pertinet quallis tibi vide aris quam allis



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 16,313 ✭✭✭✭markodaly


    Yes, because its soft holocaust denial. Its the denial of the fact that Jews can be a victim, something you yourself are engaging in.

    Why is that?

    Why are you constantly lying about the facts as we know them?

    Why dont you believe the Dutch authorities?

    Why dont you believe the Dutch Police?

    Why dont you believe the Dutch CJO?



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 16,313 ✭✭✭✭markodaly


    Its the primary cause for sure.

    Hamas are overtly Anti-Semitic and want to see the destruction of Israel and the murders of Jews. They have said this themselves. Dont you believe them, if so why not?



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,886 ✭✭✭dmcdona


    The issue I have is you quote the above people and present it as "evidence" and "fact".

    In posts you have submitted, people have said "belief", "allegedly" etc. This is not "fact" nor "evidence". As I've said, you appear to have trouble with the definitions of the words.

    Your final question is utterly irrelevant. But speaks volumes.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,769 ✭✭✭Homelander


    So politicians will say whatever is expedient to say. I don't think anyone is going to disagree with that, politics in a nutshell the world over. We all understand global politics is a complex game not a game of truth.

    But why are Dutch police saying what they are saying?

    I'm not getting dragged into those other questions which amount to nothing but deflection of what I asked you and are not remotely linked to what I asked you.

    Why are Dutch police saying what they are saying about what specifically happened in Amsterdam? Who is dictating that they say what they say?



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 7,147 ✭✭✭SafeSurfer


    I certainly don’t believe you and your justification for Maccabi fans nearly killing a man in Athens.
    Hypocrisy.

    Multo autem ad rem magis pertinet quallis tibi vide aris quam allis



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,769 ✭✭✭Homelander


    I think you can't answer a simple question because you don't like the answer rather than there being no answer.

    Why are Dutch police saying what they are saying? It's an astounding simple question and it should be easy to answer for anyone who claims that their version of events is wrong or being guided by direction.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 16,313 ✭✭✭✭markodaly


    You really need to think about your life choices if you want to argue about how those babies died, the exact methods and the exact numbers, and the exact circumstances.

    It will say a lot about you if you really want to have that argument.

    This is the same type of soft Holocaust denial that is mentioned in the video.

    "Oh Jews did die in the Holocaust, but it wasn't 6 million and they weren't gassed…etc.."



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 7,147 ✭✭✭SafeSurfer


    My goodness. Marko thinks the primary cause of the 7th October attack was antisemitism.

    Multo autem ad rem magis pertinet quallis tibi vide aris quam allis



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 16,313 ✭✭✭✭markodaly




  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 7,147 ✭✭✭SafeSurfer


    You really need to think about why you are on message boards making up stories about a person throwing a bottle to justify Israeli thugs nearly killing him.

    Multo autem ad rem magis pertinet quallis tibi vide aris quam allis



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 7,147 ✭✭✭SafeSurfer


    Multo autem ad rem magis pertinet quallis tibi vide aris quam allis



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 17,609 ✭✭✭✭nacho libre


    Markodaly, i notice earlier in the thread you were complaining about people ignoring posts because it doesn't suit their narrative, yet you ignored my post to you and now this one. So I will ask you again do you condemn the fact that 70 percent of those killed in Gaza are women and children. Since you say you are opposed to all violence against innocent people, you will be keen to unreservedly condemn Israel for this.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 16,313 ✭✭✭✭markodaly


    From the very same article you posted.

    image.png

    Care to comment on the above?

    Do you accept the Dutch authorities' version of what happened?



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 16,313 ✭✭✭✭markodaly


    You are floundering mate.

    You have halfway to Australia with the amount of spinning you are doing.

    Your post is not a response.

    Again, do you accept what the Dutch Authorities have to say about this event, or are they lying? If so, why are they lying.



This discussion has been closed.
Advertisement