Advertisement
Help Keep Boards Alive. Support us by going ad free today. See here: https://subscriptions.boards.ie/.
https://www.boards.ie/group/1878-subscribers-forum

Private Group for paid up members of Boards.ie. Join the club.
Hi all, please see this major site announcement: https://www.boards.ie/discussion/2058427594/boards-ie-2026

General Irish politics discussion thread

1199200202204205295

Comments

  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 626 ✭✭✭felonious_Gru


    Name a tangible key difference between FF and FG ?

    Where each stood in 1921 or even 1991 isn't relevant



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 626 ✭✭✭felonious_Gru


    @strazdas , Are you talking about Michael Martin the current leader of FF?

    Martin is not remotely stereotypical of a FF leader , he's a woke progressive of the highest order and only concerned with what the urban commentariat and international opinion thinks of him , he is famously dismissive of even back bench FF opinion as seen during the repeal the eight referendum



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 7,750 ✭✭✭yagan


    Half of ff sitting tds voting against allowing an abortion referendum is a very very startling distinction.

    They may tied with fg at the hip on property but within the home they are most definitely different polities.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 626 ✭✭✭felonious_Gru


    Maybe but the parliamentary FF party hasn't reflected this in two decades almost, Michael Martin wouldn't be out of place politically in labour, the greens or the Soc Dems or FG

    I can't think of any FF senior members who are not progressives



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,092 ✭✭✭Caquas


    Try responding to my argument - no party leader in the past 30 years has sought an overall majority. So, no real change because not running enough candidates to win an overall majority is just acknowledging that long-standing reality.

    Of course, reducing the number of candidates on the party ticket will piss off aspiring candidates who might run as Independents but most of those are male who would be blocked by the 40% gender quota. https://www.independent.ie/irish-news/elections-2024/shock-in-wexford-as-long-serving-fianna-fail-councillor-quits-party-to-run-as-independent-in-general-election/a2132717276.html

    Even with the reduced numbers, no party imagines that all their candidates could be elected (though Sinn Féin came close and that will always haunt them 🤡)



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 18,858 ✭✭✭✭Loafing Oaf


    But that's ancient history now. Only four FF TDs voted against the final reading of the abortion legislation. This is what formerly 'pro-life' FF TDs are now saying about the issue.

    Such a total volte face over such a short period IMO has to raise questions about how much belief and conviction there was in their previous position…



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 15,581 ✭✭✭✭dulpit




  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 79,523 ✭✭✭✭FrancieBrady


     acknowledging that long-standing reality.

    Now you are getting it. That is the change.



  • Moderators, Sports Moderators, Paid Member Posts: 33,133 Mod ✭✭✭✭Podge_irl


    It has as much to do with the expanded Dáil (something we will likely need a referendum on sooner rather than later) as any "seismic shift" in politics.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 33,195 ✭✭✭✭blanch152


    It is not much of a change to acknowledge a long-standing reality, unless you have been in complete denial the whole time.

    Party leaders have talked for 30 years about "leading" a government, and not about overall majorities. That hasn't changed with this election, has it?



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 7,750 ✭✭✭yagan


    TDs shifting their stance in retrospect just means they'll change their outlook again as needed for reelection.

    A third voted against repeal and theres still votes to be chased there. Aside from aontú I don't see tds from any other party except ff openly courting them.

    Post edited by yagan on


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,092 ✭✭✭Caquas


    So as I said, accepting a long-standing reality, not the

    "huge change in the political dynamic"

    which you announced this morning.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 79,523 ✭✭✭✭FrancieBrady


    I didn't announce it. I posted a journalist announcing it as the first time something had happened since the foundation of the state.

    No, not a change at all at all. 😁



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 18,858 ✭✭✭✭Loafing Oaf


    how exactly are Fianna Fáil courting socially conservative voters going into this election because I’m not seeing it. Afaics as of 2024 ff are just as liberal as the other major parties in every significant way.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,099 ✭✭✭CrabRevolution


    The "FG and FF have to merge" claim reminds me of the paradoxical "I've always hated the Greens, so they've lost my vote" line.

    If someone already hates FG and FF, what difference would their merger make to them? They're not going to vote for the parties separate or combined, and they haven't lost their vote either.

    If anything it's advantageous for opposition parties that the parties they reckon are identical and going after the same voters are dividing their resources, duplicating their efforts, and running candidates against each other.

    It's just a soundbite that doesn't stand up to scrutiny.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 14,686 ✭✭✭✭hotmail.com


    A bit odd for Roderic O'Gorman, who is a member of the Irish government, to publish a statement warning against Trump getting elected.

    I'm not a fan of members of the government trying meddle in foreign elections. And it's pretty obvious he's doing this to create publicity to save his own seat.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,267 ✭✭✭Peter Flynt


    It's always the most wokiest of wokes who demand definitions of woke on here.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2, Paid Member Posts: 28,401 ✭✭✭✭Peregrinus


    Which suggests a definition. Woke: the personal charactaristic of repeatedly asking for a definition of "woke",

    By contrast, as we observe over on this thread, a person who is not woke can by identified by the characteristic of persistently asking for a definition of "hatred".



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2, Paid Member Posts: 28,401 ✭✭✭✭Peregrinus


    There's nothing "damaging to democracy" about coalitions. The candidate you voted for is liable to support a government incluliding a party you hate because the candidate you voted for, and the parties you like, didn't secure a majority of the votes. Because your vote isn't representative of a majority, there is no democratic principle you can appeal to that says the government should be composed only of parties that you like. Elected officials of differing view working together to find a consensus for government that take account of the views of a majority of voters is pretty much the essence of democracy.

    This is indeed how Ireland has been governed for the past 30 years and, notably, it's been better governed during that period than for most of the time before, and better governed than countries like the UK where the electoral system compromises democracy in order to deliver single-party governments that are handed power on a plate without the tiresome need to secure the support of a majority of voters.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 33,195 ✭✭✭✭blanch152


    You claimed it was a "huge change in the political dynamic". It wasn't and it isn't. It is the acknowledgement of a long-standing reality.

    For inaccurate hyperbole, your reaction is up there with the inevitability of a SF government you posted only a short few months ago.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 79,523 ✭✭✭✭FrancieBrady


    IMO the acknowledgement is a huge thing.
    The 'first time' something happens in the history of the state can rightly be called that. Ambition and belief in a distinct policy/ideology has been put to one side. This will enable fudged mergers rather than the offering of a distinct choice to the electorate. By not running enough candidates it seems to me that it is now the choice of some.
    Just an opinion.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 15,581 ✭✭✭✭dulpit


    To be fair, if someone is throwing out woke as a negative against a politician it would be useful to know what specifically they mean by being woke, and what specifically is objectionable there.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,092 ✭✭✭Caquas


    Here is a shocking notion - if the candidate you vote for is in the minority, they should do the honorable thing and sit on the Opposition benches until they win a majority. Politicians of opposing views working out compromises is a valid political process but it is far removed from the democratic will.

    A coalition of like-minded parties could reflect the majority view as has sometimes happened in Europe (e.g. CDU/CSU/FDP under Kohl) but it has never happened in Ireland (and it happens much more rarely in Europe now as politics has fractured). Instead, until 1989, we had unhappy marriages of convenience to get FF out but then Haughey miscalculated - he had to swallow the bitterest pill (the PDs) and Bertie understood FF must join in the coalition game.

    You say Ireland has been better governed by the coalitions in the past 30 years. You may be one of the last of the Bertie supporters but you must admit they drove the economy into the ditch with the bank guarantee. Or perhaps you give credit to FG/Labour for turning the country around in 2011-2016 but then you must give credit to the Troika. Or you are one of the 20% who supported the governing party (FG) in 2020?

    The Irish people will pass judgement soon on the current government. Some may vote for a return to the nearest thing to single-party government but I don't think FF/FG can win an overall majority and we will again have a Programme for Government which is a patchwork of pet projects.

    Post edited by Caquas on


  • Posts: 0 [Deleted User]


    It's always the most evasive of evaders who evade clarifying what they're talking about on here.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 15,581 ✭✭✭✭dulpit


    But nobody will have a majority? So does that mean everybody sits on the opposition benches?

    How do you know that people who have voted (as a random example) for Fianna Fáil automatically want them in power with Fine Gael? Or that if you vote Labour you must want them in power with Sinn Féin?

    There's no way of knowing, but because we have a representative democracy we allow the elected reps make that decision for us as a public.

    The idea that a single party in majority if a good thing is madness to me.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,267 ✭✭✭Peter Flynt


    24 days to the general election and it still hasn't been called.

    It seems to me that FF/FG/Greens want a campaign so short that they don't want to discuss their appalling record in government on crime, housing, immigration, cost of living, green taxes, poor public transport……..



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,092 ✭✭✭Caquas


    The idea that a single party in majority if a good thing is madness to me.

    Amazingly, most of Irish people would agree with this unfounded proposition and for only one reason - they don't trust our politicians. More precisely, after Haughey took power they didn't trust FF, the only party that could form a single-party government. Now our politics is too fractured to generate a majority for any single party so we try to make a virtue of necessity. But let's not fool ourselves into believing that a mash-mash of opposing parties is superior to a single party government.

    So does that mean everybody sits on the opposition benches?

    Not at all. Let those parties which are like-minded form a government. FF and FG are the obvious examples but SF and the Left would also be workable if they had the votes.

    There's no way of knowing, but because we have a representative democracy we allow the elected reps make that decision for us as a public.

    There is the source of the disconnect between the Irish people and our politicians. No politician has the honesty to say "Give me the power to make choices on your behalf!"

    Time and again, the voters have taken the first opportunity to punish parties (the PDs, WP, the Greens, Labour, IA) who joined in coalition with the parties they despised but politicians refuse to draw the obvious lessons, except one - "Disguise your intentions until after the election"

    The Greens had a nightmare outing at the EP/Locals and they will get a second dose at the end of the month. But by Christmas, there will be some party (SDs?) or bunch of Independents ready to prop up a government their voters did not want. The alternative may be a minority government but, unlike many others countries, our Constitution requires firstly a majority vote in the Dáil to nominate the Taoiseach and Ministers.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2, Paid Member Posts: 9,923 ✭✭✭blackwhite


    Under the 1992 Electoral Act the time from calling to holding the election must be between 17 and 25 days. Looks like it's going to be called either Thursday or Friday, so 21-22 days from the polling date.

    Yesterday is literally the earliest day they could call it for polling on the 29th, but if they were actually engaged in the nonsense conspiracy you've spouted then they'd actually wait to Tuesday of next week to call it.

    Do you ever check the facts before posting?



  • Moderators, Sports Moderators, Paid Member Posts: 33,133 Mod ✭✭✭✭Podge_irl


    Sundays do not count in the calculation so the latest they can dissolve for a Nov 29th election is this Friday (well Saturday technically).



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2, Paid Member Posts: 9,923 ✭✭✭blackwhite


    Apilogies - missed the Excluded Day definitions



Advertisement
Advertisement