Advertisement
Help Keep Boards Alive. Support us by going ad free today. See here: https://subscriptions.boards.ie/.
https://www.boards.ie/group/1878-subscribers-forum

Private Group for paid up members of Boards.ie. Join the club.
Hi all, please see this major site announcement: https://www.boards.ie/discussion/2058427594/boards-ie-2026

2024 F1 General Discussion Thread

19192949697110

Comments

  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 7,983 ✭✭✭bren2001


    Its not a mess. Max got a penalty, rightfully so. There's zero contraversy here outside of Max fans bitching.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,426 ✭✭✭Hijpo


    Its controversial because it's 10s for Max and nobody else. It's 10 seconds for the first "offence" even without contact. Watch the other instances of other drivers getting away with it.

    It's the inconsistency that people are giving out about. Even Russel has come out and said they need full time stewarding to reduce inconsistencies.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 7,983 ✭✭✭bren2001


    The rule doesn't require contact. It's a silly argument. There's zero contraversy outside Max fans.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,426 ✭✭✭Hijpo


    Explain the other instances where there was no contact, drivers going off track and not receiving a 10 second penalty.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 7,983 ✭✭✭bren2001


    No bother if you can provide the full plethora of data and camera angles available to the stewards who make the decision. Let me know when you send it on.

    Can you outline in the rule where contact is required? No.

    The only people moaning are Max fans.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,426 ✭✭✭Hijpo


    Absolute nonsense request.

    if its only an issue with verstappen fans as you claim then why has it triggered the director of the GPDA to call for changes to be made to allow for more consistent stewarding.

    All the facts go against your claims.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 7,983 ✭✭✭bren2001


    Absolute nonsense request.

    So you want me to explain why stewards made a decision different to another without access to the information they have? Pointless exercise. Look at the rule. Max broke them. The penalty is 10s. Really is that simple.

    All the facts go against your claims.

    Awaiting your facts, all you have is whataboutery. The rules are clear as are the penalties for breaking said rule. The only fact…

    Fandoms are absolutely toxic.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,871 ✭✭✭Dave0301


    I like Max, but those penalties last week were absolutely deserved.

    The 2nd incident at turn 8 was particularly reckless and all the data and telemetry supports that.

    Arguing otherwise or trying to deflect onto other incidents just makes you sound unreasonable.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,426 ✭✭✭Hijpo


    No, I agree with the second penalty. Blatant, hands down.

    The first one nobody understood. Not even Brundle.

    Verstappen even had Sainz on the apex that he had to avoid, telemetry showed Norris was not making that corner. To get 10 seconds for it is excessive.

    I'm not deflecting, I'm trying to find the consistency in the decisions. Why was one worthy of 10 seconds but others went without penalty at all. Nobody has any answers to those questions they just rollout the "aw max fan crying" jibe. If anything, that type of post is unreasonable.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 7,983 ✭✭✭bren2001


    telemetry showed Norris was not making that corner

    According to whom? Oh, Horner? Hardly a reliable source.

    You have eyes, go back and watch, Norris clearly makes the corner before being shoved off.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,871 ✭✭✭Dave0301


    How did Verstappen have Sainz at the apex!? He was behind Sainz and that is what stopped him from being able to do what he did the week before and get the apex ahead of Norris.

    The reason Norris got a 5 second penalty the week before is that Verstappen was ahead at the apex and Norris keep the advantage after going off track. It was reduced by 5 seconds as Verstappen went off track too.

    The below gives a good overview of why Verstappen got his penalties. They are both clear cut.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 9,843 ✭✭✭weisses


    Lando in Austin ..leaving the track and gaining an advantage 5 sec

    Max a week later leaving the track and gaining an advantage 10 sec



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 7,983 ✭✭✭bren2001


    They give the reason why Norris was given a 5s penalty instead of 10s a week earlier in the document. Lando "had little alternative other than to leave the track because of the proximity of Car 1 (Max) which had also left the track".

    Max had no mitigating circumstances to bring the standard penalty down from 10s to 5s. I see no credible argument for Max to get a lesser penalty when you look at the tape where there is a relatively clear argument for Lando a week earlier.

    https://x.com/fiadocsbot/status/1848118098626285947/photo/1



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,426 ✭✭✭Hijpo


    Will you relax, i said he had Sainz at the apex and had to avoid him not that he beat sainz to the apex. Palmer said Verstappen would have beaten Norris to the apex only for sainz was on it, sounds like he did nothing wrong in the lead up to that corner. Norris stayed in it on the outside going too fast. Verstappen avoids contact with Sainz, and slows enough to stay on track and make both corners. Norris goes off track, gets ahead and stays ahead.

    You think Horners data was false? Anyone would be able to challenge that then.

    Probably should all be back in the race thread so leaving it at that.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 9,843 ✭✭✭weisses


    So what the FIA is saying ..Verstappen forced Lando out because he went off himself and Lando had no opportunity to give that place back at all ?

    Lando deserved 10 seconds there and Verstappen should have gotten a track limit added.

    FIA is correct that Lando had to take evasive action ..But he still gained a lasting advantage by doing so



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 7,983 ✭✭✭bren2001


    Verstappen forced Lando out because he went off himself and Lando had no opportunity to give that place back at all ?

    That's an incredibly odd interpretation. Nowhere does it state Lando had no opportunity to give the place back. He should have and that's why he was given a penalty (ultimately). He was deemed to have left the track and gained an advantage. However, the reason for leaving the track was taken into account in that Lando had committed to the overtake but due to Max's incredibly late breaking, Lando had no other option but to leave the track. It takes the circumstances into account.

    There are very clear and obvious differences between the two scenarios. You might disagree with the FIA's thought process but it is not a demonstration of inconsistent stewarding.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 19,164 ✭✭✭✭AMKC
    Ms


    Ah here. I thought I was missing some interesting F1 news and all it is is ye two arguing. Get a room.

    Live long and Prosper

    Peace and long life.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 7,983 ✭✭✭bren2001


    Horners statement is false. Telemetry cannot tell you if someone is or is not going to stay on track. Its just data to be interpreted. Eyes can be a pretty good judge. Watch it back, pretty darn clear Norris made the corner, was ahead at the apex, and was entitled to space. Its a slam dunk penalty.

    Pretty obvious Horner is biased in his statements and him stating Norris wouldn't have made it proves nothing. I'm sure Zak would say Norris would have made it if asked, again, proves nothing.

    https://www.planetf1.com/features/max-verstappen-telemetry-data-shows-he-fell-into-own-trap-twice



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 9,843 ✭✭✭weisses


    Who Pissed in your porridge this morning ?

    Lando P1 in fp1 is the latest news



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,614 ✭✭✭Busman Paddy Lasty




  • Advertisement
  • Moderators, Motoring & Transport Moderators, Sports Moderators Posts: 753 CMod ✭✭✭✭LIGHTNING


    Folks move on, I get it that its hot topic but move on.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,567 ✭✭✭niallm77


    So max can seal the deal in Vegas



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 15,674 ✭✭✭✭vectra


    More or less has it in both hands already.
    Delighted



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 12,321 ✭✭✭✭klose


    I believe I read if he finished within 2 points of Norris in Vegas he wins it.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 15,494 ✭✭✭✭dulpit


    There's 60 points available from final 2 races (25 for the win, 1 bonus for fastest lap, plus 8 for the Qatar sprint).

    Mac has more wins, and he's 62 points clear. So if Lando doesn't finish 3 points or more ahead of Max in Vegas it's Max's championship.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 627 ✭✭✭CONSI


    To be fair that was some drive by verstappen to come through from 17th with no DRS. Just seemed to have so much confidence in the car when loads of others were sliding off. Dont think its fair of Lando to say the win was down to luck and not good driving. He was lucky aswell only to get a 5000 fine for the restart.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,873 ✭✭✭McFly85


    Just saw that Johnny Herbert was on the stewards panel this weekend so no surprise that Lando got off lightly. But in the grand scheme of things it really doesn’t matter - his championship fight never really materialised this year and was definitely more hype from Sky than anything. Hopefully next year the McLaren can be competitive from the start.

    Masterclass from Max though, will absolutely be remembered as one of his best races ever, and highlights why he will be regarded as one of the all time greats.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 7,983 ✭✭✭bren2001


    But in the grand scheme of things it really doesn’t matter

    Might make a difference in the constructors tho. While McClaren are ahead, its not insurmountable.

    Unbelievable race from Max. Poor from Lando and a bit unlucky but I think Max wins the race even if Norris doesn't pit just before the red flag.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 23,990 ✭✭✭✭mickdw


    That's the end of the drivers championship anyway.

    ItIt's About a 40 point swing to what I was expected after qualifying.

    Great drive.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 21,635 ✭✭✭✭El_Duderino 09


    That's pretty much it for the championship.

    I was supporting Lando but can't really begrudge Max. He's been very good all season. And yesterday he did as much as he could and was having a great race, even if he was lucky in how it turned out with the red flag and getting a free pitstop.

    I was relying on all the luck going Lando's way to pinch the championship so it wasn't likely. Looking forward to next year.



This discussion has been closed.
Advertisement
Advertisement