Harris Vs Trump 2024 US Presidential election - read the warning in the OP posted 18/09/24

a machine in need of maintenance: at a rally trying to remember what he experienced at McDonald’s he couldn’t remember the name of a Deep Fryer. “Whatever the hell that thing was”

Completely disagree.

I feel you are holding the Democrats, the party and voters to a way higher standard than Republicans.

We're in this mess because for 9 years, people have done what you are doing.

This is a sign of an America that's in a very troubling place with respect to its morals, expectations and civic responsibilities, that's not gonna change until it wakes up to that fact.

Blaming Democrats (who are by no means perfect) just delays any serious move to accepting the real problems they have.

Now a load of democrat supporters in the USA are throwing their toys out of the pram because the Washington Post refused to endorse Harris and just stayed neutral.

Honestly can none of them think for themselves and just vote without having their choice backed up by a newspaper.

It's amazing that up until today when they took an explictly pro-democrat stance on pretty much everything were the real arbiters of truth and now even the slightest degree of not 100% supporting the democrats and all of a sudden they're pieces of trash , really shows you people just want propaganda from the newspapers they read.

Did people really think that a publication owned by Jeff Bezos would have any standards apart from doing what suited him when it came down to it.

Hilarious that the Washington Post with its hilariously pretentious "Democracy Dies in Darkness" tagline and it being bigged up as a newspaper of record by the democrats has now become a disgraceful publication because of merely wanting to stay neutral and not endorse a candidate.

If Republicans were so sure of a Trump victory I wonder why they're now saying states should skip the election and electors should just go ahead and award their votes to Trump, as Rep. Andy Harris has argued North Carolina do.

Whoever these people are, they are not your dad's Republicans.

Now a load of democrat supporters in the USA are throwing their toys out of the pram because the Washington Post refused to endorse Harris and just stayed neutral.

There is nothing 'neutral' about Jeff Bezos exerting oligarchal authority over the paper to squelch the editorial board's decades long tradition of issuing a presidential endorsement.

It has nothing to do with 'staying neutral' and everything with Jeff Bezos not wanting to be on the 'enemies list'

The only thing hilarious about it is this pitiful 'hot take' on it that you've written.

3 types of voters in America at the moment, Trump, Harris and what the f/ck just happened to our country.

Which candidate has raised over a billion dollars in the campaign?

And which Candidate had a billionaire Gov speaking at the DNC?

WAPO doesn't need to endorse anyone, the articles that come from that print speaks for itself. Well known who they endorse, or hate I should say.

Trump just wrapped a 3 hour unscripted podcast with Rogan. Should be an interesting watch tomorrow when it's released.

😂

That poor effort at a false equivalence reveals the issue in and of itself: that billionaire Democrat at the DNC didn’t donate a billion dollars to her campaign. this is exactly like the gambling fallacy been highlighted here for days now: a handful of billionaires support Trump and represent the overwhelming majority of his financing, but Harris’ fund raising was majorly brought in by over 1.5 million small donors (and that was the number at the end of August).

Do you see the difference yet? This is an election. Dollars don’t vote. People do. And Elon and Jeff annd Peter Thiel etc. only get one vote each.

and you know what she’s not doing with the money? She isn’t being a fascist: she’s not buying up newspapers’ silence, she’s not creating fake Trump campaign sites to generate false outrage, she doesn’t own her own social media propaganda site, she’s not generating dozens of specious polls to water down the averages, she’s not using anonymous gambling accounts to game the prediction markets, she’s not in secret talks with Putin, she’s not sending texts pitting US Muslims and Jews against one another, etc. etc.

It’s telling that Trump and a handful of oligarchs are trying to pull out all the stops and none of his supporters bat an eyelid at that, but if Kamala Harris doesn’t shake her head right during an interview she’s unfit to lead. It’s a pathetic influence campaign. And I don’t believe it is working.

Doing that Podcast was an interesting choice by Trump, like, he's not going to win any voters from it, but he could lose some.

Also, why did you feel the need to say 'unscripted', is there a rumour in MAGA circles that Trump needs a script to follow. Interesting that.

Raised for their campaign or grifted to their 'campaign'? You just mention in the campaign so I just want to know if that includes raising 'campaign funds' to pay their legal bills and grifting $3 Chinese bibles for $60 (which assuming the same markup after the tariffs, will now cost $96, but rather than $57 profit, he will make over $90)

meaning that Harris's team wanted to control what Rogan could ask. Trump agreed to an unscripted ask me anything interview.

said without evidence dismissed without evidence.

“He has finally reached the final boss of the manosphere podcast universe….”

You mean to not control what Rogan could ask….