Advertisement
If you have a new account but are having problems posting or verifying your account, please email us on hello@boards.ie for help. Thanks :)
Hello all! Please ensure that you are posting a new thread or question in the appropriate forum. The Feedback forum is overwhelmed with questions that are having to be moved elsewhere. If you need help to verify your account contact hello@boards.ie

"Green" policies are destroying this country

1108410851087108910901118

Comments

  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 15,277 ✭✭✭✭Thelonious Monk


    Do you think a rural independent TD bloc in government would be good for our environment and biodiversity etc.? O



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 15,579 ✭✭✭✭charlie14


    Do you think the present three parties in government will canvas as a triumvirate for re-election to govern for another five years ?

    Realpolitik is based on practical rather than moral or ideological considerations and covering your flanks. FG and FF have a lot of disquited rural voters. They are not going to add to that by canvassing to go back with the Greens. An alliance with a group of rural T.D.s would suit both much better.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,911 ✭✭✭PommieBast


    The opportunity cost of the new Dublin cycle lanes is a half-arsed effort to build a proper bus infrastructure. The should have made the entirety of the river side of the quays a continuous bus lane. Far more people will ever use that compared to the cycle lanes that actually took the space, and by orders of magnitude.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 407 ✭✭bluedex


    Who cares? It would be extremely difficult for them to be any worse, for peoples life in general.

    In reality having a rural independent TD bloc Vs a Greens government party is going to make absolutely zero difference to global climate change, but would possibly be less destructive to peoples standard of living in Ireland

    Never argue with an idiot. They will only bring you down to their level and beat you with experience.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 15,277 ✭✭✭✭Thelonious Monk


    I said our environment and biodiversity, which I imagine most people in Ireland care about. Didn't mention climate change.l



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 9,333 ✭✭✭Tenzor07


    Very very few people use the River Liffey, sure they should build a new dual carriageway on that…



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,989 ✭✭✭tinytobe


    Climate change won't be solved in Ireland, no matter what "Green" policies the government introduces.

    Paying more for petrol when filling of the car, or some extra tax on aviation will never save the climate.

    What needs to happen is that the world needs to get away from coal, and get away from coal permanently, quickly and forever. If humanity would do that, it wouldn't matter what kind of car you'd be driving or how often you might decide to take an airplane somewhere.

    As far as I know and as sad as it is there are over 1000 coal fired power plants either planned or under construction somewhere in this world. Mostly 3rd world countries, China, India, etc…



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 9,287 ✭✭✭Backstreet Moyes


    The Greens have nominated O Gorman as their new leader and all he cares about his increasing the population.

    More flights in and out of the country.

    Move material for building houses.

    More heating for houses.

    More cars on the road.

    You would forgive me for thinking they want to increase the carbon footprint in Ireland.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,928 ✭✭✭thatsdaft


    It’s worse than that, don’t forget the bizarre crusade against datacenters and direct and indirect high paying jobs those result in, not only import people but ensure they are on welfare and not work in high paying industries



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 9,143 ✭✭✭Gloomtastic!


    If there are no Greens in government who are you all going to blame in FFG for implementing EU policies?



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 15,277 ✭✭✭✭Thelonious Monk


    I've thought about this and they'll just blame the Greens and Eamon Ryan's legacy



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 9,143 ✭✭✭Gloomtastic!


    Couldn’t they blame the EU policies? Or are they just being good little Irish people and seeing the EU as blameless.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 6,004 ✭✭✭roosterman71


    Here's an article from late last year

    Has anything changed in the interim?



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,928 ✭✭✭thatsdaft


    Them EU green policies will be ejected in coming years

    Germany is falling apart under them policies, and where Germany goes EU goes

    Speaking of EU policies, the one which is marks wood imported from rainforests half way across world and burned and then marketed as “green” is one of my favourites



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 9,143 ✭✭✭Gloomtastic!




  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 12,337 ✭✭✭✭MadYaker


    Interesting article on RTE today

    Climate policies will raise temperatures by 3.1C - UN

    I follow the news on this pretty closely and have done for ten years now and as time ticks by we (the world not just Ireland or Europe) move further and further away from where we need to be. Is it time to have a real discussion about what's actually achievable in terms of mitigating climate change? We need to start planning for the inevitable imo, how will the climate change, how do we adapt etc. I don't hear anyone talking about a plan B, just a plan A that clearly is not working.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 15,277 ✭✭✭✭Thelonious Monk


    Flooding, drought and food security should be planned for. I know we produce a lot of food but it's not that varied and we eat mostly imported food. I think we're locked in for the weather to get more and more unpredictable in future.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,911 ✭✭✭PommieBast


    Ironically one group of people who have been adapting to climate change are the designers of oil rigs.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 25,446 ✭✭✭✭Larbre34


    The European Green Deal hasn't got long to live.

    Expect major downward revisions on many targets in the next Commission term.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,204 ✭✭✭ginger22


    With the way the Germany economy is tanking this green deal doesn't have long to run. Even the ECB are starting to pannick dropping interest rates and they are usually a year too late with their decisions.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 896 ✭✭✭InAtFullBack


    Interesting comment. I remember listening last year to Today FM's Matt Cooper (for my sins) and yer man from Carlow Weather was on and so was John Gibbons, scaremonger in chief. Carlow Weather dude was basically saying that we in Ireland need investment in flood warning systems and other such adaptations - whereas Gibbons was of the opinion that if Ireland was a zero-emissions country then the Midelton Floods would never happen (it was a few days after the floods there). Gripping stuff. The likes of Gibbons and his ilk need to pick up a history book on the Irish climate.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 896 ✭✭✭InAtFullBack


    These kind of novelty articles surface every now and again. Pick a point in time to suit your argument against another point in time.

    Of course, those points in time never compare to the years just before and after 1000BC when the Vikings settled and farmed in Greenland, along side the medieval warm period when grapes were harvested in England and indeed SE Ireland.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 13,456 ✭✭✭✭machiavellianme


    The vikings were incredible in what they achieved but I'm not sure they managed time travel back to the iron age? Are you sure it wasn't 2000 years later in 1000AD?



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,749 ✭✭✭Pa ElGrande


    The Irish state signed us up the Aarhus convention put into law back in 2012. That has given eNGOs and individuals power to use "environmental protection" to conduct lawfare attacks on any development. Unsurprisingly what is good for the goose is good for the gander and some developers are resorting to lawfare themselves in response. environmental laws have created a cottage industry of environmental consultants and solicitors that prey on planning process to extract money, there is nothing like property development planning in this country to bring out grifters. Those layered costs are incurred before a sod is turned on a development, combined with specification inflation and other regulations, it just drives up costs even more.

    The average price of a new build reached €410,000 last year, over 41pc more expensive than existing homes.

    The median price for a property in Ireland in the third quarter of 2023 was €320,000, an increase of €15,000 in one year.

    The median price of a home in Co Dublin stood at €425,000, 55pc more expensive than all other counties, where the median price was €274,000, according to the latest housing report from Irish company Geowox. source


    'Serial' objectors blocking housing plans to extract money from developers

    Net Zero means we are paying for the destruction of our economy and society in pursuit of an unachievable and pointless policy.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,749 ✭✭✭Pa ElGrande


    Weather forecasters in Ireland can't really predict the weather beyond 3 days, the accuracy of their forecasts declines markedly, nothing has changed, the weather will remain unpredictable for the foreseeable future. When people talk about climate change, they are talking about the statistics of weather over an arbitrary time period, they often settle on 30 year time windows using a convention established in the early 20th century. Despite all the sensationalist news coverage there has been no significant change in severity of weather events and data proves humans are much better prepared and have become more resilient to severe weather events since the start of the 20th century. The claim that the weather will become more unpredictable in future cannot be supported by evidence.

    Significant famines of the 20th and 21st century (Yemen, Sudan, malnutrition in Gaza), have either been a consequence of war (previous examples Bengal famine, Ethiopia 1980s) in marginal growing areas or imposition of Marxist ideology (North Korea in the 90s, Mao's Great leap backward, Pol Pot year zero, Russian collectivisation). The world population has risen by substantial margin globally since the advent of agricultural and industrial revolutions, war significantly disrupts the distribution of food resources needed for life support, adverse weather creates temporary logistical problems and may destroy individual crops and bad weather can have an effect on food prices year to year. The threat to food security in Ireland comes from war (Ukraine or the Red sea round Yemen) and the pursuit of unattainable net zero goals by various European states. We will have to get creative to find find calories in event of major disruption of oil supplies, that stops the harvest and distribution of food, however, pursuit of net zero is the end of the post World War cheap food policy, we will spend a greater portion of our incomes on food, that has severe consequences when you are not well off, you are going to want cheap calories and that's not necessarily the best quality food.

    The farms we have in Ireland today are much more productive than the dog and stick farming that preceded World War II. Study Irish peoples diet prior to World war II if you want to know what sustainable food looks like in this country. You can still find people who lived in 1950s Ireland, ask them what they ate. Oliver Fletcher, a farmer in Leicestershire, England who has been putting out videos, providing insight into the development of UK agricultural policy, pre and post war. It is very interesting to learn the rise of the "organic" food growing movement was embraced by some members of the English aristocracy with their own motives that did not include concern for the farmer or providing food to the masses and how the current pursuit of "sustainable" agriculture appeals to them as owners of large tracts of land. The experience of World war II food rationing is the major reason why Europe pursued the agricultural policy it did.

    Net Zero means we are paying for the destruction of our economy and society in pursuit of an unachievable and pointless policy.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,749 ✭✭✭Pa ElGrande


    Ruinable energy is not cheap. Try this one: The Country Where Taxpayers Are Charged Billions When the Sun Shines

    Welt calls it “the solar trap”, and it works like this: our Renewable Energy Sources Act (EEG) pledges to pay renewables producers fixed tariffs for every kilowatt hour of electricity their installations feed into the grid. Whether you are an ordinary climate-conscious person with solar panels on your house or you run massive solar farms, the EEG entitles you to receive these fixed “feed-in tariffs” for a period of 20 years. The EEG also requires grid operators to accept your electricity regardless of demand and to sell it on the electricity exchange.
    <snip>

    In September alone, Germany paid €2.6 billion to renewables producers for electricity that had a market value of a mere €145 million. Our sunny autumn is destroying our already-fragile Government budget. Federal number-crunchers had originally allocated €10.6 billion for feed-in tariffs in 2024, but already the Government owes €15 billion and the year is not yet over. Scholz’s Cabinet is thus trying to allocate an additional €8.8 billion for the rest of the year. The Parliament has yet to approve the additional funds, though, and also the damned sun will just not stop bloody shining, and so probably even this supplementary allocation won’t be enough. We’re bleeding money, all for a sun that doesn’t send any bills. source


    Demand and supply, who knew? The article focuses on the negative price on electricity. Meaning they have to PAY someone else to take that power. Now, where does that money come from? It comes from other economic activity that produced that money. Said activity most likely uses fossil fuels. . .

    Net Zero means we are paying for the destruction of our economy and society in pursuit of an unachievable and pointless policy.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 13,456 ✭✭✭✭machiavellianme


    More foolhardy proposals from the most conscientious party. We already have strong penalties for the distance travelled, why add additional tolls? There's a significant amount of tax and duties per litre, so the further you drive, the more it costs.

    https://m.independent.ie/irish-news/politics/fine-gael-and-fianna-fail-join-forces-to-block-green-partys-ridiculous-pollution-tax-on-drivers-before-election/a550272342.html



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 7,088 ✭✭✭Clo-Clo



    Do you really think the Green Party is going to implement a massive overhaul of how tax on cars works just at the election after not doing it for 4 years in government ?

    Are you really that gullible?

    You do understand a change like that would take months and months of meetings/negotiations etc to implement.

    Honestly this thread is just hilarious


    When the big bad Green Party is gone who will you have to blame then



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,749 ✭✭✭Pa ElGrande


    If the Green party senses they are on the way out of government, it makes sense to do a last time push. Green party leadership do follow direction from their party members, remember this is a party who kept FF in government, just to get a Stag hunting bill passed in 2010. Over 10 years later, deer need to be culled. They may have been punished for one election cycle, however, the electorate has a short memory. Labours vote imploded with most of their voter pool going to Sinn Fein, that left a floating left wing vote that considers Sinn Fein taboo, The Green party tap into that voter market using environmentalism as the bait. Commercial advertising for consumer goods puts a lick of green paint on their products to increase margins (cars, mortgages, food), there is much reinforcement in the media and commercially and the Green party is aligned with that messaging. There is no political party linking the rising tax take from "environmental" taxes as a contributor to increased cost of living.

    If you look at Moving Together - A Strategic Approach to the Improved Efficiency of the Transport System in Ireland. Towards the end you will see what they are pursing. How about a workplace parking levy? Experience elsewhere shows Employers outside the public sector pass this tax on to their employees. Let's tax the workers even more with "ultra low emissions zones", Want an electrician or plumber to service your property, it's already €100+ for a callout, in future if you live in ULEZ it will be callout fee + ULEZ tax + extra labour and parts (VAT). The green tax overhead keeps going up, as it does, the Green partys vote will increasingly be confined to wealthy urban left wing voters.

    As for FF & FG, they are no better, they keep signing us taxpayers up to international treaties/agreements, then turn with a straight face tell the electorate to be the "best boys in Europe", we have "obligations " to pay said taxes. Disagree, they label you as a populist for roysh climate denier.

    Net Zero means we are paying for the destruction of our economy and society in pursuit of an unachievable and pointless policy.



Advertisement