Advertisement
If you have a new account but are having problems posting or verifying your account, please email us on hello@boards.ie for help. Thanks :)
Hello all! Please ensure that you are posting a new thread or question in the appropriate forum. The Feedback forum is overwhelmed with questions that are having to be moved elsewhere. If you need help to verify your account contact hello@boards.ie

DART+ (DART Expansion)

1365366368370371394

Comments

  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 273 ✭✭PlatformNine


    Fair enough, my thinking was that a short train was better than no train, and sending half length trains could serve as a interm solution if platform extensions aren't complete by the time the line is "DART capable." I am not sure how long the extensions could take. That way they could at least begin Wicklow services even if it isn't at full capacity. Or if they are running half length sets it could only be Wicklow-Connolly so as to not take away northern line capacity



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 72,751 ✭✭✭✭L1011


    A half length running in any slot over the existing network would damage capacity.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,505 ✭✭✭p_haugh


    In terms of the new fleet deliveries, was it just the one driving carriage delivered last Friday? If so, is there any indication as to when the 4 other carriages to make up a full consist will be delivered?



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 273 ✭✭PlatformNine


    ah true, it just doesn't work does it. Because to not take away capacity on Connolly-Greystones, it needs to operate as a shuttle to Greystones, but that loops back to the discussion about Greystones needing a third platform for it to have the capacity for the shuttle service. And I suppose even if they were to operate a shuttle service from Greystones it might need charging infrastructure? so even with the third platform that might not work.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,505 ✭✭✭p_haugh




  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,172 ✭✭✭Ben D Bus


    Given tight capacity on the electricity grid and the unfortunate overlap of peak electricity and peak commuter demand, would the new trains be able to operate on battery power during peak hours if requested by Eirgrid? Even under OHLE? Or would that place undue operational limitations on the service?



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 7,494 ✭✭✭Former Former Former


    To my knowledge, most/all of the bridges along the Dart+ West line are protected structures and will not be demolished.

    The bridge at Castleknock station is not protected and was originally to be demolished and replaced but that was not popular and the final design involves raising it to allow for the OH wires.

    Can't speak to other lines



  • Moderators, Motoring & Transport Moderators, Technology & Internet Moderators Posts: 23,623 Mod ✭✭✭✭bk


    I don't think that will be possible, while the batteries won't charge from the OHLE, they wouldn't have sufficient range to run the full length without making use of the OHLE.

    BTW Drogheda will actually have a large fixed battery facility which will be used to charge the trains. These batteries can charge off peak and take the strain off the grid.

    Also the batteries on the trains actually charge in two ways, from the charging infrastructure in Drogheda (and probably Wicklow in future) and from braking regeneration while on route. They apparently won't charge from OHLE as the current OHLE setup doesn't have sufficient power available to both propel the train and charge up the batteries. However they don't need to as braking regeneration will supply significant amounts of power.

    FYI the above is from reading an engineering report on how these battery trains will work, it is a few years old, so details might change.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 230 ✭✭Bsharp


    the detail is still relevant. charging infrastructure is planned at Wicklow but unlikely they'd have a battery given the level of service would be much lower than at Drogheda.

    Max number of battery trains you could get to Wicklow is likely to be 1 per hour. Getting two trains (three with the DMU) down and back in a given hour, while allowing for charging and the passing on the single line section between bray and greystones seems like a tall feat. that's assuming you double track parts of the corridor south of Greystones to wicklow as well, potentially in an SAC.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 200 ✭✭ArcadiaJunction


    how many THOUSANDS of bridges in this country are like this one? People need high-frequency transport. I could understand if this was a rare specimen but it is not.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 273 ✭✭PlatformNine


    Charging infrastructure aside, could they reach 2tph by running trains in the same direction back-to-back(~5 minutes apart) through Bray head? It is difficult with current infrastructure but not impossible. Looking at timetables for Rosslare and Greystones services, it seems to be how they schedule Rosslare services around Greystones servics so they can stay at 2tph. If they were able to consistently do that, it could allow for Wicklow town to have 2tph.

    It of course means that Greystones and Wicklow services would always be right after each other which isn't ideal, but it at least might be possible without affecting existing Greystones services. As well I think it would mean anytime a Rosslare service is scheduled a Wicklow service would need to be cancelled in its place.

    Unfortunately I think to practically reach that frequency (ie, not repeat the August timetables), the 2-3km between Greystones and the last tunnel through Bray head needs to be twin-tracked. And like you mention that doesn't address improvements required for that frequency south of Greystones, which at absolute minimum would require a passing loop.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 18,714 ✭✭✭✭LXFlyer


    The 30 minute DART service from Greystones means that with the current infrastructure that there are only two paths each hour available to be used by Rosslare services (either northbound or southbound).

    It is also the reason that southbound Rosslare services have to directly follow Greystones DART services.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 15,586 ✭✭✭✭loyatemu


    Charging infrastructure aside, could they reach 2tph by running trains in the same direction back-to-back(~5 minutes apart) through Bray head?

    this already happens several times during the day. I think Bray Head is divided into 2 or 3 signalling section, once a train has cleared the first one a second train can enter. 07.48 Commuter is followed by the 07:54 Dart for example

    that's assuming you double track parts of the corridor south of Greystones to wicklow as well, potentially in an SAC.

    There was a loop between Kilcoole and Newcastle in the distant past, but I really doubt they will double any of it, it's about 15 minutes journey from Greystones to Wicklow so an hourly service is easily doable without the need for loops.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 7,906 ✭✭✭GerardKeating


    Would doubling the section from the end of the tunnels to GreyStone Station help much ? Would this allow many extra paths, it seems to be about a kilometer or so ?



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 15,586 ✭✭✭✭loyatemu


    it would allow one extra path, so a 20 min frequency as opposed to the current 30 min - it's about 2km. Jacobs Engineering did a report on this 5(!) years ago.

    But it seems in the Dart+ plan (any day now as they've been saying for 2 years) they're only going to double from the tunnel as far as the small crossing at the grove, as they think that will allow the same frequency and going all the way to the station isn't worth the heavy engineering that would involve.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 273 ✭✭PlatformNine


    Could the Wicklow capacity study change any of the plans from that report or current D+ plans? It is supposed to release soon.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 230 ✭✭Bsharp


    wouldn't think so.

    realistically it should contain work to get a longer DART train stopping at kilcoole and Wicklow (platform extensions and track work), some resignalling/ETCS, and substation + charging infrastructure at Wicklow. there'll be other ancillary work but those are likely to be the main works.

    The timetable will need to consider the BEMU path and how it works with the Rosslare service and other DART services. . Although we probably won't know the timetable until BEMUs start operating to Drogheda (other than 1 BEMU per hour in each direction).



  • Moderators, Motoring & Transport Moderators, Technology & Internet Moderators Posts: 23,623 Mod ✭✭✭✭bk


    Yes, I assumed just charging infrastructure at Wicklow, but not batteries. Though it would depend on the number of trains your charging and the local electricity grid capacity. Drogheda needs the batteries as they are charging more trains then the local electrical grid can handle. I'd assume that wouldn't be the case for Wicklow give the lower number of trains.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 15,586 ✭✭✭✭loyatemu


    How long do the trains take to charge up?

    • Dart leaves Drogheda fully charged
    • runs under battery to Malahide (40% of the charge used?)
    • Continues to Bray or Dun Laoghaire or wherever using OHLE
    • Returns to Drogheda, using another 40% on the battery section
    • Now it needs to recharge, how long is that going to take?

    existing Dart and commuter trains have a fairly quick turnaround.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,861 ✭✭✭tnegun


    They have regenerative braking too right so that will help but it will be interesting to see how many runs can be gotten in without having to charge.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 15,586 ✭✭✭✭loyatemu


    I guess regen is effectively indirect charging off the OHLE - i.e. it uses the OHLE to accelerate then the braking charges the battery. I'd be interested to see figures, I don't know if they've published any so far other than the 80km range?



  • Moderators, Motoring & Transport Moderators, Technology & Internet Moderators Posts: 23,623 Mod ✭✭✭✭bk


    From the engineering report, it suggested that the batteries would get a full charge from regenerative breaking between Malahide to Bray/DL and back, so it would always be running with a full battery between Malahide to Drogheda. Battery full from regenerative braking heading north, and from charging at Drogheda heading south.

    AFAIR the report said that in Drogheda the batteries could get a full charge in a 12 minute turn around. Though I can't remember if that is 0 to 100% charge or just 40% to 100%.

    Apparently 12 minutes being the normal turnaround time.

    I don't know how Wicklow would play into all of this, but I assume it would work similarly and that it gets a sufficient regenerative recharge between Malahide and Bray before heading to Wicklow and that the reverse direction is sufficient to get to Drogheda.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,098 ✭✭✭Citizen  Six


    In the recent Oireachtas Committee meeting I think I remember Jim Meade saying 20 min charge time.

    The new trains charge off the OHLE too, don't they, but not when taking power?



  • Moderators, Motoring & Transport Moderators, Technology & Internet Moderators Posts: 23,623 Mod ✭✭✭✭bk


    I don’t remember the report mentioning it, but yes, it would make sense that the batteries might be able to charge from the OHLE when stopped at stations, could get quick top-ups along the way.



  • Moderators, Motoring & Transport Moderators, Technology & Internet Moderators Posts: 23,623 Mod ✭✭✭✭bk


    So looking over the “BEMU Infrastructure Options Study” again:

    They modelled it on a 12 minute turnaround and charge time at Drogheda and apparently confirmed in meetings with IR.

    The following figures are for half length units (HLU) of 5 cars, so double that, for full 10 car train.

    They estimate they need 316kWh per HLU to get from Drogheda to Malahide and back.

    They estimate they can get 6kWh per HLU for regenerative braking into stations, so as an example they estimate if running between Connolly to Greystones and back, they can regenerate 216kWh per HLU. That would only leave them needing to charge 100kWh at Drogheda.

    Of course if they run to Wicklow or only as far as Connolly those figures would change.

    Unless I missed it they don’t really go into details on the charging speeds at Drogheda, but seem to be confident that 12 minutes would be enough time.

    BTW The Alstom trains will have 840kWh of battery per HLU.

    Note all the above is based on the early options report, further studies might have changed it.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,098 ✭✭✭Citizen  Six


    Where exactly does it charge in Drogheda? Does it need to shunt off a platform, or does it stay at the same platform it turns around on? Haven't been keeping up to date with it.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 273 ✭✭PlatformNine


    Its probably something like 20%-80%, at least that is a common "fast charge" area for many batteries. Though these BEMU batteries might be different.

    Also, Greystones-Wicklow should be less than 20km so it It shouldn't have to charge at all before returning.

    I have been looking through the debate again, on page 17 he said: "They can run under the wires and go to Droghedaand be charged, if necessary, in 20 minutes and be back out again." And on page 9: "We can charge the batteries in Drogheda or under the wires when they come back."

    The debate in general is not very technical so it might not be to the minute, but I can imagine its fairly accurate.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 7,351 ✭✭✭Pete_Cavan


    Was the line through Greystones originally double track? From Google Maps it looks like there is enough space for it.

    Why stop BMUs at Wicklow? Continue about 1.3km to a new station under the relatively new bridge which would serve a lot more people for very little outlay.

    They should be looking to add a couple of stations at Greystones. One to the north is obvious but if the existing station could be moved further north (basically the platforms running from the existing footbridge north), you could have another station beside the P&R.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,799 ✭✭✭Glaceon


    No, the line was only ever single track. The tunnels at Bray Head are a big problem.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 15,586 ✭✭✭✭loyatemu


    it's 5 mins walk from the P&R to the existing station, it's really not worth building another station there. As for the north of the town (Redford) there were vague plans for a station there when the Dart extension was being planned, and there is a big development about to go in nearby but the road down to the line is very narrow with nowhere for parking.



Advertisement