Advertisement
If you have a new account but are having problems posting or verifying your account, please email us on hello@boards.ie for help. Thanks :)
Hello all! Please ensure that you are posting a new thread or question in the appropriate forum. The Feedback forum is overwhelmed with questions that are having to be moved elsewhere. If you need help to verify your account contact hello@boards.ie

Harris Vs Trump 2024 US Presidential election - read the warning in the OP posted 18/09/24

1273274276278279574

Comments

  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,992 ✭✭✭ronjo


    Yeah, I invested 38k in a US Fund one year ago on Friday and the value now is over 52k….. Not too shabby



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 23,030 ✭✭✭✭Tell me how


    A huge number of people who held positions in his last administration resigned and/or now refuse to back his nomination.

    That is not the sign of a leader. I don't think you can call someone a leader just because they support you by voting for you, there's a lot of factors to consider. If you have to consider this, then you'd have to admit that Hillary Clinton and Joe Biden are both better leaders than Trump given more people voted for each of them in their respective elections versus Trump.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,992 ✭✭✭ronjo


    Actually thats possibly even the most damning of all.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 12,026 ✭✭✭✭duploelabs




  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 12,921 ✭✭✭✭Frank Bullitt


    Gives what away? He has a history of saying defamatory things about the Central Park 5.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,516 ✭✭✭Virgil°


    Nobody is classifying all criticism of Harris as nitpicking. It's a valid point to make that Harris should potentially have tried to differenciate herself more from Biden and his policies sooner. If the posters we're complaining about were coming on boards with such good faith talking points, I suspect there'd be much less of a problem. But that's not what's happening.

    Your post shows that it does happen. You've literally said "refuse to address all of the examples of the complaint actually applying to Trump " , You can't make this up .

    So in your own words you said if you can't have a complaint about Harris without having to answer to the "But Trump" rebuttal ,

    This isn't complicated. The issue is that a certain type of poster is coming on here constantly picking at Harris on certain things, but never ever levelling the same criticism at Trump. Even if the complaint applies to Trump tenfold.

    Then they cry foul that noone can say anything negative about Harris and throw their toys out of the pram when their points get dissected.

    It's a really boring and unoriginal strategy.

    Its insane , your that focused on the "MAGA cult" you don't realise your in your own cult ,

    I and I'm sure most posters on here, have absolutely no allegiances to the American Democratic party. Or Harris. I'm fully aware that we're talking on a left leaning discussion website. Doesn't mean that I can't rationally point out how there has been little to no good reasons put forward why Donald Trump should become the most powerful man on earth. Again.

    The cult of Boards.ie is all in your head.

    You can't fathom how people can have issues with both parties,

    I think most posters again, by way of example, can see how both American political parties have handled the Israel/Gaza calamity has been less than ideal. But this isn't a discussion of Republican vs Democratic foreign policy. It's a Harris vs Trump thread. And if you want to attack Harris over such issues then prepare to be confronted with Trumps enormous shortcomings on the subject. It's a two horse race.

    You get to choose one.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 21,032 ✭✭✭✭everlast75


    So this has been thoroughly debunked.

    Any other tries?

    Elect a clown... Expect a circus



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 16,313 ✭✭✭✭markodaly


    538 has the election slightly for Trump, while NateSilver has it as a dead heat as PA is even.

    But even they are seeing the trend and momentum going for Trump these past weeks.

    image.png


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 86,725 ✭✭✭✭Overheal


    it’s a race between a prosecutor and a criminal, between someone who has spent their entire professional career defending and upholding the law vs. someone who made their life revolve around flouting the law.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 8,106 ✭✭✭Christy42


    Change for change sake by voting for the guy who was there 4 years ago. The US is in a troubling place and won't get any better (not saying you are wrong that people may vote for Trump for these reasons but just pointing out it doesn't follow much logic)



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 15,016 ✭✭✭✭briany


    Covid was certainly not Trump's fault, but he did not rise to the challenge and was having public disagreements with his medical advisors, principally Dr. Fauci.

    There's a time for leaving all the partisanship aside and one time is most certainly when a pandemic is gripping your country. Trump simply couldn't do it.

    Great fair weather captain. Great at swanning in and taking the credit for others' hard work. No good at leading people in a crisis.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 16,313 ✭✭✭✭markodaly


    Looking at 2020, it appears that RCP was actually more accurate than 538. The Biden numbers were about accurate, but the Trump numbers were below what was the actual result.

    image.png

    Have they updated their models to capture this shy Trump vote? Time will tell.

    But if 2016 and 2020 are repeated, Trump is waltzing into the WH.



  • Posts: 0 [Deleted User]


    That's not really an argument for your misrepresentation.

    Or against your hypocrisy.

    You claimed that everyone who criticises Harris is accused of being a Trump supporter. This doesn't happen.

    You then accused me of being in a cult because I criticise Trump.

    When challenged on this, you come back with this nothing post.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 20,949 ✭✭✭✭yourdeadwright


    Oh wow look another "but Trump" reply you just can't help yourself , its very tiresome ,

    When Trump is criticised nobody on here ever says "but Harris" ,

    I don't get to chose one nor do i have to ,



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,992 ✭✭✭ronjo


    Yeah thats worrying.

    Is there any similar generic %'s for 2022?



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,992 ✭✭✭ronjo


    pretty mad also that Trump did a lot better than expected but yet has spent almost 4 years whining and whining about a rigged election.

    Pathetic little man.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 20,949 ✭✭✭✭yourdeadwright


    No i said you make every critic of Harris about Trump & you replied with the below,

    "refuse to address all of the examples of the complaint actually applying to Trump "

    So in YOUR words if we make a complaint about Harris , we need to make sure it doesn't also apply to Trump in some way,



  • Posts: 0 [Deleted User]


    But that's not all of what I said, was it? You keep trying to misrepresent me.

    Nor was it all of what you said.

    You accused me of being in a cult. What basis do you have for this false accusation beyond that I criticise Trump?



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 15,016 ✭✭✭✭briany


    I've seen people point back to the 2022 US midterms a good few times as an example that Trump's polling may be exaggerated, but midterms are not presidential elections and Trump wasn't actually running in those. There were candidates who he'd endorsed who lost their elections, but this ended up not being indicative that support for him was slipping, as he then went on to crush his opposition in the 2024 primaries in a more comprehensive fashion than 2016.

    I would venture to say that the psychology of midterms are quite different to a presidential elections and voting for a Trump-endorsed candidate isn't the same thing as voting for Trump himself.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 9,295 ✭✭✭Oscar_Madison
    #MEGA MAKE EUROPE GREAT AGAIN


    Christy42- NOTHING has any logic for me in this election 😀

    And thanks for clarifying - yes I’m purely just repeating the reasons people have said why they’re voting Republican and not Democrat



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 5,592 ✭✭✭valoren


    Trump is a leader albeit the leader of the MAGA cult. In general election terms he is not a leader since anyone seeking to lead the United States of America and speaks of "an enemy within" is not leadership material.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 23,030 ✭✭✭✭Tell me how


    This was absolutely the case.

    • He abandoned the Pandemic Readiness Office
    • He downplayed Covid in early days
    • He refused to implement quarantine early
    • He undermined the message from medical experts
    • He played politics with availability and delivery of PPE
    • He hijacked the communication message for personal reasons
    • He refused to take ownership
    • He tried to prioritize the economy over the health of society

    And at the same time, he was a divisive and antagonistic voice in the BLM conversation in the summer of 2020.

    He had re-election on a plate in front of him (A - defer to medical experts on Covid and B - speak in a a compassionateway to the Black community and appoint some stooges to look at improving relationships between black people and police forces with a detailed report that will take 6-9 months to deliver)

    If he had the brains to do either of these things (not even both) we'd be talking today about his replacement, but he showed how lacking he was in capability and so, the facade fell apart for him. He shouldn't be within an asses roar of this election after what he did, but because of Mitch/Kevin/Lyndsey, he could be President in 3 months.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 9,295 ✭✭✭Oscar_Madison
    #MEGA MAKE EUROPE GREAT AGAIN


    Let’s be clear - elections not over yet and she could surprise us all and landslide it- just thought I’d mention that.

    But if there was criticism after an election failure, I think on one hand, yes she was part of the success of the current presidency, but I seem to get the feeling that for that very reason, people are just saying “I want change” - I don’t want Joe Biden part 2.

    I think she actually made a big mistake in one of her interviews where she made absolutely NO attempt to make herself her own woman so to speak - she was asked a question about her alignment to Joe Biden and made not even a half hearted attempt to portray herself as an independent thinking future president Harris - she didn’t at all move away from under Bidens shadow and wasn’t willing to either distance herself or put forward different ways or views to what the current administration was saying - that resonated with me at lot- and in my view I think thats plagued her ever since - she’s seen as Biden 2, not Harris 1- by some of these voters who unfortunately have the pleasure of being the deciding voters by the looks of things right now



  • Posts: 6,597 ✭✭✭ [Deleted User]




  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 12,842 ✭✭✭✭aloyisious


    God forbid anyone say that Trump is involved in smoke and mirror trickery. Lindsey Graham might take offence, not Don, he has a thicker skin and knows the value of an "anything she has done, I can do better too" appearance on TV. The voter will have forgotten this episode by Nov 5th unless some-one brings up the portion size of McDonalds fries portions.

    When one likens Harris image to his, one might be going off verbal and visual script.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 16,313 ✭✭✭✭markodaly


    So, no poll is trustworthy?

    538?

    NateSilver?

    RCP?



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 20,706 ✭✭✭✭Tony EH


    This is the thing, the reality of the situation is the polar opposite. We actually don't know what a Harris cabinet will do re: Israel. However, Trump has been very clear who and what he's in favour of. He's not been shy about saying it.

    He isn't a "wild card" in any respect at all.

    It's mind bogglingly ignorant.

    🤦‍♀️



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 12,842 ✭✭✭✭aloyisious


    Do you think Trump's references to Harris as a "**** president" match anything Harris said in reference to him?



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 20,949 ✭✭✭✭yourdeadwright


    But you did say it those where your words,

    When you hear Harris criticised you straight away jump on the "but Trump" as a defence for anything perceived bad about Harris, Again lets remember your words are if we critic Harris we must address all of the examples of the same complaint applying to Trump

    Cult : devotion directed towards a particular figure or object ,



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 9,758 ✭✭✭weisses


    Correct… Im not criticizing Harris for sexually assaulting another person, Im not criticising her for being a felon on 34 counts an by the look of things more to come, I'm not criticising her for bursting into a dressing room with half naked underaged girls..

    One of These 3 things alone should be enough to rule out someone from running for the highest office.

    Sorry .. but no " but Harris" from me



Advertisement