Advertisement
If you have a new account but are having problems posting or verifying your account, please email us on hello@boards.ie for help. Thanks :)
Hello all! Please ensure that you are posting a new thread or question in the appropriate forum. The Feedback forum is overwhelmed with questions that are having to be moved elsewhere. If you need help to verify your account contact hello@boards.ie

Ireland's reliance on Corporation Tax receipts

2456710

Comments

  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 14,323 ✭✭✭✭Geuze




  • Posts: 447 ✭✭ [Deleted User]


    "When there is so much money around there is no need for any real fiscal discipline"

    Em what? How did that work out in the early 2000s? The government is committing to recurring current expenditure measures that the country will not be able to afford if the Corporation Tax golden goose gets ill. It is utter stupidity but the Irish electorate continuously fails the grown ups version of the marshmallow test so what can you do? We have people in this country who've lived through 2 national bankruptcies caused by FF who will still vote for FF 🤷‍♂️

    I've simply come to the conclusion that one must accept the country going bust every 25-30 years or leave, as we simply do not have a mature population that can see past the end of their own noses and not behave like Veruca Salt



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 21,098 ✭✭✭✭kneemos


    2008 was a blip in fairness as recessions go. Most of Europe is already in serious budget deficit and .asking painful cuts all over.

    We're not the only country offering incentives to these giant corporations but they choose to come and stay. Wouldn't be overly concerned about some hypothetical.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,548 ✭✭✭Quitelife


    our public sector is the best paid and most inefficient in Europe with no accountability for anyone and the amount of managers to staff is insane … everyone in the public sector thinks they should be on 100k when they’d be sacked in the private sector for incompetence …..as a career guidance teacher one said if your lazy and want a good pension join the public service ..



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 561 ✭✭✭CliffHangeroner


    The fact we've learnt the square root of zero since the 2008 crash leads me to believe whatever is coming down the track is completely deserved.

    The same people on every other current affairs radio or TV show asking for more more more are the same one's who'll vote for FG and FF again and again and then be ringing in the Joe Duffy show in a few years time crying about how unfair it all is that they are broke and struggling.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 561 ✭✭✭CliffHangeroner


    And a lot of them expecting the state (the taxpayer) to give them a council house, dole and medical card.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 927 ✭✭✭techman1


    the issue is we are nearly all welfare recipients in this country: children's allowance, energy credits, free school books, free dinners, all sorts of grants to unviable SMEs, agriculture, double double allowances … etc etc … the gravy being doled out is across society, we are nearly all in it … what went on in the recent budget is repeating the mistakes of the past … remember this is a right of centre government, imagine it was a bunch of left wingers ….

    You are wrong there it's definitely not a right of centre government, all governments in Ireland have been essentially leftist and socialist even more so in the last decade. Probably the only time we possibly had a centrist government was during the celtic tiger ,at least then the tax burden on workers was reduced making it more worthwhile to work which explains why we were able to build all those houses back then ( yes we built too many ) now the government reluctantly gives tax cuts but all the spending is on welfare payments, that is a socialist not right wing policy. Therefore people are not prepared to work on building sites etc like 20 years ago as the government is creaming off too much tax from middle income workers and making work less attractive



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,355 ✭✭✭crusd


    Investment in the productive capacity of the economy through massive infrastructure and housing projects, as well as creating an indigenous startup culture is what is needed. Creating a rainy day fund is about the worst thing we could do with our money as essentially it would just be funding other countries / corporations growth through however its invested and not actually doing anything to create local organic growth.

    Are the rainy day brigade the ones who would stick the 10k win on the local GAA lotto in the credit union rather that repairing the leaky roof in the house?



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 678 ✭✭✭engineerws


    I just find it mad that the the nationdebt is €234 billion now

    In 2008 it was about €40 billion.

    Whenever I raise this online people reply that it doesn't matter it's only national debt but if there was ever a systemic shock, who would be willing to loan us another €200 billion?



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,355 ✭✭✭crusd


    Mistake everyone makes is thinking the national debt is the same as a mortgage. But even so at 57% of GNP it would be a very manageable mortgage.

    The difference being of course that an economy will remain a productive asset. A 20% fall in GNP would be a disaster but the debt to GNP ration would still be good



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 7,874 ✭✭✭facehugger99


    A lot of politicians being blamed and in fairness they are a bunch of self centred cowards.

    But, any political party preaching prudence and long term planning would be decimated in an election here.

    It’s the electorate that are the real problem in this country.

    The politicians are simply a reflection of our own shortcomings.

    We haven’t learned a thing from the last recession and we deserve everything that’s coming down the tracks.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 9,480 ✭✭✭blackwhite


    Michael Noonan tried it in 2002 and got his arse handed to him.

    Every political party leader since then has realised that promising the sun, moon and stars is the way to an Irish voter's heart.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 31,110 ✭✭✭✭Wanderer78


    …this is not exactly like the lead up to the 08 crash, but it is similar in ways, again, the main reason for that crash was our over reliance on credit which of course fueled a property boom, yes we re still doing this today, but we re some what protected by the fact, a significant proportion of this debt has now been institutionalised by major investors, which of course is still helping to cause a property boom, along with our serious supply problems of course. if any of these investors were to go bust, theyd very likely be bailed out, so nothing to really worrying about there….

    yes we re exposed by being heavily dependent on corporate taxes, but its less likely that ll dry up anytime soon, this was always our long term plan anyway, when we opened up to such investment, so, its working….

    …so thank god for the surplus, and plough on with the spending, but spend it wisely, just bloody stop giving property buyers more money to speculate in property markets(first time buyers), and use it to bloody build them!

    …get cracking with investing in our long term infrastructure needs!



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 439 ✭✭Grassy Knoll


    Our approach to FDI was always about the jobs, the CT has come about from international tax reform, of which we were an unexpected beneficiary - it has largely taken us by surprise. To spend it now would be foolish IMHO - there is not the capacity to deliver housing, infrastructure etc at scale. To spend further money now would only serve to increase the wages of builders etc - not a bad outcome if you work in that sector, or that is your policy objective



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,227 ✭✭✭Emblematic


    The policy of attracting and retaining foreign multinationals, though it yields a lot of tax, is damaging to our society in a similar way that an abundance of oil (or some other resource) is damaging to many third-world societies. It creates a top-heavy economy which stifles local creativity and enterprise. In addition it makes rents unaffordable for local people.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 19,282 ✭✭✭✭kippy


    People have short memories or perhaps are too young to remember...…

    While it's best to have a mix/broad base when it comes to taxation etc you'd need to take a long hard look at shooing away the FDI investment in this country. I remember a time when people HAD to immigrate for work, where people routinely left school early, where real poverty existed and in general where we had a much poorer society. Some of the bounce is the EU, some is FDI and all it has brang with it.

    We are by no means perfect but jesus some of the opinions on this thread show a short memory.

    Now we do have an issue with spending v income and the lop sided tax take.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,227 ✭✭✭Emblematic


    It is certainly true that at one point we needed FDI and the more the better at that point in time. But just because it was the correct policy at one point in our history does not mean that it is always the correct policy. This is where I think we are going wrong in the country. We persist with policies that once made sense even after they have stopped making sense are are now damaging.

    I'm not saying drive out all foreign multinationals by the way. But more multinationals on top of what we have is not the correct way forward.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 9,975 ✭✭✭buried


    Guaranteed wallop incoming. But too late yet again. 4 years ago if you mentioned any of this up in here you were harangued "da conspiracy tred is data way"

    Bullet The Blue Shirts



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 19,282 ✭✭✭✭kippy


    You can't blame the state for continuing to chase FDI or building on what is there. You can however blame the state for housing policy and everything that goes on around it or the lack of investment and/or poor investment decisions that have happened over the last number of decades.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,227 ✭✭✭Emblematic


    You can of course blame the government if they are pursuing a policy that is no longer working for the good of the country which, in my opinion, is the situation.

    Of course, housing policy and other policies can also be criticised (as they should). But just because a policy was needed at one point in our history does not automatically mean that it will be the correct policy forever.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 19,282 ✭✭✭✭kippy


    So you'd don't believe it is currently a good thing to support whatever FDI is here or try entice further FDI into the country? Is that essentially what you are advocating?

    I really don't get knocking the FDI angle. Broadening the tax base is one of the ways to reduce the reliance on it, however as an electorate we aren't too big on that and as for the indigenous agri and tourism industries that many say are not being supported on this thread....where exactly is tourism and agri not being supported?



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,227 ✭✭✭flatty


    The MNCs are going nowhere. If they even threaten to, we are light enough on our feet to react quickly and decisively. They won't go anywhere for a generation or more. They are well embedded. We have a great education system and the tans are out of the EU, so we have very little competition.

    We will be quids in for decades to come.

    Now whether that is actually a good thing or not is an interesting debate. It is an expensive place to live.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 20,451 ✭✭✭✭Strazdas


    If we didn't have the multinationals, we would almost certainly be considerably less well off and have less money in our pockets - more of a mid ranking European country, like a Czechia or a Finland or somebody.

    So there's a touch of swings and roundabouts about it all. If we didn't have the multinationals and the corporation tax, we would be far less exposed to a possible future financial crash for sure - but we wouldn't necessarily be doing all that well either.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,020 ✭✭✭tinytobe


    I wouldn't worry too much about Ireland's reliance on corporation tax receipts at all.

    Ireland is of interest for mulitnationals because of the very fact that corporation taxes are low and lower than in other countries. The legal framework of Ireland is reliable, the English language understood everywhere for investors. These facts alone offer some form of security.

    One can still have a good intake of taxes if taxes are low and the business climate is of interest.

    The only problem I would see on this matter is that reliance on corporation tax receipts can be unreliable.

    But what are the alternatives? An Ireland like in the 70ies or 80ies? I'd say Ireland is considerably better off than back then.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 12,140 ✭✭✭✭tom1ie


    Regardless of how dependent we are on MNC’s in Ireland, shouldn’t we be trying to develop another stream of revenue for the state- just in case?

    For example shouldn’t we be building all the wind farms off the west coast so that they are state owned, we can then sell excess wind to the European grid, so that private companies aren’t making the money off it?



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 883 ✭✭✭creeper1


    I think there's no doubt about the immense benefit multinationals bring. Without them Ireland would have been like Greece during the great recession (in other words an absolute basket case).

    There's also no doubt either about the reason multinationals invest in Ireland. Ireland's headline orporation tax is 12.5. % and before the crack down they could pay an effective rate of 2.2% with the double Irish or whatever it was called.

    For context Donald Trump made a big deal of lowering American corporation tax from 35% to 21%.

    Most analysis also tends to point to this revenue stream being safe because of the before mentioned educated workforce, English language usage and above all else lowtax regime.

    It's essential to keep corporation tax as low as possible



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,127 ✭✭✭greenfield21


    It was actually quite interesting to hear Trump on rogan talking about Apple in Europe and the need for America to reduce the corpoarte tax rate to 15% to bring home profits. On the other hand Harris will raise it to 28%.

    Also another interesting item is one of the main people raising this issue over the last number of years is Brad Setser who who has published numerous articles on it and ultimately ended up with a job in the Biden administration and then acheived nothing. It had some clear reforms proposed in his articles in the cfr. Ultimately the lobbyists always win.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,020 ✭✭✭tinytobe


    I don't know how much of a fiscal business case there would be in the united states to lower corporation tax rates from 35% to 21%. First of all the US economy is doing well, no sign of a recession, plus the US fiscal situation is in massive debt. They can only service that debt if there is a some form of tax intake.

    Besides that, 21% would still be higher than Ireland and Ireland is still lower than most countries in the EU, plus Ireland speaks English. All are still going to be advantages.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 7,633 ✭✭✭timmyntc


    Far more likely is the US taking a radical change to stop offshoring of profits related to Intellectual property (IP).

    This is how so much corporate tax is paid in Ireland - IP is moved to Irish based companies and all revenue derived from said IP is then taxed here, so it doesn't get taxed elsewhere.

    All US have to do is say they do not recognise this tax arrangement any longer. - close the loophole and then all IP tax will be paid there instead since that's where most of the IP is created



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,425 ✭✭✭almostover


    You're correct, it's like any sound financial advice. It usually involves diversification. Our economy tanked 15 years ago because we put all our eggs in the construction industry basket. Now we're heavily leveraged in the MMC sector. It's great what we have but the tax revenue should be used to diversify the economy



Advertisement