Advertisement
If you have a new account but are having problems posting or verifying your account, please email us on hello@boards.ie for help. Thanks :)
Hello all! Please ensure that you are posting a new thread or question in the appropriate forum. The Feedback forum is overwhelmed with questions that are having to be moved elsewhere. If you need help to verify your account contact hello@boards.ie

DART+ (DART Expansion)

1363364366368369394

Comments

  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,416 ✭✭✭KrisW1001


    The 8500s will be 30 years old by the time Cork sees any electrification. I suspect it'll be less hassle to allow them to see out their operating life in Dublin, and start Cork with new stock.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,367 ✭✭✭goingnowhere


    Cork will start as a battery operation if it goes that way so will be Alstom units, but likely will see 29000 units first.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 274 ✭✭PlatformNine


    Oh I don't disagree, I unfortunately think what will happen is they will either in the next year or maybe even shortly after the BEMUs start service, realise that the 8100s have nothing left. That IE doesn't have any other choice but to use BEMUs to replace them. However as of transport debate on the 9th, IE is still planning on using the first two orders to replace sets on the future D+ servics. I am starting to suspect that part of the reason for the 5x EMU sets are to supplement 8100s as they start to fail or need some repairs to last until the new sets come start service. Which following the time line of the first two orders might not be until Jan. 2029, though hopefully sooner.

    The problem with that is it would defeat the purpose of why they bought the BEMUs, which was to start freeing 29Ks and 22K/ICRs especially from GDA service before electrification is finished because they don't need over head lines, they just need charging stations while they are stabled or in a siding.

    I don't know what ever happened, but I would assume something did as my understanding of how safety certifications for rolling stock work (and I will admit my understand is not very good) is that it is for 40 years, or at least it was for the 8100s. Which expired this year meaning it would have had to get renewed to continue operating passenger services. The 10 year life extension was to get them to a 50 year service life.

    Also while on the topic of CACR fleet (as it does relate to the DART/DART+ fleet plans), I think there is talk of ordering Adessia sets, or at least that is what the link below makes it sound like. Correct me if I am wrong because I might be talking out of my arse here, I think the original framework was 600 carriages but extended to 750(30 addition sets) as part of the CACR? Which I think was also a shift from the CMATS plan originally being for 22x 2-car or ~40m sets.

    https://www.irishrail.ie/en-ie/about-us/iarnrod-eireann-projects-and-investments/investment-new-trains

    But either way yes while many things will be getting casced as D+ progresses, I doubt the 8500s will be. If CACR gets a brand new fleet Cork wont need them and I am also not sure if there are enough sets. They likely don't need 22-car 4/5-car sets, but they clearly are planning to have more so they might want 22, if not the full 30 sets. Even if they are fine with just the number of 8500 carriages, depending on the number of individual trains they want, the 17 sets might not be able to form enough trains.

    My theory is the 8500s will be kept around Dublin and live out their days running shuttle services, M3-Clonsilla and Howth-Howth Junction. However I would personally like if they recieved a heavy refurbishment and a life extension of 15-20 years after their refurbishment that way they can see use on some future electrified commuter area. However I don't think anywhere will have electrification before the 8500s reach end-of-life.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,367 ✭✭✭goingnowhere


    The first batch is 13 BEMU and 6 EMU, the 6 EMU to ensure the DART can run all services at full length, it was also sized as a 1:1 replacement for the 1984 fleet to ensure a fallback position if the DART+ project imploded

    The tentative order for 20 sets under discussion now will likely be a 20 EMU order, battery sets cost more and the weight being carried around is significant so if you don't need it don't carry it. That leaves 31 BEMU to cover Dublin Drogheda and the Wicklow hourly, there are 29 29k sets for comparison

    Maynooth line is off limits to BEMU due lack of ETCS which is tied to the DART+ West, can't use Hazelhatch either until DART+ South West signalling is done. Cork is the only location with confirm ETCS installation contracts in place

    The decision has been taken NOT to fit the 1984 fleet with ETCS so they are stuck to the existing DART route only and will be replaced as soon as possible.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 274 ✭✭PlatformNine


    my bad it is 6 EMU sets.

    I see, I miss understood some statements from IE, I thought increasing service along on the Maynooth and Kildare lines involved putting the BEMUs in service on them. However I went back and reread the statements and its actually that sets freed from Drogheda will be able to increase capacity on them while they are being electrified. That does make sense however it does surprise me a bit as I know they have really been trying to free up ICRs from the inner commuters.

    I would very surprised if they order any more BEMUs. I will be interested to see what they do with the BEMUs once D+ electrification is complete though.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 230 ✭✭Bsharp


    Fair to say you know exactly what you're talking about.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,416 ✭✭✭KrisW1001


    "it was also sized as a 1:1 replacement for the 1984 fleet to ensure a fallback position if the DART+ project imploded"

    Thank you for that information. I knew I'd heard somewhere that the first order was connected with replacing the 8100 fleet. I had thought it was definite, with the BEMUs cascading when more EMUs arrived, rather than a contingency position. In fairness to IÉ, I can understand their caution: if DART+ had been canned, it wouldn't have been the first major rail project to have the rug pulled from under it..



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 92 ✭✭A1ACo


    Between this forum and articles in Irishcycle.com it sounds like there has been a bit of flipflopping between different parts of Irish Rail and what to do with the original 8100, and notwithstanding above about them being replaced as soon as possible, has it been said anywhere publicly that heavy maintenance, and replacement of parts etc. of the original DART fleet is not going to be carried out?

    Maybe it is an abundance of caution/ fear, but it feels a little like if the 1st new fleet is accepted into service, and the original DART fleet is scrapped ASAP, and then there is some problem with the 2nd and 3rd new fleet order - well then the rest of the DART project could be held up, and/ or some problem turns up with the 1st new fleet aswell, then things could become chaotic. It also seems that delays of 2-4 years are not totally uncommon on the continent for new train fleets and/ or fleet-wide problems turning up in service.

    As for the costs, I think the 2019 Irish Rail report on the idea of the refurb said that fitting of ETCS to the original DARTs would alone cost Euro 6m, which is alot (and who knows how much now)… though compared to the monies being spent on road/path refurbs nationwide that may not be so eye-watering, considering the numbers of users of the (DART) infrastructure.

    Worst come to worst, if refurbs done, it could in a few years be a good few million spent on 'old rope' stock that is no longer needed, or used to justify not purchasing new stock (if there is an economic downturn), and may have problems storing them if surplus - with 'too many' trains… Though parts of the country with no/fewer trains or DART types might take issue with that concept.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 18,714 ✭✭✭✭LXFlyer


    The first batch will not be replacing 8100s.

    They will be used to/from Drogheda, cascading diesels elsewhere.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 92 ✭✭A1ACo


    Here is some of this cycle website's commentary on it, including noting ESB/Eirgrid problems at Drogheda (seems Eirgrid are facing challenges/ lots tasks in other parts of the country too) and looking at a battery farm backup there:

    Irish Rail sent an early ‘Christmas present’; commuters expected see benefit from 2026 -- IrishCycle.com

    On a lighter note, the individual seats on the new DARTs look a little thin, will they be comfy on a trip from Drogheda? I think I read somewhere that the new Blue (with yellow flecks) moquette is to tie-in with Public Transport bus and trams seats (not entirely convinced of that.. the DART green seats moquette is maybe boring, but distinctive enough and recognisable etc.).

    On that note, this German 'rail influencer' shows as his no. 1 and no. 2 choices at the recent Innotrans 2024, as the (no.2) Stadler, RS Zero, and (no.1) Siemens, Vectrain… that both include in the seating options/ configurations, at least 3 types of bench/ flush surface double seats…. similar to the 8100 DART benches/ 'couches' that a lot of people seem partial to.

    TOP 10 Züge der Zukunft - Innotrans 2024 mit BR 105, Coradia Max, RS Zero, ARS, Vectrain u.v.m. (youtube.com)

    PS. the German to English auto-subtitles tell me he gives the Stadler bench seats a couple of thumbs up for their comfort including continuous headrest.

    Post edited by A1ACo on


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,804 ✭✭✭Glaceon


    Maintenance of the 8100s has been lacking for a while from what I can see. A lot of them hadn’t had repaints for 20 years. Some are getting work done now but probably only in response to the media reports showing holes in the bodywork on one of them! I recently saw one that you could still see the imprint of the DART25 logo on.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 274 ✭✭PlatformNine


    IE has always been very public about the first orders of new rolling stock not being used to replace 8100s. Even as of the transport debate with Jim Meade on October 9th that remains the plan. What we have been told so far is that the 31 BEMU units(first two orders) arriving are to be used initially for Drogheda and after there are enough sets there, for Wicklow town. And those two services orders will be used to send 29Ks elsewhere until signalling and/or electrification is done so frequency can be increased before new DART units come in.

    Based on the current timeline for new units it seems that the 8100s will be replaced by the 3rd or 4th orders. The 3rd actually should be for 20 units (more than likely EMUs but I don't think its confirmed) and ordered by the end of the year, operational by the start of 2029. Past the 4th order it might be get close the 50 year service life they have been granted permission for by the time the units are in service.

    Also generally it seems that the 8100s are beyond refurbishment. They have spent a brilliant 40 years in service but they have been pushed for those 40 years. Even with the 10 years life extension it doesn't seem there will be refurbishment, just maintenance to keep them around until they are replaced. I also can't see IE wanting to spend 6m euro on them, I think they would rather put that money towards ordering units from the framework, or refurbishing fleets that still have time to see a second life. Personally I think If anything sees a second life it will likely be the 8500s, as with a good refurb I would hope they could see another 20 years, maybe more.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 468 ✭✭dublincc2


    I’ve just seen that the first of the 8200s have been scrapped (8201/8401), really a waste. They could have been used on the new network.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 468 ✭✭dublincc2


    On another note, had it been confirmed how many bridges will need to be demolished for the electrification of the DART+ lines? Is there really no way in which the bridges, in many areas dating from the Victorian era, could be retained?



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 72,751 ✭✭✭✭L1011


    They were wrecks and were out of service for a reason. They were never going to be used again.

    One unit has been partially cut up to use in the NTA accessibility centre as a demonstrator. It'll be more use there than it had on rail for 15 years.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 468 ✭✭dublincc2


    Yes I saw that, they have a lot of stuff there including buses, coaches and even part of an A320.

    I never rode on the 8200 unfortunately and I assumed the issue was that they were few in number, considering the 8100s are still on the go being much older (albeit with the Siemens upgrade).



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 72,751 ✭✭✭✭L1011


    The issue is they were junk from the day they were delivered. If they had been reliable they would have been in constant use.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 468 ✭✭dublincc2


    The 8100 seems to be the most reliable, I read somewhere they could possibly outlast the 8500s.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 72,751 ✭✭✭✭L1011


    They won't. If a life extension is approved it'll take them to ~2032 max; the 8500s can go til the end of the 2030s if not beyond - if needed.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 72,751 ✭✭✭✭L1011


    Each railway order goes in to detail on that.

    If a bridge needs to be replaced, it needs to be replaced. A reliable, modern public transport system is vastly more important to society than maintaining one of hundreds of railway bridges.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 468 ✭✭dublincc2


    I agree, but you also should consider the heritage aspect. You can see in stations along the DART line such as Malahide, the new bridge just looks out of place architecturally. Perhaps it’s a minor point in the grand scheme of things but we should be mindful of the historic and aesthetic factors.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 468 ✭✭dublincc2


    This despite the consensus that the 8100 (after the upgrade) is the superior class from a reliability and ride-ability standpoint? I could see the 8500s phased out and the 8100 (perhaps with another upgrade) still operating into the mid-century alongside the new stock.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,131 ✭✭✭riddlinrussell


    Maybe you see it, but the rail safety authority doesn't, they were pretty reluctant to give the 10 year extension and they won't be going for another overhaul, it would be more expensive to do right than getting new trains, which is exactly what they are actually doing!



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 274 ✭✭PlatformNine


    I think the life extension is until 2034, not 32, not that it makes a difference, I doubt they will even get that far. Either way, I think the life extension has already been approved? If it wasn't would they even still be allowed to operate on the rail lines? Or is approval for the life extension and CRR allowing them to be on the rail for 10 extra years different?

    I would hope we could at least get a 40 year life out of the 8500s, they are decent EMUs after all. If anything I would hope with a good refurbishment we could get beyond 40, though I know thats a stretch.

    At minimum they would need another refurbishment, if not a complete refit and rebuild from the ground up to get more than the life extension out of them. And at that rate they are likely better buying new sets, and that doesn't even cover upgrades that would be needed from changing technology like ETCS. They are good sets I won't deny that, but at the end of the day 40 going on 50 years of service, especially in a coastal area, takes its toll. And if they are looking to refurb any sets, the 8500s are decent sets that are 20 years younger.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 7,906 ✭✭✭GerardKeating


    At least one of each model should be retained/preserved for when ever we get a site for a transport muesum.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 72,751 ✭✭✭✭L1011


    The mindful bit has already happened. If it has to go, it has to go. Track will be lowered where possible instead.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 160 ✭✭OisinCooke


    IMG_2058.jpeg IMG_2059.jpeg IMG_2062.jpeg IMG_2065.jpeg

    Just glimpsed this minute something very DART+ shaped being loaded onto the tracks just outside Inchicore depot! Seems the first unit came in right under our noses! Does anyone know will it be being loaded onto its own bogies immediately or accommodation bogies first? Very exciting news!



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,367 ✭✭✭goingnowhere


    8100 reliability has been poor for years. 8500 fleet is typical Japanese basic but super reliable, about factor of 10 difference in km per failure



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 10,000 ✭✭✭✭cgcsb


    10 bridges are going. The heritage value ones are to be reconstructed in a sensitive way. some of them will only have the bridge deck heightened



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,416 ✭✭✭KrisW1001


    Interestingly, the connecting link between the GSWR (Maynooth-Drumcondra) and MGWR (Kildare-Grand Canal) rail lines at Glasnevin is included in the design drawings for the MetroLink Railway Order. This link was not shown in the drawings for DART+. This short segment will allow trains from Maynooth or Heuston to use either of the lines heading towards Connolly/Docklands. Currently, only Heuston services can access the Royal Canal line.

    image.png


Advertisement