Harris Vs Trump 2024 US Presidential election - read the warning in the OP posted 18/09/24

Musk thinks people should only vote in person. The same Musk that was pushing people to vote by mail.

The guy is a spoofer. He's following the money or whatever tax break/deal he's been promised. I wouldn't be listening to him for election advise.

Musk has so much money that, if America is as beholden to lobbyists as they say, he could buy whatever political concessions he wants.

Musk's money cannot buy him a likeable personality, however, so I suspect that the reason he's stumping for Trump is that he's been rejected as a pop cultural figure by the more liberal side of American society, so getting cheered by MAGA is the best facsimile of genuine admiration that he's going to get.

The "genius who designs rockets but is also fun and likes memes" act is not fooling liberals anymore so he's shifted his to a dumber audience.

All I can say is I admire your chutzpah. If I had been revealed to be a deceitful plagiarist who gets their opinions from conspiracy theory twitter accounts, I’d never be seen again.

Shame needs to make a comeback.

https://x.com/juliadavisnews/status/1847775487692796089?s=46&t=I5Ng64p4m8u3ocgC9fbhIA
what a classy man

It's all gone tits up

If you're claiming the OP meant the silicon valley leaders moving to Trump were dumb, I think you've misunderstand their point. He's talking about the audience Eloon is after. Eloon's doing this for the reason's posted previously - to get goodies from Convicted Felon Trump should he get elected, which Eloon doesn't think he'll get from a Harris presidency.

If more Silicon valley types are shifting conservative, well, 1) They're businesspeople 2) A lot of them are aging too. Gates and Buffett, however, aren't going anywhere, and I suspect with their fortunes. Melinda Gates and Brin's ex are involved in this election, too, on the left. Melinda's supposedly donating hundreds of millions to shift state-level elections towards the Democratic party.

Likewise, Steve Ballmer's funded a nonpartisan facts site discussing immigration and other issues.

https://usafacts.org/

I don't think any poster is particularly oblivious to that. This doesn't change the fact he's promoting conspiracy theories with no basis.

“—— poor reflection on Harris——-“. The facts DO NOT back this up. If the Republican canditate had two heads, pink hair , three arms, Two big and 4 small spurs, was jet black, only spoke Arabic, is female, etc, etc, etc she would still get close to doing well in the election . Why? Because there is a cohort of the US voting public out there that will ALWAYS vote for the republican canditate - the find the democratic side REPULSIVE to put it mildly.

Remember, remember Trump just about got in when against H. Clinton - after she/ the democrats ran a disasterous campaign re 2016 election. Biden nearly scraped in in the 2020 election. And as of today whichever of two get in will also nearly scrape in, IMO.

So it’s not because of the nature/Style/PAST RECORD of the canditate up against Trump - and she must be useless if not doing well against Trump according to Cliffhangover - it is LARGELY to do with The WE will always vote republican NO MATTER WHAT

The shift to the right from the silicon valley types was attributed to Biden not having an interest in or understanding of AI.

There has been some reconsideration of these positions as of course they shift and polls and the like are just a still photo of a moment.

Youd probably have to question anyway just how important it would be in terms of the presidential race given it seemed to peak blue in 2016 - or the day they did the analysis in 2016 anyway.

The US economy is booming, the tech companies are way ahead and the people in that field will follow whatever they think is better for their bottom line, wouldn't say it tells you much outside of that with regard to intelligence.

A high probability that Trump - if elected - may not serve the full term. Could be as short as one year so if the voters vote in Trump they are really voting for Vance. So should the Democrats highlight this if the general voter sees him negatively?