Advertisement
If you have a new account but are having problems posting or verifying your account, please email us on hello@boards.ie for help. Thanks :)
Hello all! Please ensure that you are posting a new thread or question in the appropriate forum. The Feedback forum is overwhelmed with questions that are having to be moved elsewhere. If you need help to verify your account contact hello@boards.ie

Israel are going to start WWIII

1133134136138139280

Comments

  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 6,312 ✭✭✭CalamariFritti




  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,489 ✭✭✭omerin


    I wish people on this thread would block those pro Israeli posters, to stop giving attention to their racist viewpoints.

    If people at this stage still endorse the Israeli genocide, simply put the poster's backing down to mental health issues and so as to stop them spiralling into a bigger dark hole, hide their posts from your view and the view of others who have blocked them.

    Don't let their issues result in mental health issues for you.

    Thanks in advance.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 9,721 ✭✭✭volchitsa


    Well that’s a bit weird because the Nazis are considered to be guilty of genocide - and that was around the same time.

    Also, the Armenian genocide, whose legal status is a bit less clear but that’s because the Turks didn’t commit it all to paper and hence have some plausible deniability, was decades before that again.

    ”I enjoy cigars, whisky and facing down totalitarians, so am I really Winston Churchill?” (JK Rowling)



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 7,487 ✭✭✭circadian


    1. Naming conventions change. There is absolutely nothing in your statement that denies an indigenous people in the area. In modern times referred to as Palestinians.
    2. Provocation is not a measure in defining genocide.
    3. It is not in Israels interest given the fact that they are, for the most part, an ethnoreligious state and would not want Muslim Arabs to undergo such a scenario.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 6,312 ✭✭✭CalamariFritti


    And of course it was the Ottoman Empire, a monarchy, under whose rule this happened. Which was succeeded by the much smaller and much different, both politically and culturally, Turkish Republic in the early 1920s. I reckon the Turkish Republic is official legal successor, not sure. Todays Türkiye wants nothing to do with it anyway.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,946 ✭✭✭dmcdona


    Once again - genocide was not defined and was not a crime at that time. Your argument about that specific incident is irrelevant.

    You can keep throwing out as many excuses as you like for genocide committed by Israel.

    Neither you nor I will decide if Israel is innocent or guilty. The ICJ will.

    The ICC will, if they issue arrest warrants for Netanyahu and Gallant, will also be the judge in those cases of war crimes.

    Post edited by dmcdona on


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 9,417 ✭✭✭SeanW


    Provocation does speak to intent though - if you just starting murdering people for sh*ts and giggles (like Russia seems to be doing) that should be seen a little differently to actions one takes because they're stuck in an all out war.

    As for Israel not kidnapping children, the fact is that Israel is a multi-racial nation, Israeli Jews have ancestries all over the Middle East and worldwide (Europe, the Far East, even Africa) so that would not be an issue. They could - if they were genocidal - kidnap a large portion of children, e.g. newborns, bring them across the border and have them adopted by Jewish families to be raised as Jews.

    https://u24.gov.ua/
    Join NAFO today:

    Help us in helping Ukraine.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,946 ✭✭✭dmcdona


    No - the Nazis were not prosecuted for Genocide. As pointed out previously, Genocide as an international crime did not exist until 1945. So they couldn't be "guilty" of a crime that didn't exist.

    The chief prosecutors of the International Military Tribunal (1945–1946) used the term “genocide” in their indictment of Nazi leaders. But “genocide” was not recognized as an international crime until 1948.

    Raphael Lemkin coined the word genocide in 1943 or 1944.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,946 ✭✭✭dmcdona


    Is your first sentence based on an analysis of the legal definitions of provocation and intent? If so, I'd like to see a source for that.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,574 ✭✭✭rogber


    This is Israel, backed by the West, anyone who defends Israel is defending this:



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 21,327 ✭✭✭✭Donald Trump


    How can lads arrive in from other counties, kill and evict people who are "genetically … almost indistinguishable" from them, and claim a greater right to that land?????

    Hey lads, we're genetically the same so we have the same ancestors. But I have more right to this land because I had certain more recent ancestors that fecked off elsewhere hundreds of years ago.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 7,487 ✭✭✭circadian


    That is one aspect of a potential genocide. You're ignoring literally everything else that falls within the definition of genocide.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 17,083 ✭✭✭✭Francie Barrett


    Ah come off it. You know yourself, Hamas and Hezbollah are a great bunch of lads altogether. Just like us Irish, right?

    In all seriousness, this war should have ended months ago. I have been saying this here for months now.

    As a reminder, this was the address Netanyahu made to the world a year ago.

    His war aims were extremely clear from the outset.

    Either Israel wins, or Hamas wins. There is no scenario where both side exit the war on good terms.

    As a second reminder, despite their leader being brutally slain, Hamas are still fighting, and still engaged in their war of annihilation against the Jews.

    If Hamas won't surrender, then Israel will continue to exterminate the remnants of Hamas. This is the important bit. Hamas are still defiant!

    I use my words very deliberately in this instance.

    Extermination is a word you would use to describe attacking a sickness, a disease, a pestilence.

    Hamas is a sickness, it's a disease, it's a cancer, it should be eradicated at all costs.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 54,251 ✭✭✭✭tayto lover




  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,946 ✭✭✭dmcdona


    As well as continuing the slaughter of civilians in both Gaza and Lebanon, Israel abandons its own people.

    Haaretz
    Ali Alziadana, brother of Youssef Alziadana, who was abducted from a dairy farm in Kibbutz Holit along with his sons Hamza and Bilal and his daughter Aisha, feels the public struggle for a hostage deal has reached a standstill. 'We talked, we shouted, we cried out – and no one is listening,' he says. 'I feel invisible. 

    When your own country doesn't listen to you, it hurts the most because it's home, and then you just don't know what to do

    '" – Eden Solomon

    • Protests demanding the release of hostages held in Gaza, along with demonstrations against the current government, are set to take place on Saturday evening in multiple locations across Israel.
    • In a joint statement outside the defense ministry and ahead of the protests, the families of hostages said that "the goal of the war – creating conditions for the return of hostages – has been achieved; now we must secure a deal to bring everyone home."


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,946 ✭✭✭dmcdona


    So why were the IDF informed last week that Hamas were defeated?

    Couldn't be that Netanyahu lied could it? Or does he always tell the truth?

    For sure, Israel is doing a lot of exterminating in Gaza and Lebanon - mostly civilians.

    Your description of Hamas is remarkably similar to the Nazi description of Jews in WWII.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 20,405 ✭✭✭✭Strazdas


    Human rights legislation largely didn't exist in 1939-45. One of the main reasons it began to come into existence was in the wake of the war. The fire bombing of Hamburg, Dresden and Tokyo would definitely be seen as serious war crimes in the current era, as civilians were deliberately targeted.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 54,251 ✭✭✭✭tayto lover


    Aid agencies and many others would say that Israel is the cancer and doing the genociding.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 11,680 ✭✭✭✭downcow


    I must have missed that. Tell me again which of us were here first. Please don’t talk in riddles.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 17,083 ✭✭✭✭Francie Barrett


    Your description of Hamas is remarkably similar to the Nazi description of Jews in WWII.

    You have it completely wrong.

    Hamas are not a racial or religious group.

    Hamas are military/political organisation.

    Hamas are still engaged in a war of aggression against the state of Israel which they started.

    Hamas can choose to stop this war.

    Hamas chooses not to, despite the cost to their own people.

    Hamas is a cancer, it needs to be ruthlessly eradicated.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 21,327 ✭✭✭✭Donald Trump


    Unfortunately Francie, your posts on the topic on boards.ie might not be quite that influential. Mr. Netanyahu said way back at that start of this that the ending of Hamas would not be the end of the murdering. They already had other groups lined up and mentioned that they needed to take care of next.

    Of course, I could be wrong. The zionists might well indeed place more weight on your posts than Mr. Netenyahoooo's pronouncements on the matter -"Netanyahooo said we have to keep going, but some lad posting on boards.ie said we would stop when Hamas were defeated so we better listen to him instead"



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,946 ✭✭✭dmcdona


    I completely agree that Hamas needs to be neutralised.

    I was just pointing out that your description of them was similar to the Nazi's description of the Jews. I certainly do not have that wrong.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 6,421 ✭✭✭Wolf359f


    So like deja vu, we have the US Sec Def saying the civilian casualties in Beruit are 'far too high'. We've heard it all before in Gaza and still we have people on here championing Israel on and they can do no wrong etc…



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 54,251 ✭✭✭✭tayto lover


    Didn't we have one poster during the week who said that his job and mortgage were far more important than the lives of Palestinian children. Obviously has no kids of his own.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 9,417 ✭✭✭SeanW


    So how exactly can Hamas be neutralised without an all-out war?

    https://u24.gov.ua/
    Join NAFO today:

    Help us in helping Ukraine.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 9,721 ✭✭✭volchitsa


    So a description of Hamas, a terror group sounds like the Nazi description of Jews - and you think that means the description of HAMAS is wrong??

    I’m sure you can see why describing a terror group in negative/pejorative terms isn’t actually a bad thing - right?

    ”I enjoy cigars, whisky and facing down totalitarians, so am I really Winston Churchill?” (JK Rowling)



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 6,421 ✭✭✭Wolf359f


    People took a bigger hit (financially) when the EU decided to sanction Russia, but any talk of similar with Israel is met with push back. Not even push back, in their eyes, Israel or the IDF cannot and have not done any wrong at all. All those specific cases where civilians were targeted and killed are just ignored by them. If you can ignore one case, you can ignore 2, then a dozen, then when a refugee camp gets bombed, they wouldn't even bat an eyelid.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 17,992 ✭✭✭✭A Dub in Glasgo


    Israel continuing their bloodlust against the Palestinians.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 7,849 ✭✭✭Brussels Sprout


    Another example of the IDF targetting civilians who were trying to help others. This one sounds like it's right out of the same playbook as when they massacred the World Central Kitchen charity workers.

    They just murder and MURDER and MURDER with impunity.

    It is maddening.

    I strongly believe that Joe Biden's name will be blackened in the history books for allowing this evil to continue unchecked.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 17,083 ✭✭✭✭Francie Barrett


    You are right on one respect.

    My posts on this forum have no influence.

    As a corollary, your posts equally have no influence.

    No one gives a shod what you or I think. What only exists are facts.

    The facts in this war are that either Israel wins, or Hamas wins.

    In this instance, I take the side of the people who are defending themselves against Hamas aggression.



This discussion has been closed.
Advertisement