Harris Vs Trump 2024 US Presidential election - read the warning in the OP posted 18/09/24

In North Carolina, Mark "Black Nazi" Robinson can nowadays barely fill up a conference room and he has to do it with a free meal for attendees.

In this case, an attendee's blood sugar monitor went off, which caught Robinson's attention, leading to this exchange, where Robinson was asked why he doesn't push for an insulin affordability bill, pointing out that only Democrats are pushing affordable insulin (Biden got it down to $35 for Medicare recipients)

In response, Robinson denies that Republicans tried to block their efforts to make insulin affordable, then he tries to shut up the voter. "Nobody came here to see you so please be quiet"

Can barely get a room full of people together, much less a rally, and getting into fights and shooing voters away.

Robinson is going to get creamed this election, which is going to be detrimental to Republican turnout up and down the ballot.

https://www.mediaite.com/news/mark-robinson-fires-back-at-diabetic-voter-for-asking-about-insulin-costs-nobody-came-to-see-you/

I don't think anyone thinks we're anything close to a shoe in. Saying that polling might be overcompensating for either candidate or not capturing all groups accurately isn't particularly outlandish. We've learned that it can and does get things wrong. I find it somewhat funny that you're getting hung up on substantiating claims while fawning over the man who pushes conspiracy theories on a daily basis.

Not even joking, any more than a few lines and I'm assuming it's ripped from Twitter. 😂

Possibly. Would explain the apparent musical euphoria he experienced and disassociation with the context of his surroundings he displayed during his musical sway session “love-in.” Might even explain the slurring he’s exhibited at various times sometimes it’s under control sometimes it’s alarmingly noticeable. Nobody has even bothered to try and suggest eg. He’s slurring as a 4D chess tactic that’s for sure. Today again on the tarmac in Michigan he filibustered when reporters asked him to release his medical history. He referenced how he “aced” his “cognitive test” 4+ years ago (the one doctors formatted to screen for dementia)

They haven't plagiarized anything have they?

Let me know if you can drum up a reason why you think something they have reported was false and not worth believing. They do an excellent job of sticking to reports on that which can be proven with evidence.

I didn't even look at the source. I just know that he is an elderly gent who is undergoing a very stressful exercise period in his life, having survived one assassination attempt and narrowly escaped a second. He's hopping around the US on the campaign trail sometimes doing two stops a day. If he's not on supplements of a approved regulated kind under doctor's advice to keep going under the stress of the campaign and threat level, he's a human of an alternative kind. Edit: hell, he isn't even allowed his usual form of relaxation now of golfing because it makes him an open ground target risk to an assassin.

Except he has cancelled loads of events and they've been mentioned multiple times in last few days...

What I'm absolutely uncertain about at this late stage of the electioneering [and therefore unwilling to rely on any answer I'd get from a question I'd "google" for] is how the US would get itself out of a bind if Trump stood aside [like Biden did] and the GOP had to supply new nominees for both positions as Vance would have to either move up or stand aside as well?

Is there a date limit set by election law where nominees for both election positions absolutely have to be put forward by parties and/or proposers?

What does US law say about such a outcome if Trump was suddenly obliged to step aside after the date had passed by beyond which a replacement nominee could be proposed by the GOP to avoid the problem where only one party would have nominees for the two positions?

so you have no explanation only link dumps. To a habitual liar. Who has canceled half a dozen interviews and events.

most states have laws stipulating how electors must ministrate their votes.

In fact only a few more states need to join a compact among several states in which they agree by state law to assign all their votes to the winner of the popular vote and from then on the winner of the presidency would only be decided by national popular vote (providing the states in the compact maintain their population spread and thus, electoral votes)

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/National_Popular_Vote_Interstate_Compact

depends on the state electoral laws but presumably yes.