Advertisement
Help Keep Boards Alive. Support us by going ad free today. See here: https://subscriptions.boards.ie/.
If we do not hit our goal we will be forced to close the site.

Current status: https://keepboardsalive.com/

Annual subs are best for most impact. If you are still undecided on going Ad Free - you can also donate using the Paypal Donate option. All contribution helps. Thank you.
https://www.boards.ie/group/1878-subscribers-forum

Private Group for paid up members of Boards.ie. Join the club.

Irish Indo - Greatest players of all time ranked in every position

13»

Comments

  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,228 ✭✭✭FullBack Jam


    From what I saw of Canavan when I was younger, he was a good player alright. I looked up a few youtube highlights of his in the past few days. He was a great point scorer, as is Clifford. But Clifford offers more - better goal scorer (at least I think he is, based on the lack of goals in any videos I have seen of Canavan. I could be wrong on that). Better physical presence in terms of fetching the ball as a full forward, and driving past players. But from the videos that I have seen, Canavan was better than I had ever recalled him to be.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 31,308 ✭✭✭✭breezy1985


    Clifford isn't even the greatest ever Kerry player never mind best footballer ever. That's no insult though.

    Fuking sick of this stupid "GOAT" term that is all over sport now. You see the state of clowns online crying about Ronaldo or Messi who are so obsessed with "their guy" that can't bring themselves to say anything good about "the other guy"

    Can't Clifford just be an absolutely amazing player and leave it at that. Why does he (and many others) have to be a goat or a complete fraud.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 629 ✭✭✭Avon8


    I can never understand this constant utterance that Clifford is hyped but hasn't proven it or hasn't done enough in his performances to justify the praise. What on earth have people been watching for the past 5 years?

    If we're to take All Ireland semi finals and finals as the pinnacle of the sport, as its been for 140 odd years, then Clifford has done more to justify his name in these conversations than basically anyone. He's given top class displays, either motm or very close to it*, in by my count 6 separate AI semis or finals. 2019 semi v Tyrone and 2019 final replay v Dublin, 2021 semi v Tyrone, 2022 semi v Dublin, 2022 final v Galway, 2023 semi v Derry. *obviously wasn't winning it in games his team lost

    What other modern day players has that many utterly top class big game performances to their name? Fenton comes close, i can argue 6 at a push. Gooch is close but max i can get is 5. Jack McCaffrey has 4 motm awards in semis+, which is amazing given the time he missed. That's it in the modern day. And Clifford is 25, probably only 30-40% through his career



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,862 ✭✭✭cms88


    Canavan was a good point scorer yes that's true. However you also have to take into account he was Tyrones main free taker during a lot of his career so his scoring record is always going to be high based on that. Take the 95 All-Ireland final for example. Yes he scored 11 points in that game but 10 were from frees. Free taking is a skill itself but it will also bumps up a players average scoring rate by a lot.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 31,940 ✭✭✭✭blanch152


    Just looking at Kerry forwards that I saw in my lifetime, I would put Spillane, Liston, Sheehy, Donaghy, Cooper, Egan, O'Donoghue and Fitzgerald ahead of Clifford at this point. Clifford might be better than some of them in the end, but he has a long way to go and there are a few I left out who could run him close, I haven't even mentioned Ger Power.

    Cooper, Fitzgerald, Spillane, Sheehy, Liston, Donaghy would be my front six of best Kerry forwards.

    However, going back to Breheny's list, only one player from the six-in-a-row shows up his bias.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 728 ✭✭✭Krazy gang


    Some of those wouldn't lace Cliffords boots and thats the truth. Donaghy liston , not in the same league at all. Both had better players around them for a start. Clifford has like of Moynihan burns and a past it Paul geaney



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,135 ✭✭✭I see sheep


    "a terrible war imposed by the provisional IRA"

    Our West Brit Taoiseach



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 31,940 ✭✭✭✭blanch152


    Clifford has won nothing in comparison to Liston. A hat-trick of goals in an All-Ireland final. Boy, did I hate him, but what a player.

    Show me the medals.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 728 ✭✭✭Krazy gang


    Well he's only 24! Senior all Ireland, 2 minors, 2 POTY, 4 or 5 all stars. Not to mention all his club honours. Like I said, the 2 cliffords and Sean ó shea aside this an average kerry squad.

    Take Clifford out of this kerry team and they would be a monaghan or a roscommon ( no offence or either).



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 894 ✭✭✭MattressRick


    Stop. Liston wouldn't lace Clifford's boots. If Liston was on this Kerry team would he have scored everything Clifford did in the final in 2022? Aside from the 2 marks, no.

    If Clifford was in Liston's position he sure as hell would have had the ability to score what Liston did.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 728 ✭✭✭Krazy gang


    Also medals don't tell full story. Look at Paul Conroy winning poty and 1st ever all star at 35 years old. A wonderful footballer, but didn't get the recognition of less talented players.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 31,940 ✭✭✭✭blanch152


    We are talking about the greatest players of all time.

    Conroy is a wonderful footballer, but he is not in that conversation.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 31,940 ✭✭✭✭blanch152


    Yes, he is only 24, which means he has time to prove me wrong.

    James McCarthy announced his retirement yesterday, nine times All-Ireland winner, captain on one of those years, a level of achievement that would put him well above Clifford, but, even then, still not guaranteed to be on an all-time great team.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 31,940 ✭✭✭✭blanch152


    Liston was a giant of a man, unstoppable, unmarkable. Fitzsimons has marked Clifford out of matches, he would struggle against Liston.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 894 ✭✭✭MattressRick


    Are you saying Liston never had a quiet match or was never held? I don't believe it. Liston is lucky he was a target man surrounded by brilliant footballers. Same with Donaghy twenty odd years ago, a very good target man but he needed brilliant forwards around him. Clifford has the weight of the entire county on his shoulders alone and he has scored a huge amount, he carried them to the All Ireland 2 years ago. I don't know how anyone can say Liston was a better footballer than Clifford.



  • Posts: 118 ✭✭ [Deleted User]


    The heffernan choice is a head scratcher.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 728 ✭✭✭Krazy gang


    That's a great point. Liston and Donaghy had so many free scoring forwards around them there was very little pressure on them to score.

    Whereas with Clifford if he doesn't score who will? And of course the mass defences of recent years means Clifford or shane Walsh or con have to beat 3 or 4 players to get a score.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,228 ✭✭✭FullBack Jam


    The amount of All-Ireland medals that a player has doesn't mean they are a standout from other players in terms of quality. It obviously means that they are very good to get on an All-Ireland team. But winning an all-ireland is a team effort - with the input from 25-30 players, an astute manager, and a little luck along the way. The likes of Philly McMahon, Eoghan O'Gara, Paddy Andrews etc have plenty of All Ireland medals. But would come nowhere near a conversation to pick the All-time greats.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 7,793 ✭✭✭tritium


    I think that’s perhaps a little unfair. While winning or not winning a shedload of medals doesn’t automatically make you the best on your position, some players by the sheer level of success and managing to stay at the very top, deserve to be in the conversation based on that at least in part- think Cluxton, who basically redefined his role and then made it part of a winning machine for a decade . I think that in the case of that great Dublin side it will probably only be after they all have retired that everyone will actually acknowledge how good the individuals on that team were, but they would have several players in the mix, which is just one of many things that makes Brehenys list a bit baffling



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 31,940 ✭✭✭✭blanch152


    You would expect 3-4 players from by a distance the most successful team of all time to make any best 15 but Breheny's hatred of Dublin is such that he didn't.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 5,476 ✭✭✭megadodge


    I think anybody using a count of medals as a barometer for measuring an individual player's quality is either very disingenuous or simply doesn't think before they speak.

    We're talking about a team sport here. There are numerous examples of superb players who never won an All-Ireland by virtue of their place of birth and lack of quality teammates. That's all there is to it.

    There's only so much one player can do. He can't beat 15 on his own!! And none of the players picked ever did that either.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 7,793 ✭✭✭tritium


    I’d suggest your own point is somewhat disingenuous of the point being made here. It may not be that medals tell the full story, but many of the greats will achieve a lot of medals on the back of what they contribute to their teams

    Take Peter Canavan, a player who was good enough to drag a team of less skillful players (no offence to any of them) over the line. Part of his greatness is the ability to do that, and medals follow as a result

    take Stephen Cluxton, a player who redefined how the game was played and in doing so became the bedrock of Dublins success, with medals following

    Take Jack O’Se, who basically for a long time became the template for what good looked like in his role, and as a result won many medals

    that’s not to say there aren’t players who by circumstance don’t get that chance but in many cases the really great players are the ones who demand success, well beyond what just talent could bring. There are cases where great players are lucky to be part of great teams-O’Se or Cluxton in their best teams could probably have played with a stinking hangover and their team’s quality would have been enough, but really it’s the ability to make a difference when it’s needed that marks out great player's


    that’s why not having a Gooch or Fenton in there is baffling. That’s also why it’s too early to add Clifford. Not because he should ‘win more’ but because it’s too early to point to him and say he’s shown that quality that all true greats, in any sport, display



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 5,476 ✭✭✭megadodge


    But the problem I'm referring to is not that the great players from the great teams are not great, they are. It's that there are other great players who unfortunately for them were surrounded by poor teammates, poor managers, poor county boards and worst of all poor tradition (ie. a losing mentality).

    There have been many players who would have starred on All-Ireland winning teams if they were from another county. There were a few posts previous that went along the lines of 'x is not as great as y because x has more All-Ireland medals'. That is just incredibly narrow-minded and simplistic.

    Funny you should mention Peter Canavan, a player I've already wrote about on this thread as being right up there at the very top when greatness is being discussed. The teams he won his All-Irelands with were full of quality. But he was already widely known as a great player by the time they eventually came around. He was at the very end of his already great career and one of his greatest ever performances was in the losing All-Ireland appearance of 1995 where he scored all but one of his side's points. He did everything he could to drag an average team over the line and they only lost by one point. If he hadn't been lucky enough to have the higher-quality players come along late in his career, I still think many would regard him just as highly. I certainly would.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,112 ✭✭✭Dickie10


    breheny really needs to be called out on his lazy arse journalism, he should be writing about the four clubs in all ireland semi final today not this crap of top 25 players since 2000 or whatever muck he is at. he must churn 3 or 4 of these a year out? top 10 left footed players of the 90s, top 100 players who never won an all ireland… jesus such bad journalism , its nonsense , even in a pub lads would be fed up after 10 mins chat on that



Advertisement