Advertisement
If you have a new account but are having problems posting or verifying your account, please email us on hello@boards.ie for help. Thanks :)
Hello all! Please ensure that you are posting a new thread or question in the appropriate forum. The Feedback forum is overwhelmed with questions that are having to be moved elsewhere. If you need help to verify your account contact hello@boards.ie

Aircoach Route Changes and General Discussion.

1468910

Comments

  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 198 ✭✭belfast stephen


    not all service will move back to grand central from Laganside also the rail sub is due to finish on the 12th October



  • Posts: 353 [Deleted User]


    History is all well and good but not an indicator of the present / future. As per above few posts there are translink computers operating from the new bus station



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,525 ✭✭✭p_haugh


    Thats good to see they're beginning to change their tune.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 8,070 ✭✭✭patrickc


    I saw an ad on the display of the airport carpark buses today advertising for drivers.

    @41k a year



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,617 ✭✭✭mikeybhoy


    That's the top rate think you have to be on the coaches at least 5 years to get that. Dublin Bus are paying 43k a year from the start.

    I find it baffling that private operators can get away with paying significantly less than DB/BE and wonder why there's a driver shortage. If DB/BE are paying are struggling to get drivers how do privates expect drivers when paying significantly less.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,525 ✭✭✭p_haugh


    Spotted the same on one of the coaches working the 701



  • Moderators, Motoring & Transport Moderators, Technology & Internet Moderators Posts: 23,736 Mod ✭✭✭✭bk


    Just a guess, but a driver might have a preference for driving a particular type of service. Maybe dealing with tourists is less stressful then dealing with certain members of the public on certain DB routes.

    Perhaps the rosters are better, management easier to work with, better vacation time, depot closer to home, etc.

    I've no idea if any of the above is the case, but more to point out that salary isn't the only reason why you might pick one over another. BTW it comes out as an extra €85 per month after tax. Not to be sneezed at, but I wouldn't really call it paying significantly less either.

    As an aside, I'm curious if drivers on these services might get the odd tip from American tourists, if helping with bags, etc. A €5 a night would cover that €85 difference.

    Post edited by bk on


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,617 ✭✭✭mikeybhoy


    Not my point. Point is there is no driver shortage. It's a shortage of people willing to work for crap pay and conditions. Companies would like you to believe people are not money driven when in reality the vast majority are that's why people work at the end of the day.

    If bus drivers were paid 70k a year in all companies watch the driver shortage disappear overnight.



  • Moderators, Motoring & Transport Moderators, Technology & Internet Moderators Posts: 23,736 Mod ✭✭✭✭bk


    There is a European wide bus and coach (and truck) driver shortage and it is expected to increase over the next few years:

    https://www.iru.org/news-resources/newsroom/europes-bus-and-coach-driver-shortage-widens-54-grim-outlook-2028

    It is easy to say just double wages, but will customers be willing to see ticket prices double as a result?



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,617 ✭✭✭mikeybhoy


    Luas/Train fares aren't twice bus fares yet Luas/Train drivers are on significantly more than bus drivers.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 198 ✭✭belfast stephen


    did hear from a source that there might delay until February 2025 for the new coaches on the belfast route now that's not 100% confirm its just incase anyone has heard anything



  • Moderators, Motoring & Transport Moderators, Technology & Internet Moderators Posts: 23,736 Mod ✭✭✭✭bk


    1 bus driver = 80 passengers, 1 Luas driver = 400 passengers, 1 DART driver = 1,200 passengers

    Luas carries 50 million people per year with 700 staff. DB carries 145 million per year with 4,200 staff. Luas works out at just over twice as many people carried per year per staff member. That is how they can pay Luas drivers more while charging the same fare.

    Irish Rail is a bit different, they carry 45 million with 4,000 staff, but then it isn’t true that they have the same fares, I’ve certainly never seen a €2 train ticket from Dublin to Cork! Irish Rail has intercity and commuter services that can range up to €80, so obviously they can afford more. I know you mean DART, but they don’t break out the figures like that, so can’t really compare. But you do know a DART driver is carrying vastly more passengers then a bus.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 395 ✭✭TranslatorPS


    Tram and rail drivers get that bit more in their paychecks because their training is also a lot longer, a lot more specialised and somewhat more complex – especially on the railway. It takes a lot longer to churn out one train driver than it does to get one bus driver, even on the assumption that they both pass every test the first time. Rail staff are getting paid for their knowledge build-up, and I don't mean to disparage bus drivers here, but let's be honest, a fair chunk of bus drivers' training (rules of the road) is common to any road vehicle driver, and only then does the bus-specific knowledge (vehicles, services) build up on top of that.

    Unions ¯\_(ツ)_/¯



  • Posts: 353 [Deleted User]


    https://www.rte.ie/news/business/2024/1003/1473403-aircoach-records-pre-tax-loss-of-7-23m/

    Does anyone know what the "onerous contract" is which hit them for €5.78m? It sounds like an accounting provision for future losses on a contract. The routes to NI are in their UK entity so dont think its that, they already talk about the galway route (and they would have redeployed coaches and I don't believe there were any Galway based drivers) so would it be the DAA car park but they are still operating this and invested in new buses recently.



  • Moderators, Motoring & Transport Moderators, Technology & Internet Moderators Posts: 23,736 Mod ✭✭✭✭bk


    Maybe they underbid the DAA car park contract, as in the cost of operating it is higher then they get paid. So they continue to operate it, but it is loss making. It is possible that backing out of the contract now would cost more in penalties then these on going loses.

    To be clear, I've zero inside knowledge, purely a guess based on it being the only major contract they would appear to be involved in. The only other might be a contract for coach purchases, but that seems covered in other items.



  • Posts: 353 [Deleted User]


    I'm sorry but I don't follow your logic, I don't see what passenger numbers between a train / tram and a bus has to do with wages. A plane (also in the transport game) carries less than than a dart, so do pilots earn less, similar for a ferry, truck, taxi? I am purposely making a ridiculous point as its a different skill set just like a bus and train driver.



  • Moderators, Motoring & Transport Moderators, Technology & Internet Moderators Posts: 23,736 Mod ✭✭✭✭bk


    A plane ticket can cost €50 to thousands of Euros, not €2 like a DART!

    The question the poster I was replying too was asking how can a Luas driver get paid more then a bus driver and when both have the same €2 fare. The answer is that while a Luas driver might get paid a bit more, but they carry far more fare paying passengers, thus that driver is deriving more revenue for the company.

    A very simplistic example, a full bus of 80 adult passengers paying €2 generates €160 worth of revenue. A full Luas of 400 adult passengers paying €2 generates €800

    Looking at their annual reports, basically Luas generates twice as much revenue per staff member as DB does. It makes it easier to pay a higher salary per member of staff for the same fare, because you are "earning" twice as much income.

    It is pretty basic accounting. Of course it says nothing about the difficulty of the job, dangers faced, etc. it is just looking at it from the purely accounting perspective.



  • Posts: 353 [Deleted User]


    I'm sorry but in a perfect world with no government subvention your math's might add up. But my understanding is that the company operating the luas and paying their drivers are not relying on fare income or passenger numbers (yet it may dictate the company provide more / less services but thats it), they have a contract with TFI/TII who collect the fares. They are contracted to do x and y and they need to deliver or face penalties, within this they need to calculate what is the minimum they can get away with paying drivers to have enough to deliver their commitments.

    https://www.tii.ie/en/public-transport/operations-and-maintenance/operating-contract/

    Its simple supply and demand and nothing to do with carrying X amount of passengers mean we should pay peter €15 an hour. Driving a Luas is more technical than a bus and needs specialized training (both to drive the tram and also to understand the line operating process) and importantly time, this investment means they want to retain their trained workers because time and cost to replace is large. Its factors like this that feed into how much they pay. The Luas dont have a pool of drivers to lean on like bus companies, same for Irish Rail. They also cant rely on recruitment agencies to fill short term gaps like bus companies do because trained and ready to go luas / train operators are not out there so they want security in their workforce = higher wages.

    Same applies to PSS routes like dublin bus, irish rail and go ahead. Their business model is operating a service for TFI/TII in line with their contract where they are not really incentivized for carrying passenger numbers. What they decide to pay their drivers is the minimum of what they need to attract people to drive for them and which still leaves a profit.

    This is way off topic.



  • Moderators, Motoring & Transport Moderators, Technology & Internet Moderators Posts: 23,736 Mod ✭✭✭✭bk


    Dublin Bus actually receives more government subvention then Luas does, both in total and on a per passenger carried basis.

    I don't disagree that there is more too it, longer, more technical training, etc.

    But that wasn't really the original point that we were talking about. Another poster was claiming that you could just double the wages of bus drivers and it wouldn't have any impact on the fares charged! That is nonsense, if a business doubles it's costs, of course it will need to charge customers more, pretty much business 101.



  • Moderators, Motoring & Transport Moderators Posts: 11,845 Mod ✭✭✭✭devnull


    Has the situation eased at Aircoach somewhat?

    They are no longer advertising for additional drivers on their website and they have not posted any cancellations up on their website since 11th October.

    Have they brought in a whole load of drivers from the UK or something? Very strange that the desperate drive to recruit drivers has seemingly stopped and the cancellations stopped all of a sudden out of nowhere. Quite hard to believe but excellent news if true.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 30 LF403


    The pay scale was significantly shortened as part of the recent union agreements.

    Coaches are now €18 p/h base for 12 months, then straight onto top rate @ €23 p/h after 12 months.
    Car parks are slightly less money, starting at €17p/h for 12 months, moving up to (I think) €20.50 after 12 months.
    To put that into perspective - Bus Eireann are offering 23.05 p/h on their top rate, after 7 years of service.

    As of last week: Dublin City (including Greystones) rosters achieved full staffing for the first time. The Cork depot is now overstaffed, with the rumour being that Dublin-based Cork drivers will be phased out and placed on alternative rosters (Belfast Shunt or Dublin City).

    Agency drivers will shortly be decided on by management, those performing well will be retained (if they choose) and the extras will be cut loose.


    As above, due to improved pay and conditions, driver retention and recruitment has skyrocketed, and staffing levels are much better now. Also, the use of an outside recruitment agency.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 30 LF403


    Management and SIPTU have been in preliminary meetings in the last week or so regarding further route changes.

    Possible alternatives brought forward by management include:

    -General timing refinements in order to reduce long dwell times.

    - Removing Cherrywood from the 700 due to lack of demand, and reverting the service to the pre-change 700 routing. (Dublin Airport to Leopardstown, via City Centre). No word on frequency.

    - Extending the 701 route to Dalkey Village. (Ease of turnaround in Dalkey, along with sustained demand are cited as reasons to terminate here). No word on Service Frequency.

    -Re-routing the 702 down Nutley Ln, and to its previous routing down the N11 to Greystones.

    A huge pinch of salt is advised with this one, but one source mentions a possible new service. Terminating in Dublin 15, in order to take advantage of the lack of a direct service from this area to the Airport.




  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,617 ✭✭✭mikeybhoy


    Well that's what happens when you pay staff the proper wages. Goes to show the benefits of trade unions.



  • Moderators, Motoring & Transport Moderators Posts: 11,845 Mod ✭✭✭✭devnull


    If rumours are true, in Q2 2025 the 10 Alexander Dennis Enviro 400 MMC City Double Decker bus vehicles built in 2019 currently operating on the Glasgow Airport Express route may transfer to Aircoach to operate the 700 route from Leopardstown to Dublin City Centre as they are due for replacement in Glasgow in the new year.

    These vehicles feature USB and Wireless Charging, advanced passenger information system, mobile phone holders and a stop button and grab handle at each pair of seats, which negates the need for grab handles/poles upstairs. Upstairs also features two sets of four seats around a table.

    These currently operate in a pink and purple livery and it remains to be seen if they head to these shores Aircoach will change that or they will launch a new brand for the non coach services using pink and Purple which make use of the existing colours.

    Nothing confirmed yet that this is happening but certainly this one is doing the rounds.

    Post edited by devnull on


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,617 ✭✭✭mikeybhoy


    It would be a bit of a contradiction having Aircoach emblazoned on the side of buses that are indeed buses and not coaches. Perhaps branding something along the lines of Airport Express brought to you Aircoach or something like that would be best.



  • Moderators, Motoring & Transport Moderators Posts: 11,845 Mod ✭✭✭✭devnull


    The seats on those vehicles literally have Glasgow Airport Express written on the top of them as well as in other places inside, I guess they could get rid of the Glasgow bit and replace it with something else.

    Untitled Image


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 30 LF403


    That could be a pretty damn good marketing move actually! (So don't expect them to do it).

    Having a route specific rebrand could be really beneficial to Aircoach in shaking off some of the tarnished image with the general public. The lay-person has a bad association with the big blue bus? make the rebranded buses not blue.

    They could include a tagline similar to Dublin Express saying; "Part of Aircoach" or some such.



  • Moderators, Motoring & Transport Moderators Posts: 11,845 Mod ✭✭✭✭devnull


    I actually think the pink and purple those vehicles have on them now is distinctive and would stand out, so to have a bus brand and a coach brand with the former purple and the later the traditional Aircoach blue is a good idea.

    So basically to a large degree reversing many of the changes that were made to the network originally without really badging it as such to save face, only the 703 is now called the 701.

    Obviously not exactly the same, but more or less.



  • Moderators, Motoring & Transport Moderators Posts: 11,845 Mod ✭✭✭✭devnull


    Aircoach cancelled 3 early morning airport services in a row again recently, meaning a gap of 2 hours where no other public transport was available from some locations on the route.

    It seems somewhat odd they are having to cancel 3 back to back services due to lack of staff I assume, but are no longer recruiting drivers? It suggests that whatever solution that they have for covering staff who are unavailable, it does not work and there are not enough spare staff or the process to cover those duties isn't working as well as it should.

    It is completely unforgiveable to happen at that time of day, at least if it was during the day rather than the early morning, you have a few other options. Again I'm not sure how Aircoach hopes to win back customers when it still isn't able to provide a reliable service when airport travellers need it the most.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,617 ✭✭✭mikeybhoy


    I see Aircoach are now using First Bus fleet numbers on their fleet no more C1, C2 etc. instead using five digit numbers similar to GAI.



Advertisement