Harris Vs Trump 2024 US Presidential election - read the warning in the OP posted 18/09/24

I shared political commentary from Boris Johnson earlier, which you dismissed because it didn’t align with your narrative. I assume you hold the same disdain for Giorgia Meloni? I wouldn't be surprised.

Meanwhile, you seem quite comfortable citing unstable governments reactions to Trump as though they set the standard for reputable opinions.

I provide evidence for all my claims, and when something is unverified, I qualify it. You're welcome to ignore it, but that speaks more to your selectivity than to my reasoning.

Unstable governments? I cited the former PM of Australia. You want unstable governments, look at the Tories since Brexit took root! So that's not evidence of anything, it is just nonsense.
Reputable opinions? You mean coming from Boris Johnson, who had to step down in disgrace?

In all this deflections, noted you haven't actually provided a single shred of credible real evidence to support the Trump lies you repeat here, or the obviously manufactured criticisms you are trying to drum up about Harris, which are entirely without merit or foundation.

Come back to us when you can adhere to a credible coherent standard of criticism, applied to both candidates and so actually criticise Trump, instead of being duped by his lies. Trump claimed Governor Kemp couldn't get Biden on the phone, Kemp is on public record as having saying he had just spoken to Biden, and that he had no issues in comms with Biden. This all could have been established by you before you dumped his lies here but nope why bother with facts and evidence and pass up an opportunity to spread Trump's lies?
You even tried to double down on it AFTER it has been discredited and fact checked multiple times on the thread.
Utterly disingenuous.

So your "selectively" is transparent, it is not fooling anyone - when it comes to Trump it is hear no evil, see no evil, see no evil.

So if Trump posts a scurrilous lie, you are unable to subject it to basic scrutiny, and will repeat it here.

If there's an empty criticism of Harris going around, likewise, you are all over it.

If the criticism could be equally applied - or with more validity applied - to Trump… nope, not a peep…. the silence is deafening.

So if you are so concerned about false claims on the thread, you were mentioning bleach earlier, where are any of your posts challenging false claims made against Harris? Or a false claim coming from Trump or in support of him? You claimed to be concerned about them, should be easy to produce such post shouldn't it?
And the fact that you won't be able to … discredits your pretence here enitrely.

Trump is now money on and the Democrats are getting desperate so they have resorted to wheeling Obama out.

Barack Obama is one of those people who are often wrong but never in doubt.

One Narcissist vs another.

Trump has literally been found to be a fake, or fraud if you will, in court. With actually verified documents, yet you call Kamala fake??

Not a good look if you would be livid with a politician using a chat show interview format to spread hurricane awareness. If Simon Harris was on the LLS, and as part of an interview mixing serious and relaxed content, drove home important messaging on how to stay safe… I don't know any good faith voter who would hold that against him.

If they want to be livid at a politician with consequential inaction at this time…

Hurricane Milton’s rampage is not swaying House Republican leaders who oppose returning to Washington to approve billions of dollars for disaster assistance. President Joe Biden on Thursday said lawmakers should return to Capitol Hill “immediately” from their preelection recess, echoing pleas from both Republican and Democratic lawmakers from the afflicted states.

No calls from Trump to do so.

https://www.politico.com/news/2024/10/10/biden-johnson-congress-fema-disaster-aid-00183327

I dont remember many other former presidents hanging around Washington after their term was over.

Why does Obama keep seeking the limelight, he was instrumental along with Pelosi in having Biden not run for a second term.

And yet, if Obama hadn't been out showing support, we'd be hearing you Trump supporters claiming that it was a sign of dissention in the ranks or something.

This isn't even a counterfactual: people literally did this, here, on Boards, within hours of learning Harris assumed the head of the ticket. They jumped straight to 'Obama endorsement watch,' demanding to know when Obama would come out and endorse Kamala Harris and why it didn't happen within moments, etc. etc.

seems to be huge concerns amongst democrats that a sizeable chunk of black male voters wont back kamala ...

I dont remember many other former presidents hanging around Washington after their term was over.

Not a Chief Justice Howard Taft fan then?

(*psssssst!* He was a Republican.)

Same people have no problem with Trump flying in for a photo op and therefore affecting emergency services due to accommodations having to be made for his arrival as well as that of additional press & secret service and setting up a place for him to address the press, and then flying back out and spending half his evenings at his own rallies complaining about Whoopi Goldberg and the other hosts of The View.

But Harris doing a TV interview while Biden/Harris have already offered and collated support with FEMA for the affected areas…. well she may as well be drowning Florida citizens with her own bare hands…

all voters don't think like you or your family. Just making the point it was a very poor move by Harris in such a tight race and doesn't look good but that's just my opinion.

…and of course you can point us to your source for these "huge concerns"?

I think it only matters to MAGA obsessives and will not actually have any determining factor in the election. At worst, it might instead gain her some votes in Minnesota, where the 'champagne of beers' is brewed.