Advertisement
If you have a new account but are having problems posting or verifying your account, please email us on hello@boards.ie for help. Thanks :)
Hello all! Please ensure that you are posting a new thread or question in the appropriate forum. The Feedback forum is overwhelmed with questions that are having to be moved elsewhere. If you need help to verify your account contact hello@boards.ie

Security guards on Dublin Bus

13

Comments

  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 18,757 ✭✭✭✭LXFlyer


    Au contraire, the service into UCD has at times over the years been suspended late at night due to anti-social behaviour.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 15,352 ✭✭✭✭Thelonious Monk


    The debating society must have gotten rowdy



  • Moderators, Motoring & Transport Moderators, Technology & Internet Moderators Posts: 23,688 Mod ✭✭✭✭bk


    Fares have never been better value, €2 for 90 minute's of travel across Dublin (€1 for young adults, 65c for kids) are extraordinary good value. And in the latest budget free child fares have been increased from under 6's to under 9's

    Of course all of this is subsidised by the NTA/government/taxes if you prefer, but public transport should absolutely be subsidised.



  • Moderators, Motoring & Transport Moderators, Technology & Internet Moderators Posts: 23,688 Mod ✭✭✭✭bk




  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,518 ✭✭✭p_haugh


    Not sure, they were OCS security anyways from what I recall.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,518 ✭✭✭p_haugh


    Even before the 39a became 24 hours, most buses would unofficially terminate at the UCD flyover then start again from the next stop up (Belfield Court), rather than serving the campus or the 1st stop by the entrance to UCD.

    The UCDSU led multiple campaigns to try and get it resolved, and eventually a solution was found. Part of it included better security patrols around the bus stops during the evenings.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 5,198 ✭✭✭BlueSkyDreams


    There are 5 million+ people that could be using it. so 1 million isnt great.



  • Moderators, Motoring & Transport Moderators, Technology & Internet Moderators Posts: 23,688 Mod ✭✭✭✭bk


    Which appear to be the same company operating the DB security per the RTE article.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 16 Stonekeeper2024


    As with anything a student union touches, they made an unholy balls of it and delayed a solution by months.

    The UCD stop is a known trouble spot, I was a UCD student and a (non power mad) RA and I saw up front how much trouble that stop caused. Some of these little s-1ts have led very privileged existences that have left them with an attitude of entitlement and they look down their nose at the security staff.

    The UCD Admin encourages this by never punishing a student, unless they come from a lower income background and are not plugged into the network somehow, if you come from one and you're friends with the boys that know the right people you're grand, otherwise… The uni, supposedly committed to 'equity' and other buzz words, oversaw a system at that time (don't know what it's like now) where your likelihood of getting punished depended on your background and current status there. If you were from certain schools, so were the male administrators, so you were ok. If you were on the football, Rugby , GAA, or even better if you were n these sports AND from the same school as admin you could basically do whatever you want, with the exception of something extreme or violent.

    I recall an incident legendary among the RA's where this complete tool brought in sand from dollymount strand into a high floor student apartment, even went to the trouble of getting someone in his crew who was doing engineering to calculate how much the floor could take (weight wise) but never thought to factor in the water in the inflatable pools or the effect that the sand and water might have on the electricity sockets. He was asked to leave Res but not given any academic punishments. The Rugby fellas tend to have more discipline, rowdy but not scummy, the football and GAA heads could compete with any Tommo or Decko for scumbag behaviour. They had no consideration for other students, they were a nightmare to deal with. When their exams were over it was ok to blast the music and scream your head off, when informed that others hadn't finished their exams and were still trying to study on the floor below them they didn't care and in one case I had to have 8 of us plus a dozen local cops drag the ringleaders out so we could close their windows and turn off the music. This OTT resistance from them was in response to a simple request to close their windows and turn the music down (I never enforced the theoretical no party rule because it's a stupid rule, it's a college campus what do you expect). A reasonable request was met with thuggery of the culchie variety, stenotypes galore.

    The next morning these tough guys are in tears in the office begging us not to ring their mam…I'm serious.

    Don't underestimate them…or overestimate their characters as it were. Those people now work in places like Goldman and Irish Life trying to find imaginative ways to screw middle class workers out of their pensions and life insurance so they can get a bonus. Same character, different application.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 29,875 ✭✭✭✭breezy1985


    The whole country can only use it if the whole country has access to it. Most don't because they don't have access so the posters point that anti social behaviour is the blocker is not invalidated by such a pointless comment.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,245 ✭✭✭Yvonne007




  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 5,198 ✭✭✭BlueSkyDreams


    About 17% of the population and that million includes tourists. It could be better.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,245 ✭✭✭Yvonne007


    Yes it could. And it could be worse. I think that public transport (in Dublin anyway) is pretty great and accessible. I may be just lucky as to where I am, but can't really fault it for it's affordability and regularity.

    It could always be better, but I think it's pretty great as it is.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 29,875 ✭✭✭✭breezy1985


    How much better could it be done you think by stopping the anti social behaviour which is the point of this thread.

    Funny that the rabid anti bus gates poster thinks it could be better.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 5,198 ✭✭✭BlueSkyDreams


    If anti social behaviour reduced, or at least the perception of it reduced, there would of course be more people using PT.

    I certainly know folks that dont use it because they are worried about safety. I doubt I am the only one.

    Not anti bus gates, I am anti closing car parks. Get it right.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 29,875 ✭✭✭✭breezy1985


    A very very tiny minority I would say.

    Almost nobody to the point of it being inconsequential says

    "I have great public transport access to my work, shops and social life but I bought a car because I'm worried about scumbags"



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 15,352 ✭✭✭✭Thelonious Monk


    has anyone in real life ever met anyone who wouldn't go on public transport because of anti social behaviour? i mean my parents, in their 70s, still take the bus or dart back to artane when we go out for dinner in town or they're at my place.

    what kind of weirdos are afraid to use public transport in dublin, seriously?



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,551 ✭✭✭Rocket_GD


    Perception of something doesn't mean it exists. My 84yr old Grandad consistently contradicts me about the directions of the bus routes through Dublin despite him not being in city centre for nearly 15 years.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 5,198 ✭✭✭BlueSkyDreams


    Perception is what matters, in terms of public safety. If you think its safe, you use it. If you dont think its safe, you dont use it.

    How safe it is in reality is irrelevant to the decision making.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 5,198 ✭✭✭BlueSkyDreams


    I wouldn't call them weirdos, thats a little unfair.

    Especially if someone has been the victim or witnessed an assault on the bus/luas. It can certianly put them off using it in future.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,551 ✭✭✭Rocket_GD


    As mentioned above by a previous poster I very much doubt there is anything more than a small minority that don't think that think public transport is safe. Try get any Luas/Dublin Bus between 7:30 and 9:00 or 16:30-18:30 and you will see the queues of people availing of PT (well you only will when you drive past twice a year on your pilgrimage to the mecca that is Arnotts car park).



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,245 ✭✭✭Yvonne007


    I wouldn't like my teenage daughter using certain bus routes after 8pm due to young adults being drunk on the bus from "pre-drinking" before they hit town. (not necessarily a problem, but not something I want my daughter to have to experience for the duration of her journey…she will soon be that age herself)

    And there are a few routes that serve certain areas renowned for antisocial behaviour which I would avoid. These are the routes that need tightened security.

    But the majority of the routes are absolutely fine.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 5,198 ✭✭✭BlueSkyDreams


    I am not talking about me personally.

    I am capable of listening to other peoples experiences and I understand why they might choose not to use PT. Its generally people that have had a negative experience I would say.



  • Moderators, Motoring & Transport Moderators, Technology & Internet Moderators Posts: 23,688 Mod ✭✭✭✭bk


    Last year buses in Dublin carried more people then they ever had in their history. The vast majority of people get into Dublin City Center by public transport. The buses are absolutely heaving with people at peak hours.

    These are the facts, simple as that.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 5,198 ✭✭✭BlueSkyDreams


    I dont think anyone is disputing that. It doesnt mean that there arent a cohort of people that dont use Public Transport because they dont think it is safe.

    We also have record numbers of car owners, as well as record numbers of public transport users.

    With an annual increase in population of over 100k people over the last few years, I wouldn't expect anything but an increase in both car ownership and public transport usage.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,551 ✭✭✭Rocket_GD


    This thread is about security guards on Dublin Bus, your obsession with car ownership is well known and tiresome at this stage and this is coming from a car owner.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 9,383 ✭✭✭Tenzor07


    No well you see once I don't see any trouble it means the issue doesn't exist, nothing like a good anecdote to prove it too! ;)



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,060 ✭✭✭Burt Renaults


    Everything bad that happens gets recorded and shared online nowadays, so it's easy to come away with the impression that Dublin is a shithole and that public transport is dangerous. I don't think either is more true now than twenty years ago.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 15,352 ✭✭✭✭Thelonious Monk


    you're just obsessed with making out dublin to be really dangerous for some reason, when it really isn't at all



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,608 ✭✭✭mikeybhoy


    Has anyone encountered the new security yet?



Advertisement