Advertisement
If you have a new account but are having problems posting or verifying your account, please email us on hello@boards.ie for help. Thanks :)
Hello all! Please ensure that you are posting a new thread or question in the appropriate forum. The Feedback forum is overwhelmed with questions that are having to be moved elsewhere. If you need help to verify your account contact hello@boards.ie

Harris Vs Trump 2024 US Presidential election - read the warning in the OP posted 18/09/24

1162163165167168574

Comments

  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 35,384 ✭✭✭✭odyssey06


    There's a lot of ground between "great President", or the likes of Obama and Bill Clinton, and a "bad" candidate, so that doesn't seem to any kind of realistic standard you are setting if you are throwing language like that around.

    Candidates like that don't come around every election for any party in any country.

    "To follow knowledge like a sinking star..." (Tennyson's Ulysses)



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 8,513 ✭✭✭Patser


    I've a bad feeling Trump is on the rise again, and has taken the momentum leading into last month.

    The poor debate he had is being forgotten about, and he'll happily ignore any other debates for fear of another disaster.

    Instead the aftermath of Jolene is the main talking point, and no government can provide instant relief to something like that, so there'll always be some way to knock Harris over the disaster response. He's even got his new cheerleader Musk doing pr stunts like flying in starlink supplies and cribbing that the Government is blocking him.

    And my old reliable of watching DJT media shares, has seen them rising over the last week and really jumping so far today. They're still massively down on 6 months ago, but are back near $20/share when not long ago they we approaching $12 and there was talk of them zeroing out.



  • Moderators, Politics Moderators, Social & Fun Moderators Posts: 16,723 Mod ✭✭✭✭Quin_Dub


    Very very few world leaders are ever in the conversation for "great" , what you want is competent and not deranged - Two characteristics Harris has in spades over her opponent.

    As they say, "Perfect is the enemy of Good" and Democrats in general have been guilty of this for years with their constant obsession with finding the perfect candidate and not voting if every single policy/character box isn't ticked.

    Harris will be a decent , competent and fair President - That's more than enough to justify voting for her.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 9,247 ✭✭✭Oscar_Madison
    #MEGA MAKE EUROPE GREAT AGAIN


    My god “throwing language like that around” 😀

    It’s just a personal view on Harris but you’re taking this so personally - baffling



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 531 ✭✭✭Dingaan


    He donated his full presidential salary, as confirmed by PolitiFact.

    https://www.politifact.com/truth-o-meter/promises/trumpometer/promise/1341/take-no-salary/

    Also, the New York Times covered his charitable donations during the AIDS crisis, showing his support for gay rights.

    https://www.nytimes.com/2016/04/23/us/politics/donald-trump-gay-rights.html?smid=nytcore-android-share



  • Advertisement
  • Moderators, Category Moderators, Science, Health & Environment Moderators, Social & Fun Moderators, Society & Culture Moderators Posts: 41,607 CMod ✭✭✭✭ancapailldorcha


    The salary is pennies for someone like that. The second link is paywalled. Not seeing anything to be impressed by, honestly.

    The foreigner residing among you must be treated as your native-born. Love them as yourself, for you were foreigners in Egypt. I am the LORD your God.

    Leviticus 19:34



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 35,384 ✭✭✭✭odyssey06


    You expressed an opinion on candidates, they were challenged \ counter points were made and this is your response?

    Baffling.

    Seems like you are the one taking it personally, judging by that post.

    Pretty clear sign you don't have any kind of coherent argument, when your language changes dramatically from post to post and when you respond like this.

    "To follow knowledge like a sinking star..." (Tennyson's Ulysses)



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 35,537 ✭✭✭✭Penn


    He gained far more than his Presidential salary in what he charged Secret Service at Mar-A-Lago, Bedminster and his other hotels and resorts on his many trips. Pretty much every time he played golf, his club made more money than what his salary would have been for that month because the Trump Org overcharged them. Donating his salary was entirely performative.



  • Posts: 6,597 ✭✭✭ [Deleted User]


    You mean, ripping off the little man in the form of your employees and your contractor. That sort of help ?



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,549 ✭✭✭Raoul Duke III


    Being a 'great politician', at least in a democracy, is predicated on one requirement; the ability to win elections.

    By that measure Bill Clinton was the best Dem retail politician since LBJ. Obama was pretty good. Hilary was pretty bad.



  • Advertisement
  • Moderators, Politics Moderators, Social & Fun Moderators Posts: 16,723 Mod ✭✭✭✭Quin_Dub


    He didn't take a salary because it would have meant his taxes returns would then be public.

    He also charged the federal government many many times that amount in exorbitant fees for his Golf trips to his own resorts.

    The article you linked mentions that he donated money , but doesn't say when or how much - All the more recent reporting shows him fiddling charities left and right.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 9,247 ✭✭✭Oscar_Madison
    #MEGA MAKE EUROPE GREAT AGAIN


    Yeah I take your point about “greatness” - though I have to say I was disappointed on her U turn on fracking- I also probably see her as too tied to Biden right now - not saying it’s her fault per se on that aspect - she’s juggling a lot - but I’d prefer to see more of an independent mind and thinker come through even at this late stage



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 35,384 ✭✭✭✭odyssey06


    There's a lot of OK \ middle ground you are missing there. That's the general point, you can be an ok \ decent candidate and win eg look at Starmer in UK. If you have to rely on a 'great' candidate to be able to win elections, you have deeper issues, because you're not always going to have a great candidate.

    "To follow knowledge like a sinking star..." (Tennyson's Ulysses)



  • Posts: 0 [Deleted User]


    So then what about his charitable organisations?

    This was brought up, but as usual, you haven't addressed this.

    Could you explain why you aren't addressing it?

    Do you think that this is an effective tactic?



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 11,627 ✭✭✭✭LambshankRedemption


    https://www.nytimes.com/2023/09/08/world/europe/elon-musk-starlink-ukraine.html

    Elon Musk Acknowledges Withholding Satellite Service to Thwart Ukrainian Attack. Yes, very selfless.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,549 ✭✭✭Raoul Duke III


    Well, I am trying to define 'greatness'! I don't think I am referring to margins of victory either - but rather the ability to carve out a winning campaign by force of personality and ability to connect with voters.

    Maybe I should have said 'great campaigner'!



  • Moderators, Politics Moderators, Social & Fun Moderators Posts: 16,723 Mod ✭✭✭✭Quin_Dub


    The US electoral environment doesn't allow for "independent thinking" ,, any kind of discussion about major change will be jumped on and metastasized by the opposition into being the end of the world.

    Getting elected right now is about being seen as a "safe pair of hands" that won't rock the boat.

    Also , and we are all guilty of this from our viewpoint here , but the US is not Europe so the kind of things that get Politicians elected here and that we might typically look for just don't exist there and are not what the vast majority of US voters want.

    Harris nor Trump would be within an asses roar of Election here in Ireland or almost anywhere else on the basis of policy alone , likewise none of our politicians with Irish/European policy positions would get elected there.

    We can't apply out political policy views on to the US , it's a very very different place.

    But what we can recognise is that one side is going to have basic competence and be open to compromise whereas the other will be cruel , damaging and utterly partisan in its behaviour, making it a very easy choice for our preferential winner .



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 13,000 ✭✭✭✭the_amazing_raisin


    I'll have to disagree with you on the personality front, she seems relatable enough

    Honestly, this points more towards a warped perception of what people want in a national leader, and more specifically a damning review of the current state of American politics

    It's all just a clash of personalities now, Harris can (and has) talked about policies that are for more sensible and grounded in reality than anything the republicans can come up with. But none of it matters because her opponent says crazy **** like immigrants are eating people's pets

    As I've said before, people really need to think hard about what they want in their national leaders. I would wager that competence in administration, the ability to find consensus and keen negotiation skills are far more valuable than fiery, impassioned speeches and ideological purity

    Taking an example close to home of Simon Harris, I'll be perfectly honest and admit that I wouldn't be in a hurry to head down the pub with him for a chat. Nor do I agree with every idea and policy he comes up with. However, I can't deny that he seems to work hard and seems generally capable of steering the machinery of government without crashing the whole thing. Competency over personality in this case

    As for the Americans, if they're determined to turn their political establishment into an episode of Dr. Phil, then frankly they're getting what they deserve

    "The internet never fails to misremember" - Sebastian Ruiz, aka Frost



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 86,725 ✭✭✭✭Overheal


    Yeah I take your point about “greatness” - though I have to say I was disappointed on her U turn on fracking

    To be fair, now the US is a major supplier for Europe, because Russia. Fracking plays a major role in the ability to do that, with other major shale reserves now being considered for tapping.

    image.png

    https://www.eia.gov/dnav/pet/hist/LeafHandler.ashx?n=PET&s=MCREXUS2&f=M

    The alternative is to stick to that progressive wishlist item, ban fracking, lose the ability to net export and then be hostage to OPEC+'s ability to turn the screws on the west with embargoes:

    image.png

    Sure it's 'disappointing' but so is the nature of the reality of the zero sum game being played out by countries like Russia who are invading Ukraine for its oil and gas reserves:

    https://hir.harvard.edu/ukraine-energy-reserves/

    So rather the plan is to continue pushing to electrify the west over the medium to long term with renewables and EV and be self-sustaining to the point where these countries are sh*t outta luck without an ability to hold the west hostage for our energy needs.

    Her U-turn isn't nefarious or corrupt but rather because of the changing nature of global economics, especially in respect the Ukraine war and the push by Europe to get off the Russian energy teat.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 16,606 ✭✭✭✭MisterAnarchy


    Competency over personality in this case

    Is this a wind up ?

    Simon Harris is a complete and utter spoofer who isnt fit to run a corner shop.

    He has messed up every Government brief he has been handed.

    He is grossly incompetent, yet somehow managed to weasel his way to the top, due to Fine Gael imploding and all the rats deserting the sinking ship.

    He is all that is wrong with modern day politics, all spin no substance, just like his predecessor.

    Kamala Harris and Trump would both leave Simon Harris in the dust when it comes to capability and competency.



  • Advertisement
  • Moderators, Category Moderators, Science, Health & Environment Moderators, Social & Fun Moderators, Society & Culture Moderators Posts: 41,607 CMod ✭✭✭✭ancapailldorcha


    Trump told people to inject bleach during a pandemic. There's not a single world leader, past or present in the past 50 years that'd he'd leave in the dust.

    The foreigner residing among you must be treated as your native-born. Love them as yourself, for you were foreigners in Egypt. I am the LORD your God.

    Leviticus 19:34



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 9,247 ✭✭✭Oscar_Madison
    #MEGA MAKE EUROPE GREAT AGAIN


    never said her U turn was corrupt - not sure where you got that from



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 86,725 ✭✭✭✭Overheal




  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 12,838 ✭✭✭✭aloyisious


    In what seems to be an unusual move, the Daily Mail has republished a Reuters report on a thinktank estimate on how the US national debt will be increased by Trump and Harris respectively in their financial plans for the US economy. The thinktank is the Committee for a Responsible Federal Budget (CRFB). It reckons that Trumps plan will raise the federal debt level to US$7.5 Trillion and Harris plan will raise it to US$ 3.5 Trillion over the same time period.

    The Daily Mail usually publishes stories and reports which show Trump in a favourable light so it has attached a poll result [from DailyMail.com/J.L. Partners model] putting Trump ahead and includes a mention that Musk has set up a Super PAC to aid Trumps campaign.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 531 ✭✭✭Dingaan


    I already debunked the false claim made here against Trump and Musk with verifiable facts.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 86,725 ✭✭✭✭Overheal




  • Moderators, Politics Moderators, Social & Fun Moderators Posts: 16,723 Mod ✭✭✭✭Quin_Dub


    No, no you haven't.

    You've "debunked" nothing.

    Providing single vague examples of a possible good deed does not for a moment "debunk" all the other verifiable acts of uncharitable behaviour.



  • Posts: 0 [Deleted User]


    You didn't, but ok.

    This wasn't what I asked you though. You dodged the question. It's very clear that's what you do when confronted with difficult points.

    The question I asked is if you believe this tactic of dodging and avoiding things is effective? What effect do you believe you are having by doing this?



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 86,725 ✭✭✭✭Overheal


    A High Point University poll (ranked 43rd among polls in 538) now has North Carolina Lt. Gov Mark "Black Nazi" Robinson 17 points behind his Democratic opponent, NC Attorney General Josh Stein who has 51%.

    If Harris wins Pennsylvania, Michigan and North Carolina, she wins without any other swing states.

    image.png


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 17,805 ✭✭✭✭banie01


    I think that in NC the Dems really need to start working hard to keep Robinson tied to Trump. Hammer home that Trump compared the Black Nazi to MLK.



Advertisement