Advertisement
If you have a new account but are having problems posting or verifying your account, please email us on hello@boards.ie for help. Thanks :)
Hello all! Please ensure that you are posting a new thread or question in the appropriate forum. The Feedback forum is overwhelmed with questions that are having to be moved elsewhere. If you need help to verify your account contact hello@boards.ie

Clontarf to City Centre Cycle & Bus Priority Project discussion (renamed)

1113114116118119131

Comments

  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 13,182 ✭✭✭✭Frank Bullitt


    Ah now, I don't doubt that what you are seeing is true. It does, however, seem as a bit go whataboutery on your part.

    Motorists I am sure are lethal at times on the road, but the poster was talking about cyclists ignoring a red light and lollipop lady at a school.



  • Moderators, Motoring & Transport Moderators, Technology & Internet Moderators Posts: 23,405 Mod ✭✭✭✭bk


    It isn't whataboutery, the poster posted their story of bad experience in front of a school and I followed up with my own story of even more dangerous situation in front of a school!

    Both are valid stories and perfectly on topic for this thread.

    To be clear we have been discussing multiple instances and issues of cars and trucks illegally and dangerously parking and driving on cycle lanes, footpaths and bus lanes and yes we have even been discussing poor cycling on these lanes (for instance I've mentioned multiple times cyclists cycling the wrong way).

    The point I was trying to make is that unfortunately in Ireland we are far too accepting of bad, dangerous and illegal behaviour.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 10,732 ✭✭✭✭MJohnston




  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 13,182 ✭✭✭✭Frank Bullitt


    It is whataboutery though.

    They are valid, I will give you that. However the original posters story was off cyclists not adhering to red lights and lollipop signs, you bringing in what cars are doing just avoids or sidesteps the original posters point.

    I am not denying that cars and trucks do bad stuff that will endanger cyclists, they will always do that. Much in the same way that pedestrians will give right of way to cars, cyclists (I am a motorcyclist and cyclist, in Canada at the minute) should give cars the same wide birth. Right of way means nothing when the vehicle has right of weight.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 13,182 ✭✭✭✭Frank Bullitt


    Colour me shocked that cars make up the most of that, it is almost as if there are more cars on the road than cyclists, and that they can go faster. I can't believe that.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 10,732 ✭✭✭✭MJohnston


    You're literally in this thread saying that someone pointing out they've seen dangerous behaviour by car drivers is "whataboutery" when in reality cars are, by several magnitudes, more dangerous to pedestrians than anything else on the road, as shown by those statistics.

    Complaining about aggressive behaviour by cyclists is just absolutely the most transparently dishonest debating tactic on this forum by now, and nobody with any sense is fooled by it.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,218 ✭✭✭Citizen  Six




  • Moderators, Sports Moderators Posts: 29,891 Mod ✭✭✭✭Podge_irl


    Combining motorcycle and pedal cycle in the same grouping is an interesting choice…



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 13,182 ✭✭✭✭Frank Bullitt


    The posters interjected by saying, more or less, "But look at what cars do…" when the original post was about cyclists breaking red lights at school zones.

    You are trying to use faux outrage now, it was pointed out that cyclists were breaking the lights on this new route, you revert to calling that dishonest or some sort of tactic. Like I said, I cycle as well, but I also obey the rules of the road for my own safety as well as others. This is not dishonest, nor am I trying to fool anyone by it.

    No idea why you are getting so outraged by someone pointing out that dangerous behaviours by cyclists is a thing. It is not making them a needless victim, and a poster pointing out dangerous behaviours by cars is just a red herring to the original point.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 18,878 ✭✭✭✭LXFlyer


    Anyone disobeying the instructions of lollipop men or women where children are crossing roads, bike lanes or whatever, be they in a car, bus, lorry, on a motorbike or on a bicycle are fully deserving of criticism.

    It is not acceptable behaviour by any road user, full stop.

    I can’t believe we are even debating that.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 31,010 ✭✭✭✭blanch152


    Are you claiming that cyclists are not breaking the law on this new cycle route, because that is the point the original poster made. They simply said that they saw cyclists breaking the law on this new route, not anything else about cyclists, not anything else about cars.



  • Moderators, Computer Games Moderators, Recreation & Hobbies Moderators Posts: 10,882 Mod ✭✭✭✭CatInABox


    Engineers Ireland have a great presentation on the C2CC project, which people can point to whenever you hear anyone complain about the length of the project, what they're doing, etc.

    It's also infuriating to hear one of the designers of the project speak, "when this started, no one had ever heard of protected junctions", "the council made a number of unwelcome changes to the part 8, like Island bus stops, which are a huge headache" (I'm paraphrasing on this one, just FYI, I can't remember exactly how he phrased it, but he definitely didn't approve of these changes), etc.

    Video then goes into utility design, which really shows where the time has gone into on this project.

    EDIT: Few other interesting things coming out of it: Over sized vehicles that can't fit in the DPT had to be catered for, which meant that the cantilevered traffic lights were a problem. This was solved by making the relevant lights able to swing out of the way.

    There's a good bit of pointed criticism of ESB and their old cables, but one of the main takeaways is "Get DCC to insist that the ESB fix their cables before another project like this." Case in point on this is the Spar in Fairview, which had a cable blow underneath the entrance, taking out power in that string of shops. There's now a tarmac section in the middle of the path again.

    Post edited by CatInABox on


  • Moderators, Motoring & Transport Moderators, Technology & Internet Moderators Posts: 23,405 Mod ✭✭✭✭bk


    I took a spin down there yesterday. A lovely greenway, a fantastic new addition to the city. I can't wait for the next phase of it to open.

    Lots of people jogging on it yesterday, along with walkers and cyclists. I'll say it will be very popular.

    The bit through East Point Business Park is a bit odd. There is a lovely walk way along the river in the park, that has always been there, but is now sort of part of the greenway. However it is very narrow, not wide enough for cyclists, though some cyclists were trying to use it with pedestrians on it is awkward.

    Cyclists I'd say should stick to the roads within East Point, but then getting onto the new cycleway at the back of the business park is awkward. I think they should do a bit updating there, just a simple ramp at the back of the business park would help a lot.

    Overall though, it is fantastic to see, the cycling infrastructure is really starting to come together in this part of Dublin. C2CC. Howth Road, the extension on Alfie Byrne Road, the section through Fairview Park,Griffith Avenue up the road. While not perfect, they are really starting to come together as a proper network. I can't wait for phase 2 of the greenway, phase 2 of East Wall and the nearby BusConnects rotues.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 9,519 ✭✭✭Shedite27


    Yeah went down over the weekend with my 7yo, getting through the bsuiness park is a bit odd alright, they way they advise on the maps requires you to cycle under a barrier that states "No cycling under barrier".

    I wonder if there's any space to make that gravel footpath a little wider to accomdate a cycle path on it



  • Moderators, Motoring & Transport Moderators, Technology & Internet Moderators Posts: 23,405 Mod ✭✭✭✭bk


    There is space next to the barrier to cycle by, AFAIR, as in there is space between the end of the barrier and the footpath that a single file bike should be able to pass by.

    Though when I cycled towards it they raised the barrier for me, which was very nice, but I could imagine it getting annoying for the security staff to have to do that constantly if it gets busy.

    I don't think there is space on the path in East Point, at least not without major work. It is on a raised up embankment, which I assume are flood defence with mature trees on both sides. To widen the path you'd have to cut down the mature trees and widen out the embankment. Possible of course, but not a small task either.

    I think cycling through the business park is fine, they have nice marked out on road cycle paths and it is generally very quiet in there. I'd just improve the situation with the barriers and access to and from the greenway at the back of the park.



  • Moderators, Motoring & Transport Moderators Posts: 14,110 Mod ✭✭✭✭monument


    The greenway will eventually link to Dublin Port's East Wall project, offering a safe connection from the quays etc. They don't want to promote the actual start of the greenway because if they did and people used Google Maps, some would be directed to cycle across the entrance to the Port Tunnel.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 15,442 ✭✭✭✭Thelonious Monk


    I went for a run on the new greenway yesterday, it's really well done, a great amenity. In other vaguely related news to this thread

    https://www.businesspost.ie/news/developer-of-15-storey-east-wall-tower-strikes-deal-with-international-hotel-group/

    about bleedin' time, i feel like they've been dicking around with that ugly building for years



  • Moderators, Motoring & Transport Moderators, Technology & Internet Moderators Posts: 23,405 Mod ✭✭✭✭bk


    Interesting info and map about the new Dublin Port Greenway:

    https://www.dublinport.ie/greenway/

    The map is a bit funny, what a painful detour for cyclists. I look forward to when they build the bridge.

    Good that they have added a pedestrian crossing near Bond Road, across the entrance to the port, staff at East Point use to scramble across this crossing every day, a very dangerous location, so good to see it made safe for pedestrians.

    Post edited by bk on


  • Moderators, Politics Moderators Posts: 43,273 Mod ✭✭✭✭Seth Brundle


    While the introduction of it is welcomed, I do note that they show pictures of people walking on it, dogs pulling long leashes and kids running about. It wouldn't entice me to use it really as I'd simply be quicker going an alternative route.



  • Moderators, Motoring & Transport Moderators, Technology & Internet Moderators Posts: 23,405 Mod ✭✭✭✭bk


    Yes, well it is a greenway and thus a shared path.

    It doesn't really go anywhere useful anyway in terms of commuting, it is more a place for people to go for a nice walk, run, cycle, etc. It is more a public amenity with seated areas and nice view out onto the sea.

    The Liffey Tolka Project is the more interesting one in terms of commuting. It will link the Liffey cycle way to East Wall Road and also over to Bond Road / East Point Business Park via a bridge. This is the key missing part in this area for commute cycling.



  • Advertisement
  • Moderators, Computer Games Moderators, Recreation & Hobbies Moderators Posts: 10,882 Mod ✭✭✭✭CatInABox


    In fairness, I think that they've fairly flown up with this building. There's plenty of other buildings that are smaller and are taking/have taken longer than this is get to a comparable state.

    Moxy is also a fairly good hotel chain as well, high end of the cheap brands.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,218 ✭✭✭Citizen  Six


    It started fast, but then slowed down. Seems like a long time since they started it to be fair.
    Hoarding has come down on the building closest to the petroleum station now.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 15,442 ✭✭✭✭Thelonious Monk


    they've peppered north strand with sheffield stands, still none around gaffneys though, ffs



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,218 ✭✭✭Citizen  Six


    There have one outside Da Mimmo. None outside the pharmacy or shop/Post Office there, and none at the cafe across the road.

    Sheffield stands are something that are easy enough to put in, once they are lobbied for.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 15,442 ✭✭✭✭Thelonious Monk


    There's at least one new one outside the shop now



  • Moderators, Motoring & Transport Moderators, Technology & Internet Moderators Posts: 23,405 Mod ✭✭✭✭bk


    I took a stroll down there today, I think they just haven't put the finishing touches on that area yet. You can see yellow crosses painted on the ground where they are supposed to go.

    The area looks like it mightn't be too far off being finished.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,218 ✭✭✭Citizen  Six


    I actually noticed two outside the shop/post office today. Close to the building rather than the kerb.
    And there’s 4 of them just past Cusacks too.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 765 ✭✭✭loco_scolo


    What's the story with the no left turn at Edges corner? Is that permanent, was it always planned? I find it a large inconvenience, not sure why it was deemed necessary.

    Also, has anyone noticed all the cars trying to turn right onto Poplar Row from Fairview? Google Maps is suddenly directing people that way, but there's always been a no right turn there.

    Screenshot_2024-10-03-20-14-04-65_3d9111e2d3171bf4882369f490c087b4.jpg


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,475 ✭✭✭bikeman1


    No left turn outbound at Edge's corner was always in the plan.

    Plenty of opportunities before there to turn left or up Fairview Ave.

    It makes a much better crossing for many pedestrians over the few left turn drivers who can go another way.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 765 ✭✭✭loco_scolo


    Okay cool thanks. I was doing a longer detour via Marino Park and Brian Road - didn't realize you could loop around sooner.



Advertisement