Advertisement
Help Keep Boards Alive. Support us by going ad free today. See here: https://subscriptions.boards.ie/.
https://www.boards.ie/group/1878-subscribers-forum

Private Group for paid up members of Boards.ie. Join the club.
Hi all, please see this major site announcement: https://www.boards.ie/discussion/2058427594/boards-ie-2026

Cold Case Review of Sophie Tuscan du Plantier murder to proceed

1284285287289290469

Comments

  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 304 ✭✭Zola1000


    Hi. Just a question for anyone here. I've watched both documentaries again for netflix and sky. I always was of the thinking that Sophie wouldn't have frequented any of bars in schull or certainly any of the ones bailey might be in regularly. But former publican of courtyard said Sophie was often in..and by herself or whatever..but just felt that was certainly new to me..and if bailey definitely would have seen her more often that not if she was in there odd times..just a possibility maybe, as publican mentioned bailey was often in..and wouldnt care much if he never came in



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 5,000 ✭✭✭Day Lewin


    Sure, if she went into a pub in Schull, then anyone who frequented that pub might have seen her there, obviously.

    Can we suspect them all of murdering her on the strength of that?



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,395 ✭✭✭jesuisjuste


    I'm not sure if you're Irish but pubs in rural areas are a pretty common place for people to go even just to read books/newspapers, have lunch, tea etc. alone or with others, not just for drinking and socialising. Bailey I imagine used to frequent many of the different bars for different reasons, he was into reading poetry etc. Since they were in the same area when Sophie was in town, they most probably crossed paths (literally I mean) at some point.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 38,138 ✭✭✭✭odyssey06


    Not necessarily. Did he clarify when Sophie would be in?

    Weekend of the murder Sophie visited the Courtyard late afternoon / early evening for tea and scone iirc. Bailey seems more sort to arrive for the night until closing.

    "To follow knowledge like a sinking star..." (Tennyson's Ulysses)



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 304 ✭✭Zola1000


    Thanks for that. No I get totally what you mean. I'm Irish for sure..I was more thinking maybe they were never in same type areas..at one time on few occasions

    yes that's true . no clarification of what times I guess she would be in..but yes I'm sure IB was more of night time. I see..I didn't realise that was same bar the courtyard she had scones and tea on that late afternoon.

    I'm more or less trying see if bars ever crowed and they started conversation..but unlikely given Sophie's more normal lifestyle and wouldn't be late night in them.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,395 ✭✭✭jesuisjuste


    Certainly there were a few different pubs in Goleen, Schull etc. and Sophie seemed to travel the area quite a bit too, she frequented Crookhaven etc. but I don't think there was a huge range of options, of places to go. I'd say it was more a case that even though she wasn't there frequently, when she was there they perhaps visited some of the same locations, shops, pubs etc. perhaps even at around the same time. Bailey though seemed to be more of a night owl, and Sophie more of an early bird from what I've seen.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2, Paid Member Posts: 4,908 ✭✭✭chooseusername


    I believe she asked in the Courtyard about what live music they had on. So she may have been planning on a night-time visit.

    Edit;

    May not have been the Courtyard, now I think of it.

    Sliding Doors and all that, She could have ended up listening to Bailey banging his drum.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 38,138 ✭✭✭✭odyssey06


    Was she in the audience for any of the times Karl Heinz Wolney played I wonder.

    "To follow knowledge like a sinking star..." (Tennyson's Ulysses)



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,815 ✭✭✭tinytobe


    The theory and speculation about Karl Heinz Wolney is probably met with overthinking. Mostly this is fueled by the fact that he committed suicide and stated "he'd done something terrible". I think Jim Sheridan is also rather fond of the "Wolney theory".

    There is actually no evidence that Sophie ever met Wolney, nor would Wolney have known that Sophie was at her cottage.

    And if Wolney did know he only found out by accident, also would have met her by accident, maybe in some pub. None of the conversations the police had with publicans and bar keepers statet that Sophie met Wolney. If so, it would have been without anybody taking notice.

    There is also no history of any form of connection between Sophie and Wolney nor would there have been a motive, excpet maye and speculatively something sexual.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,395 ✭✭✭jesuisjuste


    Are there any reports of the deaths of Wolney and Pecout out there, I don't think I've ever seen anything about this other than people mentioning it. Did they both leave suicide notes etc., how did they do it etc.?



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,815 ✭✭✭tinytobe


    A very good question. I haven't read any. However if something was found indicating the responsability of the murder we would know that.

    As far as I know Sophie was neither in contact with Wolney nor with Pecout. It could simply have been like they've seen light on, vaguely knew that there was a woman alone and expected something sexual, and this resulted in an argument and in an unplanned murder. Personally I don't see this as likely also there is no indication of attempted rape.



  • Moderators, Politics Moderators, Paid Member Posts: 45,528 Mod ✭✭✭✭Seth Brundle


    Agreed but that theory seems to be the basis for the AGS case against Bailey

    Help Keep Boards Alive. Support us by going ad free today. See here: https://subscriptions.boards.ie/ .



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,815 ✭✭✭tinytobe


    The AGS sadly can't be trusted, given their record, least of all Dermot Dwyer.

    The AGS speculation hinges on the idea that Sophie knew Bailey and the arrest of Bailey hinges on false and coerced statement by Marie Farrell that he was seen a good 3 or 5 km away from the murder site, at Kealfadda bridge.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 5,000 ✭✭✭Day Lewin


    But…Wolney had a history of violence against his wife, who divorced him.

    That puts him in about the same position as Bailey, with regard to being a possible suspect.

    A history of violence against a woman, lived locally, no known connection but possibly may have crossed paths at some point …you could tack on a few more bits of "circumstantial" but nothing connects him to the actual crime.

    PS Full disclosure, I can't recall where I read that Wolney was violent towards his wife; but I do recall seeing this mentioned somewhere.

    I'd very much like to see a clear, factual, verified timeline of Wolney's movements on the night of the crime.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 38,138 ✭✭✭✭odyssey06


    I mentioned it in the context in terms of getting a picture of Sophie's socialising while in West Cork, not really with the intention of speculating on Wolney himself.

    But as for the rest of your post, it occurs to me you could easily sub in Bailey for Wolney there!

    "To follow knowledge like a sinking star..." (Tennyson's Ulysses)



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 244 ✭✭Baz Richardson


    You may already be aware that Pecout had met Sophie and Bruno. It was the meeting where he warned Sophie not to trust the Hellens for some reason. Bruno stated that he was acting strangely or something like that. He had an interest in her cottage.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 12,781 ✭✭✭✭Oscar_Madison
    #MEGA MAKE EUROPE GREAT AGAIN


    So Bailey never meeting Sophie except a disputed introduction is well documented - is there any chance that Bailey “bumped into” Sophie in the days or even hours leading up to her death and arranged to go to her house or said that he’d pay her a visit sometime or whatever?

    Would this be far fetched? Just thinking out loud - IF Bailey was proved to be the murderer I’m just trying to think what would have prompted him to visit in that night.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,815 ✭✭✭tinytobe


    I see this very much the same, both Wolney as well as even Finbarr Hellens would be in the same position as suspect.

    You may want to add Bolger as well as Alfie to that list, together with somebody her husband Daniel may have sent.

    Now that you mention it, yes, correct.

    Finbar Hellens had a brush with the law previously, a case of violent behaviour. It's possible Pecout knew this thus he wanted to warn Sophie and Bruno.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 244 ✭✭Baz Richardson


    It's a bit of a stretch for Bailey to think that 2.30am is a suitable time to visit though.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,395 ✭✭✭jesuisjuste


    What gets me is that they said it was on foot. He was known to drink drive. If he was going to visit why would he do it on foot. Why don't they think he drove. Like they couldn't find DNA anywhere they looked, what difference would it make if there was none in his car. Perhaps he had a bag, and a change of clothes. Just seems strange for the gardai to fixate on certain elements of the story when there is no evidence one way or the other.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 12,781 ✭✭✭✭Oscar_Madison
    #MEGA MAKE EUROPE GREAT AGAIN


    Wouldn’t in any way try to justify a visit at either 2.30am or indeed 7.30am - who knows what was in the mind of whoever did visit her that late night/early morning- I was just more thinking out loud- IF Bailey had never met Sophie, he’d have no justification , no matter how tenuous , for visiting her home, regardless of the hour.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 12,781 ✭✭✭✭Oscar_Madison
    #MEGA MAKE EUROPE GREAT AGAIN


    There’s “some” evidence or testimony somewhere that the car didn’t move once home that night - whether it’s debatable evidence or reliable I just can’t recall - maybe someone can provide a definitive one way or the other.

    I know it’s not beyond the realm of possibility but “planning” this as an attack is for me, a very hard theory to take on board - drunk, after a night out - and anyway I’ve no doubt the car would have been covered in blood - impossible to clean up without chemicals which would have stank the car out - fabric on drivers seat destroyed - blood on wheel interior etc not a chance did Bailey drive that car that night after coming back from the pub



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2, Paid Member Posts: 4,908 ✭✭✭chooseusername


    To place Bailey "at the scene" all they had was Marie Farrell's sighting of a man at Kealfada Bridge. The man was on foot, so once that man morphed into Bailey that was their story, and they stuck to it.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2, Paid Member Posts: 4,908 ✭✭✭chooseusername


    " not a chance did Bailey drive that car that night after coming back from the pub"

    And drive the same car back to the scene some 12 hours later?



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,504 ✭✭✭chicorytip


    We have testimony from Agnes Thomas, Sophie's friend, about Sophie's account of her meeting or interaction with this strange man who wrote poetry. They may also have met on Cape Clear island the previous summer at the arts festival there. Alfie Lyons was "ninety percent" certain he had introduced Sophie to Bailey at some point so given all that I assume Ian, at least, knew about her, what she did, where she lived and her habits / movements whenever she visited Ireland . It's a very small community down there.

    Ian, armed with his reams of doggerel verse, fancied his chances of getting off with Sophie both at a physical and intellectual level but was firmly rebuffed and reacted to this in a violent manner.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,395 ✭✭✭jesuisjuste


    Outside of the gate and the immediate surroundings of the body there is no blood anywhere except a couple of spots in the garden and at the door. So if being covered in blood was an issue then there would have been evidence outside the gate, going up the road, down at Kealfadda and at the studio at a minimum. There was none anywhere, so then it stands to reason that the perpetrator had no evidence on their person, and therefore Bailey could have used a car, perhaps even cleaned himself up a bit. Makes no sense to say he walked with this in mind. How would they know the car didn't move, makes no sense.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 12,781 ✭✭✭✭Oscar_Madison
    #MEGA MAKE EUROPE GREAT AGAIN


    I’ve helped clean blood from the inside of a car many many years ago (a friend of mine got attacked)- it wasn’t a huge amount of blood by any means - but there was no disputing the smell - anyone in that car for a few days after would either have smelt blood or strong cleaning fluids



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,395 ✭✭✭jesuisjuste


    He could have parked the car and gone for a walk before or after the murder. no evidence, all supposition it seems. Coming from the same people who on the one hand say he burned a coat and on the other they took it into evidence. It's Schrödinger's coat!

    Schrödinger's coat, fires without smoke, scratches with gloves on, it's like a Grimm fairy tale.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,531 ✭✭✭tibruit


    What nobody seems to have considered at all is that he planned it all, basically to commit the perfect murder. It`s not that far fetched either based on what he was writing in his diary, expressing a desire to kill and contemplating making a list of people he might kill. It also had a payoff for him as a journalist. He was a violent monumental narcissist and it takes very little to set them off. It could have been as insignificant as rejection on the street on the Saturday.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 12,781 ✭✭✭✭Oscar_Madison
    #MEGA MAKE EUROPE GREAT AGAIN


    Shirley if you’re the attacker in this instance you would have blood on your clothing, your hands/gloves.

    And put into the mix a rake full of pints, there’s no way the person left the scene without some visual evidence on them that they would have transferred to the car .



Advertisement
Advertisement