Advertisement
If you have a new account but are having problems posting or verifying your account, please email us on hello@boards.ie for help. Thanks :)
Hello all! Please ensure that you are posting a new thread or question in the appropriate forum. The Feedback forum is overwhelmed with questions that are having to be moved elsewhere. If you need help to verify your account contact hello@boards.ie

Irish Property Market chat II - *read mod note post #1 before posting*

1827828830832833908

Comments

  • Registered Users, Subscribers, Registered Users 2 Posts: 6,665 ✭✭✭hometruths


    The average household size is absolutely meaningless and tells you nothing about the demand for housing on its own.

    Tell that to the Housing Commission who have based their entire argument for a 250k deficit on the conclusion that our actual household size is artificially high at 2.74 and this is the evidence of a deficit - in their words “one of the key findings of the Housing Commission’s analysis is that current household size is artificially elevated due to housing scarcity.”

    They have calculated that deficit of 250k based on an assumed "underlying" AHS of 2.4. This was literally the only way they could mathematically come up with a housing stock deficit. There is simply no hard data that shows a deficit and that is inarguable.

    So anybody who is simultaneously bemoaning the fact that we have a deficit of 250k houses and also saying that AHS is irrelevant is talking out of both sides of their mouth.

    And the idea that an increased number of adults living with parents is artificially inflating our AHS has been totally disproven by the ESRI, who have demonstrated the reason it is high is the proportion of young couples with children under 18.

    We find that Ireland has a high average household size on a cross-country basis. However, this appears to be strongly influenced by demographics, with high fertility rate, younger population and thus high share of households with children important factors in explaining the cross country trends. Indeed, a majority of the differences between Ireland and other countries disappear in a regression setting when socio-demographic and basic economic factors are controlled for.

    This is a direct contradiction of the Housing Commission's findings: "key drivers of household size such as fertility and longevity do not indicate any difference in trends that would explain Ireland’s divergence."

    Now obviously both of these statements cannot be true. Reading both reports it is very clear which one is more plausible.

    https://www.esri.ie/publications/household-size-in-ireland-stylised-facts-and-cross-country-trends



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,914 ✭✭✭PommieBast


    Looking at a job at Qualcomm down in Cork. Know it bad down there but doubt it as bad as Dublin, but still need a general idea. For someone with no connections to the area does €2k/month sound ballpark?



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,027 ✭✭✭PeadarCo


    You do understand that the report you have referenced indicates that there is a housing deficit. It explicitly notes that Irish house size stopped dropping to European norms after 2011. The reason has been due to Irish household size remaining relatively high for younger age groups and this has been due to supply shortages. The report itself indicates in the conclusion that Irish house size reaching European norms depends on housing supply ie the housing deficit that's obvious to see.

    You can argue about the size of the deficit but on a practical level if it's 125k or 250k it makes no difference as we can't even build 50k of houses a year. Even if 50k of houses are built every year it's still 3 years to catch up assuming they only plug the deficit and that's after a decade of housing problems.

    It's been obvious for anyone who has been renting or trying to buy over the last 10 years that there has been a housing crisis. That housing shortage has been the primary drivers of price especially in the rental market.



  • Registered Users, Subscribers, Registered Users 2 Posts: 6,665 ✭✭✭hometruths


    You do understand that the report you have referenced indicates that there is a housing deficit. It explicitly notes that Irish house size stopped dropping to European norms after 2011. The reason has been due to Irish household size remaining relatively high for younger age groups and this has been due to supply shortages. The report itself indicates in the conclusion that Irish house size reaching European norms depends on housing supply ie the housing deficit that's obvious to see.

    That's the Housing Commission report that I am calling out as nonsense. The ESRI report I referenced explicitly states the exact opposite.

    It's been obvious for anyone who has been renting or trying to buy over the last 10 years that there has been a housing crisis. That housing shortage has been the primary drivers of price especially in the rental market.

    For the umpteenth time I am not denying there is a housing crisis. There are huge problems with housing in Ireland. My beef with the absurd deficit claim is two fold:

    a) it is blinding people to all discussion of any solutions to fix the problems other than we need to build more.

    b) it is influencing sentiment of buyers and pushing prices higher making the problem worse.

    I say the deficit claims are absurd because it's demonstrably so - the numbers simply don't add up. You might as well argue that 2+2=5.

    If we had a deficit of 250k houses in April 2022 that means over 500,000 people were not housed according to their needs.

    Do you believe that, and if so who are those people?

    It's not young adults living at home - there was an increase of 83k since 2011 of all over 18s living at home, which was 13% of adults, exactly the same % as 2016 and 2011.

    Within that group undoubtedly there are people who are not housed according to their needs but it is not anywhere close to 500k.

    There were 10k homeless people.

    So if there was a deficit of 250k houses in 2022, who are the 500k people that required those houses and where were they living at the time?

    Nobody is able to answer this question, and anybody who gives it more than a passing thought will realise that it is utterly ridiculous to claim the housing stock was short by 250k in 2022.

    Unfortunately it seems even if they know it is not true, that will not stop people parroting the nonsense.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 7,615 ✭✭✭timmyntc


    Less a problem of price and more availability in my experience. Good luck finding anything other than rent a rooms, not ideal for working professionals though.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,873 ✭✭✭Villa05


    The state incentivising a property bubble

    People who qualify for the State’s Help-To-Buy assistance scheme tend to be higher earners and end up buying more expensive houses than other first-time buyers



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,121 ✭✭✭RichardAnd




  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 268 ✭✭SpoonyMcSpoon


    It 100% is a bubble, inflated by the State itself. H2B is but one of many schemes the government has concocted to keep the market afloat. It comes back to the State having so much money that it can just throw it at problems rather than having to penny pinch and be more efficient in how it spends its money.

    When it pops will depend on how reliable the corporate tax money is; if that disappears then the housing market is goosed as the FFG have not set up some sort of sustainable path in our housing market.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,155 ✭✭✭extra-ordinary_


    Will HTB be extended for secondhabd homes after the budget?…



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,914 ✭✭✭PommieBast




  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,914 ✭✭✭PommieBast


    Noted. Maybe I should play hardball and make them finding accomodation for me part of the contract.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,121 ✭✭✭RichardAnd


    Whilst I don't disagree that it is unsustainable, categorising the market as a bubble is perhaps not accurate. It brings up images of 2008, and very sudden drop in the market. This is not the same, and I don't think that it will collapse quickly as it did before. The high prices now are supported by mass immigration and a huge amount of cash both here an abroad. Neither of those are taps that are easily or quickly turned off.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,873 ✭✭✭Villa05


    Unsustainable is the key characteristic of a bubble

    Bubble and bubble bursting (ala 2008) are 2 different phases of the process



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,469 ✭✭✭Rocket_GD


    I really hope not, all that will occur is that the second hand market will jump in prices overnight.

    First time buyers would now have an extra 30k which will only lead to bidding wars going crazier than they already are. Sellers will hold out waiting for these FTB's to enter the bidding process knowing they've an extra 30k in their pocket from the Government.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,121 ✭✭✭RichardAnd


    Hmm maybe so, but what we're seeing today is rather unique. When in history was any country increasing its population by 1-2% per year whilst using a currency that can essentially be "printed" without limit? I just think that we shouldn't presume what will happen.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,121 ✭✭✭RichardAnd


    Well that means that it probably WILL be extended to second-hand houses.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,291 ✭✭✭Blut2


    The more salubrious parts of London probably provide the best guide for where Dublin will go. It followed the exact same playbook of extremely high immigration and population growth, with limits on housing construction at the same time, that we're now following. Just about 20 years ahead of us.

    Expect the working and middle classes to be completely priced out of the market unless they're living in absolute dumps or in roomshares, or doomed to commute in from very far distances from exurbs for work.

    With all the negative effects that will have on local businesses and services for even people who already own property locally too - good luck getting young teachers or gardai to work locally who can't afford to rent anywhere within sane commuting distance.



  • Registered Users, Subscribers, Registered Users 2 Posts: 6,665 ✭✭✭hometruths


    Regarding images of 08 I was listening to a Bank of Ireland economist on Irish Times podcast yesterday.

    He made the point that the difference between now and 07/08 is that there are "no clear and obvious bubbles in the economy". He said it as if everybody could see advance what would unfold back then, which is a bit of a stretch.

    As I recall most economists didn't think there were any clear and obvious bubbles in the economy in 07/08 either, it's only with hindsight that they're clear and obvious.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,595 ✭✭✭tigger123


    There was definitely economists pointing the possiblilty of a bubble back then.

    David McWilliams did a series of documentaries at the time for BBC stating as such.

    See below link:

    https://inquiries.oireachtas.ie/banking/hearings/david-mcwilliams-early-warnings-divergent-contrarian-views/



  • Moderators, Category Moderators, Computer Games Moderators, Society & Culture Moderators Posts: 8,675 CMod ✭✭✭✭Sierra Oscar


    Mortgage rate cuts starting to filter through now.

    https://www.rte.ie/news/business/2024/0926/1472038-aib-cuts-more-mortgage-rates/

    AIB is reducing by 0.25% its five-year Green fixed mortgage rate, which is available for homes with a BER rating between A1 and B3.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,121 ✭✭✭RichardAnd


    Indeed. I think the USA also serves as an example of what will happen, including all of the race politics that will be unavoidable in a heterogenous society. Good times ahead. We may even get our own version of Trump or a hack like Farage will resolve absolutely nothing but pacify native discontent.

    Hmm, some did call it before 2007, but I'm reminded of the appalling words of a former Taoiseach advising such people to self-delete. I do agree however that hindsight will be 20/20 as ever. Good old McWilliams probably already has a book in draft to publish if and when we have another disaster to tell us all how we were screwed and how he called it out.



  • Registered Users, Subscribers, Registered Users 2 Posts: 6,665 ✭✭✭hometruths


    Sure there were some, that's why I said most economists didn't see it as clear and obvious, the consensus was anything but. Hence why the oireachtas committee describes McWilliams as having "Divergent & Contrarian Views".

    Morgan Kelly is another who famously called it right. He was demonised for his views.

    The transcript of the committee hearing is worthing reading as a reminder. No doubt McWilliams likes the sound of his own voice, and revels in the opportunity to say I was right, but he does make a few valid points that may be relevant today:

    "We also have an issue with groupthink. Why did nobody, or very few, speak out? I believe groupthink is something that happens in many aspects. I believe that if you have ideas in Ireland which are beyond the mainstream, those ideas go through three phases. The first phase is open ridicule, the second phase is violent opposition and both of these happened to me. The third phase is where we are now which is that everybody pretends they were on your side all the time. This is what happens. Groupthink shifts because it is a conventional wisdom."

    and:

    The Irish housing market is a scam. It is an enormous financial swindle that could potentially confine an entire generation of young Irish workers to years of bad debt. Far from being a reflection of economic vitality and fundamental demand the housing bubble is, in the main, a vacuous financial confidence trick that has been foisted upon us by an alliance of banks and the landowners.

    and:

    Economics tells us that when the price rises the demand falls, that is what we teach kids in school. In Ireland the opposite happens with house prices. When the price rises the demand rises because people get panicked. One hears that all the time. People say: “Jesus, prices are going up by 10%. I’d better get on the ladder now because if I don’t I’ll have to pay another 10% next year.” A very active rise in prices, once it is allowed, creates a dynamic in people’s heads to buy more, not less. 



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,545 ✭✭✭Deub


    I mean it wouldn't take much to burst that bubble. We are so dependent on few big companies on our corporation that if 1 or 2 of these were to leave Ireland, it would be a double whammy: loss of high paid jobs and a nice chunk of the State budget gone.

    I know some people think it is unlikely to happen because these companies have invested so much in the country and they have qualified workforce here. However, these companies wouldn't have any remorse to leave the country if they can save money by moving somewhere else. Workforce will follow like they did in Ireland.

    I think currently the housing crisis can stay for another 10 years because most people are homeowners and right now, they can still upgrade or downgrade. It is mainly for first time buyers that it is becoming difficult. Once the population age more and the cohort of wannabe first time owners get bigger and more homeowners see many of their closed ones impacted that things would change.

    Which one will happen first? who knows.



  • Registered Users, Subscribers, Registered Users 2 Posts: 6,665 ✭✭✭hometruths


    I do agree that as long as majority of voters are alright jack, and the government are in funds, the problems will not be solved. IMO the root causes are mainly political rather than structural, hence the solutions are political. As long as there is no political will to make the necessary fixes the situation will worsen.

    As you say, eventually the tide will turn, whether that is the money runs out or the voter acquiescence runs out, only time will tell.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 268 ✭✭SpoonyMcSpoon


    Yeah, I also think it is not likely to pop in the next year or two unless the US economy blew up which would hit the few corporate tax behemoths. Betting against the Irish housing market or trying to time it is like trying to time the potential blow up to the Irish corporate tax revenue. In terms of the potential fallout and how much it could fall; people saying the Celtic Tiger was a mad time and yet house prices are above Celtic Tiger levels (while wages have climbed up no where near as high and leverage is much lower) shows that it could be a significant plunge once it gets going. At the same time it is difficult to see how the government could put any backstop in place should it start to unwind given the grotesque money they throw at the market in the good times.

    Crazy to see the budget announcement today with more spending, especially with rental tax credits of €1000 available in a year. The government is spending like a drunken sailor and it is a bit scary to watch when that drunken sailor is supposed to be at sea planning for long-term investment and even the potential for having to reduce spending in the near future. That being said, the electorate seem to be happy to see them spend like there is no tomorrow; "we all partied".



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,914 ✭✭✭PommieBast


    Oh great. Just need to find something on the market that is actually A or B..



  • Registered Users, Subscribers, Registered Users 2 Posts: 6,665 ✭✭✭hometruths


    Business Post are reporting today that the government spent almost €1bn in first six months of this year on accommodation for asylum seekers and refugees.

    The vast majority of this money has been paid to the hospitality sector rather than put into the property market - i.e it is pushing up hotel prices rather than rents etc.

    Top earner is being paid over €6m a month.

    Screenshot 2024-09-27 at 17.57.24.png

    So this is almost €2bn a year government spend on accommodation provision that is additional to the government spend on housing in the residential property market.

    Presumably the long term intention is to move these people out of hotels into permanent accommodation and start spending a lot of that €2bn in the property market instead of the hospitality sector.

    Luckily government today saying 2024 corporation tax receipts likely to be well ahead of initial forecasts.

    Prices could have plenty of room to run yet!!

    https://www.businesspost.ie/news/nearly-e1bn-spend-on-refugee-accommodation-in-first-half-of-2024-here-are-the-top-private-sector-e/



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,291 ✭✭✭Blut2


    Thats absolutely insane. €2bn in 2024 alone on housing refugees is a horrifying amount of money for the size of our country.

    For context that works out to about 500euro from the pocket of every single adult in Ireland, just in this year.

    2% of total government expenditure, almost double what we spend on our entire defense budget, or enough to literally double the entire national budget of the Garda overnight.

    Or most relevantly for this thread enough to build an additional 6000 housing units this year. That would make a pretty substantial dent in removing people from HAP, saving further government money, and reducing pressure on the rental market. If the government is going to spend that kind of money on housing anyone, like..

    I wonder what the public would say if asked if they approve of this government use of valuable tax revenue?

    Post edited by Blut2 on


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 5,108 ✭✭✭BlueSkyDreams


    What makes you think the long term plan is to move them out of the hotels?

    We now get around 25k asylum seekers per year, so those that are in the hotels and are given refugee status will move to housing, but their hotel space will very quickly be taken up with a new refugee.

    We dont have an alternative to hosting 25k new asylum seekers every year, without using hotels.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 997 ✭✭✭Greyian


    2 billion euro does not work out to about 5000 from the pocket of every single adult in Ireland.

    It would be about 500 euro.



Advertisement