Advertisement
If you have a new account but are having problems posting or verifying your account, please email us on hello@boards.ie for help. Thanks :)
Hello all! Please ensure that you are posting a new thread or question in the appropriate forum. The Feedback forum is overwhelmed with questions that are having to be moved elsewhere. If you need help to verify your account contact hello@boards.ie

The decline of FG?

1434446484982

Comments

  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,242 ✭✭✭spillit67


    Indeed. As I said before, they will be odds on to beat FF’s record of 1932 to 1948 if they are back in. Albeit in coalitions and 3 leaders, but in a far more fractured political environment.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,242 ✭✭✭spillit67


    They proposed Constitutional amendments as required. As has already been pointed out to you.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 73,518 ✭✭✭✭FrancieBrady




  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,242 ✭✭✭spillit67


    Who? The Government made two proposals to the electorate based on what you post constantly on here.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,242 ✭✭✭spillit67


    Your position here is that you “don’t know who you are voting for” except you know it won’t be FG, FF and Labour & you want them out.

    They have 48% of first preferences based on the Sunday Times poll. The combinations of preferred coalition shows either FF and FG in Government was supported by 55% in the Irish Times poll. When you add in Labour (not identified in the mix), I’m sure that number goes further up. I’m assuming the Greens are on that list as well?

    There is a next to zero chance one of those won’t be in Government next time so I’m curious how you are going to position yourself? You seem to be the type who gets angry at anyone who tries to govern.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 73,518 ✭✭✭✭FrancieBrady


    There are lists of other stuff promised and not delivered in the PFG.
    Take one:

    Dáil Reform

    We are proposing radical reform of the way the Dáil operates.

    • to hold the executive to account

    How did that go?
    What did we see them do with our own eyes again and again.

    Failed to give SIPO proper tools that SIPO themselves called for.
    Circle the wagons repeatedly to protect, even when wrongdoing was admitted.
    Make FOI harder rather than easier.

    etc etc.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 320 ✭✭mehico


    Not sure if preferences are captured in any of the polls but would be very interesting to see.

    Could FF be the big winner here in that many FG supporters will transfer to FF candidates but this may not be reciprocated by FF supporters. This could then potentially give rise to the scenario where FF win the most seats at next GE (even though they may receive significantly less first preferences)?



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 16,309 ✭✭✭✭markodaly


    Francie and other SF supporters were getting very excited about the prospect of an SF majority about 3 years ago when they were in the middle high 30's.

    I dont think we will ever see one-party majority government in this state again.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,242 ✭✭✭spillit67


    You asked what actions. I gave you them. You keep implying they did nothing.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 16,309 ✭✭✭✭markodaly


    I searched for 'New Politics' in the PFG.

    It does not exist.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 73,518 ✭✭✭✭FrancieBrady


    You can cross reference what found it's way into the PFG from this document.

    https://cdn.thejournal.ie/media/2013/08/fine-gael-new-politics-march-2010.pdf



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 30,851 ✭✭✭✭blanch152


    It is strange how we are supposed to be talking about the decline of FG at this point in time, but we are being sent to look at policy documents over a decade old. It shows how much of a struggle it is to point to any real evidence of a current decline.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 16,309 ✭✭✭✭markodaly


    Francie, you are talking rubbish.

    Look at the PFG, you will see a bullet point with each objective.

    • We will give committees the power to introduce legislation, while a new 10 MinuteRule will allow backbench TDs to introduce their own Bills. We will also tackle thehuge over-use of guillotines to ram through non-emergency legislation

    • We will introduce a package of changes that will bring about a 50 per cent increase in Dáilsitting days. Dáil Éireann will in future meet four days a week. There will be a summer recessof just six weeks and significantly reduced breaks at Christmas and Easter. We will abandonthe practice of providing a “mid-term break” – a full week off at St Patrick’s Day andHallowe’en. When the Dáil is not in session the Committees shall agree by roster that aparticular Committee shall meet in the Dáil Chamber.

    • We propose to break the Government monopoly on legislation and the stranglehold over thebusiness of the Dáil, by providing that the new Friday sittings will be given over exclusivelyto committee reports and private members business except where urgent government businessmust be taken.

    • We will enhance the democratic process by involving public representatives at an earlier stageof the legislative process, particularly before Bills are published. We will amend cabinetprocedure instructions so as to allow government to publish the general scheme of a Bill sothat Oireachtas Committees can debate and hold hearings at an early stage.

    • • While recognising that there may be exceptional circumstances in which debate may need tobe concluded by a given deadline, we will restrict the use of guillotine motions and otherprocedural devices that prevent Bills from being fully debated, so that guillotining is not amatter of routine as it has become at present, particularly at the end of a session.

    • • We will also deal with the related problem of legislation being shunted through at high speedand will ensure that Dáil standing orders provide a minimum of two weeks between eachstage of a Bill, except in exceptional circumstances.

    • • In order to enhance the role of the legislative committees, we will organise a committee weekevery fourth sitting week. The Dáil plenary will sit only for questions, including Leaders’ Government for National Recovery 2011-201623Questions and the order of business and the remainder of the day will be taken up incommittee.

    • • We will establish a petition system to the Dáil, similar to that operating in the EuropeanParliament, to be managed by a specific Dáil committee that will investigate and report onpetitions which raise issues warranting attention.

    • • We will enhance the parliamentary relationship with the European Parliament in conjunctionwith Ireland’s MEPs. These arrangements will include regular attendance by MEPs atrelevant Dáil committees.

    • • We will legislate and change Dáil standing orders to ensure the absolute confidentiality ofinformation entrusted to members of the Dáil by their constituents or informants, and ensurethat such information cannot be compulsorily disclosed through the legal process except withthe consent of the informant.

    • • We will significantly revamp the adjournment debate format. It will be renamed the topicalissue debate. There will be a minimum of 5 topical issues. These will be taken in the middleof the day and there will be provision for questions at the end. A Minister or Minister of Statefrom the relevant Department will be present and there will be an end to the practice of onejunior Minister reading out scripts on behalf of a number of Departments about a range ofissues of which he or she knows nothing.

    • • The standing orders on urgent issues are used regularly to attempt to raise issues that are noturgent and such requests are almost invariably refused. We will make the Dáil rules forraising urgent issues more meaningful by requiring a minimum number of signatories for sucha request.

    • • In future standing order 32 requests will not be read out

    Which of these were or were not done.

    Please be explicit.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 16,309 ✭✭✭✭markodaly


    Right, so are back to the manifesto…

    You do know a manifesto is not the same as a PFG?

    Honestly, you are coming across very badly here in your understanding of how our system works.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 73,518 ✭✭✭✭FrancieBrady


    I pointed out to another poster a specific action proposed and asked what has been done. I see you ignored that.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 73,518 ✭✭✭✭FrancieBrady


    😁😁

    Mark, I know what a manifesto is and what a PFG is….I posted examples of both and asked you to cross reference.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 11,732 ✭✭✭✭Red Silurian


    This isn't a thread on opposition parties though, it's about FG, which by the laws of political science directly includes FF, hence FFG, and by extension the greens and Labour. My position isn't that "I don't know who I'm voting for" just that it's irrelevant to the topic of the thread

    Since you asked, my personal preference would be for a left leaning government. One that might actually be able to fix our housing and health crises but also stand up to the far right movement rather than cower away, or worse, join them!



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,242 ✭✭✭spillit67


    So to be clear, you will hold any party who go in with those four as extensions of this.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 16,309 ✭✭✭✭markodaly


    Care to comment on the bullet point list?

    Which one of them, from the PFG were NOT done? Please be exact please as you have a habit in talking in grand narratives with no to little details.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 16,309 ✭✭✭✭markodaly


    You are drowning, all over the place.

    You banged on about "new politics"

    I mere pointed out that those were NEVER appeared on the 2011 FG/Labour PFG.

    You are utterly spoffing.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 11,732 ✭✭✭✭Red Silurian


    Is that really all you picked up from everything I said? It's genuinely disappointing to see this level of concentration among voters. Although it does explain recent local election results



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 73,518 ✭✭✭✭FrancieBrady


    You selected only a few. Predictably.

    There are lists of other stuff promised and not delivered in the PFG.
    Take just one, quite simple to achieve by a majority government if they had any serious intention:

    Dáil Reform

    We are proposing radical reform of the way the Dáil operates.

    • to hold the executive to account


    What did we see them do with our own eyes again and again?

    Failed to give SIPO proper tools that SIPO themselves called for.
    Circled the wagons repeatedly to protect, even when wrongdoing was admitted.
    Mad FOI harder rather than easier. (See the writings of Ken Foxe on this)

    One of the key reasons they began to decline IMO.

    Why did they renege on this? Because they realised that FF would take a huge hit if they were made accountable as well as collateral damage done to themselves.




  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 73,518 ✭✭✭✭FrancieBrady


    So are you saying a government party with a majority of 51(FG) seats to 20 (Labour) (35% - 19%) immediately welched on a major policy promise the minute they went into negotiations to form a government? Really?

    And you still vote for them???



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 16,309 ✭✭✭✭markodaly


    You selected only a few. Predictably.

    Nope. From the heading "Dail Reform" I selected them all.

    And you didnt answer the question..

    Instead, you go on some grand narrative and storytime about unrelated stuff.

    So, with that 20 odd bullet point in the PFG, which ones did they or did not do..



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 16,309 ✭✭✭✭markodaly


    Its a coalition Francie.

    If or when your beloved SF get into power, they will have to comprimise too. Sure didn't they let the UK run NI for them? ;)



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 73,518 ✭✭✭✭FrancieBrady


    Are you claiming they welched on New Politics at negotiation of a programme for government stage, yes or no?



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 16,309 ✭✭✭✭markodaly


    If you can point out the bits from the PFG that they did not enact….



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 30,851 ✭✭✭✭blanch152


    Tell me that you don't understand how a coalition government works without telling me you don't understand how a coalition government works.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 73,518 ✭✭✭✭FrancieBrady


    I gave you enough rope and you hung yourself. Selected some stuff and tried to pretend.

    Directly transmuted into the PFG from New Politics we have this:

    We will ensure our Government is seen to be held to account

    Did they?
    No they absolutely did not do that.

    They totally welched on it and did nothing to give SIPO the powers it needed. They made FOI harder and they circled wagons around the very behaviour that required New Politics to end it.

    Charlatans in regard to that and that is why people stopped voting for them. I.E. Their vote declined.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 73,518 ✭✭✭✭FrancieBrady


    Pretty fabulous now the notion that Labour are to blame for FG not implementing their New Politics agenda.

    You literally could not write this level of pointy fingers.



This discussion has been closed.
Advertisement